[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S748-S751]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




     HOUSING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACT--Motion to Proceed--Continued

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon.


                   Unanimous Consent Request--S. 2746

  Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, late last week, when I first scheduled this 
consent request that is relating to Jeffrey Epstein's bank records, I 
was not expecting it to be set against the backdrop of Donald Trump 
dragging America into yet another war in the Middle East.
  I will address the horrific crimes and worldwide financial network of 
Mr. Epstein in a minute. Right at the outset, I need to address the 
actions of the Trump administration this past weekend.
  This is a war the American people do not want, a war that has already 
cost American lives, a war the President and his scheming advisers have 
not even tried to justify, a war Donald Trump kicked off at his private 
club minutes before stepping out to celebrate at a glitzy fundraiser 
where attendees spent $1 million per plate.
  Now, I remember the debate about the Iraq war 20 years ago, including 
the bad faith attacks against those of us who opposed it from the 
start.
  No doubt there will be a replay of that debate. There will be some 
who say: War is on. It is time for everybody to line up behind the 
President and every other issue has got to go by the wayside. That is 
wrong.
  It has been clear from the beginning that the core principle for this 
administration is that Donald Trump gets to do what he wants, no matter 
the cost, when he wants to. It doesn't matter to him how many American 
soldiers die as a result of the war. It doesn't matter how many people 
lose their health insurance or their livelihoods as a result of his 
policies.
  And in the case of Mr. Epstein, it doesn't matter how many pedophiles 
and sex traffickers continue to walk the streets and prey on the 
vulnerable while the Trump administration hides essential Epstein files 
from the public.
  The position of this administration is that Donald Trump can't do 
anything wrong. He gets to do what he wants, and everybody else has to 
obey. Ultimately, the American people aren't going to have it. I won't 
either, and that was the message in my town meetings this past weekend.
  The last thing that I am going to do is to slow down or walk away 
from our 4-year investigation into Epstein's trafficking network 
because Donald Trump decided to kick off another open-ended war in the 
Middle East. So I am going to take just a few minutes to lay out why 
the Senate needs to pass my legislation demanding the release of the 
Epstein bank records that are at the Treasury Department.
  Here is what Americans needs to know. Four years ago, my 
investigators on the Finance Committee began digging into the so-called 
tax planning that Jeffrey Epstein performed for one of the titans of 
Wall Street. That man was Leon Black. That relationship spawned 
sprawling financial ties, and Black had a curious story about their 
relationship. Here was a guy worth billions and billions of dollars, 
really a money-making machine.
  He already employed the best tax and estate planning experts in the 
Nation.

[[Page S749]]

But over the course of several years, Mr. Black paid Jeffrey Epstein 
$170 million for what he claimed was tax and estate planning advice.
  Keep in mind that Jeffrey Epstein wasn't a tax lawyer or an 
accountant. The rates Black paid him were astronomical compared to what 
he was paying the experts that he already employed. So my investigators 
kept digging. What we found and what has been confirmed in more recent 
Epstein reports is that this story is a sham.
  Jeffrey Epstein wasn't really doing serious tax and estate work, and 
Black's lawyers had to keep tabs on the advice he did give, which was 
often shoddy.
  Our investigation grew. In late 2023, we reached out to the Biden 
Treasury Department and sought copies of the bank records that it had 
on Mr. Epstein. The Biden Treasury Department wouldn't give us the 
files, but they allowed my investigators to review them in-person and 
to take notes.
  That is how I am aware today that there is a massive file of Epstein 
records at the Treasury Department. These are detailed bank records, a 
roadmap of Epstein's financial history.
  In fact, they are filings made by banks specifically to alert Federal 
law enforcement to suspicious payments--evidence of possible financial 
crimes. They are designed to help the Treasury investigators in the 
Justice Department root out crimes like money laundering and 
trafficking.
  My investigators reviewed a large portion of them on Valentine's Day 
2024. We learned that Jeffrey Epstein made 4,725 wire transfers adding 
up to more than $1 billion in and out of his JPMorgan bank accounts in 
the decade after 2003.
  We learned that he moved hundreds of millions of dollars more through 
accounts at Bank of New York Mellon and Deutsche Bank. We learned that 
he used Russian correspondent bank accounts to process hundreds of 
millions in payments associated with trafficking in Russia and Eastern 
Europe.
  In the portion of the Epstein bank records that my investigators saw, 
there could be more than $1.5 billion in suspicious Epstein 
transactions laid out for law enforcement to review.
  Mr. President and colleagues, this is a staggering amount, and it is 
inexplicably high based on what is currently known about Epstein's 
sources of income. These Epstein records are not among the files the 
Justice Department has released over the last few months.
  The bill Congress passed requiring the release of the DOJ Epstein 
files doesn't affect the records at the Treasury Department at all. And 
the kicker, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is hiding these bank 
records from Senate investigators.

  The Secretary refused repeatedly to turn them over, and he has 
refused to let us see what we already know is there. The administration 
came in with a whole lot of bluster about whether they were going to 
release the Epstein files. So I wanted to give them a chance to make 
good on their word.
  I requested the complete set of files from the Treasury multiple 
times last spring and summer. Both times, I got denials. Secretary 
Bessent has even gone out in public and downplayed their significance. 
He has denied the Treasury has any investigative role with the Epstein 
files at all.
  At an appearance last summer, he said the Epstein files were 
``sitting there'' at the Treasury Department and that the Department's 
job was only to ``collect them.''
  He said ``there were no files, per se, just hundreds and thousands of 
reports'' and ``our job is simply to collect the reports.''
  Let me be clear on this: Secretary Bessent is not telling the 
American people the truth. A person with his background in finance 
absolutely knows perfectly well what the Financial Crimes Enforcement 
Network is all about. That is the law enforcement office within the 
Treasury Department that collects the bank records.
  And the Secretary hasn't shied away from getting involved in other 
investigations. He has the Treasury Department launching all kinds of 
efforts to help the Trump administration's deportation campaign in 
Minnesota.
  So the Secretary wants to have it both ways. When it comes to 
investigating people in communities the Trump administration considers 
to be adversaries, the Treasury Department and Mr. Bessent are totally 
aggressive. When it comes to investigating pedophiles with connections 
to Donald Trump, the files remain locked away.
  So let me explain why it is important to break the Bessent hold on 
these documents. They would help investigators learn who funded and who 
enabled Epstein. They would help us see where his payments went. They 
would help us identify any connections to organized crime. They would 
help us learn more about Epstein's patterns, for example, how he 
controlled women and girls by controlling their accounts.
  They would help reveal how Epstein's henchmen, including those who 
still control his estate, assisted in his crimes. That is the kind of 
information the Treasury Secretary's stranglehold on these documents is 
hiding from investigators. We have waited long enough.
  But a week ago, there was a stunning news report that prompted my 
decision to come to the Senate floor with the unanimous consent request 
I will make today. CBS News reported on the existence of a mystery 
Epstein investigation going back to 2010, an investigation the public 
knew nothing about until now. It was spearheaded by the Drug 
Enforcement Administration, and its targets were Epstein and 14 others. 
It dealt with drug trafficking and money laundering in New York and the 
Virgin Islands.
  The existence of this probe was revealed by a long memorandum 
prepared by one of the law enforcement agencies involved. That is an 
agency that specialized in breaking up transnational organized crime. 
Most of the 69-page memo was redacted, but the outlines are there. This 
was a major investigation that began in 2010 and ran at least into 
2015.
  So now, I am working on obtaining an unredacted copy of this 
memorandum from the Drug Enforcement Administration. There is no reason 
for the Trump administration to withhold it. It literally says 
``unclassified'' at the top of every page. I have got several other 
questions about the investigation's conclusion and its findings.
  One obvious takeaway is that the Senate cannot allow the Treasury 
Secretary to keep the Epstein bank records hidden any longer. The 
evidence out in public is clear. This wasn't some small-time operation 
run by Epstein and Maxwell. It is a miscarriage of justice that they 
are the only two persons who face prosecution in the United States.
  Epstein's network spanned the globe. It involved extraordinarily 
powerful and wealthy people. It involved serious financial crimes and 
huge flows of money. And now, based on the revelation of a Drug 
Enforcement Administration investigation, we now know as we stand here 
today it may have involved drugs and drug cartels.
  The Treasury Secretary in an administration that was interested in 
justice would have a team of highly skilled investigators digging 
through the Epstein bank records to assist with prosecutions.
  Instead, Mr. Bessent, Pam Bondi, the entire Trump group in Congress, 
and the administration is covering up for pedophiles, sex traffickers, 
and, quite possibly, drug cartels.
  If they are not going to do any investigating, the Senate ought to be 
able to step in. That is what my bill is all about. It mandates that 
the Treasury turn over these Epstein bank records to Senate 
investigators.
  We will do the job the Trump administration should have started on 
day one. And there is an important new reason to pass the bill. There 
is a lot of Epstein-related news that breaks nearly every day.
  I would wager that a lot of banks where Epstein and his network did 
business are following the news, maybe following this discussion, and 
taking a second look at his transactions.
  It is entirely possible that there are new bank filings coming in 
today, and they are flagging a new set of suspicious transactions that 
deserve investigation. The Treasury Secretary is blocking that 
investigation from happening.
  Before I wrap up, I just want to note this: I first sought these 
documents in 2023, and that was under a Democratic administration. I 
requested copies of

[[Page S750]]

them again in 2024 after my investigators reviewed a portion of them 
in-person at the Treasury Department.
  I am still frustrated that the Biden administration didn't provide 
them. So nobody has a right to claim that we didn't come out on this 
issue in a bipartisan way.
  My investigation will move forward in other directions as well. I 
continue to believe that some of the biggest banks on Wall Street were 
among Epstein's biggest enablers. JPMorgan, BNY Mellon, Deutsche Bank, 
and others had opportunity after opportunity to blow the whistle, and 
they just kept looking the other way.
  These aren't itty-bitty banks in Utah or Oregon. These were big Wall 
Street banks, and they looked the other way.
  And particularly in the case of JPMorganChase, the evidence shows 
they knew what Epstein was up to, and they looked the other way because 
he brought in mountains of cash. They waited until after he died to 
flag more than 99 percent of his suspicious payments. By then, it was 
too late to do any good in terms of stopping him.
  So now, Congress must change the rules, and I intend to push this to 
make sure that this kind of bank reporting to prevent this kind of 
horrendous situation where so many young women and families were hurt--
I am going to make sure that this situation doesn't happen again.
  There is a lot more to come from my investigation. From the 
beginning, I have welcomed participation from both sides, and that 
still stands. And my colleagues here in the Senate, Democrats and 
Republicans, know that my door is open to all of them.
  We are going to stay at it until we have all the facts because they 
are not blue and red. And then I am going to have a major reform effort 
so the Wall Street banks can never, never, never hurt the American 
people the way they have by handling the Epstein investigation.
  I strongly hope my colleagues will support my request to pass my 
bill, the Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act. There is no excuse for 
the Secretary of the Treasury to continue blocking our access to the 
Epstein bank records.
  So, therefore, Mr. President, notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask 
unanimous consent that the Committee on Finance be discharged from 
further consideration of S. 2746 and the Senate proceed to its 
immediate consideration; that the Wyden substitute amendment, which is 
at the desk, be considered and agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be 
considered read a third time and passed; and that the motions to 
reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there an objection?
  The Senator from Idaho.
  Mr. CRAPO. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, there is no 
debate that Jeffrey Epstein's crimes of sexual abuses and other crimes 
are appalling. And the investigation there is, ongoing, must focus on 
bringing those who participated to justice.
  The Justice Department already has been tasked and has tasked about 
500 lawyers to publicly release over 3 million pages, 180,000 images, 
and 2,000 videos in response to President Trump having signed the 
Epstein Files Transparency Act into law on November 19, 2025.
  According to one New York Times article, the current pile of pages 
would reach to the top of the Empire State Building.
  Since the House of Representatives took the lead on moving the 
Epstein Files Transparency Act, it is not surprising that the House 
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the House Judiciary 
Committee are now leading the congressional review of the millions of 
pages of documents from the Justice Department. The House Oversight 
Committee is particularly busy reviewing documents relating to 
corporate, nonprofit, academic, and governmental entities with known or 
alleged ties to Epstein's web of financial networks that were turned 
over by the U.S. Justice Department on January 31, along with documents 
turned over earlier by the Epstein estate.
  The House Oversight Committee also specifically requested these 
Treasury documents that have been talked about here today from the 
Department of Treasury and requested that the Department provide all 
suspicious activities reports, or SARS, and accompanying material filed 
relating to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for 
its independent review.
  That is these very files that the Treasury Department was asked to 
release and provide. Treasury replied that it would fully cooperate 
with the committee and that it will work alongside other relevant 
Federal Agencies to deliver on the request as thoroughly as possible.
  The subpoenas, depositions, and SAR requests made between the two 
House committees are part of a very robust investigatory process, one 
which deals with massive amounts of information and patterns of 
activity collected over a 20-year period.
  The Finance Committee has one of the broadest committee jurisdictions 
in the Senate, but it is the Banking Committee, not the Finance 
Committee, which has specific subject matter jurisdiction over bank 
suspicious activity reports and a more particular expertise with 
reading and handling of those documents.
  At this stage, while the House committees are pursuing the same exact 
information from the same Agencies and the Agencies have agreed, by law 
passed in the House and Senate, to release those materials, it would 
not be helpful for either the Senate Finance or the Senate Banking 
Committee to confound the process by attempting to duplicate or compete 
with their work while adding more stress to the Department struggling 
to keep up with the pace of congressional demands.
  Mr. President, for these reasons I object to my colleague's request.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
  The Senator from Oregon.
  Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, I am going to be very brief.
  First of all, as my colleague knows, we are talking about a different 
set of files. I am concerned about the Treasury Department. What my 
colleague is talking about is essentially the Justice Department.
  And what is needed here is more investigations rather than less, and 
nobody has the expertise that we have on the Senate Finance Committee. 
The Treasury Secretary knows that, and that is why his strategy is just 
to slow-walk this. He is just hoping this disappears.
  Well, I have said it at home, and I have said it again at a townhall 
meeting: I want everybody to know that we are not going anywhere on 
this. We are going to stay at it until all the information comes out. 
We are going to have a bank reform proposal.
  My colleague is on the Banking Committee. I look forward to him 
seeing my bank reform proposal because these Wall Street banks behaved 
abominably.
  They saw what was going on. I happen to think one of the reasons they 
did it is because they liked the fact that Epstein was giving them 
referrals.
  So my colleague and I agree on a number of issues. Pharmaceutical 
benefit managers would be one. But we couldn't disagree more on this. 
And until the slow-walking ends, the investigation that I have launched 
and has taken place over 4 years and has blown the whistle on a lot of 
important steps, it is a beginning. We will stay at it until we have 
got real reform.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Idaho.
  Mr. CRAPO. Mr. President, just to make one quick clarification, I am 
not just talking about the Justice Department. The Treasury Department 
has agreed to release the exact files that have been demanded and has 
said that they will provide them as thoroughly and as quickly as 
possible to the House Oversight Committee.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon.
  Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, we will make this really brief.
  I have made a number of requests specifically for the information 
that my colleague has now described as something that is going to come 
out.
  I will believe it when I see it.
  What I do know is the Treasury Department has stonewalled us every 
single day through the Trump administration.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.

[[Page S751]]

  

                          ____________________