[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S713-S714]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                           GOVERNMENT FUNDING

  Mr. LANKFORD. Mr. President, it is the end of February, but it sure 
feels like the beginning because it feels like Groundhog Day. We are in 
yet another partial government shutdown. We are in it right now.
  What is interesting is we just had our last vote of the week, and 
this is still not resolved, and Members are all heading back home as if 
everything is normal, but it is not. Next week, we will have people who 
work for the Department of Homeland Security not get a paycheck because 
it is not funded because this body has not resolved this.
  Now, I understand my Democratic colleagues want to defund ICE. I get 
that. I hear from them over and over again: Let's defund ICE. And their 
way of defunding ICE is to be able to cut off funding to this 
particular part of our Federal budget.
  But I think some of my colleagues have lost track of what this means 
to be able to cut off DHS funding. It is not just cutting off ICE. In 
fact, ICE is a very small portion of the Department of Homeland 
Security. There are about 250,000 total employees across all entities 
in the Department of Homeland Security. ICE has 21,000 of that 250,000-
plus. It is a very small group. But they are determined they are going 
to defund ICE.
  What they are actually defunding is not just ICE. They have also 
defunded U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. They have defunded 
the U.S. Coast Guard. They have defunded Customs and Border 
Protection--those are all the folks that actually handle customs duties 
and produce coming across our border. They defunded the Cybersecurity & 
Infrastructure Agency. They defunded FEMA, the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency. They defunded the Federal law enforcement training 
centers. They have defunded U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement--
that is ICE, what they were targeting. They have also defunded the 
Secret Service. TSA--those folks that a lot of Members are going to go 
check in with to get on a flight right now--they are not getting a 
paycheck next week, although they are still working this week. They 
defunded the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office.
  Listen, this is a big deal. We just had a shutdown of 43 days--the 
longest in American history. Those TSA agents lost two paychecks during 
that time period. There are a lot of Americans who can't miss one and 
make it; they missed two.
  The TSA agent I walked past a couple of weeks ago caught me as I came 
through and said: I feel like my paycheck is bipolar--I never know 
whether it is going to be there or not.
  All I could say to them was: I am so sorry. We are trying to get this 
open.
  But my Democratic colleagues are so mad at ICE and so determined that 
they don't want enforcement across the country that TSA agents in my 
State are not getting a paycheck.
  What in the world do the TSA agents in my State have to do with the 
rage against ICE? What in the world do the Coast Guard folks have to do 
with the rage against ICE? What in the world do the FEMA folks that are 
handling emergencies, in preparation for spring storms, and dealing 
with wildfires across the country--what do they have to do with their 
rage against ICE?
  If we want to have an argument about ICE, let's have it, but why are 
we cutting off the paychecks of folks that work for FEMA because 
somebody is mad at ICE? That makes no sense to me, and it certainly 
doesn't make sense to those folks at the airport in my State who work 
every single day, who show up way earlier than most Americans actually 
wake up and get up. They are already at their spot early that morning 
taking care of passengers and making sure everybody is safe. They have 
nothing to do with ICE--except now they are not getting a paycheck 
because somebody is mad.
  We should be able to resolve our differences in this body and not 
have other people not get a paycheck because of that. I have worked 
literally for years across the aisle and in conversation in this body 
to be able to come up with a very simple, straightforward bill that 
says: When we get to a moment that we haven't resolved everything in 
funding, when we get to that moment, instead of having the government 
shut down, everyone would still be paid. We would go to what is called 
a continuing resolution automatically. Everyone would still get paid. 
The status quo would continue except one thing: We would not leave. We 
would be here, the House and the Senate, 7 days a week. We would have 
to be in session and keep working until we solve the problem.
  Put the pressure on us. Rather than cutting off the paycheck of 
somebody who has no ability to be able to make the decision to solve 
this, why don't you put the pressure on us, where it should be, to be 
able to stay here until it is resolved?
  Now, I want to see my family like everybody else does. There are 
folks that have all kinds of issues that are happening this weekend. 
Some are going on codels. Some are heading overseas. Some are going 
home. Some have elections coming up. There are lots of things that are 
happening this weekend, and I totally understand everyone wanting to be 
able to get to those spots, but we have unfinished business. We should 
be here until it is done, and we should hold harmless the folks in 
Oklahoma airports who are just getting up every day and going to work 
to protect our country and protect travelers. We have to figure this 
out.

  So we have two issues. One is, let's solve the immediate one right 
now. Let's actually get the government back open, and let's actually 
get people paid.
  My Democratic colleagues have demanded that we have body-worn cameras 
on ICE agents. We as Republicans have said: We agree.
  In fact, the bill that you are blocking literally has $20 million and 
a requirement to have body-worn cameras for law enforcement in the bill 
that you are blocking. We agree. Body-worn cameras are helpful for law 
enforcement and for the public to tell the complete story of what 
actually happened.
  My Democratic colleagues have demanded that we get deescalation 
training for Federal officers. We as Republicans have said: Yes, we 
agree with that as well.
  In fact, the bill that you are blocking, that you refuse to even take 
up, actually includes money for deescalation training in it. And there 
is not some trick in it; it is the actual issue everyone seems to be 
addressing right now.
  This is about the drama of the moment and trying to be able to prove 
that you oppose Trump. OK. We get it. You don't like President Trump. 
But what I don't get is, why are the folks that work for the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, why are the folks that work at TSA, why 
are the Coast Guard members, why are the folks that handle weapons of 
mass destruction, why are the folks that handle cyber security for our 
Nation--why are we not paying them while we are having this political 
fight?
  This may be good political drama, but for the quarter-million Federal 
employees that are getting up and going to work without a paycheck this 
week, it is not drama; it is a problem that we need to solve.
  So let's finish up these negotiations, and let's actually pass a bill 
that long term says we will never have another one of these.
  I long for the day when I sit with my grandchildren one day and they 
say ``Tell me about the time that the government used to shut down when 
Congress had arguments,'' and I would say ``Yes, there was a time that 
used to happen, but we fixed that, so that doesn't happen anymore.''
  Let's solve this. We are supposed to be the adults in the room to be 
able to

[[Page S714]]

resolve our differences. Let's figure this out for the sake of all 
those folks that are working every day to protect our Nation.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Ms. HIRONO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________