[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 10, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S540-S542]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




  DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2026--Motion to 
                                Proceed


                     Working Families Tax Cuts Act

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, tax filing season is no one's favorite 
season, but thanks to the working families tax cuts, things are looking 
up this year. Americans filing their taxes are looking at a host of new 
tax relief.
  Taxpayers can take advantage of this relief for the 2025 tax year, 
which means a lot of Americans are going to be seeing bigger refunds 
this spring. That starts with the newly enhanced child tax credit. Back 
in 2017, Republicans doubled the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 
per child. With the working families tax cuts, we made that relief 
permanent and not just permanent, we boosted the tax credit again by 
hundreds of dollars, and we linked it to inflation so its value will 
never go down. Parents filing their taxes this year can take advantage 
of this additional relief.
  Then there is the new tax relief for older Americans--$6,000 bonus 
deduction for low- and middle-income seniors. Seniors will be able to 
save hundreds and, in some cases, even more on their taxes. Again, that 
applies to the 2025 tax year as well, which means seniors will start 
seeing that relief this spring.
  Tax filers of all ages will be taking advantage of the enhanced 
standard deduction this year.
  Back in 2017, Republicans nearly doubled the standard deduction, 
which is claimed by 90 percent of taxpayers in this country, and with 
the Working Families Tax Cuts, we boosted that deduction still further. 
Once again, the effects of that will be showing up in Americans' tax 
refunds this spring.
  And the good news doesn't end there.
  I said that parents will be able to take advantage of the enhanced 
child tax credit this season. They will also have the opportunity to 
open up new investment accounts for their children and to opt in to an 
initial, free $1,000 contribution from the Federal Government for 
newborn accounts. These accounts will provide another tax advantage 
option for parents to invest in

[[Page S541]]

their children's futures. Again, these accounts can be opened during 
this tax filing season. The money can be used, after the child turns 
18, for their education, to start a business, to buy their first home--
in short, to give them a head start on their American dream.
  And then there is no tax on tips or overtime. That is right. Starting 
when they file their taxes this season, Americans who receive tips--
from waitresses and bartenders to Uber and Lyft drivers--will be able 
to deduct those tips on their taxes. The same goes for overtime. 
Americans who spend long hours working overtime, like nurses, 
firefighters, and paramedics, will be able to deduct their overtime 
when they file their tax returns, and that means lower tax bills and 
more money in their pockets.
  We call it the Working Families Tax Cuts for a reason. We set out to 
make life better for hard-working Americans--for the moms and the dads 
who are struggling to fit dentist visits and car repairs and Little 
League and ballet lessons into the budget, for the Americans relying on 
tips to make ends meet and the dedicated healthcare and emergency 
workers who work overtime to help their fellow Americans, for the 
lower- and middle-income seniors pursuing a hard-earned retirement. It 
is for every American who has struggled thanks to the inflation crisis 
that President Biden and Democrats helped to create.
  To all of those Americans, I would just like to say: Relief is on the 
way, and it starts this tax season.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                           Government Funding

  Mr. BARRASSO. Mr. President, I just heard the minority leader come to 
the floor and speak about his ballooning list of demands--demands that 
are designed to protect illegal immigrant criminals. That is what this 
is about. This is the discussion right now on the floor of the U.S. 
Senate. Democrats have come up with a Christmas list of demands--
demands designed to appeal to their radical base.
  This growing list of Democrat demands makes it almost impossible to 
remove dangerous illegal immigrants from the streets of our Nation. 
Democrats are resisting even the most reasonable attempts to enforce 
our immigration laws. They don't want us--law enforcement--to enforce 
the immigration laws of this Nation. That is what they are for: getting 
rid of those laws.
  The more we learn about the demands coming from the minority leader 
and that party, the less the normal American citizen likes them, and 
that is especially if you are concerned about any safety or any 
security in the community in which you live or the neighborhood or the 
streets of your community. The Democrats continually want to make it 
harder to arrest and remove illegal immigrant criminals.
  So last week, I spoke about the one Democrat dangerous demand for 
requiring something called judicial warrants. Now, that may sound like 
a technical change. It is not. It is a dramatic change, and it would 
grind immigration enforcement to a halt.
  Do you know what it would do? It would lock in place the chaos that 
Joe Biden and the Democrats hoisted upon this country with their wide-
open border policy.
  The Democrats' preference is to release illegal immigrants who are 
criminals right onto our streets. They prefer that over holding them 
until immigration officials can come to pick them up, if they have been 
arrested.
  So I am going to take a look at one of the specific demands that the 
Democrats have come up with--and it is a new demand; I haven't seen 
this one before--because they want to ban immigration enforcement from 
their so-called sensitive locations. The so-called sensitive locations 
defined by the Democrats, in the past, have included places of worship, 
hospitals, and schools. Now, they want to include in that list polling 
places.
  Well, let's think about that. It is an entirely new provision. 
Polling places have never been included on any list like this before, 
and Democrats are now including them because they want to turn America 
into a sanctuary country and polling places into sanctuary locations. 
That is what the Democrats are demanding.
  So let me ask Democrats a simple question: Why do you want to protect 
illegal immigrant criminals at polling places? What are they doing at 
polling places?
  They shouldn't be at U.S. polling places. Why in the world would they 
be there if they are not trying to vote? And, by law, they are not 
allowed to vote.
  That tells you how far to the left the Democrats have moved. Illegal 
immigrants aren't allowed to vote in Federal elections. Sometimes 
Democrats will say that, but it is not what they want.
  Democrats seem fixated on protecting illegal immigrant criminals at 
polling places. Yet Democrats energetically opposed commonsense 
policies to protect the integrity of the ballot--the integrity of the 
ballot. It is a vital right of American citizenship--the sanctity of 
the ballot.
  Democrats opposed photo IDs to vote. You need one to check out a book 
from the library. You need one to get on a plane. You need one to buy a 
beer. But the Democrats don't want you to have to produce a photo ID to 
vote, which is a sacred right of citizenship. That is because Democrats 
oppose election integrity. They oppose ensuring American elections are 
dedicated and decided only by American citizens. They don't want that. 
They believe it disadvantages them to have just citizens vote, and they 
support banning immigration enforcement at polling places. It is 
astonishing. That is how far to the left the socialist-driven Democrat 
Party has moved.
  Illegal immigrants shouldn't be at polling places--illegal immigrant 
criminals--and they shouldn't be roaming our communities. They need to 
be arrested and removed from the country.
  Once again, Democrats are putting illegal immigrants ahead--who are 
criminals--ahead of the safety and security of the American people.
  Taken together, the list of Democrat demands points in one dangerous 
direction, and that is the direction of abolishing ICE, abolishing our 
borders, and turning America into a sanctuary nation. Republicans will 
not accept changes that make our communities less safe.
  The deadline the Democrats have demanded to fund the Department of 
Homeland Security is Friday, 3 days from now. The Department of 
Homeland Security budget is $90 billion. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement is 11 percent of that. Democrats are risking America's 
safety over 11 percent of the Department of Homeland Security budget.
  The rest of the budget goes to other critical functions the American 
people depend upon and need right now, and that is because it funds 
FEMA, or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, for disaster relief, 
as our Nation is trying to still deal with the effects of a recent 
storm. It funds TSA to help keep Americans safe when they fly. It funds 
the Coast Guard to stop the flow of drugs and what has been coming 
across to our shores from foreign countries. It funds the Cybersecurity 
and Infrastructure Security Agency to protect our Nation from cyber 
attacks and more.
  So, this week, Senate Democrats have a choice to make:
  Option 1, fund the Department of Homeland Security.
  Option 2, Democrats can once again side with the radical left and 
force a shutdown of the vital services to the American people. And why 
do they want to do that? To protect illegal immigrant criminals.
  If Democrats choose option 2, it will force a shutdown to protect 
illegal immigrants. The consequences to the American people will be 
painful. The Democrats have been choosing that side again and again--
safety and prosperity for the Republican choice; illegal immigrant 
criminals, the Democrat choice on the floor of the U.S. Senate.
  The Democrats seem to be very willing to delay disaster relief, to 
disrupt air travel for every American, and to degrade anti-drug 
operations. And our Nation will be more vulnerable to cyber attacks.

[[Page S542]]

  All of these key missions are conducted by the Department of Homeland 
Security, the one branch of government that has not yet been funded. We 
have done 11 of the 12 appropriations bills. We have funded 96 percent 
of the government. And the Democrats said: Nope, we are not going to 
fund that vital function of the government--because that is the demand 
of the radical left.
  Republicans are ready to vote to keep America safe, and we have been 
ready for weeks. To the point, weeks ago, the House of Representatives 
passed a bipartisan appropriations bill to fund the Department of 
Homeland Security. Senate Democrats had agreed to what was in the bill. 
Then the Democrats flip-flopped. And they did it why? Because of the 
cries from the radical left, the people that are calling the tune for 
that party. Democrats were for it before they were told to be against 
it.
  Democrats need to start protecting the American people and stop 
protecting illegal immigrant criminals. It is that simple. But, today, 
Democrats on this floor--we just heard it from the minority leader--
continue to be the party of open borders and illegal immigrants.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mrs. BRITT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sheehy). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mrs. BRITT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that we begin the 
rollcall vote immediately.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

                          ____________________