[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 26 (Thursday, February 5, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S497-S498]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                             Appropriations

  Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, we have 1 week and 1 day left to pass the 
Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Democrats demanded 
a tight timeline for the DHS continuing resolution. Republicans warned 
Democrats repeatedly that such a short timeline would be challenging, 
if not impossible, but to prevent Democrats from shutting down a big 
part of the government and denying paychecks to soldiers and Federal 
workers, we ultimately gave it to them.

[[Page S498]]

  Now the onus is on Democrats to negotiate in good faith and reach an 
agreement quickly. Notice I said ``negotiate.'' This is not a blank-
check situation where Republicans just agree to a list of Democrat 
demands.
  Democrats had previously agreed to a Homeland Security appropriations 
bill which included additional money for body cameras as well as 
deescalation training for Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers 
and additional oversight of funds that have already been appropriated 
to DHS. Those were all things that were agreed upon when that bill was 
initially negotiated and supported by Democrats in the House and 
Senate.
  Well, now they have reopened negotiations, and that means taking up 
ideas and priorities from both sides. We need to have a serious 
discussion about the climate of harassment--and worse--that law 
enforcement officers have been facing for simply trying to do their 
jobs.
  We also need to address the issue of cooperation between local and 
Federal law enforcement. Too many jurisdictions prohibit local law 
enforcement from cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 
a situation that makes things more dangerous for everyone.
  The President's border czar Tom Homan yesterday announced that the 
Department of Homeland Security will be withdrawing 700 Federal agents 
from Minnesota, in large part, because of cooperation from local law 
enforcement. So I hope my Democrat colleagues are ready to have some 
conversations with the White House about these and other issues.
  The White House has demonstrated that it is taking things seriously, 
and it has already resulted in body cams for all officers deployed to 
Minneapolis and, as I said, the drawdown of Federal agents thanks to 
the increased cooperation with local law enforcement that Tom Homan has 
facilitated.
  I want to see my Democrat colleagues take things seriously as well. I 
would also like to remind Democrats that they are putting funding for 
some critical Federal Agencies in jeopardy. TSA, the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, the Coast Guard, the Secret Service, the Federal Law 
Enforcement Training Center are all funded by the DHS appropriations 
bill.
  I think all Americans remember the travel disaster Democrats created 
by shutting down the government for 43 days last fall. Should Democrats 
fail to agree to a DHS funding bill and shut down the TSA as a result, 
there is a very good chance we could see more travel problems. I would 
also like to remind my Democrat colleagues that the only way to get any 
reforms at ICE is to agree to a bill. A CR would not include any of the 
reforms already included, as I said earlier, in the DHS bill, which 
they helped negotiate and supported before they changed their mind and 
didn't support it.
  And a CR certainly wouldn't include any new reforms. The Democrat 
leader was complaining about the announcement about body cams for 
Federal officers in Minneapolis, asking why it wasn't for the whole 
country. Well, I would like to remind him that the DHS bill we 
negotiated already includes money for additional body cams--somewhere 
on the order of $20 million for additional body cameras.
  The Democrat leader also complained he doesn't trust the 
administration's reforms and that we need a law. Well, getting a law is 
well within the Democrats' power, but, again, Democrats have to be 
willing to actually reach an agreement.
  If they are coming to the table demanding a blank check or refusing 
to consider any measures but their own, they are likely to end up with 
nothing, which is fine if Democrats just want a political issue.
  But if they actually want to do something, then, again, they are 
going to have to be willing to reach agreement with the White House on 
a final bill. One week and one day more, that is the timeline that the 
Democrats demanded, and I say ``demanded'' and actually got. They were 
granted.
  After having negotiated a six-bill package, which included the DHS 
appropriations bill, they decided, no, we are not going to do that. 
People want to blame the White House. They want to blame Republicans. 
Republicans had nothing to do with that. It passed the House, the six-
bill package, including the DHS appropriations bill, with 341 votes in 
the U.S. House of Representatives. Almost 80 percent of the entire 
House had cleared the DHS appropriations bill that was included in the 
package that the Senate was going to vote on that the House had already 
passed.
  And then it came over here, and the Democrats decided to blow it up. 
All of a sudden, the bill that they helped negotiate and write and be a 
part of, which included all the reforms that I mentioned--deescalation 
training, body cameras--all those things were included in the bill that 
they said they didn't then want to pass.
  So they wanted a separate discussion about those issues and demanded 
that if we didn't give them that, they weren't going to vote for the 
package.
  And so they got what they wanted. And then we had a debate about how 
long should the CR go for to allow the sides to come together behind an 
agreement. And I suggested--our side suggested--that perhaps 6 weeks 
would be a sufficient amount of time to have an earnest negotiation 
with all the parties at the table and then time to execute actually 
passing whatever is agreed upon across the floor of the House and the 
Senate and getting it on the President's desk.
  The Democrats demanded a 2-week CR or they wouldn't vote for the 
package. And so they got what they wanted, which is a 2-week continuing 
resolution to fund the Department of Homeland Security and the other 
things I mentioned--FEMA, TSA, Coast Guard, all those things--for 2 
weeks. And yet they haven't appeared yet to want to negotiate on all 
the things that they are demanding.

  They put out a list of demands yesterday. Our team, our folks, have 
tried to get with them to sit down at the table and with the White 
House to reach an agreement that would enable the Department of 
Homeland Security appropriations bill to actually be passed here in the 
Senate and the House and sent to the President. But that is not, right 
now, even in the realm of possibility because they are not engaging.
  We have got a now 1 week and 1 day timeline in which to do this, 
which is entirely unrealistic and a Democrat Party, both in the House 
and the Senate, which seems a lot less interested in getting a solution 
to this than they do in having a political issue.
  If, for some reason, the Department of Homeland Security ends up in a 
shutdown, it is going to be totally on them. They will own it. We have 
tried repeatedly, they have agreed repeatedly, before they decided not 
to agree and to demand something else, which they also got. But as of 
right now, we aren't anywhere close to having any sort of an agreement 
that would enable us to fund the Department of Homeland Security, and 
so I would hope that the Democrats will come to the table.
  The timeline that they asked for has been granted, and I hope that 
they are finally ready to get this done. It is important for the 
American people. All of these Agencies, the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, which oversees disasters in this country--we have a 
number of weather-related disasters in this country that are going to 
require the able attention of FEMA--a lot of important Agencies that 
won't get funded if they remain in this posture of resisting anything 
that doesn't give them all of their demands.
  But worse yet, not only insisting on all the demands, most of which 
are, as they know, very unrealistic and unserious, but perhaps even 
more important than that, at least as of right now, they are not 
willing to engage in a negotiation and discussion to try and reach a 
result.
  I hope that changes. I want to get this done. We want to get this 
done. I hope that there are Democrats who also want to get this done, 
and I know the President of the United States is prepared to sign a 
bill once these negotiations get underway and reach an agreement.
  I yield the floor.