[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S65-S66]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                               VENEZUELA

  Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, it is a heady experience to go through a 
classified briefing at the highest levels of our government, and 
virtually every U.S. Senator of both political parties had that 
opportunity this morning. I took advantage of it. It is rare and 
important. It was an explanation by our leaders in the Cabinet and the 
administration of what happened in Venezuela just a few days ago when 
Mr. Maduro was removed from power and brought to the United States to 
be held accountable for his actions in narcotics terrorism.
  This is not a new issue to me. In 2018, I took a trip to Caracas and 
met with President Maduro, his First Lady, and members of his 
administration. It was clear to me that Venezuela was in trouble. You 
could see it on the streets. People were literally starving, and 
hospitals were going without medicine. It was pretty clear to me that 
Maduro was ruling not by democratic appeal but by the force of his 
power in office.

  He was facing an election in just a few weeks, and I told him at that 
time that, if he did not have international observers at his election 
to verify that it was an honest election, the world would not believe 
the results. He ignored my advice, which was no surprise. He went ahead 
with the election and had a disputed result. He claimed victory, which 
others said didn't happen, and he did it again a few years

[[Page S66]]

later. So he discredited himself in the eyes of the world community, 
and his country continued to suffer.
  Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Venezuelans abandoned 
Venezuela, saying it was impossible to live there under his 
authoritarian rule without the basics of life: food, medicine, and 
shelter. So this decision to remove him is not one that causes tears in 
my household. We believe he was unfit for office. He was defeated in 
the election, and he had to pay a price for it. I am glad that he is 
not in power today.
  During the course of our briefing this morning, our military leaders 
and others spelled out the details of how he was physically removed 
from office just a few days ago. He still is going to be held 
accountable in the courts of law in the United States--that is for 
sure--but there is also discussion about where we go from here.
  If you remove the President of a country, what happens next?
  Under their constitution, a woman named Delcy Rodriguez, the Vice 
President, was sworn in as his successor. I met her during my visit 
there. She is a hard-liner when it comes to the politics of the region 
and her brother even more so. We spoke for a period of time, and I 
became convinced that they would be difficult to deal with, although 
that is the reality of the moment.
  Here is the point I want to make: I understand why our administration 
was very careful in disclosing information about the removal of Maduro 
from office. The lives and futures of the men and women in uniform from 
the United States were on the line, and we should not compromise their 
safety in any way to achieve our goal; but there comes a point--and 
that point should be immediately--when this administration decides to 
trust the American people and tell them the whole story. I believe 
there are things that can be said which will not compromise the safety 
of the United States or our friends but that explains to the American 
people what is at stake here.
  What happened in that raid to remove Maduro from office?
  Most of the details are an amazing display of military superiority, 
which the United States enjoys, but there were other questions that 
were raised, too, during the course of this.
  In addition, the question is, Where do we go from here? What is going 
to happen to Venezuela's future? What is our responsibility? What are 
we accepting?
  The American people need to be in on that conversation. It is easy, I 
learned in my time in the House and Senate, to get into a war but that 
it is far more difficult to get out of one. I worry that, many times, 
we have blundered into a situation which looks so simple in terms of 
nation building, and it turned out to be so complex. Then the war went 
on for years and years and years at the expense of not only American 
taxpayers but, more importantly, American lives. It is time for the 
American people to be part of that conversation. Why do I think so? 
Because the Constitution explicitly says it.
  The Constitution says that the power to declare war in the United 
States resides in this Chamber and in the House of Representatives. 
Congress has the only authority to declare war. This President, like 
many others of both parties, has ignored that requirement and, I think, 
at his own peril. They are engaging us in a long-term conflict which 
could cost us dearly, and they are not engaging the American people in 
the discussion and rationale of our ultimate goals in the region.
  This briefing this morning was a good one. Senator Tim Kaine of 
Virginia asked a question, and I think it was the right question: When 
are we going to trust the American people enough to tell them exactly 
what happened in Venezuela leading up to the removal of Maduro and what 
is likely to follow? It is an important, critical question. It will be 
costly in terms of the future of the United States of America if we are 
not explicit and honest with the people of this country. Now is the 
time for that honesty.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________