[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2026)]
[Senate]
[Pages S24-S26]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Anniversary of January 6
Mr. TILLIS. Mr. President, we all know that today is the anniversary
of what actually I consider to be one of the worst days in my 11 years
in the U.S. Senate. I think it will probably be that through my final
year. And I think there are going to be some speeches later on today
that may talk on the subject.
I came here mainly to thank the parliamentary staff, the Sergeant at
Arms, and the Capitol Police officers who got us all into a safe
environment within literally minutes of the Capitol being breached and
our safety being threatened here. I am going to come back to that a
little bit later.
But I think it is important for anybody who speaks this afternoon to
not just talk about the moments of January 6, but let's at least talk
about the months leading up to January 6. Let's talk about the ``defund
the police'' effort that was building steam for a couple of years
before January 6, 2021. Let's talk about the images on TV when
Kenosha--a building was burning. I think it was about August timeframe
when the riots were happening. I think it was Kenosha. A building is
burning, and I think it was CNN that said: Mostly peaceful protest in
Kenosha--but there is a building burning in the background; people have
been hospitalized, right?
Let's talk about ActBlue, which is the Democrats' equivalent--we have
a fundraising engine too. I am not saying they have something we don't.
But they actually allowed Black Lives Matter, in the years leading up
to January 6, to raise money on their website for the 13.12-mile race
because 1-3-1-2 translates into A-C-A-B, which translates into ``all
cops are bastards,'' a
[[Page S25]]
fundraising effort by the Democrats on the very site that my colleagues
use to raise money. I have got no problem with that. I used the
Republican equivalent. I am a Republican.
But I also think it is important--everybody around here has the
clarity of their being in the right and the other side being in the
wrong. But if anybody thinks that January 6 was just about what
happened on that day, then I would encourage you to do your research
and see all of the things that we were saying about law enforcement
long before January 6. Right?
It is very important for us to understand: January 6 didn't happen
because of a single event or a single set of attitudes on that day. It
happened because of an attitude around here that law enforcement is
bad; that they risk their life every day, but all cops are bastards,
according to the ActBlue website which, to their credit, finally was
taken down after I continued to make it an issue for them--long after
January 6, by the way, only about 2 years ago. So we had been
demonizing police officers.
And then we lead up to January 6, and they breached this building. I
have got to tell you, as a Member, the last Member that left this
Senate Chamber--because I was standing right there--and so angry that I
didn't want to leave and we left. We were spirited away, just about a
few blocks away, and we were safe. Actually, within an hour of the
Capitol being breached--this part of the Capitol--we were being served
a warm meal.
Now, let's back up, though, back to that time. I used to sit right
there. I was sitting in that chair when I heard the doors being
slammed. I heard--I think it was the Sergeant at Arms saying: Shut the
door because we see shadows here. We see people running all around this
building. We heard things breaking. We heard people knocking on the
door.
And then it happened. We had somebody die on the House side because
they tried to jump through an area that was only about from me to the
President right here, the Presiding Officer of House Members. Sadly,
she lost her life, but she put herself in that situation, like
everybody else that breached this building and destroyed this
institution of democracy.
So I am here to thank the staff. I remember the staff being so
focused on the event that day that they made sure that those ballots
were carried with us offsite. They were so focused on the task at hand,
they weren't thinking about their personal safety; they were thinking
about their role in certifying the election.
Now, we had the Democrats saying that January 6 was a horrible day
for democracy and that it was a true threat to democracy.
I would submit to anyone who has paid attention to say it was a
wonderful stress test for democracy because what happened is,
courageous parliamentary staff, Sergeant at Arms staff, police
officers, got us off to safety; they stabilized the security of this
building; we came back before ever leaving this complex; and we
certified the election. That doesn't sound like a weak institution to
me; it sounds like an institution that withstood one of the most
significant stress tests in the history of this country, and it
prevailed. And the reason it prevailed is because of the staff and the
law enforcement officers that kept every single one of us safe--not a
scratch on any of us.
Now, I would note that some of the first people out of this Chamber--
I won't name names--the people being escorted by police happened to be
OK or sympathetic with the ``defund the police'' message. But they were
the first ones, when there was a moment of crisis, to look to them to
get them to safety.
And we should look at every police officer and every Sergeant at
Arms' officer and every Capitol Police officer and thank them every
single day for their part in making sure that this democratic
institution withstood the stress test.
So the last thing I want to leave you with is, I think there is a lot
of confusion about the reason why this day is dark to me. Quite
honestly, I found, actually, inspiration in what law enforcement did
that day. What made it a dark day for me is when we had blanket pardons
for the people who did damage to this building.
Now, once again, let's look on a balanced basis. There may be people
coming to the floor today saying that these pardons were awful. Shame
on the President for doing it.
The fact of the matter is, the Biden administration ended up going
overboard with prosecuting people who were dumb enough to walk into the
building, but they weren't the leaders. And they were absolutely
submitted to prosecutions and costs and things that they probably
shouldn't have. They should have probably gotten a fine, and most
likely they never would have done it again.
But the President, on the advice of somebody in the White House--and
I hope I find out the name of that person--also pardoned criminals who
injured police officers, who destroyed this building.
Is there anybody listening to me today--all 30 of them that are
listening--is there anybody here, if you had that happen to your office
or your business, would you think, Well, they were just a little
hotheaded, let them go and not prosecute them or would you hold them
accountable for destroying the citadel of democracy?
So I believe that there were many people that should have been
pardoned. The people who just came in; they didn't understand what was
happening. The people that led the vanguard, the people that were
waving through, the people that burned the buildings, the people that
injured a police officer, leading to the death of an officer, should go
to prison for as long as the law allows. And yet they got loose,
including the QAnon Shaman.
Now, people from my side of the aisle said: What a terrible thing we
are doing to these people, imprisoning them. Do you all know this guy--
I forget his name, but we all know the dude with the horns and no
shirt. Do you know--everybody is talking about these horrible
conditions that these people were in when they were in jail or prison.
This man got transferred from a DC prison to another prison because the
prison he was originally incarcerated in did not satisfy his organic
diet. I am not kidding you.
So I think a lot of people are overblowing, as we oftentimes do here.
We have some Democrats today say it was all about January 6. It was
about the complacency and the onslaught against law enforcement for
years before January 6. That, I give to my Democratic colleagues.
And then after January 6, I look to my Republican colleagues and say:
Don't take the bait. People that harm police officers and destroy
Federal buildings should go to prison, and it is a damn shame they are
out because nearly three dozen of them have actually been arrested for
another crime since they were pardoned.
And, here, we have to speak truth to power. I support President
Trump. I campaigned for President Trump. I would support him again if
he ran for reelection, which is not going to happen. However, we acted
on bad advice. We let bad people go, and we sent the message that if
you come to this Capitol and you got the right President in office, he
is going to let you get past things that not any one of us would get
away with if we did it in our home State.
OK. I vented a little bit. But I want to let everybody know that
comes to the floor: Don't come to this floor with some righteous
indignation that you think one party or the other is responsible. We
are both responsible. We should own it because this Capitol and this
democracy deserves better.
The last thing I will leave you with is, we actually passed a law
that was to allow a plaque to be mounted thanking the law enforcement
officers who actually helped us that day, responded to the call of
Washington. It was a horrible scene.
I find out and I heard from Speaker Johnson that it is
unimplementable. And I found out the reason why this plaque cannot be
placed on a wall anywhere is because the letter of the legislation says
that it would list the law enforcement officers who responded that day.
Well, this plaque that is ready to be installed actually lists every
law enforcement agency that responded that day because there were
hundreds, if not thousands, of people who responded to the call.
[[Page S26]]
So later this week I am going to help the Speaker with his ability to
implement the installation of this plaque by coming to the floor and
seeking unanimous consent to simply say: We won't list the individuals,
but we will list their agencies. And I look forward to the opportunity
to do that later this week.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.