[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 214 (Thursday, December 18, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8888-S8891]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Senate Accomplishments
Mr. LANKFORD. Mr. President, we are getting ready to turn the page
into 2026, which is hard to process in some ways because so much has
happened in 2025.
I have a habit when I approach the end of the year to look back and
also take a quick look forward where things might be going. But just
thinking about this year, we have had more votes in this body this year
than any Senate since 1976. We have been in session more days than any
Senate in the past 50 years. We actually confirmed more nominations in
the first year of a new Presidency than any Senate in decades and
decades. It has been a lot of work that has happened in this Chamber
this year.
Just reflecting back on that, I see what still needs to be done, but
I think there is some benefit just for us to be able to pause for a
moment and think about what has already occurred in this incredibly
busy year.
We talk a lot about the Working Families Tax Cut Act that we passed
this past summer. The regulations are being written out by the IRS and
multiple others to be implemented for this coming tax season. But there
are so many things that actually went into that, and the debate around
it was so noisy, I think people lose track of the things that are
actually in it.
I talked to some teachers in Oklahoma who have no idea that next
year, when they buy school supplies, they will be able to write off a
deduction for the school supplies that they purchase because of the
Working Families Tax Cut Act. We are literally treating every classroom
as if it is their own small business and they have their own small
business expenses. They can deduct from their taxes their expenses from
their classroom. That has never happened before, and we think that will
be a tremendous gain for classrooms all over the country and will be a
direct help to teachers. That was one of many things that were in the
bill as well as things like no tax on tips to be able to help service-
related employees all over the country and no tax on overtime, which is
especially beneficial to our first responders and our law enforcement
who work so much overtime, including the Capitol Police who are right
here. There are a lot of overtime hours, and that is going to be a
direct help to them.
I was talking to a person at a checkout line not long ago who was a
working senior adult. As I am checking out, she said: Hey, that bill
that y'all passed? That is going to keep me from paying taxes on my
income after Social Security, after I am receiving that, and that is
going to be a huge help to me.
She just couldn't thank us enough because, as a working senior, she
just needed a little bit of help.
There are so many different things that we were able to get done in
that Working Families Tax Cuts bill. We were able to provide a new
child tax credit. We were able to provide a tax incentive to businesses
that actually provide quality childcare for their employees so that so
many employees who want to have their kids near them at work could
actually have that opportunity. I am grateful that we are able to do
some things that are substantial for a lot of those families.
Within the past hour--it is kind of funny--even just walking the
floor on this, I had someone who just made a random comment. They had
no idea of my connection to it, but they just made a random comment
about a part of the bill that I actually helped author in that Working
Families Tax Cuts bill, and that is the area where we deal with full
expensing.
If you are not a business owner, you have no idea what that is, but
if you own a farm or a ranch or a business, you know exactly what it
is. If you have got big capital expenses--think, for a farm or a ranch,
a tractor or a truck or think, for manufacturing, a big piece of
equipment--when you are able to purchase that, that is a business
expense, but in the past, in the Tax Code, you would have to write that
business expense off over several years. You do eventually get to write
it off, but all of the expense is actually in the first year when you
had to buy it. You were prohibited from writing it all off in your
first year.
I was able to get that changed in this bill, in the section that I
authored, so that those businesses and farmers and ranchers, in the
year that they purchase that big equipment, can also write it off on
their taxes in that 1 year rather than having to stretch it out over
several years. It is exactly the same to the Federal Government as far
as income that is coming in as tax revenue to the Federal Government.
There is no difference. But to that business and that farm and ranch,
it is a huge difference for them.
As for many of those small businesses that have big capital expenses,
literally, if they have a big capital expense that year, they also have
to go to the bank and borrow money to help pay their taxes that year
because it takes several years to be able to depreciate that out. That
is gone as of this year. That is no longer going to be an issue.
[[Page S8889]]
Literally, every economist has said that it is one of the most
significant parts of the bill as far as economic activity across the
country because it incentivizes more people to buy another piece of
equipment to be able to use. It makes a business more efficient--and
guess what. The person who sold them the piece of equipment also gets
more business. It literally churns our economy and gets us up into a
higher speed economically, providing more jobs and more opportunity for
more people.
I also worked a lot on a section of the bill that a lot of people
don't talk about, but it is very important to me, and I found it has
been very important to a lot of other folks as well in the nonprofit
sector.
In 2017, we made a change in the tax law. That change doubled the
standard deduction, simplifying the tax filings for about 91 percent of
Americans, which is much more straightforward than it used to be. But
the tradeoff for that was, if you donated to a nonprofit and you didn't
itemize your taxes, that nonprofit donation was no longer tax
deductible for you, meaning the top 9 percent of people in the country
in income who itemize their taxes get to write off their nonprofit
donations, but no one else does. That may not seem like a big deal, but
in the past decades, nonprofits have lost $20 billion--$20 billion
going into nonprofits. That is a very significant issue.
America has three safety nets: The third of those safety nets is
government. The first safety net is the family. The second safety net
are churches and nonprofits. The third safety net is government. The
government can never keep up with all of the issues and the social
needs. We have got to have strong families. We have got to have strong
churches and nonprofits. They are the ones that are actually taking
care of the homeless and the hurting and the hungry. They are the ones
who do it every single day. They are the volunteers who are out there
who are supported in what they are doing by usually small-dollar
donations.
So, as of January 1 of next year, we will have made a permanent
change in tax policy to say, if your family donates to a nonprofit of
your choice--pick whichever one you want to--if your family donates to
a nonprofit, as of next year, you will be able to write off up to
$2,000 of that donation on your taxes whether you itemize or not.
The goal is to have stronger nonprofits, which means more people
getting assistance in their communities face to face. The government
writes checks. Nonprofits meet people face to face--mentor, help--in a
way that the government never can.
So this body made a decision together in their Working Families Tax
Cuts Act to say we are going to do something to be able to strengthen
our nonprofits all around the country, and I am very proud to be able
to be a part of that.
We forget about this, but we started this year by passing a very
simple piece of legislation. It says, if someone is illegally present
in the country and has committed a crime, if he is arrested, he has to
be removed from the country. As strange as it is, that didn't used to
be the law. We literally had people arrested who were illegally present
in the country. Then they were just released right back out again. Many
of those individuals had committed crimes over and over and over, and
they were just released again, released again, released again.
This body voted this past January and said that that is not going to
ever happen again. We are never going to have individuals who are
victims of crime in just this repetitive nature of it over and over
again.
We have done a lot to just talk about the value of every single
child. This body and my colleagues who are here will know that I speak
out often on this issue. I am one of those crazy people who thinks
children are valuable--all of them. I don't think some children are
valuable and some children are disposable. I think all of them are
valuable. So we have done a lot to be able to just talk about this
issue and to be able to bring it up.
There are several bills that we have actually worked through, one
being the MOMS Act, which bolsters access to resources and assistance
to help moms and children thrive.
We have actually tried to work through multiple different things
dealing with conscience protections. There is a bill that I have that
actually works to protect the conscience rights of those who are in the
medical profession and are going through training.
As odd as it sounds right now, in medical training, you are now
brought to a point that it is assumed that abortion is going to be part
of your medical training unless you opt out of it. Even at that point,
they can still bring you in and say: You have got to be able to choose
right now.
I can tell you stories of medical students who have actually reached
out to our office and said that they literally were brought into an
abortion as a part of their medical training and were told, if they
left, they would have a mark on their educational record saying that
they abandoned the patient. This is even when they had said they did
not plan to ever do elective abortions in their practices--ever--and
wanted to be able to opt out of it.
Listen, there is a simple way to be able to do this. Change the
perspective on it to say that, automatically, everyone is opted out and
that, if you wanted to do elective abortions, you would have to choose
to opt into that in your residency.
But the abortion folks want to make sure as many people as possible
are trained to be able to do elective abortions because they want to
keep that going--violating the conscience rights of many people who go
into medicine to save life, not to take it. So we are working through
the process to be able to now protect that.
Cindy Hyde-Smith, the great Senator from Mississippi, and I are
working on a bill called the RESTORE Act to deal with infertility
issues and to be able to find multiple different ways to walk alongside
families.
We have a bill that deals with pastors and nonprofits that have been
targeted by the IRS for simply speaking their minds. It should not be
so in America.
Senator Jacky Rosen, my Democrat colleague from Nevada, and I lead
the anti-Semitism task force here in the Senate. Anti-Semitism should
not be a partisan issue--it should be a nonpartisan issue--and it
should not be a part of who we are in America. The problem is we have
rising anti-Semitic conversation happening all around our Nation right
now from the left and from the right, and it is disheartening in a
nation that values every single person.
Of the many people who actually speak out openly about diversity in
our Nation and about protecting the rights and opportunities of every
person no matter where they are from--for them to have equal
opportunity and an equal ability to be able to rise--they seem to have
no problem, at times, ranting anti-Semitic tropes, sometimes flippantly
and sometimes in a hostile way.
We have had folks just during this year, in public settings, talking
about how much they love Hitler or making jokes about the gas chambers.
We have folks talking about organized Jewry or folks talking about, if
you support Israel, maybe you have some kind of brain virus. We have
folks chanting ``from the river to the sea'' and ``liberation by any
means.'' On a college campus even this year, a Jewish student was
confronted with someone saying: If I see another pig female Jew, I will
drag you away, rape you, and throw you off a cliff.
This is the United States of America. We stand for the rights of
every individual to have any faith of their choosing and to live that
faith openly and without fear. So why is it that, when I go to Hanukkah
festivals, there have to be so many police there? Do you know why? It
is because some people hear these dumb statements and they do dumb
things. Acts of violence come out of that.
Just this year, we had two Israeli Embassy staff members who were
murdered while they walked out of an event here in Washington, DC--just
this year. Just this year, we had, in Boulder, CO, a gathering of folks
there just to stand in support of Israel, and someone came by with
incendiary devices and literally set a group of Jewish people
peacefully speaking out for Israel--they set them on fire in the
street. Just this year, a Chabad Jewish center was set on fire
overnight in Florida. That is in our country. I could go on and on--not
to mention the incredibly painful first day of Hanukkah with the attack
in Sydney, Australia.
[[Page S8890]]
Anti-Semitism has no place in our Nation. Now, I understand you have
a First Amendment right to be able to say any dumb thing that you want
to say, but I also have the right to call it out for what it is. It is
anti-Semitic hatred. Don't try to shape it in some way to say: This is
my right to be able to speak out.
It is. It is also my right to call it out and say: In my party, as a
Republican, we have no place for anti-Semitic hatred. In our Nation, we
should make no space for someone to be able to intimidate someone
because of their faith or their background no matter who they are.
This year--this year--we were able to pass a bill assisting rural
hospitals with $50 billion--$50 billion. I don't know what the rural
hospitals are like in everybody else's State, but I can tell you what
they are like in Oklahoma. They take care of some great people. They
are dedicated folks in the medical profession, but they struggle
because they don't have a high patient count. They are not trying to do
intricate surgeries; they are trying to help someone who just got hit
on the road in an accident or to help someone who had a heart attack or
someone who had a stroke. They are trying to stabilize them and to help
them. Yes, they are going to transfer them to a big hospital somewhere
else, but they are desperately needed all across rural Oklahoma. They
really struggle to keep up because of the incredible price of medical
technology now. So we just passed a bill dealing with $50 billion to be
able to help rural hospitals all over the country get caught up and
then to be able to maintain what they are doing.
We were able to help rural nursing homes as well, rural nursing homes
that were actually facing a Biden-era rule that Biden-era folks--they
told me they meant well by it, but basically they were requiring a
bunch of additional 24-hour nursing assistants and nurses to be able to
be on sight at any point in those nursing homes.
Now, that sounds like a great idea, but understand that there are
physically not that many nurses that live in rural areas across the
country. What that really was going to mean--although they seem to have
meant well, what that really meant was they were going to close down a
bunch of rural nursing homes all over my State, distancing people at
one of the most vulnerable moments of life away from their families.
That is a terrible idea.
This body was able to flip that and say: We are not going to allow
that to be able to happen. We are going to change that to where that is
different.
This body just passed the national defense authorization. Thankfully,
we have now gone six decades, and every single year, we have passed it.
In my State, we were able to do several things to be able to make
sure we are protecting national security in the work we continue to do
in Oklahoma.
Tinker Air Force Base is the largest Air Force depot we have in the
country. It is critical for the maintenance of all those aircraft and
the strength of our warfighters.
Tinker Air Force Base has struggled with civilian hiring--we have
thousands of people there--not because we don't have great Oklahomans
that want to serve our Nation as a civilian at Tinker Air Force Base
but because of foolish hiring rules that were set aside and created
that slowed down the process of hiring.
In the national defense authorization, I was able to put in an
amendment to be able to get that changed so that we are able to
actually do the civilian hiring that our Nation requires so that we can
actually continue to be able to defend ourselves and our Nation
anywhere in the world.
We want to make it very clear that we have the most lethal, most
moral fighting force in the history of the world, and we want to make
sure we are strong and ready enough that no one ever would challenge
us--ever. That is what brings us greater national security.
This year, in a moment probably no one here saw--and that is OK. We
all have different issues in our States. In a solemn moment in April of
this year, we gathered on the Capitol grounds right over there, around
the enormous, 100-year-old trees that are planted all over the Capitol
grounds, and we were able to plant a tiny, little live oak. Most folks
probably won't even notice, but you will. Next to that little live
oak--it is just about that tall now--is a little plaque saying it is a
seedling from the Oklahoma City Survivor Tree.
Thirty years ago this past April, a person with deep hatred for the
Federal Government drove up to the Federal building in Oklahoma City
with a truck loaded with fertilizer and diesel fuel, ignited it, and
killed 168 people that day. It was 30 years ago this year.
Across the street from the Federal building there was a tree that was
just a gangly little tree that was in a parking lot, quite frankly,
growing up through the asphalt. The detonation itself literally twisted
the tree across the street and blew every single leaf off of it--
literally blew every single one of them off of it.
No one paid any attention to that. Obviously, through the recovery
and all that happened in trying to recover families, taking care of
people, and trying to stabilize the community, no one really noticed
until the next year, literally a year later, that that twisted, bent
tree budded. It survived that blast, and it has become the signature of
Oklahoma City, the Survivor Tree. It is still doing well, by the way.
A seed pod was taken from that tree, was grown in some soil, and then
it was transplanted here to the Capitol grounds so that every person
that walks past it for centuries from now will walk past and see that
little plaque and remember those who were lost and those who survived
and those who were changed forever in April of 1995.
We have to do that this year because we never want to forget.
We have gotten a lot done this year. There is still a lot more to do
next year. We have to finish appropriations, we have a lot of work to
do on housing costs, we have a lot of other bills that are still
pending, but we have been able to accomplish much.
I understand full well that we are divided. I understand full well
that we don't agree on everything. I get that. But where we can find
agreement, let's get moving. Let's solve the issues.
One last thing. Many folks in this body know my friend Jim Inhofe.
Jim Inhofe served in this body literally for decades. He used to sit
right there.
Jim Inhofe and I several years ago worked on a new formula for
veterans hospitals--to partner a veterans hospital with another
hospital so they would share resources. So the veterans hospital would
never have to keep up with other hospitals; they could share resources
and physicians in a brandnew way.
It had never been done quite like this before. We were able to
partner together to be able to do that in Tulsa, OK, where Oklahoma
State hospital and a new veterans hospital would rise up right in
conjunction with it so that the best researchers, the best equipment,
the best physicians could share that space back and forth so that our
veterans would never hear someone say ``Well, we are going to have to
send you to a different VA hospital, a different place, to be able to
get that type of care.'' They could get it right there at home.
It is a new model. I am pleased the Veterans' Committee and other
leadership, including my colleague Jerry Moran, who is sitting on the
floor today, were a part of it.
For Jim and I to be able to work through that process was an honor,
for us to be able to get that in Tulsa.
Never did I ever think that a couple of years later--this year--I
would be dedicating that hospital as the James Mountain Inhofe Tulsa
Veterans Medical Center after my friend Jim Inhofe passed away. That
hospital that he and I worked together on now bears his name.
Veterans, in the days ahead, will continue to get quality care in
Northeast Oklahoma from the legacy of Jim Inhofe but also from the
commitment of this body to say that we are going to do what it takes to
take care of our veterans, as we continue to do.
I am grateful to this body for the work that we get done because it
matters to people, but we have lot more to do, so let's get after it.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Kansas.
Mr. MORAN. Mr. President, first, before I make the remarks I would
like to make, let me commend my colleague from Oklahoma Mr. Lankford
for his comments. I have said this to my colleagues, Republican and
Democrat, and
[[Page S8891]]
I would join in this call for getting things done.
A message that I have tried to make clear is that many of us, most of
us, perhaps all of us are away from home, away from family. We come to
Washington, DC. And in much of my life, I felt guilty about being gone
from things at home. That sense of regret about being absent to family,
to kids, to wife, is somewhat compensated for in the service that comes
from this, serving in the U.S. Senate, from public service. But unless
we actually accomplish things, it is hard to justify the sadness that
comes, the challenges that come, the absence of fulfilling
responsibilities that occur in our lives if we are here without
accomplishments.
As Senator Lankford made so clear, it doesn't always have to be the
biggest things or the things that are thought of to be the biggest; it
could be things that are in many ways, in people's minds, the modest or
small things. But I can't imagine that anybody in the U.S. Senate or
Congress or public service or in jobs that are demanding would do so if
they didn't think there was a goal accomplished at the end of their
time.
We all ought to take to heart what the Senator from Oklahoma said
about getting things done. It can help us justify being away from those
we love so frequently and doing something that actually matters to
America and the world.
We don't--certainly we shouldn't--come here for purposes of the name
on the door or a nice desk in a big office or for the camaraderie or to
be able to call yourself a U.S. Senator. Those things are absolutely
meaningless. But if we can find the common denominator between
Republicans and Democrats, between individuals from different States
and different parts of the country; if we can find the common
denominator between people who have different ideas and political
philosophies, the U.S. Senate should be a place that is designed to
pull people together, to bring us together so that those
accomplishments occur.
I commend my colleague from Oklahoma as a Senator who has
accomplishments and works hard to make sure that we all are working
together so we all can have accomplishments. I express my gratitude to
and respect for the Senator.