[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 212 (Tuesday, December 16, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8757-S8762]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026--Continued
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from South Carolina.
Unanimous Consent Request--S. 2978
Mr. GRAHAM. Mr. President, I will be asking unanimous consent here in
a second.
To my colleagues on the Democratic side, a lot of people in the
country are wondering if we can ever do anything together. We have done
some things together but nothing more uniting in the Senate since I
have been here than in the response we have achieved on both sides of
the aisle regarding Putin's barbaric invasion of Ukraine.
We have 85 cosponsors, giving President Trump the ability to tariff
countries that buy cheap Russian oil to keep Putin in the fight. That
has been a major accomplishment. We also have a bill making Russia a
state sponsor of terrorism under U.S. law that I believe passed through
the Foreign Relations Committee unanimously.
Now, what does this bill do? It designates Russia as a state sponsor
of terrorism based on the fact that Putin's Russia has kidnapped, for
lack of a better word, almost 20,000 Ukrainian children in the occupied
territories controlled by Russia in Ukraine.
We had a hearing last week about this, and it was amazing what we
learned. Some of these Ukrainian children are being taken from their
families in Ukraine and are winding up in North Korea. I couldn't
believe it. There are 200 different camps that these kids are being put
into to make them Russian. This is one of the greatest outrages of the
21st century or any other century. We had compelling testimony from the
Ukrainian Ambassador and the NGOs that follow this that detailed the
brutality of Russia's effort to separate Ukrainian children from their
families and turn them into pawns of Putin's. Some of these kids were
taken as young children and, as teenagers, are now in the fight for
Russia. The videos will just break your heart.
Now, how does the bill work? Within 60 days of its passage, if Russia
has not come up with a plan to return the kidnapped children--there is
no process of reintegration--and if the Russian Government is still
attacking civilian infrastructure, then Russia will be designated as a
state sponsor of terrorism.
When you look at international terrorism activities, they include
kidnapping under section 2331(1) of title 18. So
[[Page S8758]]
this legislation is designed to label Russia as a state sponsor of
terrorism for the kidnappings of we estimate up to almost 20,000--
probably more--Ukrainian children in the occupied territories. If this
doesn't make you a terrorist state, what would?
For us to turn our backs on this problem I think would be the worst
possible signal we could send in terms of world order. I am confident
that if we get a vote on this bill, it will pass overwhelmingly because
most Senators want to be on record as saying: I did something necessary
in the face of brutality.
The one thing I have learned in my time here is that if you appease
aggression, you get more of it; if you are silent in the face of evil,
it will grow.
To my Democratic colleagues Senators Shaheen, Blumenthal, and so many
others, you have been great to work with.
We have tremendous wide and deep bipartisan support for this. I am
hoping that the negotiations in Berlin will bear fruit and that we can
end this bloodbath in a way to prevent a third invasion, with an
honorable and just outcome. I don't think Ukraine can evict every
Russian soldier, but having said that, you don't want to reward Putin
for this invasion; you will just get more of it. We have to prevent
what happened in 2014 and in 2022 this time around.
One of the tools in our toolbox is to label Russia as a state sponsor
of terrorism for kidnapping these children. It would make the Russian
economy radioactive. There are only four nations that are designated as
state sponsors of terrorism under U.S. law. This would be number five.
It is a well-deserved label based on the conduct of Putin regarding the
Ukrainian children.
In that regard, I ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding rule
XXII, the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No.
246, S. 2978; that the committee-reported substitute amendment be
withdrawn; that the Graham substitute amendment at the desk be
considered and agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read
a third time and passed; and that the motion to reconsider be
considered made and laid upon the table.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there an objection?
The Senator from Kentucky.
Mr. PAUL. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, designating
Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism is a colossally bad idea, a
dangerous provocation, and a roundabout way of allowing military
strikes on Russian targets. If you doubt this, ask the Venezuelans. All
of the ``kinetic strikes'' on Venezuelan boats are justified because
they are designated as a terrorist sponsor. They have these fancy
names. We call them designated terrorist organizations. Therefore, it
is like a war but not quite a war, but they justify their attacks, and
they justify acting like there is a war with Venezuela by designating
them as terrorists.
Never underestimate Washington's ability to make things worse.
In its insistence that Moscow be a permanent enemy of the United
States, the foreign policy establishment is pushing to impose more
punitive measures on Russia--measures that may make globalists in
Washington feel virtuous but that in reality will do nothing to help
Ukraine, do nothing to bring peace in Europe, and do nothing to make
Americans safer or more prosperous. In fact, if there is one thing more
likely to disrupt the peace talks and make it less likely to find
peace, it is simply that of labeling Russia a terrorist nation.
If you want to destroy the peace process, you should pass this
legislation and shout it from the rooftops that you are calling Russia
a terrorist nation--if you want to disrupt the peace talks.
This bill, which would designate Russia as a state sponsor of
terrorism, directly undermines President Trump's diplomatic efforts to
end the 4-year war in Ukraine. If you like the war in Ukraine, vote for
this bill because this bill will do everything possible to drive Russia
away from the table.
Our goal should be to seek deescalation and stability in Europe,
which will only come about by establishing working relations with the
Russians. None of this says that Russia isn't the aggressor. None of
this says that Russia isn't doing bad things. They are in the middle of
a war. Yes, they are the aggressors. But simply standing forth and
showing how virtuous we are by calling them terrorists will do nothing
to end the war and may well allow the war to continue. The hardliners
in Moscow already believe they are at war with the United States, and
designating them as a state sponsor of terrorism will only throw
further fuel on that fire.
This misguided legislation would destroy any semblance of U.S.-Russia
bilateral relations, and it is not going to achieve its desired
intention. It is absurd to think that applying more economic pressure
on Russia will get them to change their objectives. They have fought
for 4 years. They have lost tens of thousands of soldiers, and they
have killed tens of thousands of soldiers. Some say there are up to 1
million casualties of this war. We have already imposed 16,000
sanctions on them. Do we really think 16,001 is going to do the trick?
We think: Oh, we are going to call them a terrorist. What a terrible
thing. They are going to lay down their arms and give back the land
they have taken.
No, that is not what is going to happen. This will not work, but it
might drive them away from the process of coming to a negotiated
settlement.
If this bill is enacted, Russia will likely conclude that
negotiations are futile, and they will continue the grinding war of
attrition on the battlefield. It should come as no surprise, given the
disparity between Russia and Ukraine in terms of economic strength and
population, that a war of attrition does not favor Kyiv.
President Trump has repeatedly made clear that this is not our war
and that his primary desire is to end the killing. He is 100 percent
right. Congress should fully support the President's efforts to end the
needless slaughter of a generation of young people in Ukraine and
Russia, but this legislation will do the opposite of his intentions.
This legislation will put peace further away. It may well drive a wedge
in negotiations and end the negotiations.
The way to do this, the way to achieve peace, is to pursue realistic
negotiations--negotiations that, whether you like it or not, will
require that Russia's security interests are taken into consideration,
not by ratcheting up tensions with Moscow or by designating them as a
state sponsor of terrorism.
The Washington establishment already succeeded in its foolish
designation of drug cartels in the Western Hemisphere as terrorist
organizations. Now we are conducting extrajudicial killings of
individuals seemingly every day, with no congressional authorization or
oversight. What is next? Are we going to commit extrajudicial
executions of Russians once they are designated as state sponsors of
terrorism? That is exactly what we are doing in Venezuela.
They say: Oh, we are just not killing any drug dealers; we are
killing drug dealers who are terrorists.
That sort of begs the question: When they release a narcoterrorist
who has been in prison for 45 years--former President of Honduras
Hernandez--oh, well, why is he not a narcoterrorist?
Oh, because we name who the narcoterrorists are. The guys we are
killing in the boats, they are the narcoterrorists. The guy who was
convicted and sent to prison for 45 years--the former President of
Honduras--is not a narcoterrorist.
As to the justification for killing the people in the boats who are
not armed--there has been no evidence presented that anybody in these
boats has been armed. We are killing unarmed people because we are
calling them narcoterrorists, and now we are going to call the Russians
terrorists. What does that mean? Are we setting up the predicate for
bombing Russian boats?
They say they don't need authority for war. They say they can do it.
But you are helping them by designating Russians as terrorists. When
you do and when they begin to blow up Russian boats, what will we say?
The Washington establishment has succeeded in this foolish
designation. We now have drug cartels. We are conducting these
killings. What is next? Will we allow the killings of Russians? Will we
allow the bombings of Russian boats?
[[Page S8759]]
Designating countries or cartels as terrorists essentially becomes an
end run around congressional war-making powers.
The Constitution says we declare war.
They say: Well, it is not quite war; it is somewhere in between war,
but it is not drug smuggling anymore. We don't kill drug smugglers on
sight, but we do kill them if they are designated as terrorists.
So it is just game-playing with these labels. It is circular
reasoning, but everything about it leads to more war and leads to less
restraint.
Once they are designated as terrorists, attacks on the country are
argued to be sanctioned. This is an argument for saying that bombing
Russian boats will be sanctioned. The terrorists, the Venezuelans, are
said to be terrorists. Their boats are targets, and we can bomb them
like it is a war but not a war because we haven't voted on it. If we
label Russians as terrorists, is that the same conclusion?
So while we are not at war with Russia, designating them as a state
sponsor of terrorism implies that no further vote of Congress is
necessary before letting the bombs fly. To think that the risk of
escalation must no longer concern us because a war has gone on for
years is folly. There is still danger to escalating the war with
Russia. We must still take great care to ensure that the United States
is not foolishly dragged into a kinetic conflict through stupidity or
miscalculation.
Americans supported President Trump because they resonated with his
message of ``America first.'' Outside of the globalist elites in
Washington, everyday Americans do not want to be further entangled in a
war 5,000 miles from our shores.
Congress should reject this bill and instead focus its efforts on
advancing realistic peace negotiations in Ukraine and in pursuing
policies that advance America's national interests.
I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
The Senator from South Carolina.
Mr. GRAHAM. No. 1, you are very consistent, Senator Paul, in the
sense that you do not believe that standing up to aggression stops it.
I do.
When you appease it, you get more of it. In 2014, Putin invades
Crimea. We end that conflict only to have him invade again in 2022. You
can have your opinions, but you need to listen to what the enemy is
saying. If you believe Putin is going to stop voluntarily, you are
completely discounting everything he has said and everything he has
done.
He is going to go until somebody stops him. Not one American soldier
has died in the effort to stop him in Ukraine. We have provided
weapons. We put sanctions. We have done a lot of things, but the war
keeps going.
Senator Paul advocated for getting out of Afghanistan, Syria. You
name it, he wants to leave. The problem is that the people you leave
behind want to kill you. Senator Paul doesn't believe that radical
Islam is dedicated to the destruction of the American people, our way
of life. I do.
Under his model, if you leave them alone, they will leave you alone.
There is really no reason for us to be forward-deployed because we are
safe if we just ignore them.
If you ignore Putin, there goes Taiwan. All the negotiations--I
appreciate them--they haven't worked. We are negotiating, and
Ukrainians are dying.
How many Ukrainians have died since these talks have been going on?
To my friends in the Trump administration, you have an obligation to
bring this war to an end for the good of the civilized world. I
appreciate your going to Berlin. I hope we come up with security
guarantees that will prevent another invasion like in 2014 and in 2022.
I hope America will say the third time around: Putin, you come into
Ukraine after we have a cease-fire, then you run into the ``coalition
of the willing'' and the United States. And if you don't say that,
Putin will come back.
So the worst thing you can do is not understand the times in which
you live. People didn't understand Hitler. These arguments made today
were all made in the thirties, and 50 million people died when people
in power, like us in the Senate, don't understand the world in which we
live in. Putin has raped and murdered en masse Ukrainians who just wish
to be Ukrainians.
To Senator Paul, if he gets away with this, there goes Taiwan. But
you will do nothing for Taiwan. I don't know if you would do anything
if they actually went into Kentucky. The point is, the rest of us
believe you are the outlier. There is nothing about the Washington
establishment here. It is about common sense, learning from history,
having a half a brain when it comes to dealing with aggression.
If you think ISIS is going to leave you alone because you want to
leave them alone, that is insane. If you think Putin will stop until
somebody stops him, you have missed a lot.
So what are we trying to do? We are trying to make it hard to do
business with Russia. China is the No. 1 purchaser of Russian oil--
cheap; the No. 1 purchaser of Ukrainian oil--cheap; the No. 1 purchaser
of Venezuelan oil. What does that have in common? China is propping up
all these dictatorships. Without China, India, and Brazil buying
Russian oil--cheap--Putin would have no money, virtually, to prosecute
the war. So we are trying to make it hard to prop up Putin's war
machine.
A ``state-sponsored terrorism'' designation against Russia would
matter. It would cripple his war machine because he would be
radioactive in terms of doing business. And if you turn your back on a
regime that kidnaps 20,000 children, takes them away from their family,
appropriates them to Russia, then, boy, have you lost your way.
If that is not terrorism, if that is not something Americans should
care about, what the hell should we care about? We are labeling the
conduct of Putin for what it is: ``state sponsor of terrorism.''
So let it be said that in 2025, almost everybody in the Senate,
except two or three, believes that Russia should be a state sponsor of
terrorism under U.S. law, not to go to war with Russia but because of
their conduct of taking 20,000 children away from Ukrainian families,
putting them in camps in Russia, and sending some of them to North
Korea.
If that is not something we should push back against, God help the
world. If Putin gets away with this, the world will--only time will
tell what would happen.
To my Democratic and Republican colleagues, thank you for working
together with Senator Blumenthal and myself.
Senator Shaheen, you have been terrific.
Thank you for letting Russia know if this war doesn't end honorably
and justly, we are going to crush your economy. We are going to come
after your customers.
Putin will go as far as he can go until somebody stands up to him.
That is what I have learned when it comes to Putin.
And as to the U.S. Senate, this is one of our finest moments. This is
one of our finest hours when we came together to create legislation to
punish a country that would kidnap children of another country, rape
and murder and pillage.
Thank you very much. I turn the floor over to Senator Blumenthal.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. Lummis). The Senator from Connecticut.
Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Madam President, first, my thanks to Senator Graham
for his steadfast advocacy and eloquence and his partnership. It has
been bipartisan from the start. It involves Senators Britt and
Klobuchar, as well as Senator Shaheen, who is with us today, and
Senator Coons and so many others.
In fact, let the world know, the Senate is united behind the children
and parents of Ukraine. There may be some dissent--and we just heard
one voice--but it is a small minority. To our European allies, to
Ukraine, to the world, and, most importantly, to Vladimir Putin: You
should know that America will stand against kidnapping and abducting
children. That is the principle that brings us to the floor today.
Let me say to my colleague from Kentucky, there is not a scintilla of
evidence--not one single bit of fact--that could persuade you that
passing this measure will slow down or impede any peace negotiations.
That is not what we are hearing from the negotiators. It isn't what we
are hearing from Ukraine and its leaders who steadfastly support this
measure. It is not what we are hearing from our European allies who
also have expressed
[[Page S8760]]
support for this measure, and it is not what we are hearing from our
conscience.
We are here today because we see in Vladimir Putin and his policy of
abducting children literally the face of evil. There are very few
issues where there are black and white sides. You know, most of the
issues that come before this body are gray--on one hand, on the other
hand.
This kind of war crime ought to shock the conscience of America and
the world. And, in fact, let's call it what it is. It is genocide. It
is genocide because what Vladimir Putin wants to do is to destroy a
people. He is abducting the children of Ukraine to deprive that nation
of its future--of its children, of its culture, of its race and
nationality.
It is more than just about tanks and bombs and drones. It is about
the future of humanity, who we are and what we will tolerate from a
world leader who is bent on destroying a nation and its people. When
you destroy its children, you are destroying its future.
I have been privileged to visit Ukraine eight times since the
beginning of Vladimir Putin's slaughterous invasion, most of them with
Senator Graham, who has been such a great partner in this effort. And I
have some very searing memories of meeting with the amputees and
veterans of Ukraine who have been at the front--not just for months but
years--literally fighting because their country's future is at stake.
I have memories of meeting with those veterans. I have memories of
visiting Bucha where, in the first days of this war, Russians literally
lined up women and children and shot them in the back of their heads
and then buried them in a mass grave; memories of speaking to President
Zelenskyy and hearing about those days when the Russians came within
kilometers.
We have driven from his bunker to the place where the Russians were
stopped--literally, a 5-minute car ride--and his courage in staying
there and continuing this fight.
I have memories of the bombed schools and hospitals and apartment
houses. But the memory that sticks with me most vividly is of children
who have been rescued after their abduction and parents whose children
have been kidnapped, hearing about those children taken to reeducation
camps, to foster families, where they were, in effect, made Russian.
They were forbidden to speak Ukrainian. They were forbidden to practice
their religion. They were forbidden to try to reunite with their
families.
It is beyond horror and heartbreak to hear these stories. What we are
doing here is very simply recognizing that the world will not tolerate,
again, this kind of genocide, that it should shock our conscience, and
that designating Russia as a ``state sponsor of terrorism'' puts it in
the same category as the other outlaw renegade nations, whether it is
Cuba, Iran, North Korea.
And by the way, we haven't bombed their ships. We haven't bombed
their countries. We haven't bombed their planes. Designating them as
state sponsors of terrorism doesn't mean we bomb them. To my colleague
from Kentucky, I have my own criticisms of what is happening in the
Caribbean today, and I share many of his criticisms, but it is simply a
stream of consciousness that brings the two together. There is no logic
or fact that makes them the same.
We need to stand strong behind Ukraine in those negotiations and
insist on Ukraine's security, airtight and approved by the U.S.
Congress, an article V-type of guarantee that commits the United States
to Ukraine's security.
But today we are here about a moral and a practical issue. We are
here about 10-month-old Margarita. Russian forces abducted her, changed
her name, her citizenship, her birthplace. They changed it from
Kherson, Ukraine, to Podolsk, Russia.
Artem, a 16-year-old boy taken by Russian soldiers to a remote
orphanage, slept on ``sagging metal beds'' without bedding. He was
forced to eat crackers every day.
Ilya, a 9-year-old from Mariupol, his mother was killed in a Russian
missile attack. He was made an orphan by the Russians, who then called
him an orphan as though it was something unconnected to what they did.
He buried her with his own hands, and then Russians took him to a
hospital in Donetsk, operated on him without anesthesia, and told him
not to say ``Glory to Ukraine'' anymore.
These are war crimes. Children should be safe. They should be
protected. They should never become pawns in an imperial war of
conquest. This assault on children is a real assault on humanity. It is
an attempt to erase Ukraine's identity through the manipulation and
torture of the most vulnerable. There are at least 210 facilities
across Russia and Russian-occupied territories housing these abducted
children.
Russia has brazenly obstructed international efforts to rescue them,
even to locate and document them. It withholds records. It cuts off
communication. It deliberately undermines any effort to remit these
children to their homes and families. Congress must act. Now is the
time.
Let me be clear. These are not just Ukrainian children. They are
future scientists, artists, dancers, teachers, and leaders. They are
the heart of a free and prosperous Ukraine. The world cannot abandon
them.
We may talk here about tankers and territories, and we should seize
those shadow fleet tankers--no question about it. But this tragedy is
deliberate, systematic, evil. It cannot go unanswered. We cannot turn a
blind eye to this cruelty. We cannot evade the obligation to fight for
every Ukrainian child stolen from a family in that great country.
I yield the floor to my great colleague from New Hampshire, Senator
Shaheen.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Hampshire.
Mrs. SHAHEEN. Madam President, I am pleased to join my colleagues
Senator Blumenthal and Senator Graham, who are right to highlight
Russia's conduct in Ukraine and the need to hold Vladimir Putin's
murderous regime accountable.
I think our colleague from Kentucky couldn't be more wrong when he
talks about this bill as continuing the war in Ukraine. The fact is the
only thing Vladimir Putin does understand is pressure, and the problem
is we haven't put enough pressure on him in the United States and in
Europe.
And if appeasement is what was going to end this war, then we have
already done that. President Trump rolled out the red carpet in Alaska
when he met with Putin. That got us nowhere.
The only thing Vladimir Putin understands is pressure, and we need to
do everything possible to add to the pressure on Putin and Russia so
that he will come to the table, so that he will actually negotiate in
good faith and end this war because, as talks continue, we need to be
clear about what actually is driving this war. And Senators Blumenthal
and Graham talked about Putin's interests in totally eliminating
Ukraine and absorbing the culture and absorbing the country into
Russia.
President Putin doesn't want peace on terms that respect Ukraine's
sovereignty. Russia continues to strike civilian infrastructure,
continues to kidnap thousands of abducted Ukrainian children. These are
not the actions of a government that is negotiating in good faith.
Second, as has been said, Russia is not sustaining this war alone.
Moscow relies on China for materiels and technology to keep its war
machine running. It relies on North Korea for people to fight this war.
And, finally, Putin's strategy depends on exhausting Ukraine's ability
to defend itself and rebuild. These are not abstract problems.
As Senator Graham was going through the litany of Russia's
encroachment into Ukraine, what he missed was, in 2008, when Russia
went into Georgia and took two provinces in Georgia, South Ossetia and
Abkhazia. They are now basically Russian mandates within the bounds of
Georgia.
So these are not abstract issues. They describe how Russia is
fighting this war, and Congress has the authority and the tools to
raise the cost of that strategy, to make it harder on Vladimir Putin.
And that is why we are here on the floor today, supporting the bill
that would designate Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism, because
what this bill does is it addresses the character of Russia's conduct
in this war, and, as
[[Page S8761]]
Senator Blumenthal said so eloquently, it speaks to the values that we
have in the United States; that we have got to take on a country--a
regime like Vladimir Putin's--that would steal children from another
country. It reflects the use of terror as a tool of state policy that
includes the abductions of Ukraine's children. What this bill would do
is to further isolate the Putin regime. It would make clear that his
conduct carries real consequences as far as we are concerned in the
United States.
Fortunately, this isn't the only bill that Congress can pass to put
pressure on Putin. In addition to this bill, the Foreign Relations
Committee has passed two other pieces of legislation that would do
exactly that.
One is the STOP Russia and China Act, which is a bill that goes
directly at the supply chains that Putin relies on to rebuild forces
and prolong the fighting. It would block Chinese entities from
supplying materiels and technology to Russia's war effort. And without
that support, Russia's ability to keep escalating is sharply reduced.
Now, the other is the REPO Act. This bill addresses the costs of
Russia's aggression. It would authorize the use of frozen Russian
sovereign assets to support Ukraine's defense and recovery, and it
would ensure that Russia, not Ukraine or the U.S. taxpayers, would bear
the responsibility for the destruction it has cost.
Taken together, these bills give Congress a clear way to raise the
cost of Putin's strategy. They target the supply chain, the money, and
the conduct of the Russian state itself. They send a unified signal
that escalation will be met with real costs. That is the message that
Congress should be sending now to up the ante on the cost of this war
for Vladimir Putin and Russia.
So we are not going to stop with this UC request today. We are going
to keep going, into January, until we see a real commitment on the part
of Russia to go to the negotiating table.
With that, I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Banks). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
ENFORCE Act
Mr. BLUMENTHAL. Mr. President, earlier today, Senator Cornyn came to
the floor and asked for unanimous consent to pass the ENFORCE Act. I am
proud to have co-led that bill with him, and he has been an excellent
partner in this work. I couldn't be here when he asked for and received
unanimous consent, but I am enormously appreciative about the bill
passing the U.S. Senate today.
This bill is deeply important to protecting our children from child
sexual abuse material, which is rampant on the internet. Every parent
knows and every teacher is aware of the dangers of child sexual abuse
material, of the toxic content that is driven by artificial
intelligence and algorithms that people barely can pronounce, let alone
understand.
As technology advances, we know that the methods of abuse also
change. Using modern AI, abusers can generate realistic child sexual
abuse material every day, using normal photographs of children--school
pictures; local paper photos from soccer games, track meets, or scout
troop fundraisers. The stuff of everyday life becomes weaponized by the
CSAM abusers. With AI, every one of these images can be turned into
pictures of horror and do hideous harm to children.
On the modern internet, those abusive images are available forever.
We know about forever chemicals polluting our environment, like PFAS.
These forever images contaminate a person's life forever.
The ENFORCE Act would ensure that people convicted of producing AI-
generated child sexual abuse material would be subject to the same
consequences and accountability as people convicted of producing other
types of child sexual abuse material.
The harm of AI-generated CSAM is immense. It is devastating. It is
destructive of human lives, literally, and sometimes actually results
in young people taking their own lives.
I am glad this important bill has moved through the Senate today. I
hope our colleagues in the House of Representatives will stand with us
and adopt the ENFORCE Act so we can take effective law enforcement
action against these hideous abusers of children. There is no excuse
for delay or inaction. The lives of our children are at stake.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Washington.
Washington State Flooding
Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, you know, over the past week, my home
State of Washington has experienced catastrophic and recordbreaking
flooding due to an ongoing atmospheric and winter weather event. It has
been devastating. And with more rain coming and further evacuations
underway today, it remains dangerous. Earlier this morning, we saw the
first reported death connected to the flooding, a tragic and sobering
reminder of what is at stake.
And as response and recovery efforts continue across my State, I want
to take a moment to recognize the valiant effort of first responders
and teams at all levels, coming together to get lifesaving information
out to our communities so people can prepare and evacuate and to go in
and rescue people whenever and wherever needed.
Last week, I led the Washington State delegation in requesting an
expedited emergency declaration to get Federal disaster response
resources out to our State. I was glad to see that request quickly
approved by FEMA. That is how it should always work. We should always
come together in times of tragedy and focus on helping people.
And that is exactly what I saw happening this past weekend, when I
was on the ground in Washington State. I met with local officials, with
business owners, with families. I saw up close and personal what our
communities are facing and how they are responding. And I want to share
a few things that were very clear to me this weekend.
This flooding showed, plain as day, how the decisions we make here in
DC really matter for families back home.
Mr. President, 20 years ago, I fought for funding so the city of
Mount Vernon could secure a flood wall. This week, that wall paid off
big time, preventing major flooding from devastating downtown Mount
Vernon.
We also saw how the flood prevention infrastructure made a huge
difference protecting communities all around my State. That is an
important reminder. I want all of my colleagues to remember, as we work
on these funding bills: Prevention matters. Preparedness matters.
Having strong infrastructure and a quick response saves lives.
That is why I champion these kinds of investments every year--
topnotch weather forecasting, resilient infrastructure, disaster
preparedness and response, and more--because the only thing we ever
know about the next crisis is that we need to be ready before it
strikes.
Another thing I saw when I was visiting the frontlines of the
flooding this past weekend is how our local, State, Tribal, and Federal
officials are all coming together to do incredible work. I really can't
say enough how grateful I am to all the experts and heroes who have
been putting in very long hours, solving hard problems, and even
putting themselves at risk to save lives and protect our communities
during these floods--from the meteorologists and experts who are
monitoring and updating all of us on constantly changing conditions to
local officials, firefighters, and police departments, getting out
important warnings and getting people out of harm's way; to the Coast
Guard, which is doing search operations and flyovers to help evacuate
people who are in danger; to the National Guard, which is supporting
rescue and response missions, staffing traffic control points, and
filling sandbags to divert flood water; and, of course, neighbors,
everyday people, stepping up and lending a hand wherever they can help.
It truly is inspiring to see.
Now, one of the most important things I saw this weekend, when I was
hearing from folks about the flood damage, is that we are not out of
the woods yet in Washington State--not even close--not when it comes to
the immediate threat of these floods, since the rain is continuing
right now, this week.
[[Page S8762]]
Just this morning, we saw a levee breach on the White River, and ``Go
now'' evacuations have been issued for the city of Pacific, in South
King County--not when it comes to landslides, which remain a huge risk
at this moment, and, certainly, not when it comes to recovery.
Mitigating disaster, responding to disaster--that is crucial, and we
have done a good job so far, but our work is not done until we have
tackled recovery.
And while we still don't know the full scope of this destruction,
what we do know is that the damage that has already been done is
massive. Entire neighborhoods and huge swaths of farmland have been
flooded. Some roads have buckled. Some are covered in debris. Some were
just simply swept away. Businessowners are returning to flooded shops
and ruined inventory. There are families coming home only to find their
house is gone. We have downed trees. We have downed powerlines, damaged
wastewater facilities, and breached levees. And, again, there will be
more destructive flooding to come.
The painful truth is we have a lot of broken pieces floating across
Washington State right now, and it will be a slow, hard process to put
this all back together again and help people get their lives back on
track.
So here is my message to everyone back in Washington State who is
dealing with the tremendous aftermath of these devastating floods: I
know you have a long road ahead, but I promise you will not walk that
road alone. I will be with you every step of the way. I will be your
voice here in Washington, DC, and I will fight tooth and nail to make
sure you get the support you need to build and to recover.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SCHMITT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Nomination of Thomas Albus
Mr. SCHMITT. Mr. President, I rise today to wholeheartedly endorse
the nomination of Tom Albus to be the U.S. attorney for the Eastern
District of Missouri. He is part of the forthcoming nominations package
that this body will be voting on later this week.
His nomination in particular is special to me. He not only is eastern
Missouri--the eastern district of Missouri, my lifelong home--but when
I was attorney general of Missouri, Tom was my first assistant, the
chief deputy when I first came into office.
He is a proud alum of Georgetown, Mizzou Law, and St. Louis
University High School.
Tom is one of the finest prosecutors I have met in my whole life. For
17 years, Tom served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Eastern
District of Missouri, where he won numerous special achievement awards
and recognition for his outstanding service.
Tom served as my first assistant attorney general in Missouri and
then as a circuit judge in Missouri's 21st Judicial Circuit, which is
in St. Louis County.
In his distinguished legal career, Tom has appeared in nearly 900
Federal criminal prosecutions and civil matters. He has tried 15 cases
to verdict and presided over dozens more as a judge.
But Tom shines just as bright outside of the courtroom. He is as
committed to St. Louis as anyone I have ever met. As a lifetime leader
at the Missouri Athletic Club, in our local parish--the Mary Queen of
Peace Catholic Church--with Big Brothers Big Sisters of Eastern
Missouri, and as the mock trial coach for St. Louis University High
School and now St. Joseph's Academy, Tom has a pure and genuine heart.
That is what he cares about--service.
Tom is sharp, serious, and a lifelong proponent of law and order. He
is a career law man.
As interim U.S. attorney, Tom is already delivering results, going
after violent crime and its root causes with everything he has got.
Just in the last few weeks under his watch, he has indicted a former
high school baseball coach on drug trafficking charges. He has
sentenced child sex traffickers to serious, long prison terms. He has
taken down illegal immigrants tied to a nationwide organized retail
crime ring. That is leadership. That is Tom Albus.
He has trained for this job that we are set to vote on here his
entire career. I have the utmost confidence in his abilities. He is
going to do a fantastic job as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern
District of Missouri, and I urge my colleagues to support his
nomination.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Michigan.
____________________