[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 211 (Monday, December 15, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H5876-H5878]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




              UTAH WILDFIRE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ACT OF 2025

  Mr. STAUBER. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 1045) to amend the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire 
Prevention Act of 2004 to require the establishment of an additional 
Institute under that Act.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 1045

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Utah Wildfire Research 
     Institute Act of 2025''.

     SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL INSTITUTE.

       (a) In General.--Section 5(b)(2) of the Southwest Forest 
     Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 (16 U.S.C. 
     6704(b)(2)) is amended--

[[Page H5877]]

       (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
       (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(D) the State of Utah.''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 5(e)(1) of the Southwest 
     Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 (16 U.S.C. 
     6704(e)(1)) is amended by striking ``and Colorado'' and 
     inserting ``Colorado, and Utah''.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Minnesota (Mr. Stauber) and the gentleman from Puerto Rico (Mr. 
Hernandez) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Minnesota.


                             General Leave

  Mr. STAUBER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and 
include extraneous material on H.R. 1045, the bill now under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Minnesota?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. STAUBER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1045, the Utah Wildfire 
Research Institute Act of 2025, offered by Representative Kennedy of 
Utah.
  Across the West, and particularly in Utah, wildfire risk is 
increasing. In 2024, more than 90,000 acres burned in the State. Along 
the Wasatch Front, the number of fire weather days has grown by 15 
since 1973, meaning fires now have a longer window to ignite and 
spread. This is exacerbated by the accumulation of hazardous fuels, 
caused by a century of fire suppression and a lack of active 
management.
  In 2004, Congress created the Southwest Ecological Restoration 
Institutes, or SWERI, in Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico to advance 
wildfire research and promote science-based forest management. These 
institutes have been invaluable partners to Federal and State land 
managers, producing peer-reviewed research, improving forest health, 
and helping reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires across the West.
  Despite facing the same wildfire threats as its Four Corners 
neighbors, Utah is the only State in the region without a SWERI center. 
Representative Kennedy's legislation corrects this oversight by 
authorizing an additional institute in Utah, allowing the State to 
expand research, strengthen watershed restoration, and develop 
innovative fuel-reduction strategies.
  We know that forest management is the single most crucial factor in 
determining wildfire severity. This bill builds on a proven model and 
will bolster Utah's ability to confront wildfire risks head-on.
  Mr. Speaker, I commend Representative Kennedy and the chairman of the 
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Senator Lee, for their 
leadership on this issue. Their legislation has broad support in the 
State of Utah, and I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting it 
today.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

                                         House of Representatives,


                               Committee on Natural Resources,

                                Washington, DC, September 3, 2025.
     Hon. Glenn Thompson,
     Chairman, Committee on Agriculture,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Chairman Thompson: I write regarding H.R. 1045, the 
     ``Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025,'' which was 
     ordered reported by the Committee on Natural Resources on 
     July 23, 2025.
       I recognize that the bill contains provisions that fall 
     within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Agriculture and 
     appreciate your willingness to forgo further consideration of 
     the bill. I acknowledge that the Committee on Agriculture 
     will not formally consider H.R. 1045 and agree that the 
     inaction of your Committee with respect to the bill does not 
     waive any jurisdiction over the subject matter contained 
     therein.
       I am pleased to support your request to name members of the 
     Committee on Agriculture to any conference committee to 
     consider such provisions. I will ensure that our exchange of 
     letters is included in the Congressional Record during floor 
     consideration of the bill and will include such letters in 
     the committee report on H.R. 1045. I appreciate your 
     cooperation regarding this legislation.
           Sincerely,
                                                  Bruce Westerman,
     Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                                     Committee on Agriculture,

                                Washington, DC, September 3, 2025.
     Hon. Bruce Westerman,
     Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: This letter confirms our mutual 
     understanding regarding H.R. 1045, the ``Utah Wildfire 
     Research Institute Act of 2025.'' Thank you for collaborating 
     with the Committee on Agriculture on the matters within our 
     jurisdiction.
       The Committee on Agriculture will forego any further 
     consideration of this bill. However, by foregoing 
     consideration at this time, we do not waive any jurisdiction 
     over any subject matter contained in this or similar 
     legislation. The Committee on Agriculture also reserves the 
     right to seek appointment of an appropriate number of 
     conferees, should it become necessary, and ask that you 
     support such a request.
        We would appreciate a response to this letter confirming 
     this understanding with respect to H.R. 1045 and request a 
     copy of our letters on this matter be published in the 
     Congressional Record during Floor consideration.
           Sincerely,
                                            Glenn ``GT'' Thompson,
                                                         Chairman.

  Mr. HERNANDEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of Representative Kennedy's bill, the 
Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025.
  This bill would expand wildfire research capacity by including Utah 
in the Southwest Ecological Restoration Institutes network, also known 
as SWERI. The SWERI program has proven to be a valuable model for 
scientific collaboration and forest health innovation, assisting in 
wildfire restoration and preparedness across the Southwest.
  This legislation proposes Utah State University as the host 
university, which would partner with local, State, and Federal agencies 
to enhance forest and rangeland management and implement strategies for 
long-term ecological restoration. Adding a fourth institute in Utah has 
the potential to increase and accelerate the reach and impact of SWERI.
  While I support adding another SWERI to the existing network, I must 
also note that I remain very concerned about the administration's 
proposed deep cuts to our land management agencies, which partner with 
SWERI and fund their key research efforts. The administration's attacks 
on these agencies threaten the very existence of current SWERI and the 
viability of the new Utah site.
  We need sustained investment for research to protect our communities 
and landscapes, and the administration's proposed level of investment 
would certainly not be sufficient to support the existing program, let 
alone the expansion proposed by this bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge support for this legislation, but I also call 
upon my colleagues to join us in standing up to this administration's 
reckless cuts.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. STAUBER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from 
Utah (Mr. Kennedy), the lead sponsor of this bill.
  Mr. KENNEDY of Utah. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my bill, 
H.R. 1045, the Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act of 2025.
  Utah is in a wildfire crisis. Our unique environment makes wildfires 
a constant danger. It is common to drive down I-15, a major 
thoroughfare in Utah, in the warm months and see fire on the side of 
our beautiful mountains.
  In 2004, Congress created three regional centers in Arizona, 
Colorado, and New Mexico dedicated to strengthening forest health and 
reducing wildfire risk. These centers, now collectively known as the 
Southwest Ecological Restoration Institutes, or SWERI, serve as hubs 
for research, data sharing, and on-the-ground collaboration. They bring 
together the expertise of our universities with the experience of 
State, local, and Federal land managers.
  Since 2004, Utah has had over 23,000 wildfires and over 3 million 
acres burned. These aren't mere statistics but represent impacted 
livelihoods, damaged watersheds, strained emergency responders, and 
long-term burdens on our economy, infrastructure, and public safety.
  These fires have scarred our lands and endangered our growing 
population. For us in Utah, the next major wildfire is not a question 
of if but when and how devastating it will be.
  That is why the Utah Wildfire Research Institute Act is essential. By 
passing this bill, Congress has the opportunity to strengthen how we 
understand, prevent, and respond to wildfire in the Mountain West.

[[Page H5878]]

  As the only Four Corners State to not have a SWERI facility, it is 
only right for Utah to have a dedicated hub focused on the wildfire 
challenges facing Utah and the surrounding States.
  It will allow our universities, firefighters, land managers, and 
Federal partners to work together. It will help us understand fire 
behavior in high-elevation deserts. It will support innovations in fuel 
management, post-fire watershed recovery, and community resilience. 
More importantly, the Utah wildfire institute will ensure that we are 
not simply reacting to each crisis as it comes but planning ahead.
  This bill reflects what Utahns already know, that collaboration, 
science-based planning, and proactive management are the most effective 
tools we have to protect our land and our people. It is a vote for 
safer communities, healthier forests and rangelands, and responsible 
stewardship of the places that we call home.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the Utah Wildfire 
Research Institute Act as this investment will protect Utah for 
generations to come.

                              {time}  1620

  Mr. HERNANDEZ. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this 
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. STAUBER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, this legislation is straightforward. It builds on the 
proven success of the Southwest Ecological Restoration Institutes in 
Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico by finally extending this important 
program to Utah.
  Establishing a SWERI in Utah will expand wildlife research, 
strengthen collaboration with land managers, and provide new tools to 
improve forest health and reduce catastrophic wildfires. I urge my 
colleagues to support Representative Kennedy's bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Stauber) that the House suspend the rules 
and pass the bill, H.R. 1045.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________