[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 210 (Friday, December 12, 2025)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1193]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OPPOSITION TO PERMITTING BILLS
______
HON. BETTY McCOLLUM
of minnesota
in the house of representatives
Friday, December 12, 2025
Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the slate of
permitting bills that the Republican majority has brought to the House
Floor this week. These bills roll back vital protections that ensure
our constituents have access to clean air and water, and can weigh in
on projects that will affect the health of their selves, their
families, and their community.
Make no mistake, the six bills before the House this week are not a
commonsense, bipartisan permitting package. They are the latest attempt
for President Trump and Congressional Republicans to roll back
protections for our environment so that their big oil and gas friends
can ``drill, baby, drill'' without consequence or punishment.
Republicans claim that H.R. 3893, the PERMIT Act, just cuts
unnecessary bureaucratic red tape. That is false. In reality, the
PERMIT Act is a partisan package of over a dozen bills that roll back
the Clean Water Act, further weakening protections on our rivers,
lakes, streams, and wetlands. This bill protects polluters from
responsibility for treating toxic pollution in their waste stream like
lead, mercury, selenium, PFAS, and arsenic. If enacted, the PERMIT Act
will lead to an increase in the unregulated discharge of these harmful
chemicals into local bodies of water.
In addition to the PERMIT Act, House Republicans have brought five
additional bills forward that will raise prices for consumers and
prioritize polluters over the American people. Let me tell you just how
bad these bills are:
H.R. 3668 would strip states of their ability to enforce their own
clean water laws concerning natural gas pipelines.
H.R. 3628 would force states to show arbitrary preference for fossil
fuels over clean, cheap energy.
H.R. 3638 would require the Department of Energy (DOE) to issue a
supply chain report, asking DOE to do more with less after Elon Musk
and DOGE forced out 3,500 DOE employees and put the agency's capacity
to write such a report in doubt. If Republicans are concerned about
energy supply chains, they should start by repealing the One Big
Beautiful Bill Act, which attacked tax credits and programs designed to
strengthen our supply chains.
H.R. 3616 would grant the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
unprecedented power to veto or demand changes to any federal agency
action, including environmental rules.
H.R. 3632 would force old, expensive power plants to stay online for
up to five years after their scheduled retirement date, sending
already-high electricity bills through the roof.
Mr. Speaker, these bills do not exist in a vacuum. We are considering
these bills in the wake of Trump Administration actions to cancel and
stall clean energy projects. In October, President Trump canceled over
$7.5 billion in grants for 223 clean energy projects. President Trump
canceled over $714 million in funding for Minnesota. These grants would
have funded battery storage for a more stable grid, modernized
transmission lines, and funded a battery recycling education program at
Macalester College.
My Republican colleagues want to talk about permitting reform? Let's
talk about how President Trump is weaponizing the existing permitting
process to freeze the approval of permits for onshore wind and solar
projects, leaving thousands of megawatts of clean power in limbo at a
time when demand for electricity is sky rocking. If Republicans succeed
in passing these bills and gutting protections for our communities and
environment, it will mean that oil and gas companies have an easier
pathway to polluting the land, air, and water we all rely on.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose all six of these bills. I
once again urge the Republican House Majority to stop bringing these
harmful bills that fast-track fossil fuel projects, restrict
communities' ability to challenge harmful development, and work to
undermine clean energy development. This is not the way to improve
Americans' lives.
____________________