[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 209 (Thursday, December 11, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8661-S8663]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                               Healthcare

  Mr. HAGERTY. Mr. President, I rise today to speak about the 
unaffordability of healthcare, a crisis created and perpetuated by my 
Democrat colleagues across the aisle.
  Fifteen years ago, without a single Republican vote, congressional 
Democrats authored and signed into law the so-called Affordable Care 
Act, also known as ObamaCare.
  Ever since, congressional Democrats, without Republican support, have 
continued to prop up this failed system with tax credits and bogus 
incentives to hide a broken foundation. Congressional Democrats even 
expanded these tax credits under the guise of the pandemic--again, on a 
wholly partisan basis--not once but twice, which included setting a 
deadline for their expiration this year.
  Now they are expecting the American public to believe that 
Republicans are culpable--culpable--for what the Democrats have done. 
They have clearly broken the system.
  When ObamaCare passed in 2010, Democrats promised the American people 
that this legislation would make insurance affordable. Sadly, this 
promise has gone unfulfilled. I have heard from constituents across my 
home State of Tennessee who are grappling with the realities of this 
broken system.
  In 2014, the premium for a benchmark plan was $197. That is 2014. In 
2026, that premium is expected to be $711. That is an increase of 260 
percent.
  As if this wasn't enough evidence, take the story from a constituent 
in East Tennessee who is self-employed. He and wife own and operate a 
consulting firm. For his family of three, their insurance premium for 
the exact same plan they had this year will increase from $1,400 a 
month to $2,200 a month; no new coverage, no additional family members, 
just higher cost from an inefficient and fraud-ridden system that is 
collapsing under its own weight.
  This is not affordable health insurance. If health insurance were 
truly affordable, then Tennesseans like the one I just mentioned would 
not be forced to rely on taxpayer subsidies just to afford their 
monthly premium, not to mention out-of-pocket costs, copays, and 
coinsurance.
  Beyond affordability, the Democrats promised to ``fix'' the 
healthcare system without adding to the national deficit. Their reforms 
were supposed to lower the deficit by more than $100 billion. Instead, 
according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, ObamaCare 
has cost taxpayers an additional $1.3 trillion. The deficit has 
continued to grow, with healthcare spending being a driver of that 
deficit.
  Welcome to socialism, my friends.
  ObamaCare was supposed to ``end abuses by insurance companies'' and 
create what they call a ``robust and competitive'' marketplace.
  Well, ObamaCare has been nothing but a profit-making machine for 
insurance companies. ObamaCare has funded tens of billions of dollars, 
especially in pandemic-era subsidies, directly to insurance companies. 
And we have seen insurance companies' profits balloon to historic 
levels.
  Now, let's talk about the fraud that prevails in the ObamaCare 
system. We will never have a competitive marketplace when that 
marketplace is riddled with fraud.
  As a test for the ease and the extent of the fraud that plagues 
ObamaCare, the GAO created applications for fictitious individuals--all 
using invalid information--and submitted these fake applications to the 
Federal ObamaCare exchanges for enrollment. The results--shocking.
  Of the 24 invalid applications that were submitted, 23 of them--that 
is more than 95 percent of the applications--were wrongly approved for 
subsidized health insurance. Get that. Over 95 percent of these 
fraudulent applications were approved to be subsidized in ObamaCare.
  As of this September, 18 of the 20 fake enrollees for 2025 are still 
covered. Not only did the ObamaCare exchange not identify these 
fraudulent identities, but insurers didn't either. Why? Well, perhaps 
it is because those 18 applicants paid more than $10,000 per month to 
the insurance companies for these nonexistent patients. The money 
wasn't paid to the patients. The money was paid directly to the 
insurance companies to the tune of $10,000 each. No wonder the 
insurance companies aren't complaining. No costs, no services provided; 
it all falls to the bottom-line profitability of the insurers when this 
happens.
  The solution to this floundering system, created by the Democrats 
without a single Republican vote, is certainly not what Democrats have 
proposed today. They want to continue wasting Americans' hard-earned 
dollars.
  Earlier today on the Senate floor there was a stark difference of 
views. On one side, Senate Democrats proposed a 3-year extension along 
with the repeal of anti-fraud provisions that we passed during the 
Working Families Tax Cut. More fraud, more waste, more ill-obtained 
profits for insurers. This unserious, partisan proposal would cost a 
whopping $83 billion. It would not

[[Page S8662]]

lower premiums for 93 percent of Americans by a single cent. I opposed 
that effort.
  Instead, Republicans are offering real solutions, solutions that will 
lower benchmark premiums by 11 percent, save $30 billion by 
appropriating cost-sharing reductions, and empower patients to make 
their own healthcare decisions.
  There are further Republican solutions being debated right now, 
solutions that add serious fraud protections and ensure that wealthy 
Americans are not receiving taxpayer subsidies, solutions that ensure 
no Federal funds are used for abortions; that ensure illegal immigrants 
aren't accessing these credits to free-ride and overwhelm the American 
healthcare system.
  I hope my Democratic colleagues will stop playing their political 
games and begin to work with Republicans to actually lower the cost of 
healthcare for the American people.
  Mr. President, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk called the roll.
  Ms. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Ms. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, there has been a lot of discussion 
today following the votes on the floor this morning about healthcare 
and healthcare costs.
  It was just about a year ago exactly--it was December 12 of last 
year--I spoke to a reporter from Alaska, and we were talking about just 
the staggering costs of healthcare costs and what we were seeing with 
the rise at that time. I pointed out to this reporter that Alaska had 
already seen 3 years of premium increases that exceeded 50 percent in 
total. This was putting a pressure on individual and household budgets 
in a way that people were telling me that this is an unsustainable 
trend.
  I said then that we are going to have to address the issue of the 
enhanced premium tax credits at the Federal level. We are going to need 
to address the fact that these come to an end at the end of this 
calendar year. And I said then we have got a year to kind of figure 
this out, to buy time to pursue what I feel is important, and that is 
true reform--some of the long-term reforms that will not just help us 
address the cost of health insurance but, more importantly, the overall 
cost of healthcare in this country. That is the driver there. That is 
the problem.
  So that was about a year ago--almost exactly a year ago, and yet here 
we are. Little has changed. Key transparency in legislation remains 
stalled. Too many Alaskans are facing premium increases that are now 
approaching 500 percent. Think about what that means. I have shared 
with some colleagues a text that I received from a friend of mine in 
Fairbanks, and she and her husband will be looking at the potential for 
premiums in the range of $36,000. Nobody--nobody that I know of--can 
afford premiums for $36,000.
  So we know we have got a job here in the Congress. We know that we 
have to address this issue of rising costs to healthcare. But what we 
are facing right now, literally, on this 11th day of December, the 
immediate issue is this expiration of the enhanced premium tax credits 
and this cliff that is in front of thousands of Alaskans--about 24,000 
Alaskans. Millions of Americans are facing this.
  So this morning we saw what we saw. The Senate voted on two dueling 
healthcare proposals to address this healthcare cliff. Both proposals 
were partisan in nature. Neither one was written in a committee setting 
or reported through what we refer to as the regular order process. 
Unfortunately, neither really included any attempt at compromise. 
Neither tried to gain the support from the other side or to address 
perhaps the very valid concerns that were raised by the other side, and 
so it is no surprise that we are where we are, which is two failed 
votes on the Senate floor.

  And those measures failed. But, Mr. President, I would just suggest 
that we have failed. We have failed. This institution here in this 
Senate, we failed to work together. We failed to reach consensus. We 
failed to help all those who are facing these, shockingly, completely 
unaffordable increases in their healthcare premiums as they are looking 
at the new year.
  We voted on a Democratic proposal as part of the agreement that 
allowed us to reopen the Federal Government after a record-setting but 
ultimately a pointless 43-day shutdown. And the headline of that 
measure was that it would extend the current subsidies for 3 years.
  Unfortunately--unfortunately--there is no recognition of the much 
needed reforms. The two speakers preceding me both pointed out there 
are flaws in the existing system. If we are going to be addressing a 
program and a continuation of it, I think it is our responsibility to 
make sure that we are making sure that these programs don't have ways--
that they are not being abused.
  We also voted on a Republican proposal which would have prefunded 
health savings accounts. This is something that so many Americans are 
very familiar with, but it would allow for Americans to receive dollars 
more directly in their hands, to go in their pockets for their own care 
while also funding cost-sharing reductions projected to reduce premium 
costs down the line and some other provisions. But it was good work by 
the chairman of the HELP Committee as well working with the chairman of 
the Finance Committee. And I was encouraged by what we were beginning 
to see there, but there were flaws, quite honestly, with that approach 
as well.
  So where did I end up? I ended up voting in favor of the motion to 
proceed to both of these proposals, but I want to be clear here. It is 
not because I fully endorse the Democratic proposal and I fully endorse 
the Republican proposal. Neither of the proposals, in fairness, met the 
challenge, as far as I am concerned.
  The Democratic proposal would have extended the status quo under the 
Affordable Care Act which, as we have heard, has failed to restrain 
costs, and it has done so for longer than necessary to build the 
stability that I think we need to develop better policy.
  More importantly, it included no reforms--no reforms whatsoever. We 
have seen examples of how the system has been abused, and as stewards 
of Federal taxpayer dollars, it is incumbent on us to address matters 
like that.
  So making sure that there were legitimate reforms, making sure that 
we don't set up another cliff just like we would have done under the 
Democratic proposal--it would have set up another cliff in 2029. And 
that cliff would look even more staggering if we just continued to 
allow and subsidize unchecked premium growth.
  And then on the Republican proposal over here, again, I give credit 
to the authors of that measure because it did focus on some longer term 
reforms that I do believe can help people over time. But what it didn't 
address was the immediate situation that folks are facing: this 
immediate cliff, the imminent pain that is going to come with this 
massive spike in premiums in Alaska.
  Again, maybe it is more extreme in other States, but we are still one 
of the 50 States. And when you are talking about premium increases that 
are doubling or, in many cases, tripling, that is not sustainable. So 
we had a proposal that had its flaws. There were also some provisions 
in the Republican bill that we know were not going to garner support 
from across the aisle.
  And I guess where I am today--as most Members have left the Chamber, 
have left the building, they are going back to their States for the 
weekend--we are leaving with unfinished business, and this is something 
that we have known was coming for a long time, for a long time. It is 
not like this just crept up on us. We had a chance to address it in 
budget reconciliation, but we couldn't agree to do so. We were told: 
No, no, no. You know, we have got a lot of time on that. We will do it 
later.
  That would have been a win on healthcare. We would have avoided this 
anxiety that we are in right now. We had a chance to address it, to 
avoid or end the shutdown. The same story; we weren't able to do that, 
and so we let the clock run. We wait and we wait and we settle for 
competing proposals, and now we are where we predicted--where I 
predicted we would be. We failed in both, and nobody wins from that. 
Nobody wins from this either politically and certainly not in real 
life.

[[Page S8663]]

  As I was coming over here, I asked some of the folks that were with 
me--and I said: What day is Festivus Day? Festivus, for those who are 
not familiar, is kind of like the day of grievances, which apparently 
is December 23, just before Christmas. I am not here to do a preemption 
of Festivus and just air grievances because I don't think that is what 
people want us to do here.
  I think they want us to try to figure out, OK, you have demonstrated 
what you can't do. Now, can you demonstrate what you can do? And that 
is where I want to put us. I refuse to accept that where we are right 
now, which is two failed bills, is the best that we can do.
  I voted to proceed to both proposals, not because they solve the 
problem, not because they are great policy, but because I think they 
kind of represented the least bad options available to us at this 
eleventh hour and because I think we should be talking about it. We 
should be debating them, amending them, having an opportunity to do so 
on the floor, and seeing if we can't make some progress there. 
Sometimes out in the open gets us somewhere--not too often these days. 
But I will tell you the alternative, which is doing nothing and letting 
people--really letting people suffer here, I think, is worse.
  So, again, today, we showed the country what we can't do, but I 
wanted to show that there are bipartisan votes in the Senate that are 
eager, that are anxious for a bipartisan compromise. And I don't think 
it is too late for that. It is December 11 here. The year is not over. 
Our session is not over. I agree that we don't have a lot of time, and 
we know that. But I think we can still come up with something that, 
again, would give people in this country comfort knowing that my 
premiums are not going to double and triple in the calendar year 2026.
  So that is exactly what I am hoping the Senate is going to do and 
what I challenge every one of us to focus on before we adjourn this 
year.
  And it is not like we are starting from scratch here. The ingredients 
for what we are going to need have been out there. We just need to get 
them all together and figure out how we are going to bake this. I think 
we know a lot of the work has already been done. We know the general 
contours of what an agreement could look like.
  By my count, there are no fewer than eight plans that are out there. 
There are probably more than that that we can draw from. You have got 
the Democratic bill that we saw, which was the 3-year offering. You saw 
the Cassidy-Crapo effort. Senators Moreno and Collins have a proposal. 
I have put forward a proposal. Senator Rick Scott has, and Senator 
Hawley, Senator Marshall, Senator Husted. There is a lot that is out 
there. And so many have been speaking about this for so long now.
  I have put legislation on the table, a 2-year extension of the 
premium tax credits, to buy us time to avoid this situation. I have 
also proposed ways to address it in both budget reconciliation and in 
my frameworks, when we were trying to figure out how we handle the 
shutdown. So there is not a lot of new stuff out here. We know what the 
component pieces are.
  And it is not just in this body. Look at what is happening down the 
hall here.
  Two--two--bipartisan proposals by Members of the House, and they are 
circulating for signatures so that they might be able to discharge and 
be able to move this. To me, I think that is really significant. You 
have got Members in the House that are coming together, and they are 
going to stand out and put their name up front on a bipartisan effort. 
Maybe, it is not everything that they want, but they are willing to put 
something out there because they believe that the American people 
demand and deserve a solution.
  And so I am encouraged. I am really encouraged by the momentum that 
we are seeing coming out of the other body as a way out.
  And so if you take time to look at the proposals that are out there, 
you can see where we need to go. You can see where there is overlap. 
You can see where there are areas that serve as the foundation for an 
agreement. I think there are so many that agree that we have got to 
have some extension of an enhanced premium tax credit. Maybe it is not 
3 years. Maybe it is. We know it is at least 1 year. Perhaps it is 2 
years.
  Most agree on the need for reasonable reforms to ensure that these 
credits are going to go to those who need them most and to protect the 
taxpayers who foot the bill from the waste, fraud, and abuse, because 
we know that that is real. We have to address that. We have got some 
good measures, good ideas on what to do there. They are already 
written. We can plug them into a bipartisan measure.
  And there is consensus for reasonable limits on who can receive the 
credits and an understanding that reforms need to be made, again, to 
reduce the fraud in the system.
  And I think we can do some of that through some of the program 
integrity reforms and by addressing plans where the customer is not 
currently paying any premium whatsoever.
  So, again, I acknowledge the great work that Senator Cassidy has put 
forward with proposing solutions that give families options here when 
it comes to their healthcare choices.
  So here we are on December 11. We have taken the partisan votes, and 
now we need to move forward. We need to develop a bipartisan product 
based on what we do agree on. And I firmly believe--I firmly believe--
that it is in our reach, if we try, but to get there in this short 
period that we have in front of us, we have got to remember that none 
of us get to design this on our own. None of us will get exactly 
everything we want. The time for that is over.
  We have proven that no specific plan of that nature has the kind of 
support that we need. So we have got to do better. We have got to do 
better. We can't just say: Happy holidays. Brace for next year. That is 
our message to you.
  We need to focus on the people who are going to be hurt if we do 
nothing, and we need to set aside the politics and the partisanship 
that are preventing us from helping them.
  I think there is still a consensus to be had here, and know that I 
stand at the ready to do everything that I can to help in that effort 
before we adjourn at the end of this year.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Washington.