[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 209 (Thursday, December 11, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H5787-H5789]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RAISING A QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of the
privileges of the House and offer the resolution that was previously
noticed.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the resolution.
The Clerk read as follows:
H. Res. 939
Resolved, That Donald John Trump, President of the United
States, is an abuser of Presidential power who, if left in
office, will continue to promote the incitement of violence,
engender invidious hate, undermine our democracy, and
dissolve our Republic, that he is impeached for high crimes
and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of
impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:
Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of
Representatives of the United States of America in the name
of itself and of the people of the United States of America,
against Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of
America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment
against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.
article i: abuse of presidential power by calling for the execution of
members of congress
In his conduct of the office of President of the United
States, Donald John Trump, in violation of his constitutional
oath to faithfully execute the office of the President of the
United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States,
and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that
the laws be faithfully executed, has unfaithfully,
dangerously, and unconstitutionally abused his official
position by threatening Democratic lawmakers in Congress with
execution.
President Trump called for the execution of six Democratic
lawmakers, all of whom are currently serving in the U.S.
Senate or U.S. House of Representatives and who previously
served in the U.S. Military or in U.S. Intelligence
communities, in response to a short video that they posted on
November 18, 2025. In their video, the Democratic lawmakers
appropriately urged current members of the military and
intelligence communities to adhere to the Constitution and
the laws of our country. They specifically said: ``Like us,
you all swore an oath to protect and defend this
Constitution. Right now, the threats to our Constitution
aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. You can
refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders. No one
has to carry out orders that violate the law or our
Constitution.''
On November 20, 2025, in response, President Trump called
for their execution. In one social media post, he wrote:
``It's called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL. Each
one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND
PUT ON TRIAL. Their words cannot be allowed to stand--We
won't have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET.
President DJT.'' In another, he wrote of the lawmakers:
``SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!'' Dangerously and
unconstitutionally, he reposted a third party's post: ``HANG
THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD!!''
President Trump's call for the execution of lawmakers is a
reckless and flagrant abuse
[[Page H5788]]
of Presidential power that promotes extra-judicial punishment
and the assassination of Members of Congress, and warrants
impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives and trial by
the Senate.
article ii: abuse of presidential power to intimidate federal judges in
violation of the separation of powers and independence of the judiciary
In his conduct of the office of President of the United
States, Donald John Trump, in violation of his constitutional
oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the
United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States,
and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that
the laws be faithfully executed, has unfaithfully,
dangerously, and unconstitutionally abused his official
position by threatening Federal judges.
President Trump has fostered a political climate in which
lawmakers and judges face threats of political violence and
physical assault; and in this climate has made threats and
vituperative comments against Federal judges, putting at risk
their safety and well-being, and undermining the independence
of our judiciary.
Case in point, in response to a Federal district court
ruling with which President Trump disagreed, he posted:
``This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and
agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was
not elected President . . . This judge, like many of the
Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be
IMPEACHED!!!''
Another U.S. District Chief Judge has reported receiving
increased numbers of violent threats, particularly after he
began hearing arguments in a lawsuit against the Trump
administration.
In 2025, roughly a third of the Federal judiciary has been
flooded with threats, with data showing that these threats
spike each time Trump uses abusive rhetoric against judges.
On May 2, 2025, Reuters reported that U.S. Supreme Court
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson addressed President Donald
Trump's attacks on the judiciary. The relevant part of the
article stated as follows:
``(1) ``U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
said on Thursday attacks by Republican President Donald Trump
and his allies on judges were `not random' and seemed
`designed to intimidate the judiciary.''
``(2) Specifically, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Jackson
remarked that, ``The attacks are not random. They seem
designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical
capacity.''
``(3) Justice Jackson added, ``The threats and harassment
are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government.
And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the
rule of law.''.
The judiciary is afforded power over ``all Cases, in Law
and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the
United States, and Treaties made'' and ``to Controversies to
which the United States shall be a Party.'' U.S. Const. art.
III, sec. 2. Intimidating judges, and recklessly calling for
the impeachment and removal of judges who disagree with him
demonstrate a willingness by Trump to usurp authority
afforded by our Constitution to the judiciary and demonstrate
a disregard for the Constitution and the careful balance of
powers that protects our country from abuses by any single
branch.
President Trump's threats place the lives of Federal
judges, court officials, and innocent bystanders at risk,
promote the incitement of violence, and undermine our
democracy, which cannot survive where President Trump's
incendiary comments engender invidious hate and where dissent
is punishable by death.
In all of this, Donald John Trump has acted in a manner
contrary to his trust as President and subversive of
constitutional government to the great prejudice of the cause
of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people
of the United States.
Wherefore Donald John Trump, by such conduct, warrants
impeachment, trial, and removal from office.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The resolution qualifies.
Motion to Table
Mr. SCALISE. Mr. Speaker, I have a motion desk.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion.
The Clerk read as follows:
Mr. Scalise of Louisiana moves to lay the resolution on the
table.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion to table.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
Announcement By the Speaker Pro Tempore
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, this 15-
minute vote on the motion to table will be followed by 5-minute votes
on:
Passage of H.R. 3628; and
Passage of H.R. 3638.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 237,
nays 140, answered ``present'' 47, not voting 9, as follows:
[Roll No. 322]
YEAS--237
Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei (NV)
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Barr
Barrett
Baumgartner
Bean (FL)
Begich
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs (AZ)
Biggs (SC)
Bilirakis
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Bresnahan
Buchanan
Burchett
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Costa
Crane
Crank
Crawford
Crenshaw
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davidson
Davis (NC)
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Downing
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Evans (CO)
Ezell
Fallon
Fedorchak
Feenstra
Figures
Fine
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Fong
Foxx
Franklin, Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Garbarino
Gill (TX)
Golden (ME)
Goldman (TX)
Gonzales, Tony
Gonzalez, V.
Gooden
Goodlander
Gosar
Gottheimer
Graves
Gray
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Hamadeh (AZ)
Haridopolos
Harrigan
Harris (MD)
Harris (NC)
Harshbarger
Hern (OK)
Higgins (LA)
Hill (AR)
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Hurd (CO)
Issa
Jack
Jackson (TX)
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kean
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kennedy (UT)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley (CA)
Kim
Knott
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Langworthy
Larsen (WA)
Latta
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Lee (NV)
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Mackenzie
Malliotakis
Maloy
Mann
Massie
Mast
McCaul
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McDonald Rivet
McDowell
McGuire
Messmer
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Moolenaar
Moore (AL)
Moore (NC)
Moore (UT)
Moore (WV)
Moran
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Onder
Owens
Palmer
Panetta
Patronis
Perez
Perry
Pfluger
Reschenthaler
Riley (NY)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Roy
Rulli
Scalise
Schmidt
Scholten
Schrier
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Shreve
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stanton
Stauber
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Stutzman
Suozzi
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner (OH)
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Epps
Van Orden
Vindman
Wagner
Walberg
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Westerman
Wied
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke
NAYS--140
Adams
Amo
Ansari
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bishop
Bonamici
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Carbajal
Carson
Carter (LA)
Casar
Castro (TX)
Chu
Cisneros
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Correa
Craig
Crockett
Davis (IL)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dexter
Dingell
Doggett
Elfreth
Escobar
Espaillat
Evans (PA)
Fletcher
Foushee
Friedman
Frost
Garamendi
Garcia (CA)
Garcia (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jacobs
Jayapal
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (TX)
Kamlager-Dove
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy (NY)
Khanna
Krishnamoorthi
Larson (CT)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Liccardo
Lofgren
Lynch
Magaziner
Mannion
Matsui
McBride
McClain Delaney
McGarvey
McGovern
McIver
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Min
Moore (WI)
Morrison
Moulton
Mullin
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Olszewski
Omar
Pettersen
Pingree
Pocan
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Randall
Raskin
Rivas
Ross
Ruiz
Ryan
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sherman
Simon
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Stansbury
Stevens
Strickland
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Velazquez
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson Coleman
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)
ANSWERED ``PRESENT''--47
Aguilar
Bell
Bera
Beyer
Bynum
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Clark (MA)
Conaway
Courtney
DeLauro
DelBene
Fields
Foster
Frankel, Lois
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Jeffries
Kaptur
Landsman
Latimer
Levin
Lieu
McBath
McClellan
McCollum
Meeks
[[Page H5789]]
Morelle
Moskowitz
Mrvan
Pallone
Pappas
Pelosi
Peters
Pou
Schneider
Sewell
Soto
Subramanyam
Sykes
Tran
Veasey
Walkinshaw
Whitesides
NOT VOTING--9
Donalds
Gillen
Gimenez
James
Meuser
Nadler
Rutherford
Salazar
Swalwell
{time} 1408
Messrs. SMITH of Washington, CORREA, Ms. STEVENS, and Mr. MAGAZINER
changed their vote from ``yea'' to ``nay.''
Mr. COSTA, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, and Mr. VAN ORDEN changed their vote
from ``nay'' to ``yea.''
Mrs. McBATH, Mr. COURTNEY, Mses. DeLAURO, HOULAHAN, Messrs. SOTO, and
MOSKOWITZ changed their vote from ``yea'' to ``present.''
Messrs. LANDSMAN, CASE, and PAPPAS changed their vote from ``nay'' to
``present.''
So the motion to table was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
Stated for:
Mr. MEUSER. Mr. Speaker, had I been present, I would have voted YEA
on Roll Call No. 322.
Mr. JAMES. Mr. Speaker, had I been present, I would have voted YEA on
Roll Call No. 322.
____________________