[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 201 (Tuesday, December 2, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H4989-H4992]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




    DESTROYING UNNECESSARY, MISALIGNED, AND PROHIBITIVE RED TAPE ACT

  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 916, 
I call up the bill (H.R. 4305) to direct the Chief Counsel for Advocacy 
of the Small Business Administration to establish a Red Tape Hotline to 
receive notifications of burdensome agency rules, and for other 
purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 916, the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Small Business, printed in the bill, is adopted and the bill, as 
amended, is considered read.
  The text of the bill, as amended, is as follows:

                               H.R. 4305

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Destroying Unnecessary, 
     Misaligned, and Prohibitive Red Tape Act'' or the ``DUMP Red 
     Tape Act''.

     SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF RED TAPE HOTLINE.

       Section 203 of Public Law 94-305 (15 U.S.C. 634c) is 
     amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
       ``(c) Red Tape Hotline.--
       ``(1) Establishment.--Not later than 180 days after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Counsel for 
     Advocacy shall--
       ``(A) establish, operate, and maintain a hotline, to be 
     known as the `Red Tape Hotline' to receive a notification 
     from a small entity relating to the burden of complying with 
     a rule, guidance, policy statement, or other activity of an 
     agency that is applicable to such concern;
       ``(B) establish an email address, submission form, phone 
     number, or such other method as determined appropriate by the 
     Chief Counsel for small entities to submit such notifications 
     to such hotline; and
       ``(C) establish a website providing such email address, 
     submission form, phone number, or other method in a manner 
     that is easily accessible.
       ``(2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
     enactment of this subsection, and annually thereafter, the 
     Chief Counsel for Advocacy shall submit to the Administrator 
     of the Small Business Administration and Congress a report on 
     the Red Tape Hotline that includes--
       ``(A) the rules, guidance, policy statements, and other 
     activities for which notifications are

[[Page H4990]]

     most frequently received, including the affected industry 
     sectors for such rules, guidance, policy statements, or other 
     activities (as applicable);
       ``(B) a summary of the notifications received, including 
     the type of small entity or other organization that submitted 
     the notification and the geographic area and industry 
     category from which the notification was sent;
       ``(C) an identification of the agency that issued each such 
     rule, guidance, policy statement, or engaged in such other 
     activity, including an identification of which such rule, 
     guidance, or policy statement such agency issued or an 
     explanation of which such other activity the agency engaged 
     in, as applicable;
       ``(D) recommendations for each agency that issued such a 
     rule, guidance, policy statement, or engaged in such other 
     activity, for reducing the burden of such rule, guidance, 
     policy statement, or other activity on small entities; and
       ``(E) a summary of actions taken by the Chief Counsel to 
     address such rules, guidance, policy statements, and other 
     activities, including any such rules, guidance, policy 
     statements, or other activities (as applicable) for which the 
     Chief Counsel submitted comments or analysis.
       ``(3) Definitions.--In this subsection--
       ``(A) the term `agency' has the meaning given such term in 
     section 551 of title 5, United States Code; and
       ``(B) the terms `rule' and `small entity' have the meanings 
     given such terms, respectively, in section 601 of such 
     title.''.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The bill, as amended, shall be debatable for 
1 hour equally controlled by the chair and the ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Small Business or their respective designees.
  The gentleman from Texas (Mr. Williams) and the gentlewoman from New 
York (Ms. Velazquez) each will control 30 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Williams).


                             General Leave

  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all 
Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their 
remarks and include extraneous material on the bill under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Texas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 4305, the DUMP 
Red Tape Act, introduced by Representative Wied from the great State of 
Wisconsin.
  Mr. Speaker, entrepreneurs across America are driving our economic 
growth, but too often they are forced to fight through layers of red 
tape just to keep their doors open. Every day, small businesses deal 
with outdated, duplicative, or unclear regulations that make it harder 
for them to hire, grow, and innovate.
  Since 1976, the SBA Office of Advocacy has served as a voice for 
small businesses across the country. The Office of Advocacy works to 
encourage small business success through the government's legislative, 
regulatory, and administrative process. When it comes to regulatory 
costs, Office of Advocacy is equipped to represent the interests of 
small businesses at the Federal level.
  To make this easier, Office of Advocacy launched the Red Tape 
Hotline, a necessary resource that gives small businesses a direct, 
real-time way to report burdensome regulations that are holding them 
back.
  The Red Tape Hotline empowers small business owners to speak up and 
help Office of Advocacy hold Federal agencies accountable for the red 
tape that is crushing their day-to-day operations.
  The Red Tape Hotline was created by following President Trump's 
executive order, ``Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation.'' The 
DUMP Red Tape Act codifies the executive order and ensures that small 
businesses always have a reliable channel to be heard.
  This bill strengthens Office of Advocacy's ability to deliver small 
business concerns directly to Congress, ensuring that we have the real-
world data which we need to push for smarter, more effective regulatory 
policies.
  While the public can submit comments to proposed rules, this Red Tape 
Hotline provides small businesses the opportunity to provide feedback 
on the true burden of compliance with active regulations.
  This bill also requires Office of Advocacy to submit an annual report 
to Congress summarizing the notifications received through the hotline. 
By strengthening and formalizing this process, Congress will receive a 
clear picture of how Federal regulations affect different types of 
businesses nationwide. This will help ensure that Congress is acting on 
accurate, real-world information.
  Some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle may argue that 
the hotline improperly focuses on burdensome regulations rather than 
collecting positive feedback, but it is simple: The purposes of this 
tool is to identify obstacles that need attention, and regulations that 
function well do not require intervention.
  Small businesses are not asking us to preserve the status quo. They 
are asking to eliminate the barriers that prevent them from thriving. 
By isolating problematic rules, we empower Congress and Federal 
agencies to focus time and resources where they are needed most, while 
still preserving the regulations that work.
  The DUMP Red Tape Act strengthens our commitment to a pro-job, pro-
innovation economy by ensuring that Federal agencies remain accountable 
and responsive to the needs of Main Street.
  Mr. Speaker, with that in mind, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' 
on H.R. 4305, and I reserve the balance of my time.

                              {time}  1530

  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 4305, the Destroying 
Unnecessary, Misaligned, and Prohibitive Red Tape Act, or the DUMP Red 
Tape Act. While H.R. 4305 is less objectionable than the other anti-
regulatory bills, it is simply not necessary.
  To begin with, a deregulatory hotline already exists on 
regulations.gov. Establishing another creates duplication and drains 
SBA resources. Isn't this contrary to everything Republicans, the 
administration, and the recently dissolved DOGE effort tried to 
prevent, duplicity?
  More concerning, the proposal hasn't been vetted properly. In the 
first 100-day report, the Office of Advocacy indicated there were 96 
small business submissions and, more recently, reported there were 301 
submissions. Yet, despite repeated requests for more information, the 
Office of Advocacy has failed to provide any specific information about 
this request to the committee--Democrats and Republicans.
  We have no way of knowing if the submissions are related to rules. 
They could have easily been about tariffs or unpaid invoices to 
contractors.
  To the best of my knowledge, the Office of Advocacy has not weighed 
in with the administration, which raises concern over its lack of 
independence from the administration.
  Turning to the specifics, the bill lacks adequate reporting 
mechanisms to identify who is making the submissions, leaving it 
vulnerable to abuse and unable to differentiate between a small 
business, trade organization, or law firm. The bill focuses on the 
costs of regulations, not the benefits, which greatly outweigh the 
costs.
  For these reasons, I oppose the bill. It is important to note that I 
said to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle that if we can get 
information from the Office of Advocacy as to what small businesses are 
actually submitting and the mechanics of the hotline to ensure 
independence, I would be willing to work with them. Instead, the bill 
is being rammed through the House to score political points.
  I urge my colleagues to oppose the bill and focus on real solutions 
to lift up small businesses during these troubling economic times.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may 
consume to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Wied).
  Mr. WIED. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my bill, H.R. 4305, 
the Destroying Unnecessary, Misaligned, and Prohibitive Red Tape Act, 
also known as the DUMP Red Tape Act.
  For too long, America's small businesses have been buried under 
costly regulations. After suffering through 4 years of regulatory 
onslaught by the Biden administration, totaling nearly $1.8 trillion in 
new costs and requiring an additional 360 million hours to comply with 
these new regulations, small businesses are desperate for regulatory 
relief.

[[Page H4991]]

  A report published last December by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce 
found that over half of small business owners view the cost of 
complying with regulations as a barrier to growth.
  Small businesses are forced to navigate complex environmental 
reporting requirements, overtime and wage rules that change from one 
administration to the next, and lengthy permitting processes that can 
delay construction projects for months or even years.
  Family-owned shops face costly data privacy mandates designed for 
multinational corporations, while contractors struggle with ever-
shifting OSHA paperwork requirements that eat up their time better 
spent on the jobsite.
  Earlier this year, the Small Business Administration created the Red 
Tape Hotline under its Office of Advocacy. This hotline gives small 
businesses a seat at the table to highlight the prohibitive red tape 
regulations from across Federal agencies that hurt their ability to 
grow and compete.
  My bill takes that progress further. It codifies the hotline into law 
and requires annual reports to Congress so that we know exactly which 
rules are holding back growth and what steps are being taken to fix 
them.
  I am pleased that my bill earned the endorsement of the U.S. Chamber 
of Commerce and Associated Builders and Contractors, which recognized 
the need for a direct line of communication to the SBA for small 
businesses.
  The DUMP Red Tape Act is a commonsense way to gather input directly 
from the people most harmed by overregulation to allow Congress to take 
meaningful action.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support this important 
piece of legislation and stand with America's small businesses.
  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to 
the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Walkinshaw).
  Mr. WALKINSHAW. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this bill. 
Codifying the so-called Red Tape Hotline, an anonymous inbox, the 
contents of which, as the ranking member articulated, we know virtually 
nothing about, will do nothing to help small businesses.
  While the majority is busy claiming to fight bureaucracy by creating 
new bureaucracy, they are ignoring the real crisis small businesses are 
begging us to address: the looming lapse of the enhanced premium tax 
credits.
  I know this because I have met with small business owners in my 
district, like Rachel Rozner, who is the owner of the Elden Tea Shop in 
Reston, not far from here, a five-person business that is exactly the 
kind of Main Street business that the majority claims to champion.
  As she told me, Rachel's business depends on the tax credits. Her tea 
shop is not an exception. It is the norm. Nearly half of all adults 
with ACA marketplace coverage are small business owners, small business 
employees, or self-employed. In many cases, the Affordable Care Act and 
the enhanced premium tax credits have given them the freedom to start 
their small business, but the Republican attacks on healthcare will 
force small businesses to close.

  Nationally, 22 million Americans, including millions of small 
business owners, will see premium hikes averaging 114 percent. Some of 
their premiums will double, triple, or even quadruple. These are 
middle-class workers. These are employees of small businesses. These 
are small business owners, the people keeping our local economies 
alive.
  Republicans keep telling us they are the party of entrepreneurs, but 
you can't be the party of entrepreneurs while you are driving up their 
healthcare costs and driving them out of business.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose this bill.
  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may 
consume to the gentlewoman from Wyoming (Ms. Hageman).
  Ms. HAGEMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the DUMP 
Red Tape Act and thank Representative Wied for his leadership on this 
crucial deregulatory initiative.
  In addition to regulations that are promulgated pursuant to the 
Administrative Procedure Act, there exists a vast scope of additional 
regulatory documents that impact small businesses. These are guidance 
documents, memoranda, bulletins, circulars, letters, and more, which 
Wayne Crews, a fellow in regulatory studies at the Competitive 
Enterprise Institute, has more properly referred to as regulatory dark 
matter.
  Only rules that are adopted pursuant to the APA actually carry the 
force of law. Yet, in practice, agencies seek to skew the intent of 
congressional law and impose other requirements through this regulatory 
dark matter, thereby avoiding compliance with the APA requirements.

                              {time}  1540

  Identifying the full scope of the regulatory state as it exists 
through this dark matter is not only a challenge for Congress and the 
agencies themselves but for our small businesses, as well.
  Under the first Trump administration, agencies cataloged or attempted 
to catalog all of these various guidance documents, but as soon as he 
took office, President Biden stripped away this essential transparency 
measure in the early days.
  The reality is that reforming the regulatory state begins with 
identifying its true magnitude, and that is an exercise which Congress 
simply cannot do alone.
  The deregulatory agenda President Trump instituted, which resulted in 
the creation of the SBA Office of Advocacy's Red Tape Hotline, captures 
this reality.
  It does so by creating a forum by which to partner with the small 
businesses of America, who can identify sector-specific regulations 
that impose undue regulatory compliance challenges and costs.
  By voting for the DUMP Red Tape Act, we can codify this hotline and 
the essential role that it plays and make permanent this partnership 
with America's small businesses in a much-needed deregulatory effort.
  Federal regulation's total compliance costs and economic effects are 
at least $2.155 trillion, which equates to over $16,000 in annual 
hidden regulatory costs to the American taxpayer. If we truly care 
about affordability, about the economy, about small businesses and 
their consumers, then there is no better policy than deregulation, and 
this bill will further empower the SBA Office of Advocacy in 
coordination with the small businesses that it represents.
  Mr. Speaker, I thank again Representative Wied and Chairman Williams 
for their leadership on this important issue, and I urge my colleagues 
to vote in favor.
  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may 
consume to the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Schmidt).
  Mr. SCHMIDT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding.
  Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to rise in support today of H.R. 4305, 
the DUMP Red Tape Act.
  I am back again on this subject with this chart that shows the growth 
and the number of pages in the Federal Register where all of the 
Federal regulations are published. It is where they are codified. That 
is where you go to look them up, and the number of pages has quadrupled 
in my lifetime.
  Let me just offer a couple of thoughts on how this bill is, in my 
view, important for small businesses to get at that problem of the 
creeping weight of Federal overregulation.
  In my district, the Second District of Kansas, the eastern part of 
the State, it is, more or less, 80 percent of the small businesses in 
the State employ 20 or fewer people. Eighty percent of them are really 
small businesses. There are about 93 percent if you go under 500 
employees. For a lot of us that sounds like a big number, in my part of 
the world, but under 20 employees, that is a small business. Those are 
the Main Street businesses we are talking about.
  I talk with a lot of people that own those businesses, that work in 
those businesses. They are all active in their communities. They 
support everything from the local sports team to the local charity to 
the local school's foundation. That is what they are focused on: making 
a living, making their business work, whatever it is they do: providing 
professional services, other services, retail items, manufacturing 
items. That is what they are focused on.

[[Page H4992]]

  They are not focused on this. They don't have an army of compliance 
attorneys and compliance consultants to help them figure out what is in 
these 200,000 pages of Federal regulation and what that means for how 
they conduct their behavior in their communities each and every day.
  Mr. Speaker, how do we figure out where to start? I think this bill 
is a very commonsense answer: Ask the people who are most affected. The 
whole point of the red tape hotline that President Trump set up and 
that this bill codifies and makes permanent is to allow the people in 
the small business world who are affected by regulatory decisions made 
in this town, our Nation's Capital, to tell somebody who has the 
ability to aggregate that information and do something about it. Let's 
bring it to the attention of lawmakers that this is where you need to 
focus. This one, of all of these, is what is making a difference in 
preventing me from adding more employees or having a little more 
liquidity so that I can maybe redo the storefront on Main Street. Maybe 
I can give a little more to the local charitable cause or maybe my 
family will just be a little bit more comfortable going into the 
holidays.
  Mr. Speaker, ask the people affected and listen to their voices. That 
is what this bill does. It makes sure we put in place a simple 
structure that is permanent so that the vagaries of this town don't 
change things on Main Street.
  Mr. Speaker, I strongly support this measure. It is just common 
sense.
  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Mr. Speaker, small businesses are being crushed by the Trump tariffs, 
and the SBA Office of Advocacy, to the best of my knowledge, has not 
conveyed their concerns to the White House.
  The Office of Advocacy is supposed to be an independent office within 
the SBA, and it is responsible for advancing the views and concerns of 
small businesses before Congress, the White House, Federal agencies, 
the Federal courts, and State and local policymakers, but it has done 
nothing on tariffs. That is particularly troubling to me and should be 
equally troubling to my friends on the other side of the aisle.
  Instead of helping small businesses that are being crushed by the 
Trump tariffs, the majority is focused on creating another deregulatory 
hotline, even though one already exists on regulations.gov. This bill 
to codify a hotline at the SBA Office of Advocacy is duplicative, 
unnecessary, and a waste of taxpayers' dollars.

  The system is clearly broken. For years, the chairman and ranking 
member of the Small Business Committee have had a strong tradition of 
working together to find common ground. That cooperation was essential 
in helping entrepreneurs launch and grow their small businesses. It is 
exactly what we are losing now.
  We are wasting valuable time today on bills that are unnecessary, 
divisive, and a waste of taxpayers' dollars.
  Unfortunately, my Republican colleagues are focused on regulatory 
bills that will not help small businesses one iota, while allowing the 
authorization for critical, vital counseling and training programs to 
lapse. It doesn't make sense. Small businesses deserve better than 
slogans over substance.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to oppose this bill, and I yield 
back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. Speaker, despite what my colleagues say, there is no hotline that 
exists exclusively for small businesses. H.R. 4305 will fix that 
problem. It will provide an avenue for small businesses to engage with 
the SBA Office of Advocacy, a voice that is focused on advocating for 
Main Street.
  This bill passed out of the committee on a bipartisan basis, and as 
chairman, I am committed to getting our Members the information they 
need to support Main Street.
  Ultimately, this information will come as an annual report to 
Congress upon enactment, but for now, we will continue to work with the 
Office of Advocacy to understand concerns from small businesses across 
the country.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.
  Pursuant to House Resolution 916, the previous question is ordered on 
the bill, as amended.
  The question is on the engrossment and third reading of the bill.
  The bill was ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, and was 
read the third time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on passage of the bill.
  The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that 
the ayes appeared to have it.
  Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further 
proceedings on this question will be postponed.

                          ____________________