[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 195 (Wednesday, November 19, 2025)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E1099-E1100]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




  OPPOSITION LETTER LED BY THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION ON THE 
 COMMON-SENSE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY NOW IN DC ACT OF 2025 
 (H.R. 5107) AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CASH BAIL REFORM ACT OF 2025 
                              (H.R. 5214)

                                 ______
                                 

                       HON. ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON

                      of the district of columbia

                    in the house of representatives

                      Wednesday, November 19, 2025

  Ms. NORTON. Mr. Speaker, today, the House of Representatives debated 
the Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 
2025 (H.R. 5107) and the District of Columbia Cash Bail Reform Act of 
2025 (H.R. 5214). I include in the Record a letter opposing these bills 
led by the American Civil Liberties Union.
                                                November 18, 2025.
     Hon. Mike Johnson,
     Speaker, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
     Hon. Hakeem Jeffries,
     Democratic Leader, House of Representatives,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Speaker Johnson and Leader Jeffries: On behalf of the 
     ACLU, ACLU DC, National Urban League, and The Bail Project we 
     write to express our opposition to the D.C. Cash Bail Reform 
     Act (H.R. 5214) and the Common Sense Law Enforcement and 
     Accountability in D.C. Now Act (H.R. 5107).
       We urge all Members to ``Vote NO'' on H.R. 5214 and H.R. 
     5107. The ACLU will score these votes.


                     The D.C. Cash Bail Reform Act

       H.R. 5214, the DC Cash Bail Reform Act, requires mandatory 
     detention on a wide range of cases and is almost certainly 
     unconstitutional under the requirements set out by the 
     Supreme Court in United States v. Salerno. This bill would 
     reverse more than 30 years of successful, data-driven 
     pretrial policy reforms in D.C. and replace it with a wealth 
     based system that fuels mass incarceration, racial 
     disparities, and benefits the 2 billion dollar bail industry.
       D.C.'s pre-trial system is grounded in individual 
     assessment, not based on wealth. The federal Pretrial 
     Services Agency for the District of Columbia evaluates each 
     person's likelihood of appearing in court and assesses 
     individualized conditions of release to support community 
     safety. The results of D.C.'s current risk and safety based 
     pretrial system outperform most cash-bail jurisdictions in 
     the country. Ninety-two percent of people released pretrial 
     in D.C. remain arrest-free before trial, 87% appear for their 
     court dates, and 86% complete the pretrial period without any 
     compliance violation.
       H.R. 5214 would replace D.C.'s current risk and safety 
     based system with a cash bail system that requires mandatory 
     detention for a wide range of conduct. Cash bail would 
     disproportionately harm Black D.C. residents. Nearly 90% of 
     the D.C. jail population and 80% of the people released 
     through the Pretrial Services Agency are Black, due to 
     systemic overpolicing. Abolishing D.C.'s pre-trial system 
     which balances risk and safety and on an individualized 
     basis, and replacing it with a cash bail system which favors 
     release for wealthy defendants and imprisons those who cannot 
     afford bail, would deepen existing racial disparities and 
     disproportionately separate Black families from their 
     communities, jobs, and housing.
       The District of Columbia has operated a successful risk and 
     safety based system for more than three decades. These 
     policies were informed by input from local stakeholders 
     including courts, prosecutors, police, and community members. 
     Congress should not override the local policy making process 
     of D.C. stakeholders and the will of D.C. residents and 
     democratically elected leaders.
       A pre-trial system that relies on regular check-ins, 
     targeted social-service referrals, and text message reminders 
     consistently outperforms cash bail systems at securing 
     appearance and protecting public safety. Maintaining housing, 
     employment, child-care, and medical care substantially 
     reduces recidivism and promotes community safety. D.C.'s 
     current pre-trial system is a calibrated approach to public 
     safety that appropriately weighs public safety risks while 
     also considering the need of individuals to maintain critical 
     supports such as housing and employment on a case by case 
     basis. In contrast, H.R. 5214 would implement a cash bail 
     system that would financially ruin many of D.C.'s lower 
     income families, force many parents, disproportionately women 
     and Black women, out of the workforce, and expose children to 
     the well-documented harms of parental detention, all of which 
     increase long-term risks to public safety and community 
     wellbeing. The D.C. Cash Bail Reform Act will harm D.C. 
     residents and will not make D.C. safer because it ignores the 
     evidence and data on pretrial detention and thirty years of 
     local input and governance.


  The Common Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability in D.C. Now Act

       H.R. 5107, the Common Sense Law Enforcement and 
     Accountability in D.C. Now Act, would repeal D.C.'s 
     Comprehensive Policing

[[Page E1100]]

     and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 (CPJRAA), which 
     enacted several recommendations to improve public safety, 
     accountability, and trust. These recommendations came from 
     the D.C. Police Reform Commission, a body of retired law 
     enforcement, community leaders, experts, and directly 
     impacted residents. Among the critical provisions that H.R. 
     5107 would repeal are reforms to officer discipline 
     processes. These reforms were recommended after several 
     officers in D.C. were reinstated despite major misconduct 
     including sexual assault and domestic violence. D.C. 
     residents, D.C. police chiefs, and the D.C. Auditor all 
     opposed the laws that H.R. 5107 would reimpose, which allowed 
     police to keep their jobs even when they committed a crime or 
     broke the law. As the D.C. Auditor reported, ``MPD management 
     expressed frustration over the reinstatement of `bad cops' 
     and concern that MPD officers are demoralized when their 
     colleagues are reinstated despite breaking the rules. They 
     suggested that officers may be more likely to engage in 
     misconduct when they believe they have a good chance of 
     overturning any resulting discipline.''
       H.R. 5107 would also repeal many other common-sense reforms 
     of D.C.'s laws that have been adopted across the country, 
     including:
       Timely and thorough investigation of incidents that involve 
     deadly use of force by an officer or a death in custody.
       Release of body camera footage in cases of serious bodily 
     injury or death in custody.
       Background checks so only highly qualified officers are 
     hired, and those who engage in misconduct cannot simply leave 
     one jurisdiction to be hired in another.
       With appropriate safeguards and limits, preservation and 
     dissemination of officer disciplinary records that are 
     subject to open records requests.
       Strengthening use of force review boards.
       Increased training, as well as clearer guidance on use of 
     force.
       Limiting the possession or use of certain military-grade 
     equipment by law enforcement agencies.
       H.R, 5107 would repeal a locally approved law that provides 
     transparency and accountability for police misconduct and 
     promotes community safety.
       For these reasons, the ACLU, ACLU DC, National Urban 
     League, and The Bail Project strongly urge Members to vote NO 
     on H.R. 5214, the DC Cash Bail Reform Act, and vote NO on 
     H.R. 5107, the Common Sense Law Enforcement and 
     Accountability in D.C. If you have any questions, please 
     contact Nina Patel, Senior Policy Counsel ACLU Justice 
     Division.
           Sincerely,
       American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties 
     Union of the District of Columbia, The Bail Project, National 
     Urban League.

                          ____________________