Congressional Record, Volume 171 Issue 191 (Wednesday, November 12, 2025)

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 191 (Wednesday, November 12, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H4595-H4609]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF SENATE AMENDMENT TO H.R. 5371,
CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS AND EXTENSIONS ACT, 2026

Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules,
I call up House Resolution 873 and ask for its immediate consideration.
The Clerk read the resolution, as follows:

H. Res. 873

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be
in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R.
5371) making continuing appropriations and extensions for
fiscal year 2026, and for other purposes, with the Senate
amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without
intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the
chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that
the House concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate
amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The
motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the
Committee on Appropriations or their respective designees.
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the
motion to its adoption without intervening motion.

The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman from Minnesota is recognized
for 1 hour.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield
the customary 30 minutes to the ranking member, the gentleman from
Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as
I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time
yielded is for the purpose of debate only.

General Leave

Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their
remarks.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentlewoman from Minnesota?
There was no objection.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, last night, the Rules Committee met and
reported a rule providing for the consideration of the motion to concur
in the Senate amendment to H.R. 5371, the Continuing Appropriations,
Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans
Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026, and I am happy to say that it will
end the government shutdown.
The rule provides 1 hour of debate on the motion equally divided and
controlled by the chair and the ranking member of the Committee on
Appropriations, or their designees.
I rise in support of this rule and the underlying legislation. This
bill delivers on our commitment to the American people by finally
reopening the government. It delivers on the promises that we have made
to our veterans, our farmers, and our taxpayers.
Let's be honest: This government shutdown was completely avoidable.
On September 19, House Republicans passed a continuing resolution that
funded critical services and would have given us time to negotiate
long-term solutions. It was a yes vote to keep the government open and
to pay our troops, air traffic controllers, and Federal employees.
Every Democrat but one voted no. Every Democrat but one voted to shut
the government down. This is not opinion, and this is not messaging
like Democrats keep trying to spin it. It is a fact that anyone can
check the vote record. Democrats voted against a nonpartisan, clean CR
free of poison pills that would have continued Biden-level funding and
kept the government open for negotiations.
Democrats chose politics over people. They refused to support a
commonsense measure, and American families paid the price.
This bill restores stability to our national nutritional programs,
which were put under unnecessary strain during the shutdown. It will
fund WIC and SNAP, ensuring that low-income mothers and their babies
have access to healthy and nutritious foods.
These programs should not have been used as a bargaining chip during
the shutdown. Republicans are stepping up to protect Americans and
ensure these programs remain stable and funded. That is what
responsible governance looks like.
There are three appropriations bills included in the CR, put here to
jump-start our appropriations process.
H.R. 5371 delivers for rural America. It provides funding for the
Farm Service Agency to support our Nation's farmers and ranchers. It
invests in rural development programs, including funding affordable
housing rental assistance for low-income families and seniors in rural
communities. These investments strengthen our local economies and
ensure that rural communities are not left behind.

{time} 1640

For our troops, this bill demonstrates our dedication to veteran
medical care, including funding for

[[Page H4596]]

mental health, telehealth services, homelessness programs, caregiver
programs, opioid misuse prevention and treatment, medical research,
healthcare tailored to our female veterans, rural healthcare
initiatives, and construction for new VA hospitals and veteran
cemeteries.
We are also funding veteran disability programs, education benefits,
and employment training. Funds will be invested in military family
housing projects to support those who support our troops and in
projects to improve quality of life for our servicemembers, including
hospitals and schools.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 5371 is what governing with a purpose looks like.
If Democrats had joined us in September to pass a commonsense
continuing resolution, we could have avoided this Democrat shutdown
altogether, but they chose reckless posturing over responsibility. Now,
Republicans are stepping up to restore stability and reopen the
government for the people.
I stand in support of this bill, and I urge my colleagues to support
H.R. 5371 and stay focused on what matters: serving the American
people.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from Minnesota
(Mrs. Fischbach) for yielding me the customary time, and I yield myself
such time as I may consume.
It is great to see you all, Mr. Speaker. We have been looking for you
guys everywhere. Where the hell have you been?
Imagine my shock when I found out that you guys went home.
Republicans have been on 8 weeks of taxpayer-funded paid vacation. Why
did Republicans do it? They did it because Democrats had the audacity
to ask them to try to lower people's healthcare costs.
While they sat on their couch for 8 weeks, we were working. We
listened to people who told us their health insurance premiums are
doubling and tripling. We heard from people who don't understand why
you guys moved at the speed of light to give tax breaks to billionaires
but won't lift a damn finger to extend the tax credits that help ensure
people's health insurance premiums don't skyrocket.
This CR, this dirty CR, which does nothing to solve the healthcare
crisis, is one of the most immoral, unethical, evil things that I have
ever seen happen in all of my time in Congress. It is just part of a
larger pattern of indifference from Republicans that we have seen time
after time after time.
When the billionaire class needed another tax cut, when they wanted
to funnel money to the people who write their campaign checks, boy, did
Republicans deliver. They rammed through their awful, big, ugly bill in
a nanosecond. What the hell is wrong with them?
While regular people are struggling to pay bills, Donald Trump's net
worth has gone up by $3 billion since he became President.
People's health insurance premiums are doubling and tripling, but
Republicans say there is no affordability crisis, even as their tariffs
are costing people an extra 1,200 bucks per year.
Regular people can't afford the rent, and Republicans are letting
Trump gild his bathroom and build a ballroom to host the rich and
powerful elites who own the GOP.
These guys are bailing out Argentina. They are giving $40 billion to
an entirely different country rather than helping the 42 million
Americans who can't afford to put food on the table.
Here is the clincher, Mr. Speaker: Buried in this CR is a corrupt
kickback for eight Republican Senators, a million-dollar payday funded
by taxpayers taken straight from the Treasury and deposited directly
into their pockets.
What the hell is wrong with this place?
They promised to put America first. The only thing you guys put first
is yourselves, yourselves and the rich and powerful people who pull
your strings behind the scenes.
These people don't care. They don't have to call the insurance
company because their claim was denied. They don't buy their own
groceries. If you have a private jet, an offshore bank account, and an
invite to Mar-a-Lago, go ahead and support your Republican
Representative. If you are a regular person who feels like you are
getting screwed over, and if you are fed up with the status quo here in
Washington that only works for those at the top, this majority is not
fighting for you--but we are.
Democrats are on your side, and we will fight with you every step of
the way against the corruption, the lies, and the BS coming out of this
administration. We will not back this so-called deal. It is not a real
solution, and it is certainly not a clean CR. This CR leaves families
twisting in the wind with zero guarantee there will ever, ever be a
vote to extend tax credits to help everyday people pay for their
healthcare.
I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this rule and ``no'' on the
underlying legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, there is so much to unpack and to object
to in the ranking member's opening statement, but I just want to
comment on one of the issues.
I find the statement that Republicans were on vacation laughable. The
idea that Republicans were on vacation during the shutdown is just
simply false. It is false. Many of us were in Washington or in our
districts meeting with constituents, advancing local priorities, and
staying fully engaged with our constituents and our work.
Our dedication to serving the American people didn't pause during the
shutdown, whether in D.C. or back at home, which, for the record, I was
in both places and many, many of my Republican colleagues were, too. We
were doing the work we were elected to do.
The real story here is not about the absence. It is about the
commitment, and for Republicans, we never wavered.

If the Democrats cared so much about working, they would not have
shut the government down.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentlewoman from North Carolina
(Ms. Foxx), the esteemed chairwoman of the Committee on Rules.
Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, psychologists have a word for the things the Democrats
accuse us of: ``projection.''
Mr. Speaker, I sure hope you did not watch all 7 hours of the
Democrat group therapy session last night in the Rules Committee, but
if you did, you saw what a clown show it was.
It was a crisp 40 degrees outside when we adjourned at around 1:30
a.m. this morning, but with the amount of hot air being spewed by
Democrats in the committee room for 7 straight hours, you would have
thought we were in the dead of summer.
Mr. Speaker, at this point, I don't think Democrats really agree on
anything. Last night and into the early hours of this morning, they
showed everyone that they couldn't even agree on what they were angry
about. They went off on so many tangents that it would have been a
miracle if they arrived at a single, coherent thought at any point
during our meeting.
The American people will see the exact same thing play out from them
during this debate and during general debate on the floor later today.
Apparently, the only thing Democrats can agree on is that the
government needs to stay shut down and that the American people need to
suffer even more than they have already made them suffer.
We heard from Democrats repeatedly about the millions of people they
believe are going to be affected when their own temporary COVID credits
sunset at the end of this year--their own temporary COVID credits.
Did we hear anything about the millions of Americans who got walloped
by Democrats when they shut the government down?
Did we hear an apology from Democrats to the American people for
deliberately misleading them over 40 days?
Did we hear an admission that the only reason they shut down the
government is to cover up for a catastrophic policy failure that they
concocted and set an end date on?
No, we didn't hear one of those things, not one.
Mr. Speaker, I am not surprised. This is the kind of behavior that
Americans have come to expect from Democrats. Has anyone ever noticed
how Democrats have developed such a visceral reaction when confronted
about their abdication of responsibility?
They shut the government down, and the moment you call attention to
their own actions, all they do is obfuscate and start shrieking about
unrelated things.

[[Page H4597]]

Scientists should study this at length and try to come up with a
cure. It is a serious affliction, as was evidenced numerous times over
in our Rules Committee meeting.
It is well past time to reopen the government and end the Democrat-
concocted nightmare that Americans have been living through for over 40
straight days.
The CR before us will end that nightmare. It will get this
legislative body and the entire Nation moving once more.
Democrats should grow a spine and accept responsibility for their own
failures. I urge a ``yes'' vote on the rule.

{time} 1650

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, you have to love the Republicans. The gentlewoman from
Minnesota says that they weren't on vacation. I want to remind her that
they haven't voted for 8 weeks, and most people define ``vacation'' as
you don't have to show up to work and you get paid.
That is exactly what Republicans did. They didn't show up to work,
and they got paid. It was a paid vacation.
Mr. Speaker, I now yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms.
Johnson).
Ms. JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for
yielding.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong opposition to this bill. I am a
``hell no'' vote on any legislation that strips healthcare away from
millions of Texans.
In my district, nearly 100,000 of my constituents rely on the
Affordable Care Act's tax credits to pay for their coverage. Without
these lifesaving credits, many of them will go without healthcare at
all.
Every day during this shutdown, my office has heard from thousands of
families across my district saying: For the love of God, save my
healthcare.
Tucked away in this bill is a brazen payoff of millions of taxpayer
dollars funneled to the benefit of a handful of Senators. While
families are struggling to afford groceries and healthcare, we are
being asked to sign off on a deal that lines the pockets of the very
people who wrote it. That is an insult to every hardworking taxpayer
who expects honesty from their government.
The contrast could not be clearer. Republicans are operating in the
currency of cruelty and corruption while Democrats are fighting with
courage and compassion. The American people deserve better, and I will
never stop fighting to protect the basic necessities that every family
needs to survive.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Georgia (Mr. Austin Scott).
Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman for
yielding me time.
Mr. Speaker, the American farmer needs this bill to pass. The
American soldier needs this bill to pass. Our air traffic controllers
need this bill to pass. The men and women who protect us here in this
Capitol and all Federal law enforcement need this bill to pass.
Mr. Speaker, I am one of those who represent a lot of Federal
employees, and they have been without a check for a long time. This is
very simple. It is very simple. It is way past time to open the
government up. There are going to be a lot of excuses about could have,
should have, would have, and that we need to take this provision or
that provision out, or Democrats are going to vote to keep the
government shut down.
Mr. Speaker, the vote today is straight up or straight down. You vote
to open the government up today, or you vote to keep it closed. That is
all there is to it.
As for the provision that has been mentioned a few times about the
Senate language, I have introduced a piece of legislation already to
repeal the Senate language, and I am hopeful that we will have a vote
on that as soon as we get back.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I love my Republican colleagues. The majority is
introducing legislation to repeal provisions in a bill that they are
going to vote ``yes'' on. Figure that out.
Mr. Speaker, the previous question is the House Democrats' last
attempt to make a change to this rule before it gets voted on, and I
use this opportunity to talk about a last-minute provision that was
slipped into this CR in the Senate. It is an outrageous giveaway to pad
the pockets of eight Republican Senators, and it is one of the most
corrupt things that I have seen in my life.
Mr. Speaker, if the House defeats the previous question, I will offer
an amendment to the rule to consider as adopted an amendment to the
continuing resolution, offered by Representative Subramanyam, which
would strike the corrupt giveaway out of the text of this bill so that
it does not make it into law.
Mr. Speaker, this is a massive payday for Republicans. It would allow
eight Republican Senators to shovel millions--millions--of dollars into
their own wallets. I am talking about cash money. It is not for their
States and not for their constituents. No, no. It is for their own
personal bank accounts.
Why should a United States Senator or any party get a special right
that nobody else has? No State legislator, no Governor, no judge, and
no citizen in the entire country has this right, but we are creating it
for a handful of Republican Senators. It is immoral. I say it is
unconstitutional.
It is wrong, and it is probably the most brazen theft and plunder of
public resources ever proposed in the United States Congress. It was
tucked into this legislation, and I speak directly to Republicans who
say that they can't vote with us because it will delay the reopening of
the government.
First off, that is exactly what these corrupt Senators were hoping
they would say. Second, we absolutely can send this back to the Senate.
They can quickly strip it and send the bill to the President. They
finished this package in less than 2 days. This is one small thing that
needs to be deleted. It is easy, and it could be done very fast.
Mr. Speaker, please spare me the excuses that we will get this done
next week with a new bill. Once this is law, that is it. It is signed
into law forever. It will never change. It is permanent, and the
majority voted for it. Republicans all know that. So they shouldn't say
that they are going to pass some new bill next week to address this.
That is just an excuse to do nothing that would fix it.
Republicans moved at the speed of light to give tax breaks to
billionaires, and the least that they could do is to give the same
urgency to stop this shamelessly corrupt fleecing of the American
people.

Mr. Speaker, I get it. Trump is suing the U.S. Government for $230
million, and I guess these Senators want in on the action. They want
their own payday. I have never seen this level of grift, shameless
corruption, and theft of public money in my entire life, ever.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my
amendment into the Record, along with extraneous material, immediately
prior to the vote on the previous question.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, to discuss our proposal, I yield 1 minute
to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Subramanyam).
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair will remind the gentleman from
Massachusetts and others to please refrain from engaging in
personalities toward Members of the Senate.
Mr. SUBRAMANYAM. Mr. Speaker, I thank the ranking member for yielding
me time.
Mr. Speaker, do you know what people hate more than seeing their
costs go up? It is seeing their costs go up while corrupt politicians
line their pockets with taxpayers' money. That is what they really
hate, yet that is what this bill does.
Republican Senators slipped into this bill a legal pathway for them
to personally receive millions of dollars of taxpayers' money for being
investigated after January 6. My colleagues on the other side talk
about fiscal responsibility and say that there is no money for
healthcare, but somehow there is taxpayer money for Republican
Senators. This an ethics violation. This is a breach of trust, and it
calls into question the very legitimacy of this institution.
Mr. Speaker, I put forward an amendment to reject this corruption,
but

[[Page H4598]]

committee Republicans voted it down last night. They said that they
knew that it was corrupt but that there was nothing that could be done
and that the system didn't work.
Republicans are the system, and House Republicans promised a vote on
this next week as a standalone bill. There is no guarantee that the
Senate will act. In fact, they probably won't act. The majority has the
power to join us in righting this wrong today. Let's take out this
ridiculous kickback. Otherwise, a vote for this bill is a vote for
corruption.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I never said that this bill was perfect. Not everyone
agrees with the provision, and our colleague from Georgia (Mr. Austin
Scott) just mentioned that he is already addressing it. What we do
agree on is that it is critically important to get the government open,
and that is why we are here today.
Mr. Speaker, it is getting our Federal employees paid and getting our
troops paid. It is getting SNAP back on track and getting our airports
back to full capacity. Once this happens, we can tackle the issues. We
can get back to really doing the things for the American people and not
using their suffering as leverage like Democratic Whip Clark is willing
to do.
Democrats have spent weeks performing political theater by refusing
to open government, and they continue to perform that political
theater. We need to prioritize the reopening of the government and stop
the suffering that the Democrats want to use as leverage.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr.
Langworthy).
Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of this rule
and ending this shutdown chaos.
For more than 40 days, the American people have endured a painful and
entirely avoidable government shutdown. It was not because of policy
differences but because Senate Democrats and Chuck Schumer chose
politics over people.
While Washington stalled, hardworking Americans paid the price. Our
air traffic controllers went without pay. A system stretched thinner by
the day had a new strain put on that system, which put millions of
lives at risk. Americans depend on them to keep our skies safe.
Families who rely on SNAP and WIC, parents who are just trying to feed
their kids, were left wondering how they would make it through another
week.

{time} 1700

At the same time, our border agents and Coast Guard members continue
to serve this country as their own families went without pay. Through
it all, while everyday Americans carried the weight of this shutdown,
Senate Democrats had chance after chance to end it, but instead they
chose to prolong the pain. That is not leadership. That is hypocrisy.
It was never about budgets or priorities. It was about power. It is
not about turning government on. For them, it was about turning
government into performance, where the people paying the highest price
are the ones furthest from Washington.
For more than 40 days, families were used as political pawns and
props while those responsible stood in front of cameras pretending to
solve the crisis that they created. I actually saw a Member from my
home State stand at a food bank, decry the fact that nutritional
assistance was in question, then swear up and down that they would vote
against ending this shutdown. That is the epitome of hypocrisy, and the
American people deserve better than that.
House Republicans did our job. We passed a clean continuing
resolution weeks ago, the same kind of straightforward measure that
should have been agreed to immediately to keep this government open.
Senate Democrats blocked that 14 times, prolonging this shutdown just
to score points to their woke, angry mob.
This measure before us today is the same bipartisan framework they
could have passed 40 days ago. The only thing that has changed is the
political calendar.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the rule. Let's stand
with the American people, the families, the veterans, and public
servants who have carried the burden of this shutdown and reopen our
government. Let's get this country moving again.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from ABC News titled: ``Inflation climbs to highest
level since January, beef prices soar.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From ABC News, Oct. 24, 2025]

Inflation Climbs to Highest Level Since January, Beef Prices Soar

(By Max Zahn)

Consumer prices rose 3 percent in September compared to a
year ago, extending a monthslong uptick that has sent
inflation to its highest level since January, government data
on Friday showed. The reading came in lower than economists'
expectations.
The fresh data marked a slight increase from a 2.9 percent
year-over-year increase recorded a month prior. An
acceleration of price increases over recent months has
coincided with a flurry of tariffs issued by President Donald
Trump.
Beef prices soared nearly 15 percent over the year ending
in September, data showed. Trump has set off outcry among
some ranchers over a plan to import beef from Argentina in an
effort to reduce U.S. prices.
Egg prices, a longtime symbol of rising costs, fell almost
5 percent in September. The price of eggs, stands about 1
percent lower than where it was a year ago. The price of
coffee has surged 19 percent over the past year, the data
showed.
The White House touted the September inflation numbers
coming in below economists' expectations on Friday, with
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posting on social media that
they were ``good news'' for American families.
Leavitt also said on X that the ongoing government shutdown
would likely result in no inflation report for October,
``which will leave businesses, markets, families, and the
Federal Reserve in disarray.''
The data arrived more than a week later than originally
planned, since the government shutdown has severely hamstrung
the release of information about the economy.
The latest acceleration of price increases comes at a
wobbly moment for the Nation's economy. In recent months,
inflation has picked up while hiring has slowed, posing a
risk of an economic double-whammy known as ``stagflation.''
The economic conditions have put the Federal Reserve in a
bind. If the Fed raises interest rates as a means of
protecting against tariff-induced inflation, it risks tipping
the economy into a downturn. On the other hand, if the Fed
lowers rates to stimulate the economy in the face of a hiring
slowdown, it threatens to boost spending and worsen
inflation.
Last month, the Fed cut its benchmark interest rate a
quarter of a percentage point, opting for its first interest
rate cut this year in an effort to revive the labor market.
``It's a challenging situation when our goals are in
tension like this,'' Powell said, but he added that the
balance of risks had shifted toward greater concern over
sluggish hiring.
Policymakers are widely expected to make an additional
quarter-point cut when they meet next week, according to CME
FedWatch Tool, a measure of market sentiment.
But an elevated inflation reading on Friday could give Fed
officials pause, since a rate cut would increase the
likelihood of a spike in demand that further drives up
prices.
In recent months, tariffs modestly contributed to the
uptick in overall inflation, analysts previously told ABC
News, but overall price increases owed largely to a rise in
housing and food products with little connection to Trump's
levies.
Last week, President Donald Trump threatened 100 percent
tariffs on all China-made goods starting Nov. 1 in response
to restrictions placed on rare earth minerals. Beijing has
publicly stood firm on the policy, leaving the two sides at
an impasse with massive implications for the price of
consumer goods imported from China.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from The Washington Post titled: ``From groceries to
gas, Americans say they're spending more under Trump.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From the Washington Post, Nov. 4, 2025]

From Groceries to Gas, Americans Say They're Spending More Under Trump

(By Abha Bhattarai and Andrew Ba Tran)

A majority of Americans say they are spending more on
groceries and utilities than they were a year ago, and they
blame President Trump for the rising prices, a Washington
Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll finds.
About 7 in 10 Americans say their grocery costs have risen
in the past year, while about 6 in 10 say their utility costs
have edged

[[Page H4599]]

higher, according to the poll, conducted in late October.
Roughly 4 in 10 say the same about health care, gas and
housing. The findings reflect angst about the cost of living,
which has emerged as a key issue in the off-year elections
across the country on Tuesday.
``Even as inflation has gone down, people are still
struggling with very high price levels for food, energy and
health care,'' said Sophie Mitra, an economics professor at
Fordham University. ``The rate of increases has slowed, but
things are still very difficult, especially for low- and
middle-income households.
Americans' discontent reflects government data showing that
inflation is slowly worsening. Utility costs, in particular,
have jumped 12 percent in the past year, according to data
from September. Grocery prices have risen by 3 percent,
though some categories have recorded more dramatic increases.
Meat prices, for example, have climbed more than 8 percent
since last year, while canned fruits and vegetables are up 5
percent. Coffee has gone up by nearly 19 percent.
Roughly 6 in 10 Americans blame Trump ``a great deal'' or
``a good amount'' for the current rate of inflation and
rising prices, the Post-ABC-Ipsos survey found. About two-
thirds of independents (66 percent) and 92 percent of
Democrats blame him, compared with 20 percent of Republicans.
The poll also found that 65 percent of Americans disapprove
of Trump's handling of tariffs and that 62 percent disapprove
of his handling of the economy, both figures little changed
from April.
Responses were split across party lines, particularly for
food expenses: 89 percent of Democrats, 73 percent of
independents and 52 percent of Republicans report spending
more on groceries compared with a year ago. Overall,
Democrats were more than 30 percentage points likelier than
Republicans to say they are spending more on a range of
necessities, including gas, health care and housing.
Rising prices have made affordability a key political issue
in the Tuesday elections. Despite their differing ideological
views, Democrats running in Virginia, New Jersey and New York
have centered their campaigns on addressing cost-of-living
issues. Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor in
New York, has focused heavily on making the city more
affordable through proposals such as universal child care,
free buses and city-owned grocery stores.
``Every politician says New York is the greatest city on
the globe,'' Mamdani said in his first campaign ad. ``But
what good is that if no one can afford to live here?''
In Palmerton, Pennsylvania, Vicki Sestok is paying 30
percent more per kilowatt-hour of electricity than she was a
couple of months ago. She and her husband, who have already
switched to LED lights and installed a heat pump, are running
out of ways to cut costs, she said.
``The house will just have to be cooler this winter,'' said
Sestok, 57, who voted for former vice president Kamala Harris
in last year's presidential election. ``We're going to have
to put on an extra sweater, and that's going to be that.''
The rising utility bills are just one of the challenges
squeezing Sestok's finances. Her daughter, a chemist,
recently lost her job because of funding cuts, and her son,
who is disabled, has yet to get his latest round of SNAP
benefits. ``I'm helping out on both ends,'' she said.
Food costs are also inching up, she said. Sestok spends
between $200 and $250 a week on groceries, at least $70 more
than she used to.
Although the Trump administration's sweeping new tariffs
have yet to dramatically reignite inflation, there are signs
that they are pushing up the price of certain goods, such as
toys and cars. Economists warn that it could take months for
the full effects of those policies to show up, leaving many
business owners and household on edge. More than 6 in 10
Americans say tariffs contribute to inflation, the poll
found. And nearly 6 out of 10 Americans believe tariffs harm
the U.S. economy, including 88 percent of Democrats and 64
percent of independents. However, nearly half of Republicans
say the U.S. economy is improved by tariffs.
By 45 percent to 28 percent, more people say they believe
tariffs hurt U.S. manufacturing companies, although 56
percent of Republicans say the levies will help domestic
producers.
Spencer Williamson, who works in medical sales in Tempe,
Arizona, says he's feeling better about the economy than he
was a year ago. The 34-year-old voted for Trump and says he's
hopeful that the president's plan to revive manufacturing and
create new jobs will lead to longterm change. In the
meantime, he has been happy to see his grocery bill stay
steady.
``Certain things seem to be stabilizing,'' he said. ``But,
of course, there are still hurdles. House prices are still
too expensive. It's hard to feel great about the economy.''
The Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll was conducted
online Oct. 24 through Oct. 28 among 2,725 U.S. adults. The
sample was drawn through the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, an ongoing
panel of U.S. households recruited by mail using random
sampling methods. Overall results have a margin of error of
plus or minus 1.9 percentage points.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from The New Republic titled: `` `No, You're wrong':
Trump Spirals When Pressed on Rising Food Prices.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From The New Republic, Nov. 3, 2025]

``No, You're Wrong'': Trump Spirals When Pressed on Rising Food Prices

(By Rachel Kahn)

President Donald Trump desperately tried to pivot the
conversation away from his tanking economy in an interview
with 60 Minutes Sunday.
When the president brought up the stock market, O'Donnell
pointed out that many Americans may not feel the effects of
market growth in their wallets: ``When the stock market is
doing well, that doesn't affect everybody. Not everybody is
invested in the stock market--''
``It does,'' insisted Trump. ``Oh it does, it does.''
O'Donnell pushed ahead, observing, ``Grocery prices are
up.''
Trump ignored her, choosing to instead over-exaggerate the
growth of 401(k) retirement savings accounts. O'Donnell, not
taking the bait, tried again to get the president to answer
her question: ``But for people that don't have 401(k)s, who
are not invested in the stock market--they've seen their
grocery prices go up.''
``No, you're wrong.'' Trump responded. ``They went up under
Biden, right now they're going down. Other than beef, which
we're working on.''
In reality, grocery prices are not down--they're up.
Grocery prices are 2.7 percent higher than they were last
September and 1.4 percent higher than January, when Trump
triumphantly returned to office. They're also still on the
rise, according to data released by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics last Friday. Overall, grocery prices have
increased almost 30 percent in the last five years.
Though this is far from the first time that Trump has lied
on camera, pretending that grocery prices are down is
particularly egregious. The president campaigned on lowering
prices, and has lied repeatedly about the fact that his
nonsensical tariffs and cruel mass deportation campaign--
which targets many of the people who grow and harvest our
food--have hurt consumers.
Meanwhile, Trump is gilding the Oval Office and building a
ballroom. At least he's not out of touch!

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from The New Republic titled: ``Trump Admits He
Doesn't Care About `Affordability' As Economy Plunges.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From The New Republic, Nov. 7, 2025]

Trump Admits He Doesn't Care About ``Affordability'' as Economy Plunges

(By Malcolm Ferguson)

As inflation rises, layoffs surge, and SNAP benefits stop,
President Trump told Americans point-blank that he does not
want to hear about their affordability issues.
``Talk about the cost of Thanksgiving, and the cost of
living through Thanksgiving. . . . Our energy costs are way
down, our groceries are way down, everything is way down. And
the press doesn't report it,'' the president said last
evening while taking questions from reporters. ``You know, I
call the Democrats conmen and women, they make up numbers.
But when you look at the 25 percent reduction in costs for
Thanksgiving between Biden and me . . . it's the biggest
reduction in cost in the history of that chart or whatever it
is they do.''
The Thanksgiving cost numbers Trump is touting come
directly from Walmart, which is selling a $40 Thanksgiving
basket compared to a $55 one last year. But this year's meal
has less food in it too.
``So I don't wanna hear about the affordability,'' Trump
continued. ``We're getting close to $2 a gallon gasoline.
With Biden it was $4.50, $5. Another thing, inflation. We had
the worst inflation in the history of our country. Now we
have virtually no inflation at all . . . so the affordability
is much better with the Republicans.''
This short rant was ridden with lies. Everything is not
``way down.''
Inflation is still going up. This summer, Americans saw the
biggest grocery price jump in over three years. Average
grocery prices in September were around 2.7 percent higher
than they were the year before and around 1.4 percent higher
than they were when Trump got back into office in January.
It's truly a travesty that this man who campaigned on
affordability, and on remembering the forgotten working
class, is now telling those very same people to shut up and
be happy while outright lying about the state of
affordability in this country. It was already bad, and Trump
has unquestionably made it worse. But he'd rather lie and
finger-point than admit that and work to fix it.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from MSNBC titled: `` `Not a big issue': Republicans
shrug as consumers confront health care sticker shock.''

[[Page H4600]]

The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From MSNBC, Oct. 30, 2025]

`Not a Big Issue': Republicans Shrug as Consumers Confront Health Care
Sticker Shock

(By Steve Benen)

For those who follow health-care policy closely, it's been
obvious for quite a while that health insurance premiums were
poised to soar, especially as Republicans allow Covid-era
subsidies to expire. The problem, however, has been on the
horizon for a long time.
That's no longer the case; the problem is here. Many
Americans are now confronting the severity of increased
costs, with millions of families facing payments that will
double or even triple in 2026.
The conditions have left GOP officials with limited options
about how best to respond to the problem. Much of the party
has effectively settled on the position of ``this doesn't
really matter.'' The Hill reported:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Administrator Mehmet Oz downplayed on Wednesday the likely
substantial increase in the amount Americans will pay for
health insurance on the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) federal
marketplace.
At an event ostensibly about prescription drug costs, a
reporter asked, ``Unless those tax credits are extended, the
subsidies, the average plan will increase for Americans by
somewhere around 115 percent. Do you believe that Congress
should extend those subsidies so that most Americans do not
receive significant increases in their premiums?''
Mehmet Oz, the former television personality who was tapped
to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, asked
about the source of the figure. The reporter noted that the
statistic came by way of KFF, a leading health research group
(formerly known as the Kaiser Family Foundation).
Oz responded that KFF had retracted that assessment (that
does not appear to be the case), before adding that ``the
truth'' is that the average American who gets coverage
through the Affordable Care Act will only have to pay $13
more next year. He added that increased costs are ``not the
big issue.''
Right off the bat, it's worth emphasizing that Oz's claims
weren't true: It's not clear where his claim about $13 in
additional costs comes from, but the actual increases are on
track to be vastly worse.
Complicating matters, however, is the frequency with which
other Republicans are also responding to the conditions with
shrugged shoulders. House Speaker Mike Johnson, for example,
last week derided the ``so-called forthcoming health-care
crisis.''
The same day, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin told
CNBC viewers, ``I don't think this is going to be any kind of
gut-wrenching problem if these enhanced subsidies just go
away.''
A few days later, Republican Rep. Mark Alford of Missouri
acknowledged that many U.S. consumers will have ``a hard
time'' dealing with the increased coverage costs, but he
wanted his party to stay the course anyway.
The Republican answer to this problem is to downplay the
importance of the problem. That seems politically untenable,
but for now, GOP officials don't appear to have an
alternative.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an opinion article published in MSNBC titled: ``Trump's
Argentina bailout once again puts Americans last.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From MSNBC, Oct. 21, 2025]

Trump's Argentina Bailout Once Again Puts Americans Last

(By Rep. Nydia Velazquez)

In January, Donald Trump opened his inaugural address by
promising to ``put America first'' daily and usher in a new
golden age for American families. Ten months in, Americans
are still waiting for the golden age to arrive and reeling
from Trump administration policies that have actively made
their lives worse.
His administration's signature legislation delivers the
largest Medicaid cuts in U.S. history, threatening to strip
coverage from 15 million people while taking food assistance
from children, seniors, and people with disabilities. His
erratic trade policy has worsened the cost-of-living crisis,
amounting to an average $1,300 tax increase per household
this year. And as the Republican shutdown drags on, essential
services are halted and paychecks paused for hundreds of
thousands of federal workers.
Now, with government operations paralyzed and Americans'
pocketbooks reeling, the White House has made the
extraordinary decision to move forward with a $20 billion
bailout for Argentina. Republicans and Democrats alike are
asking what, exactly, is ``America First'' about sending
billions of U.S. dollars abroad while Americans are suffering
at home. The irony is especially sharp for U.S. farmers, who
have been shut out of China's soybean market because of
Trump's trade war--just as Argentina moves in to fill that
gap. While Washington props up Buenos Aires, small-farm
bankruptcies here have climbed to a five-year high.
During a White House meeting with Argentine President
Javier Milei last week, President Trump provided the answer.
Asked how the bailout would help the U.S., he replied, ``Just
helping a great philosophy take over a great country.''
Even Trump knows this deal has nothing to do with helping
Americans and everything to do with propping up a political
ally.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called Argentina a
``systemically important ally,'' but its real importance to
this administration is political rather than economic.
President Milei has styled himself as an ideological cousin
of Trump and Elon Musk, though his campaign of extreme
austerity came first. At the Conservative Political Action
Conference (CPAC) in Washington, D.C., this February, Milei
presented Musk with a chainsaw to highlight the links between
Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, and
Milei's austerity campaign in Argentina. Like DOGE, Milei's
program was billed as a war on waste, but in practice, it
became a showy slashing spree that gutted public services
while doing little to fix Argentina's deeper economic
problems.
Milei's program has driven household spending on utilities
up from 6 percent to 15 percent, according to a report from
the University of Buenos Aires, and pushed the country to the
brink of a currency crisis.
This situation has left many Argentines fed up with the
Milei political agenda, causing his party to suffer a
stunning loss in a Buenos Aires provincial election in
September. With more potential losses looming in a pivotal
Argentine midterm election, Trump decided to step in to stop
the bleeding. The political motive behind the bailout was
made crystal clear last week when Trump said the U.S. is
``not going to waste our time'' if Milei's coalition did not
prevail in November.
That motivation should alarm every taxpayer. Using U.S.
funds to influence a foreign election is a glaring misuse of
public money. The fact that Milei's government is embroiled
in numerous alleged corruption scandals makes the bailout
even more concerning.
Even the structure of the bailout raises red flags. The
Treasury Department is utilizing the Exchange Stabilization
Fund, or ESF, to extend a massive line of credit without any
conditionality or immediate congressional oversight. Such
intervention is almost without precedent. Historically,
deployment of the ESF--such as for Mexico in 1995 and Asian
economies in 1997--came with clear repayment terms and
transparency requirements to protect American taxpayers. The
Trump administration has disclosed no such safeguards here.
This is important, as Argentina's capacity to repay the
loan is highly uncertain. Its sovereign bonds are rated below
investment grade across the board. Investors consider them a
speculative gamble, reflecting just how precarious
Argentina's finances have become. Meanwhile, the government
has been burning through billions in reserves to prop up an
overvalued exchange rate--a strategy that cannot last, no
matter how much it borrows from the United States or other
institutions. The Treasury Department owes the public an
explanation of what safeguards or repayment terms exist to
protect U.S. taxpayers from loss.
Trump's promise to put America first has become a hollow
slogan. At home, he's dismantling the government programs
that working families rely on. Abroad, he's using taxpayer
dollars on a risky bailout of a foreign government that
shares his politics. If this is his idea of America first,
Americans deserve far better.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from PBS titled: ``Trump administration working on
doubling Argentina financing to $40 billion.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From PBS News, Oct. 16, 2025]

Trump Administration Working on Doubling Argentina Financing to $40
Billion

(By Fatima Hussein and Andrea Vulcano)

Washington (AP)--The Trump administration is looking to
provide an additional $20 billion in financing for Argentina
through a mix of financing from sovereign funds and the
private sector.
That would come on top of the $20 billion credit swap line
that the U.S. Treasury pledged to Argentine President Javier
Milei and his government this month to bolster the South
American nation's collapsing currency.
``We are working on a $20 billion facility that would
complement our swap line, with private banks and sovereign
funds that, I believe, would be more focused on the debt
market,'' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters
Wednesday. He called it ``a private-sector solution'' and
said ``many banks are interested in it and many sovereign
funds have expressed interest.''
At a White House meeting Tuesday with Milei, Republican
President Donald Trump said his administration wanted to help
``our neighbors'' with the aid package, but he also suggested
that the money could be pulled if Milei 's party did not
prevail in the Oct. 26 midterm elections.
``If he loses, we are not going to be generous with
Argentina,'' Trump said.

[[Page H4601]]

The Argentine peso weakened slightly Wednesday after
Trump's comments. The peso depreciated about 0.7 percent,
with the dollar--the currency Argentines rely on to save--
trading at 1,395 pesos, compared with 1,385 pesos the
previous day.
On Wall Street, shares of major Argentine companies rose
slightly after dropping as much as 8.1 percent Tuesday upon
Trump's comments.
In Argentina, the opposition's criticism was swift.
Former President Cristina Fernandez, who is under house
arrest after a corruption conviction, wrote on social media:
``Trump to Milei in the United States: `Our agreements depend
on who wins election.' Argentines . . . you already know what
to do!''
Martin Lousteau, president of the centrist Radical Civic
Union, said ``Trump doesn't want to help a country--he only
wants to save Milei, and that ``nothing good can come of
this.''
Maximiliano Ferraro, head of the opposition Civic
Coalition, called Trump's comments ``a blatant act of
extortion against the Argentine Nation.''

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from Forbes titled: ``Presidency Boosts Trump's Net
Worth By $3 billion In A Year.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From Forbes, Sept. 9, 2025]

Presidency Boosts Trump's Net Worth by $3 Billion in a Year

(By Dan Alexander)

Donald Trump just had the most lucrative year of his life.
The president is now worth a record $7.3 billion, up from
$4.3 billion in 2024, when he was still running for office.
The $3 billion gain vaulted him 118 spots on The Forbes 400,
where he lands at No. 201 this year.
No president in U.S. history has used his position of power
to profit as immensely as Trump. His primary vehicle for
enrichment: cryptocurrency, an asset class full of hype and
vulnerable to regulators. Teaming up with his three sons,
Trump announced a crypto venture in September 2024 named
World Liberty Financial, which initially struggled to gain
traction. Then he won the White House.
Crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun, whom the Securities and
Exchange Commission had accused of fraud, invested $75
million, routing an estimated $40 million to the president-
elect and millions more to his family members, kickstarting a
bonanza that has since snowballed. In January, days before
reentering the White House, Trump launched a memecoin, adding
hundreds of millions to his pile of cash.
In office, Trump rolled back regulatory enforcement of
crypto and signed legislation favorable to the industry,
ensuring he would personally benefit from conflicts of
interest. His memecoins, initially tied up for three months,
now unlock daily, freeing tens of millions per week. World
Liberty Financial, meanwhile, has continued selling tokens,
including to opaque buyers, generating an estimated $1.4
billion so far. A Trump family entity receives a roughly 75%
cut of those sales, amounting to more than $1 billion.
The president apparently made plans to sell part of that
entity, according to a letter that a court-appointed monitor
overseeing the Trump Organization wrote to a New York judge
in May. It remains unclear what percentage the president sold
or whether the transaction even happened. The identity of the
supposed buyer also remains unknown. The Trump Organization
did not respond to questions about the deal. (Shortly after a
Forbes reporter first exposed it, the president ranted about
the journalist on Truth Social.)
With supporters piling into risky assets, Trump deployed
his cash conservatively. He paid off $114 million of debt
against 40 Wall Street, a troubled New York skyscraper, at
the start of the summer. In July, he knocked out a couple of
smaller loans, totaling an estimated $15 million, against
mansions in New York and Florida. He also loaded up on
municipal and corporate bonds. Trump's balance sheet is now
stronger than it has ever been, with an estimated $1.1
billion of liabilities and $8.4 billion of assets, $1.1
billion of which are in liquid holdings.

Cashing in on Crypto

Most of Trump's jump in net worth comes from his move into
cryptocurrency, which provided him with a pile of cash. He
still has plenty of coins leftover, set to jump in value as
they unlock over the course of his presidency. Below, Forbes
highlights which parts of the Trump fortune improved the most
over the last year.
Memecoin: +$710 million
Liquid assets: +$660 million
Licensing and management business: +$410 million
Legal victory: +$470 million
World Liberty Financial tokens: +$340 million
Stablecoin business: +$240 million
Almost everything in his portfolio is doing well. Appellate
judges in New York threw out a roughly $500 million fraud
penalty in August. Trump's real-estate licensing business,
stalled out for years, has come roaring back to life, with
new deals in Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Romania, India, Qatar and
the United Arab Emirates. Revenues jumped an estimated 580%
in 2024 to $45 million, boosting the value of the business by
$400 million. In the United States, the president's golf-and-
club portfolio continues to thrive, as profits jumped an
estimated 30% in 2024, adding roughly $325 million to Trump's
net worth.
With so much money coming in, the president may soon get
back to his first love, building. He and his family have been
making noise for years about constructing small villages at
golf resorts in Scotland and Florida. Projects like that
require a lot of liquidity, something that has not always
been available to Trump. But now, after reclaiming the White
House--and cashing in on the power that comes with it--he can
pretty much do anything he wants.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from People.com titled: ``Donald Trump Hosts Great
Gatsby-Themed Halloween Party as 42 Million Americans Brace for SNAP
Benefits to Expire.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From People, Nov. 1, 2025]

Donald Trump Hosts Great Gatsby-Themed Halloween Party as 42 Million
Americans Brace for SNAP Benefits to Expire

(By Bailey Richards)

President Donald Trump celebrated Halloween with a Great
Gatsby-themed party as millions of Americans prepared to lose
their SNAP benefits amid the government shutdown.
On Friday, Oct. 31, Trump, 79, hosted a Halloween party
inspired by F. Scott Fitzgerald's classic 1925 novel at his
Palm Beach, Fla., estate, Mar-a-Lago. The president sat with
Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the Roaring '20s bash,
which was complete with feathers and flapper dresses, photos
show.
The official theme of the lavish event was The Great
Gatsby, the Roaring '20s and ``a little party never killed
nobody,'' according to reports from White House
correspondents Danny Kemp and Kellie Meyer of AFP News Agency
and NewsNation, respectively.
Footage of the event shared by Meyer on X shows Trump and
Rubio, 54, smiling and chatting at a table with other guests.
At a certain point in the evening, all members of the press
were ordered to leave Mar-a-Lago, Meyer reported.
Trump hosted guests at his Palm Beach property as millions
of Americans braced to lose their federal Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, sometimes
referred to as ``food stamps,'' the following day amid the
ongoing government shutdown.
Last week, the U.S. Department of Agriculture warned that
there would not be enough funding for the 42 million
Americans who rely on SNAP benefits to receive their money on
Saturday, Nov. 1. (The program provides one in eight people
in the U.S. with money to buy food.)
U.S. President Donald Trump talks at a press conference
with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) at
Chequers at the conclusion of a state visit on September 18,
2025 in Aylesbury, England. This is the final day of
President Trump's second UK state visit, with the previous
one taking place in 2019 during his first presidential term;
``SNAP/EBT Food Stamp Benefits Accepted'' is displayed on a
screen inside a Family Dollar Stores Inc. store in Chicago,
Illinois, U.S., on Tuesday, March 3, 2020. Dollar Tree Inc.
released earnings figures on March 4.
``Donald Trump hosted a Great Gatsby party while SNAP
benefits were about to disappear for 42 million Americans,''
Newsom wrote on X, reposting Kemp's photo from inside the
event. ``He does not give a damn about you.''
The government shutdown began on Oct. 1 and is the second-
longest on record. The largest point of contention is related
to the Affordable Care Act, with Democrats seeking to quickly
extend ACA tax credits to prevent healthcare premiums from
dramatically rising for millions of Americans. Despite
overwhelming public support, Republicans have refused to
budge on the issue, saying they can negotiate after the
government reopens.
Never miss a story--sign up for PEOPLE's free daily
newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has
to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest
stories.
Along with the loss of federal SNAP benefits for millions,
hundreds of thousands of federal employees are furloughed or
working without pay amid the government shutdown. Longtime
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) employee
LaShanda Palmer is one of them. She has not been paid since
the shutdown began, she previously told PEOPLE.
``I have a car note, I have insurance, I have a grandchild
that I have guardianship over, who's 6,'' as well as two of
her five children who live with her, she told PEOPLE. Palmer,
who works at the Philadelphia International Airport, also has
a $1,375 rent payment due on Nov. 1, along with overdrawn
checking and savings accounts and mounting overdraft fees.

[[Page H4602]]

``It is extremely hard,'' said the lead transportation
security officer, one of an estimated 1.4 million federal
employees furloughed or working without pay while the federal
government is locked in a shutdown.
Elaborating on her situation amid the shutdown--the second
she's endured, including the last one during Trump's first
term--Palmer told PEOPLE, ``I don't want to get an eviction
notice. I'm in a position right now, come Nov. 1, where my
rent may not get paid because I don't have [rent money] to
pay it.''
``And it's not that I don't work for it because I am
working for it,'' she added. ``I should have it.''

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from The New York Times titled: ``Trump's Latest
White House Makeover: The Lincoln Bathroom in Marble and Gold.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From The New York Times, Oct. 31, 2025]

Trump's latest White House Makeover: The Lincoln Bathroom in Marble and
Gold

(By Luke Broadwater)

President Trump is not stopping with the East Wing.
On Friday, Mr. Trump said he had renovated the bathroom in
the Lincoln Bedroom, posting two dozen photos on social media
as he continues to remodel the White House in his own style.
Mr. Trump said the new design of black and white marble
with gold faucets and light fixtures was ``very appropriate
for the time of Abraham Lincoln.''
The bathtub fixtures have been replaced, and the tub itself
is embedded in a nest of ``highly polished statuary marble,''
as President Trump put it. Credit . . . Donald Trump, via
Truth Social
The White House did not say, in response to questions, who
paid for the renovation, how much it cost or which contractor
built it.
The bathroom is only the latest remodel that Mr. Trump has
undertaken at the White House, including the demolition of
the East Wing. He has wide latitude as president to make
changes, although critics have raised questions about the
funding and lack of transparency.
President Harry Truman redid the bathroom in 1945, and Mr.
Trump has repeatedly criticized its style.
Speaking to donors this month, Mr. Trump called the
bathrooms style ``not good.''
``Art Deco doesn't go with, you know, 1850 and civil wars
and all of the problems,'' Mr. Trump said. ``But what does is
statuary marble. So I ripped it apart and we built the
bathroom. It's absolutely gorgeous and totally in keeping
with that time.''
A photo of the sink and vanity taken in July, before the
renovations began. Credit . . . Andrea Hanks/The White House
Edward Lengel, who served as the chief historian of the
White House Historical Association, said of the photos Mr.
Trump posted: ``It doesn't look anything like 1860s interiors
to me.''
Michael F. Bishop, the former executive director of the
Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission, said the bathroom
was a sitting room in the president's day and was unlikely to
have included marble.
``The present-day bathroom only takes up a portion of the
Lincoln sitting room,'' Mr. Bishop said. ``They created a
bathroom in the corner of this room. Trump's change to the
bathroom is not remotely a crime against historical
preservation or anything like that. It was just a fairly
dated-looking bathroom.''
The historian Harold Holzer, the author of many books about
Mr. Lincoln, said that when Mr. Lincoln moved into the White
House in 1861, there were two water closets on the second
floor, including one adjacent to the rooms where he lived
with the family.
When Mary Todd Lincoln complained about the overall poor
condition of the White House, Mr. Holzer said, he reminded
her that it was better than any other house they had ever
lived in.
``Lincoln had an outhouse in Springfield, and heaven knows
what when he lived in log cabins with his parents, so the
plain bathroom was fine with him,'' Mr. Holzer said. ``He
thought it was a majestic step up.''
During his second term, Mr. Trump has wasted no time making
changes to historical elements of the White House, arguing
that parts of it are dated or too small. He tore down the
entire East Wing, which had stood for more than a century, to
make way for a planned 90,000-square-foot, $300 million
ballroom that he said was necessary for receiving
dignitaries.
His plans for the size of the ballroom continue to expand.
Mr. Trump has said that he and a group of donors--not the
taxpayers--are footing the bill for the ballroom. His staff
has released a list of donors, but has not said how much each
one has given. The money is being deposited in the Trust for
the National Mall, a nonprofit, tax-exempt entity that is not
subject to transparency laws.
He also has added gold moldings and gold decorations
throughout the Oval Office, and gold ornaments to the Cabinet
Room. He cut down the White House's historic magnolia tree,
which President Andrew Jackson planted in 1829 in memory of
his wife, Rachel.
He removed a photo of Hillary Clinton and replaced it with
an image of his own face colored with the American flag. He
added marble floors and a chandelier to the Palm Room.
He paved over the Rose Garden grass to add a patio. Along
the West Wing colonnade, he added gold-framed photos of every
American president except his predecessor, Joseph R. Biden
Jr., whom he depicted as an autopen.
Mr. Trump and White House staff members say the president
is granted wide latitude to make renovations on the property.
Mr. Trump has said he is not subject to zoning regulations or
permitting requirements.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to include in the
Record an article from The Nation titled: ``The Bill to End the
Shutdown Is Full of Giveaways to Republicans.''
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Massachusetts?
There was no objection.

[From the Nation, Nov. 11, 2025]

The Bill to End the Shutdown is Full of Giveaways to Republicans

(By Joan Walsh)

Last night, eight Democratic senators caved and voted for a
bill to open the government without restoring the Affordable
Care Act subsidies they'd promised to fight for. You might
think Donald Trump would appreciate the olive branch, but
you'd be wrong. That very same night, Trump's Justice
Department announced a mass pardon for almost 80 individuals
involved in Trump's campaign to overturn the 2020 election.
This list included Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and John
Eastman.
But that's not the only gift to the Republicans who tried
to help Trump overturn the 2020 election. Tucked inside the
bill is a measure that would create a slush fund to enable
senators who've had their phone records subpoenaed, without
their knowledge, to sue over invasion of privacy, for at
least half a million dollars. It's basically free money for
Lindsey Graham, Marsha Blackburn, Bill Hagerty, Josh Hawley,
Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, Ron Johnson, and Cynthia
Lummis, all of whom had their metadata subpoenaed by Jack
Smith. (No messages were included.) If they all won in court,
they'd pocket at least $4 million collectively.
The bill would limit the government's defense against such
claims, removing qualified or sovereign immunity as grounds
for such a move to fight a lawsuit over the issue.
In last-minute maneuvers, Senate majority leader John
Thune, who has called Smith's phone subpoenas ``Biden's
Watergate,'' added the provision personally. ``Leader Thune
inserted that in the bill to provide real teeth to the
prohibition on the Department of Justice targeting
senators,'' Texas Senator Ted Cruz declared.
``I am furious that the Senate Minority and Majority
Leaders chose to airdrop this provision into this bill at the
eleventh hour,'' New Mexico Democratic Senator Martin
Heinrich said in a statement. ``This is precisely what's
wrong with the Senate.'' In case you missed it, that's a slap
at Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who presided over
last-minute negotiations on the package but voted against it.
Oregon Senator Ron Wyden, a privacy advocate, nonetheless
slammed the provision as ``very troubling'' to Politico.
There are obviously other troubling provisions in this
alleged compromise, which, remember, keeps the government
open only until January. The good news is that it funds SNAP
through next year--recipients don't have to worry about
losing food benefits during another stalemate in at the
beginning of 2026. Other measures touted as victories--
furloughed workers getting back pay, some fired workers
getting their jobs back--likely would have happened anyway.
Senate Dems did get a promise from Thune to hold a stand-
alone vote on restoring ACA subsidies, but there's no
guarantee he'll do it; even if he does, it's unlikely to
pass; and House Speaker Mike Johnson has already announced
that he won't bring the measure up for a vote. So it's DOA.
Another problem with the cave-in was its timing, coming
only days after Democrats won huge election victories in
Virginia, New Jersey, California, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.
Schumer is reportedly claiming he got the Democratic
defectors to hold off until after the elections, to avoid
depressing turnout (a sign Democratic leaders knew the cave-
in would be unpopular with their base). He couldn't have
asked them to take maybe another week, to avoid snubbing the
Democratic activists who worked so hard on those election
victories?
Meanwhile, Zeteo reports that Trump officials are
celebrating the Democratic surrender, calling party leaders
``losers'' and ``pussies,'' after Trump himself already
admitted that the shutdown contributed to GOP losses last
Tuesday.
The bill still has to pass the House. Is it possible
outraged Democrats will be joined by some Republicans and
reject the Senate GOP's self-protection? Or will House GOP
leaders add a similar provision for their members--at least
one, Pennsylvania Representative Mike Kelly, also had his
phone metadata released to Smith. Anything is possible in
Johnson's caucus circus. The bill could fail for other
reasons, even though

[[Page H4603]]

Johnson claims he has the votes. We'll find out Wednesday,
when House members return from their long vacation to vote.

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 15 seconds.
Mr. Speaker, I am sorry that the gentlewoman thinks that trying to
stop people's healthcare premiums from doubling and tripling and
quadrupling is political theater, but we don't. I don't have time to
address all the BS coming from my colleagues across the Chamber, but it
is clear this Republican leadership is not only failing to deliver on
their promises but they are selling out at the expense of the basic
needs of the American people.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Roy).
Mr. ROY. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from Minnesota for
yielding.
Mr. Speaker, here we are on September 19, House Republicans passed
legislation which would have funded government through November 20.
Here we are on November 12, and we are basically where we would have
been had we just passed the bill that we passed in September.
What did we get for all of that? What happened over all these days?
Well, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle were searching for a
reason for voters to support them next November. They were searching
for a cause.
We know this because there were intervening elections and a lot of
rhetoric but no results. We are here right now, with Democrats having
joined Republican Senators to send a bill over here to fund government
through the end of January with three appropriations bills, which we
worked through regular order, to keep spending relatively flat. It
advances the priorities the American people sent us here to advance, to
back up the President who is securing the border, which he was sent to
Washington to do; to restore military to focusing on defending this
Nation rather than advancing woke priorities, which the American people
sent him here to do; for us to continue to work, to grow, and to build
this economy after 4 years of being wrecked with reckless spending but
also abhorrent policies. The American people are now saying: What on
Earth were Democrats doing?
My Democrat colleagues' response is healthcare. That is the only
default position they have is the default to healthcare. The fact is,
it is because they broke the system so badly that they are now coming
and asking us to have the Treasury print money to then give out in
order to enrich insurance companies with massive subsidies. That is the
actual fact.
The American people understand this and they recognize that they
don't want insurance companies to be enriched, but they want to be able
to go get the doctor of their choice. The American people understand
this and so do we.
We are here to open the government, and we are here to stand up for
doctors and patients instead of insurance companies and big regulators.
I support this legislation. I know my Republican colleagues do. The
question really is: Will Democrats support this legislation, or will
they wish to perpetuate the shutting down of government to enrich
insurance companies?
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I don't think we ought to be lectured by
somebody who, over the years, has been the king of government shutdowns
and who worked for a United States Senator that pushed for a government
shutdown to object to the Affordable Care Act.
I just want to make it clear to everybody: This is a Republican
shutdown. They control the White House. They control the House. They
control the Senate. This government shutdown is because they don't want
to negotiate. It is their way or the highway. This is a Republican
shutdown. They own it.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Maryland
(Mr. Raskin), the distinguished ranking member of the Judiciary
Committee.
Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, this bill, which they now call imperfect,
contains the single most corrupt provision for legislative self-dealing
that anyone in this Chamber today has ever voted on. It is such an
egregiously corrupt act of legislator self-enrichment and plunder of
the taxpayer that not only did every single House Democrat oppose it in
the Rules Committee last night, but multiple Republicans were
denouncing it, that is, before they were summoned into a side room and
instructed to vote for it, which they all proceeded to do.
Now they are telling us: Vote for it today and they will repeal it
maybe next week or maybe the week after that or maybe before Christmas.
I have a solution. If Members don't like this corrupt provision, don't
vote for it today. That will work.
This is a great bill, a great bill that is if you think eight
Republican U.S. senators should have a right to collect at least $1
million in a jackpot bonanza payoff from the taxpayers simply because
they were subject to the exact same rules all other Americans were
subject to and are subject to now. They don't propose to change those
rules for anybody else, not for more than 300 million Americans, not
for the Members of the House of Representatives, not for Governors or
mayors but for themselves. They want to deal themselves a special legal
privilege.
In this Republican class war, a Great Gatsby economy where President
Trump has made more than $3 billion since he reoccupied the White
House, the Federal building which he has proceeded to demolish in large
part while millions of Americans face losing their healthcare and their
SNAP benefits. This provision is an affront to our taxpayers and to the
rule of law.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman has expired.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 15 seconds to the
gentleman from Maryland.
Mr. RASKIN. It is an affront to everyone who believes that we, in
public office, must be the servants of the people, not the masters of
the people who get special, legal rights and privileges and
multimillion-dollar payoffs, people who think that they have a right to
better treatment than everybody else, like Ghislaine Maxwell in the
prison camp where she gets room service, puppy time, and special gym
privileges.

{time} 1710

Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from
Oregon (Ms. Bonamici).
Ms. BONAMICI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to this
continuing resolution. I will not support a bill that will continue the
Republicans' assault on Americans and their pocketbooks. At a time when
Oregonians and Americans are already struggling with rising costs, this
bill locks in devastating cuts to healthcare and drives up the cost, in
many cases, significantly.
The assault on healthcare and the Republican shutdown more broadly
are further proof that the first 10 months of this Trump administration
have been chaotic, harmful, and completely out of touch with the needs
of the American people. Donald Trump held an extravagant Great Gatsby
party at Mar-a-Lago the night before SNAP benefits expired, while the
administration and Republicans continue to ignore the needs of working
families. That is not governing. They have abandoned their
responsibility to bring down costs and grow the economy.
Mr. Speaker, this bill was already bad, but now they have added this
corrupt, get-rich-quick scheme to give hundreds of thousands of
taxpayer dollars to Trump-aligned Senators. That is outrageous.
Oregonians and Americans deserve better.
My colleagues should listen to their constituents, vote ``no,'' and
come back to the table and join us in the work to make healthcare
affordable and accessible to all.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
North Carolina (Mr. McDowell).
Mr. McDOWELL. Mr. Speaker, I rise today as we are in the process of
ending the longest government shutdown in our Nation's history and to
affirm that this Congress will get back to leading America into her
next golden age.
Over 40 days, that is how long the government has been closed. For
over 40 days, Democrats here in this body and in the Senate have chosen
chaos over our country. They chose to shut the government down because
politics demanded it, not policy.

[[Page H4604]]

The elites who dominate their party's decisionmaking are the ones
least impacted by its decisions.
Were the far-left activists and Democrats here in this body the ones
not getting paychecks? No, Mr. Speaker. That was the air traffic
controllers, our troops, and our Capitol Police officers.
When these same people passed ObamaCare, were they the ones impacted
by the law, or was it the middle-class teacher in North Carolina who
could no longer keep their doctor? We all know the answer to that, Mr.
Speaker.
Across the Nation, Federal workers are working two and three jobs
just to stay afloat, all so Democrats could champion illegal aliens who
exploit our compassion as they poison our communities with deadly
fentanyl.
That is not governing. That was extortion of the American taxpayer.
That ends today.
Today, we are in the process of finally reopening the government,
returning to the business of the people, and further implementing the
mandate our constituents sent us here to deliver on.
Democrats chose to have a month of political theater, but political
shows don't do one thing to help make the costs of everyday items more
affordable. It is time to govern and to focus on making America more
affordable for the middle class.
Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote on this rule.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, we are getting lectured on governance by a
guy who is just coming off an 8-week paid vacation. Give me a break.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from New
Jersey (Ms. Sherrill), the next Governor of New Jersey.
Ms. SHERRILL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to a rule for a bill
that does nothing to protect over 450,000 New Jerseyans who will see
their healthcare premiums skyrocket.
I took my first oath to the Constitution when I was 18 and went to
the Naval Academy. It is an oath to serve, to run toward the fight. I
ran for Congress after I saw Washington Republicans attacking the
Affordable Care Act.
I promised I would take on the status quo. I would fight the big
fights because that is what people expect of their leaders. That is
what people deserve from their leaders.
I am proud of the wins that I have delivered as the Representative
for New Jersey's 11th District: capping the cost of insulin and
prescription drugs for seniors, funding the Gateway Tunnel, the PACT
Act for veterans, flood mitigation projects, and delivering for
Picatinny Arsenal.
New Jersey has trusted me, and last week, they placed their trust in
me again, electing me their 57th Governor. I ran on a similar promise:
to take on anyone and stop at nothing to lower costs and build
opportunity for everyone.
This will be my last speech in this Chamber. I intend to submit my
resignation next week and turn to protecting all of New Jersey.
My parting message to Jersey is: Thank you.
To my staff, thank you for your dedication to serving the 11th
District of New Jersey.
To my colleagues, do not let this body become a ceremonial rubber
stamp for an administration that takes food away from children--
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentlewoman has expired.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the
gentlewoman from New Jersey.
Ms. SHERRILL.--and that rips healthcare away from people and takes
food away from children.
To the country, stand strong. As we say in the Navy: Don't give up
the ship.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Rhode Island (Mr. Magaziner).

Mr. MAGAZINER. Mr. Speaker, House Republicans are back from their 54-
day taxpayer-funded vacation. But don't get me wrong, they do know how
to work hard. When billionaires wanted tax breaks, they moved mountains
to make it happen. When Argentina needed a $40 billion bailout to help
Trump's buddy, they moved quickly to make it happen at the White House.
When working people need help, when millions of Americans are seeing
their health insurance costs double and triple and Americans all across
this country are feeling like they are going to have to go without
health insurance for the first time in their lives because they can't
afford it anymore and have to make that terrible decision about which
of their family members they are going to cut off of their insurance,
House Republicans are nowhere to be found.
When Donald Trump's stupid tariffs are raising the price of groceries
and the cost of coffee is up 40 percent over the last year, House
Republicans are silent. When working people need help, they are absent.
Shameful.
They will work when billionaires need tax cuts, when Argentina needs
a bailout, but when working people need relief, they go on a taxpayer-
funded vacation. Shameful, Mr. Speaker.
Vote ``no'' on this budget. Do not cut the healthcare of the American
people.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
New York (Mr. Lawler).
Mr. LAWLER. Mr. Speaker, the reason we know this is a Democratic
shutdown is because of how angry they are that we are about to reopen
the government, period. That is all you need to know.
Jerry Nadler said the shutdown is really ``an extremist policy
designed to appeal to an extremist base and hold the whole country
hostage.''
That is exactly what the Democrats have done over the last 43 days.
They have held the American people hostage, trying to extract insane
things, like free healthcare for illegal immigrants.
If they were serious about tackling the healthcare affordability
crisis in this country, then they would address the fundamental problem
with ObamaCare. Since ObamaCare took effect, healthcare premiums have
risen by 96 percent and on the open market by 114 percent.
When I asked Leader Jeffries to sign on to the 1-year extension of
the premium tax credit, he refused. He stuttered. He stammered. He
couldn't answer a single question because this shutdown was never about
healthcare. It was always about appeasing a far-left radical base.
Chuck Schumer said: Every day gets better for us.
Katherine Clark said: Of course, people will suffer. We want to use
this as leverage.
It is an embarrassment to this country. You should all be ashamed of
yourselves for inflicting this pain on the American people, taking away
food stamps from 42 million Americans, defunding WIC, and not paying
our troops, our Federal employees, and our air traffic controllers. It
is a disgrace, and you should all hang your heads in shame.
Vote ``yes'' to pass the bill and reopen the government.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Let me remind my colleagues, I fully
recognize that there is a lot of pent-up anxiety, and emotions have
been elevated somewhat, but please, in the interest of the decorum of
this House, direct your comments to the Chair and do not engage in
personalities toward the Senate and toward the President.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, let me just say that the gentleman from
New York sounds as extreme as his voting record. Mr. Speaker, I say to
the gentleman who just spoke, by supporting this bill, he is betraying
7,000 constituents in his district who rely on the ACA to afford their
healthcare. Boy, I am glad he is not my Representative.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr.
Kennedy).
Mr. KENNEDY of New York. Mr. Speaker, as the Representative of
western New York, where so many people in my community, like others
across the country, are already struggling to afford healthcare, I urge
my colleagues to reject this disgraceful bill.
As an occupational therapist, I know exactly who these cuts will
hurt. I have heard from so many who are desperate for a lifeline, like
Iris, a mom in Buffalo, who is worried about how she will keep her
kids' healthcare insurance; or Andy, a nursing home resident in
Tonawanda, who relies on Medicaid to get the services he needs; or the
kids at Bornhava, a special needs school where I provided therapy, who
depend on early intervention services.

[[Page H4605]]

Donald Trump and congressional Republicans began their assault on the
people of our country in the big, ugly bill.
This bill further devastates healthcare and leaves millions of
Americans to pray they don't get sick. Shame on anyone who goes along
with it. This country deserves better.
I will be voting ``no,'' and I urge all my colleagues to do the same.

{time} 1720

Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, there is some big news, some breaking news
in the last hour. I am proud to say that our newest colleague,
Representative Adelita Grijalva, just became the 218th signature on the
Massie-Khanna discharge petition to compel the release of the Epstein
files.
To all my Republican colleagues who refuse to sign on: Time is up,
you need to figure out where you stand on this because you are about to
go on record. Is your loyalty to Trump more important than going after
pedophiles? Make no mistake, these files will come out. It is no longer
a question of if, only when, and whether the White House chooses to
stand with the survivors or throw them under the bus.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms.
Dexter).
Ms. DEXTER. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong opposition to this
rule and the underlying bill.
As a physician who spent 20 years saving lives, I did not come to
Congress to let healthcare be decimated by Congress. I came to fight
for my constituents who deserve to be able to see a doctor they trust,
afford their medication, and keep their families healthy.
If House Republicans let the ACA tax credits expire, they are
complicit in forcing Oregonians to make impossible choices, like
whether to keep their insurance or put food on the table.
As a physician, I know what comes next. People go without. They go
uninsured, they delay care, and they skip refills. They get sicker, and
sometimes they end up in medical debt that is devastating.
The cost of living is already too damn high. Republicans are
committed to cutting Americans' care. They patently rejected amendments
to protect Americans, ignoring millions of American families who are
desperate for relief.
I will be an absolute ``no'' on the rule and the underlying bill, and
I refuse to give up on ensuring affordable healthcare for all.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
The ranking member mentioned the discharge petition, and he is very
proud that it has 218 signatures, but not that long ago today we had a
unanimous consent request that would have moved that resolution along
over to the Senate, and I believe the Democrats objected to it.
It seems more like a political stunt than it does that they actually
wanted to have that resolution moved along because if they had not
objected, it would have gone on its way, and they would have
accomplished what they wanted to do.
I don't see their real desire to have the resolution passed. I see it
more, like I said, as a political stunt, and it certainly is actually a
moot point, given that the Oversight Committee is already releasing
many of those files. As a matter of fact, I believe they have done tens
of thousands of them, but I believe this morning they did another
20,000 files, so they are being released, and this all seems for
naught.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr.
McClintock).
Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, Jimmy Failla offered Democrats this pro
tip: If you are going to call it the Republican shutdown, you are not
supposed to get mad that it is ending.
Anyone who remembers their ``Schoolhouse Rock'' knows that once the
House originates an appropriation, the Senate must either amend it or
pass it. Now, the House did its job on September 19 with a simple
appropriation that made no policy changes. It merely kept the
government operating at current levels while we finished debating
priorities.
Democrats deliberately blocked the Senate from acting, demanding $1.5
trillion of new spending as a ransom. Finally, thank God, eight of them
put country ahead of party and voted to end this madness.
Hearing the bitter recriminations from our leftist colleagues, it
seems unlikely we will see much bipartisanship today, but with or
without, we will reopen the government tonight and get back to
addressing the challenges that confront our country.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts has 11
minutes remaining on his side. There are 9 minutes remaining on the
majority side.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I am surprised the gentlewoman brought up
the unanimous consent request, but I am glad she did because I want the
Record to be clear. I didn't hear any objection on the floor. The
Republican chair basically ruled it as an improper unanimous consent
request, and so that is why it didn't move forward.
However, I do know this, because I am on the Rules Committee, and I
do know the gentlewoman time and time and time again voted against
releasing the Epstein files. I know my Republican friends are hoping
that they don't have to go on record because they don't want to get
Trump upset at them, but the bottom line is every single Republican
will go on record, and you will have to make clear whether you are on
the side of a pedophile or whether you are on the side of the victims.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to direct their
comments to the Chair.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from
Washington (Ms. Jayapal).
Ms. JAYAPAL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to oppose this bill that allows
health insurance premiums for 22 million American families to skyrocket
and raises healthcare costs for everyone. Trump and his Republican cult
of followers in Congress have unleashed a shameful crisis of cruelty
and corruption on the American people.

First, they slash Medicaid by a trillion dollars, kicked 15 million
Americans off of healthcare, set up the playboard for rural hospitals
to shutter, all so that they could give $7 trillion in permanent tax
breaks to their billionaire buddies.
Then they refused to negotiate with Democrats to extend the
Affordable Care Act tax credits so that 22 million wouldn't have to
choose between healthcare and rent. When we refused to go along with
that, they caused this 45-day Republican shutdown, illegally refused to
pay SNAP benefits for the hungry, and illegally canceled flights,
throwing the country into chaos.
Trump and Republicans want to make Americans poorer and sicker, while
Trump builds his gilded ballrooms, protects pedophiles, pardons those
who buy his memecoins, and lets Americans starve. Shame on them. I am a
``hell-no'' on this bill.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from
Tennessee (Mr. Rose).
Mr. ROSE. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to oppose the Senate's provision
that allows Senators to make financial gain off illegal government
surveillance.
Three things can be true at once, Mr. Speaker. The first truth is
this: The shutdown has to end. The American people and countless
Tennesseans I represent are suffering and experiencing real pain. This
record-breaking Schumer Democratic shutdown was completely avoidable,
and it was completely carried out for political purposes.
The second truth is that the last administration, led by Joe Biden
and his autopen, unfairly surveilled conservatives and conservative
Members of Congress. That included sitting United States Senators.
Yet, Mr. Speaker, the third thing I would note is that the American
taxpayer has suffered enough because of the last administration. No one
in this body should support allowing Senators to sue and collect from
taxpayers because the FBI went rogue under President Biden.
Don't get me wrong. The overreach is more than troubling. It is
unfathomable that the Department of Justice was weaponized in this way.
I fully support holding those radical agents accountable and the
ongoing investigations into their misdeeds, yet no elected officials
should profit from

[[Page H4606]]

the political calculation of leftwing bureaucrats and judges.
Mr. Speaker, the folks I represent are still reeling from historic
Bidenflation, the effects of the border crisis, and the regulatory
agenda of the last administration. It is shameful to ask them to
shoulder the burden of paying U.S. Senators a half million dollars or
more for those misdeeds.

{time} 1730

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Green).
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, and still I rise. I rise to call to
my colleagues' attention that they are no longer claiming that this is
a clean CR. The truth is that it is a dirty, filthy, and stealthy CR
that has been contaminated with millions of dollars for people who have
not earned it. They want to take it from the taxpayers of this country
because they have concluded somehow that they have been harmed where no
harm has been proven or brought to our attention.
Mr. Speaker, I believe that healthcare for all is important because
we in Congress have the best healthcare in the world. Yet, people with
the best healthcare in the world do not see fit for persons who need it
and who are among the least, the last, and the lost to acquire
healthcare, something that they have.
Healthcare is becoming wealthcare for too many people in this
country. We need to extend the subsidies. We need to make sure that
everybody who can get to a doctor gets care. This is not a poor
country.
Mr. Speaker, I refuse to take a poison pill and let my colleagues
tell me I will regurgitate it next week. The poison pill has killed the
CR.
Mr. Speaker, this is not a clean CR! This is a dirty, corrupt
Continuing Resolution that I cannot in good conscience support. This CR
does nothing to address the Affordable Care Act subsidies whose
expiration Republicans refused to address. This CR includes a shameful
stealthy provision that would allow eight senators to sue the federal
government for millions of dollars. To allow each of the eight Senators
to concoct legislation to benefit themselves and sue the federal
government for a $1 million taxpayer funded giveaway would legitimize
their blatant corruption in the so-called clean CR.
Millions of Americans deserve a permanent solution to the healthcare
affordability crisis, much more than the billionaire contributors to
campaigns who just received millions of dollars in tax breaks from
their Republican accomplices. While the American people were working
through the shutdown, President Trump partially demolished the White
House and Senate Republicans negotiated a $ million-dollar gift to some
of their colleagues.
This shutdown need not have happened. Republicans control the House,
Senate, and Presidency. They could have kept the government open with a
negotiated settlement, or in the same way they placed Mr. Gorsuch on
the Supreme Court, by using a majority rule rather than a 60-vote rule.
I cannot support this corrupt and dirty CR, and I urge my colleagues
to oppose this legislation too.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from
New York (Ms. Ocasio-Cortez).
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. Mr. Speaker, it is great. It is great that
Democrats have a line of people who are willing to fight for working-
class Americans from coast to coast in this country.
Mr. Speaker, God forbid that we have a Member of the Republican
caucus who stands up and actually wants to extend the Affordable Care
Act so that people with cancer, need insulin, and all sorts of
healthcare issues across this country have their health insurance
protected and extended throughout 2026.
It is unconscionable that what we are debating right now is
legislation that will give eight Members of the United States Senate
over $1 million apiece. We are robbing people of their food assistance
and of their healthcare to pay for it.
How is this even on the floor? How can we, as Members of Congress--
Republican or Democrat--vote to enrich ourselves by stealing from the
American people? That is what this legislation does. In fact, Senator
Graham went before the press earlier today, and he said he was going to
seek well over $1 million from the American people from this.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot support it, and we cannot stand for it.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I would point out to some of my
colleagues that the Democrat government shutdown stopped the SNAP
benefits. If they were very concerned about making sure that people had
their nutritional assistance, they wouldn't have shut down the
government. That is what caused it.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gill).
Mr. GILL of Texas. Mr. Speaker, it is great to hear from Ms. Ocasio-
Cortez, the new leader of the Democratic Party. Unfortunately, we
didn't get to hear from Mr. Zohran Mamdani, their other leader.
Mr. Speaker, I am proud to vote this evening to reopen the Federal
Government. For 40 days the Democrats shut our government down to
pursue unrealistic policy proposals that they know the American people
do not want.
Mr. Speaker, the American people do not want healthcare for illegal
aliens. They do not want our tax dollars funding leftwing media
outlets. They do not want to drive up our debt $1.5 trillion as part of
a short-term continuing resolution.
Mr. Speaker, the last 40 days have been nothing but pure political
nihilism. I am glad this nightmare is over so we can get back to work
on behalf of the American people.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, first of all, let me just say to the gentlewoman this
Republican shutdown didn't need to happen. All they needed to do was
extend ACA tax credits so the American people wouldn't get screwed on
their health insurance bills.
I would also point out to her the President of the United States
illegally withheld SNAP benefits. Two Federal judges, basically two
court orders, backed us up on that. He is the first President ever in
history to shut off food benefits to people during a shutdown. Shame on
him.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from California (Mr.
Khanna).
Mr. KHANNA. Mr. Speaker, our country is at a moral crossroads. Just
today, it comes out that billionaires are worth $8 trillion. That is
more than 50 percent of Americans combined.
What does the President do? He decides he doesn't have the money for
the American people. He is going to starve the American people to give
$40 billion to the corrupt Libertarian leader in Argentina. Mr.
Speaker, $9 million would have fed the American people. How is that
America first?
Then he says he doesn't care about the cab driver who is now paying
$2,600 per month in healthcare as opposed to $44. He doesn't want to
save the 20 million Americans who are going to face high premium
increases. How is that America first?
Mr. Speaker, we need national health insurance in this country. We
need to tax billionaires in this country. We need to fund SNAP in this
country. We need to stop funding Argentina and corrupt foreign leaders.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I want to address the healthcare issues the Democrats
continue to bring up. They act like this had anything to do with the
premiums of everyone in the country. We are talking about the
Affordable Care Act COVID-era subsidies. This is not what is affecting
other people's premiums, other than those folks who qualify for those
COVID-era premium subsidies. That is it. They continue to make it sound
like this is responsible for every kind of increase that people are
seeing.
The Affordable Care Act's original subsidies will remain in place. So
that is the original subsidies, ensuring that millions still qualify
for the income-based tax credit and capping out-of-pocket costs
relative to income.

{time} 1740

It is the COVID era. I can't say that enough. It is the COVID-era
subsidies that are in question here, and premium increases are actually
driven by multiple factors, including medical inflation, provider
consolidation, and rising

[[Page H4607]]

drug costs. However to actually reduce premiums, that is what we must
address. We must have comprehensive discussions about that, not just
political theater and sound bites. We have to actually sit down and
have those discussions, and that is what getting the government back
open will do.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, the ACA polls at 65 percent. Donald Trump
is at 37 percent.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Massachusetts
(Ms. Pressley).
Ms. PRESSLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of every elder who
can't afford their prescriptions and every parent who went to work
hungry so their child could eat. In the United States of America, there
is no lack of resource, only a deficit of empathy, political will, and
courage.
At its best, government is a backstop, a compassionate steward of the
public good. At its best, government catches people when they stumble
at a moment of hardship. At its best, government does right by the
people, all the people.
Struggle does not discriminate, Mr. Speaker. Hardship is not a
character flaw and has zero to do with work ethic. Every single person
is one diagnosis and one layoff away from hardship. Life can change in
an instant.
What we are bearing witness to is not only a lack of political
courage, but it is a fundamental betrayal of the people, incompetence
and indifference to the suffering of our neighbors, the shame and the
sham of it all.
Any Member of Congress who would vote to deny a child a meal or
medication, it is child abuse and neglect. I ought to file a 51A on
Republicans for that. Every person in this Chamber and every person in
our country has lost a loved one to cancer, and yet Republicans would
vote to deny people lifesaving cancer treatment and research.
Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House, and
with a majority they have chosen to enact harm to make people hungry,
poorer, sicker, and less safe.
The shame and the sham of it all. You the people deserve better. We
the people deserve better, and I won't stop fighting until you get it.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close, and I reserve
the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Wisconsin (Mr. Pocan).
Mr. POCAN. Mr. Speaker, yes, the Federal Government will officially
reopen with the House vote today, but here is what won't happen. We
won't protect the 22 million people paying more for the ACA or the 15
million people losing their healthcare outright due to Republican
actions in the big, ugly law, nor will we stop the healthcare rate
increases for everyone in this country.
We won't be restoring food assistance today for the millions of
Americans who benefit from SNAP because House Republicans voted to cut
the number one program that keeps kids and seniors out of poverty by
over $180 billion.
Nor will we be able today to roll back the tax cuts for billionaires
and Republicans' GOP donors that they funded by gutting those
healthcare and food programs.
I sure hope Republicans are tanned and rested after their 8-week paid
vacation, because they are going to need it. Democrats are going to
continue fighting every single day for people's healthcare and food
benefits. We are going to be on Republicans day after day until we get
it done.
Vote ``no.''
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close, and I reserve
the balance of my time.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from
Maryland (Mr. Olszewski).
Mr. OLSZEWSKI. Mr. Speaker, this funding deal is why Americans have
lost faith in Congress. It does absolutely nothing to address the
crushing cost of healthcare, in what amounts to a massive tax hike on
working families.
It does absolutely nothing to stop President Trump from canceling the
very funding we would provide, something he has already done again and
again.
Here is what it does: It allows Senators to write themselves, and
only themselves, million-dollar checks because their phone records were
legally subpoenaed, checks paid for by American taxpayers.
It is corruption at a whole new level. With bribery and insider
trading, someone breaks the law. Here, Congress is writing a law that
protects and funds corruption. It is brazen and disgusting and an
effort to legalize corruption. Anyone who votes for this CR is
complicit in that corruption.
If government still belongs to the people and not the powerful, then
we must reject this self-serving scam.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I don't have enough time to rebut all the absurd claims
made by the other side. Suddenly, they all have an opinion on
healthcare. They had a decade to come up with a plan, and they came up
with nothing.
I am glad they finally acknowledged that this is a dirty CR that
shovels millions of dollars into the pockets of Republican politicians.
They hate this bill so much that they are all going to vote for it.
They say that we shut the government down.
Really, Mr. Speaker?
The last time I checked, Republicans are in charge around here. We
heard for months about their mandate. They control the House, the
Senate, and the White House. They have a duty to keep the government
open, and they failed. They did not have the votes. They refused
to negotiate with us because we wanted to help regular people instead
of billionaires, and now they want to blame us for the consequences of
their own actions.

What the hell is wrong with them?
Give me a frigging break.
America is the richest country in the history of the world. We are
blessed with an abundance of so much. There should not be an
affordability crisis. Every single person in this country should be
able to have a good job, a living wage, affordable food and healthcare,
and have a shot at a better future. That is what I am fighting for.
That is what we are fighting for. That is how I want to make America
great. That is the Democratic vision for what this country could be.
From a moral perspective and from a set of values, we believe it is
immoral to have a system that gives so much to just a few billionaires
by depriving so many of the basic things they need to live a good life.
It is clear to me after this debate that Republicans do not share those
same values.
I am going to fight like hell, and we are going to fight like hell
because I believe in America. We believe in America, and we believe
that the hopes and the dreams of the American people will prevail.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
As we wrap up this debate, I want to take a moment to cut through the
noise from our colleagues on the left. Instead of focusing on the
legislation before us, they are resorting to fear tactics and tossing
out false claims about what this shutdown is really about.
The CR would have kept the government open to continue and finish the
appropriations process. Yet the Democrats refused and instead chose to
shut down the government.
My colleague mentions values. Democrats claim that our values are
different. Democratic Whip Clark said: ``Of course there will be
families that are going to suffer . . . but it is one of the few
leverage times we have.''
So if those are the values they are talking about, I don't share
those values.
Mr. Speaker, I won't make the American people suffer, whether it be
their SNAP payments, whether it be keeping air traffic controllers
paid, or whether it is paying our troops. Making the American people
suffer are not the values that I share.
For the record, Republicans did not cause this shutdown, and we have
not been on vacation. I have been splitting my time between D.C. and
the District, as I mentioned before, meeting with constituents in both,
meeting with Federal agencies, and hosting a teletownhall. I know how
hard my Republican colleagues have been working for their constituents
and the American people.

[[Page H4608]]

It was the Democrats who shut down the government when they refused
to support a clean CR that would have kept the lights on and protected
critical services, and now it is the Democrats who continue to shift
the blame.
Now, getting back to the issue at hand, let's talk about what this
bill actually does.
H.R. 5371 restores the funding for SNAP and WIC. It reimburses the
contingency reserves to make sure that programs remain stable and
reliable. Actually, President Trump moved $300 million of tariff
revenue to fund WIC during the shutdown. Republicans are the ones
protecting food security and not playing games with it.
This bill also delivers for our farmers and ranchers and for rural
development. It invests in the communities that feed this country and
keep the economy strong. It supports our troops and Federal workers. It
ensures our servicemembers and their families have the support they
need, and it honors the promises we have made to those who have served.
Yes, it reopens the government, restores stability, and resumes
regular order.
So let's be honest about what a ``yes'' vote means. A ``yes'' vote is
a vote for veterans care. A ``yes'' vote is a vote for SNAP and WIC. A
``yes'' vote is a vote for $700,000 for a fire engine in Ranking Member
McGovern's district and $1 million for the Navajo Nation Division of
Community Development in Representative Leger Fernandez's district. A
``yes'' vote is for farmers. A ``yes'' vote is for our troops and for
Federal workers, and, yes, it is for reopening the government.
A ``no'' vote is a vote against all of that, including the
development of a wastewater treatment facility in Mr. Neguse's
district, and $1.5 million in watershed conservation in Representative
Clark's district. It is a vote against Federal workers. It is a vote
against healthcare. It is a vote against feeding hungry children, and
it is a vote against common sense.
The material previously referred to by Mr. McGovern is as follows:

An Amendment to H. Res. 873 Offered by Mr. McGovern of Massachusetts

Strike all after the resolving clause and insert the
following:
That upon adoptipon of this resolution it shall be in order
to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 5371) making
continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year
2026, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment
thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention
of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the
Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House
concur in the Senate amendment with the amendment specified
in section 2 of this resolution. The Senate amendment and the
motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on
Appropriations or their respective designees. The previous
question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its
adoption without intervening motion.
Sec. 2. The amendment referred to in section 1 is as
follows:
Page 217, beginning on line 6, strike section 213.
Mrs. FISCHBACH. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and
I move the previous question on the resolution.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on ordering the previous
question.
The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.
Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, the Chair
will reduce to 5 minutes the minimum time for any electronic vote on
the question of adoption of the resolution.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 216,
nays 213, not voting 4, as follows:

[Roll No. 283]

YEAS--216

Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei (NV)
Arrington
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Barr
Barrett
Baumgartner
Bean (FL)
Begich
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs (AZ)
Biggs (SC)
Bilirakis
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Bresnahan
Buchanan
Burchett
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crank
Crawford
Crenshaw
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Downing
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Evans (CO)
Ezell
Fallon
Fedorchak
Feenstra
Fine
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Fong
Foxx
Franklin, Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Garbarino
Gill (TX)
Gimenez
Goldman (TX)
Gonzales, Tony
Gooden
Gosar
Graves
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Hamadeh (AZ)
Haridopolos
Harrigan
Harris (MD)
Harris (NC)
Harshbarger
Hern (OK)
Higgins (LA)
Hill (AR)
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Hurd (CO)
Issa
Jack
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kean
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kennedy (UT)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley (CA)
Kim
Knott
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Langworthy
Latta
Lawler
Lee (FL)
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Mackenzie
Malliotakis
Maloy
Mann
Massie
Mast
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McDowell
McGuire
Messmer
Miller (IL)
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Moolenaar
Moore (AL)
Moore (NC)
Moore (UT)
Moore (WV)
Moran
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Owens
Palmer
Patronis
Perry
Pfluger
Reschenthaler
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Roy
Rulli
Rutherford
Salazar
Scalise
Schmidt
Schweikert
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Shreve
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Stutzman
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner (OH)
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Westerman
Wied
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke

NAYS--213

Adams
Aguilar
Amo
Ansari
Auchincloss
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bell
Bera
Beyer
Bishop
Bonamici
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Bynum
Carbajal
Carson
Carter (LA)
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cisneros
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Conaway
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (IL)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dexter
Dingell
Doggett
Elfreth
Escobar
Espaillat
Evans (PA)
Fields
Figures
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Friedman
Frost
Garamendi
Garcia (CA)
Garcia (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Gillen
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez, V.
Goodlander
Gottheimer
Gray
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (TX)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy (NY)
Khanna
Krishnamoorthi
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latimer
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Liccardo
Lieu
Lofgren
Lynch
Magaziner
Mannion
Matsui
McBath
McBride
McClain Delaney
McClellan
McCollum
McDonald Rivet
McGarvey
McGovern
McIver
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Min
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Morrison
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Olszewski
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pelosi
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Pingree
Pocan
Pou
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Randall
Raskin
Riley (NY)
Rivas
Ross
Ruiz
Ryan
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Simon
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Stansbury
Stanton
Stevens
Strickland
Subramanyam
Suozzi
Swalwell
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Tran
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Vindman
Walkinshaw
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Whitesides
Williams (GA)
Wilson (FL)

NOT VOTING--4

McCaul
Meuser
Onder

Watson Coleman

{time} 1814

Messrs. SORENSEN, POCAN, and Ms. GILLEN changed their vote from
``yea'' to ``nay.''
So the previous question was ordered.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution.

[[Page H4609]]

The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that
the ayes appeared to have it.

Recorded Vote

Mr. McGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.
A recorded vote was ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote.
The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 213,
noes 209, not voting 11, as follows:

[Roll No. 284]

AYES--213

Aderholt
Alford
Allen
Amodei (NV)
Babin
Bacon
Baird
Balderson
Barr
Barrett
Baumgartner
Bean (FL)
Begich
Bentz
Bergman
Bice
Biggs (AZ)
Biggs (SC)
Bilirakis
Boebert
Bost
Brecheen
Bresnahan
Buchanan
Burchett
Burlison
Calvert
Cammack
Carey
Carter (GA)
Carter (TX)
Ciscomani
Cline
Cloud
Clyde
Cole
Collins
Comer
Crane
Crank
Crawford
Crenshaw
Davidson
De La Cruz
DesJarlais
Diaz-Balart
Donalds
Downing
Dunn (FL)
Edwards
Ellzey
Emmer
Estes
Evans (CO)
Ezell
Fallon
Fedorchak
Feenstra
Fine
Finstad
Fischbach
Fitzgerald
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Flood
Fong
Foxx
Franklin, Scott
Fry
Fulcher
Garbarino
Gill (TX)
Gimenez
Goldman (TX)
Gonzales, Tony
Gooden
Gosar
Graves
Greene (GA)
Griffith
Grothman
Guest
Guthrie
Hageman
Hamadeh (AZ)
Haridopolos
Harrigan
Harris (MD)
Harris (NC)
Harshbarger
Hern (OK)
Higgins (LA)
Hill (AR)
Hinson
Houchin
Hudson
Huizenga
Hunt
Hurd (CO)
Issa
Jack
Jackson (TX)
James
Johnson (LA)
Johnson (SD)
Jordan
Joyce (OH)
Joyce (PA)
Kean
Kelly (MS)
Kelly (PA)
Kiggans (VA)
Kiley (CA)
Kim
Knott
Kustoff
LaHood
LaLota
LaMalfa
Langworthy
Latta
Lawler
Letlow
Loudermilk
Lucas
Luna
Luttrell
Mace
Mackenzie
Malliotakis
Maloy
Mann
Massie
Mast
McClain
McClintock
McCormick
McDowell
McGuire
Messmer
Meuser
Miller (OH)
Miller (WV)
Miller-Meeks
Mills
Moolenaar
Moore (AL)
Moore (NC)
Moore (UT)
Moore (WV)
Moran
Murphy
Nehls
Newhouse
Norman
Nunn (IA)
Obernolte
Ogles
Onder
Owens
Palmer
Patronis
Perry
Pfluger
Reschenthaler
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rose
Rouzer
Roy
Rulli
Rutherford
Salazar
Scalise
Schmidt
Scott, Austin
Self
Sessions
Shreve
Simpson
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smucker
Spartz
Stauber
Stefanik
Steil
Steube
Strong
Stutzman
Taylor
Tenney
Thompson (PA)
Tiffany
Timmons
Turner (OH)
Valadao
Van Drew
Van Duyne
Van Orden
Wagner
Walberg
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Westerman
Wied
Williams (TX)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Womack
Yakym
Zinke

NOES--209

Adams
Aguilar
Amo
Ansari
Balint
Barragan
Beatty
Bell
Bera
Beyer
Bishop
Bonamici
Boyle (PA)
Brown
Brownley
Budzinski
Bynum
Carbajal
Carson
Carter (LA)
Casar
Case
Casten
Castor (FL)
Castro (TX)
Cherfilus-McCormick
Chu
Cisneros
Clark (MA)
Clarke (NY)
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Conaway
Correa
Costa
Courtney
Craig
Crockett
Crow
Cuellar
Davids (KS)
Davis (IL)
Davis (NC)
Dean (PA)
DeGette
DeLauro
DelBene
Deluzio
DeSaulnier
Dexter
Dingell
Doggett
Elfreth
Escobar
Espaillat
Evans (PA)
Fields
Figures
Fletcher
Foster
Foushee
Frankel, Lois
Friedman
Garamendi
Garcia (CA)
Garcia (IL)
Garcia (TX)
Gillen
Golden (ME)
Goldman (NY)
Gomez
Gonzalez, V.
Goodlander
Gottheimer
Gray
Green, Al (TX)
Grijalva
Harder (CA)
Hayes
Himes
Horsford
Houlahan
Hoyer
Hoyle (OR)
Huffman
Ivey
Jackson (IL)
Jacobs
Jayapal
Jeffries
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (TX)
Kamlager-Dove
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kennedy (NY)
Khanna
Krishnamoorthi
Landsman
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latimer
Lee (NV)
Lee (PA)
Leger Fernandez
Levin
Liccardo
Lieu
Lofgren
Lynch
Magaziner
Mannion
Matsui
McBath
McBride
McClain Delaney
McClellan
McCollum
McDonald Rivet
McGarvey
McGovern
McIver
Meeks
Menendez
Meng
Mfume
Min
Moore (WI)
Morelle
Morrison
Moskowitz
Moulton
Mrvan
Mullin
Nadler
Neal
Neguse
Norcross
Ocasio-Cortez
Omar
Pallone
Panetta
Pappas
Pelosi
Perez
Peters
Pettersen
Pingree
Pocan
Pou
Pressley
Quigley
Ramirez
Randall
Raskin
Riley (NY)
Rivas
Ross
Ruiz
Ryan
Salinas
Sanchez
Scanlon
Schakowsky
Schneider
Scholten
Schrier
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Sewell
Sherman
Sherrill
Simon
Smith (WA)
Sorensen
Soto
Stansbury
Stanton
Stevens
Strickland
Subramanyam
Suozzi
Swalwell
Sykes
Takano
Thanedar
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Titus
Tlaib
Tokuda
Tonko
Torres (CA)
Torres (NY)
Trahan
Tran
Underwood
Vargas
Vasquez
Veasey
Velazquez
Vindman
Walkinshaw
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Whitesides
Wilson (FL)

NOT VOTING--11

Arrington
Auchincloss
Frost
Kennedy (UT)
Lee (FL)
McCaul
Miller (IL)
Olszewski
Schweikert
Watson Coleman
Williams (GA)

{time} 1821

So the resolution was agreed to.
The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

____________________