[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 186 (Thursday, November 6, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Page S7964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Mr. Welch):
S. 3145. A bill to amend title XI of the Social Security Act to
require the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test a
comprehensive alternative response for emergencies model under the
Medicare program; to the Committee on Finance.
Ms. COLLINS. Mr. President, I rise today with my colleague from
Vermont, Senator Welch, to introduce the Comprehensive Alternative
Response to Emergencies Act, or the CARE Act. Our bipartisan
legislation would require the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services to test a 5 year treatment-in-place model for Medicare. This
model, also known as TIP, is the practice of treating patients in their
homes or where a medical emergency occurs. The pilot program in our
bill would reimburse EMS for the care they administer to seniors in
emergencies outside of the hospital, such as for minor medical
incidents. This program would expand access to health services for
seniors, especially in rural communities, while reducing unnecessary
emergency room visits and expenses.
Emergency room doctors throughout Maine often tell me about the
frequent backlogs and long wait times that patients experience in
waiting rooms. One way to address this problem is to reduce the number
of nonessential emergency room visits. By creating a pathway to
reimburse EMS for treating certain patients at home, the CARE Act will
help decrease the number of emergency room visits and lengthy wait
times.
When EMS arrives after a 9-1-1 call, they usually transport patients
to the emergency department immediately. Many patients, however, may
not need emergency services from a hospital and could be better served
by receiving treatment ``in place.'' EMS is capable of providing a host
of interventions, such as treating hypoglycemia for a patient with a
diabetic emergency or responding to routine, chronic seizures.
Most insurance plans, including Medicare, do not reimburse emergency
medical services unless the patient is transported to the hospital. The
current payment model can thus incentivize transportation to the
hospital even when a less expensive level of care is appropriate.
The CARE Act will also help support EMS providers' long-term
financial viability. According to the Maine Ambulance Association,
approximately 35 percent of EMS calls conclude without transport.
Without reimbursement, EMS providers must absorb the costs of these
calls, further challenging the sustainability of their operations. The
treatment-in-place pilot program proposed by our legislation offers a
solution to this financial burden by reimbursing EMS for this kind of
care.
This model also saves Medicare money. When CMS implemented a trial
version of TIP during the COVID-19 pandemic, the program demonstrated
more than $500 net savings to Medicare per patient encounter.
This commonsense bill builds on the past success of TIP. TIP
increases communities at a time when EMS is facing historic staffing
and financial challenges, by removing the need for time-consuming
transport. The reimbursement of a TIP encounter is only a fraction of
the cost of ambulance transport and a hospital emergency department
visit.
Reducing unnecessary emergency room visits, lowering costs, and
easing the strain on our hospital and EMS workforce will help improve
care overall. The CARE Act presents an opportunity to further test the
TIP model and improve patient care, while supporting the brave first
responders who save countless lives in our communities. Our bill is
supported by the
American Ambulance Association, the Maine Ambulance Association, the
National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians, the National
Rural Healthcare Association, the National EMS Quality Alliance, and
many other local EMS organizations around the country. I urge all my
colleagues to support this legislation.
____________________