[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 134 (Saturday, August 2, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Page S5502]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Jeffrey Epstein
Mr. President, what I wanted to discuss here with Senator Schiff
was--Senator Schiff was an assistant U.S. attorney, which is one of the
prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office. I was a U.S. attorney. U.S.
attorneys have a higher but slightly more ceremonial role, I think
assistant U.S. attorneys would be swift to confess, and AUSAs do a lot
of the direct work.
One thing that Senator Schiff and I both noticed with respect to this
Epstein saga has been that the Deputy Attorney General of the United
States went out and did a direct witness interview with Epstein's
coconspirator and Trump's friend Ghislaine Maxwell.
If you don't know the backdrop to this and how things ordinarily work
in the Department of Justice, it is hard to fathom how very weird that
was, so we would like to take a minute and describe, from our
perspective, how it is that, in regular Department business, the
engagement with witnesses takes place.
I will turn it over to the former assistant U.S. attorney to give his
description of how and when a prosecutor would go into a room with a
witness. But as I do that, let me just say that the Deputy Attorney
General of the United States virtually never ever, ever, ever, ever,
does. For somebody at that level to be involved is truly bizarre.
With that, let me give Senator Schiff a chance to engage in his part
of the colloquy here.
Mr. SCHIFF. Senator, thank you.
There are lots of extraordinary and suspicious happenings around the
Epstein case in the last few months. But just by way of background to
those who may not be following each development, you have Epstein at
one point describing himself as one of Donald Trump's closest friends.
You have Donald Trump saying at one point that he shares a bond with
Epstein over their mutual like of attractive women and pointing out
that, in the case of Epstein, they tend to be on the younger side. You
have the President recently acknowledging he is upset with Jeffrey
Epstein for stealing young women from Mar-a-Lago--by Epstein--for
purposes that he did not disclose--the President did not disclose.
Tragically, in April, one of those women--one of those children,
underage women--working at Mar-a-Lago committed suicide. She was a
victim of the Ghislaine Maxwell-Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking. Just
this past April, she took her own life. But she was one of those women,
apparently, that Trump was upset that Epstein was taking away from him
at Mar-a-Lago. It certainly begs the question of, what did Trump think
Jeffrey Epstein was doing with these young women he was taking from
Mar-a-Lago?
So these are just some of the questions we hope will be answered,
but, of course, after promising the MAGA base that he would disclose
these files, after Bondi promised and Kash Patel promised and Trump
promised, they have reneged on this.
So this is the backdrop in which Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche
goes to visit the No. 1 coconspirator, Maxwell.
The other background piece of this is that Todd Blanche isn't just
some Deputy Attorney General; Todd Blanche is Trump's former criminal
defense lawyer. Todd Blanche is the guy who sat in the courtroom in
Manhattan helping to defend Donald Trump against the Stormy Daniels
allegations against him, for which Donald Trump was convicted of
multiple felonies.
As you will remember from the Judiciary Committee when Blanche came
for his confirmation hearing, you and I were both concerned about
whether Blanche would be able to shed his role as Trump's criminal
defense lawyer when he adopted the new role of being the No. 2 person
in the Justice Department.
All of this begs the question of, when this very unusual thing
happened where the No. 2 person at the Justice Department goes to talk
to the coconspirator, this child sex predator, is he acting as Trump's
defense lawyer or is he acting as a Deputy AG?
As you were alluding to, if this wasn't bizarre enough, for a top
person like that to go interview a witness is unprecedented. For them
to do it secretly--and we don't know if this was recorded; we don't
know if an FBI agent was present. It would be unthinkable to do this in
the absence of an FBI agent taking down the statement, but there is no
evidence that took place.
The only thing we do know is that this interview lasted 9 hours, and
after the interview, Ghislaine Maxwell got the special treatment of
being moved from her prison in Florida to a minimum security prison in
Texas that is like a camp, to which sex predators are not supposed to
be sent. So why did she get that special treatment?
Finally, one other point I would make before I yield back to you
about how unusual all this is, is the defense attorney representing
Maxwell is friends, apparently, with Todd Blanche, the Deputy Attorney
General, and when Maxwell was asked ``Are you hoping for a pardon out
of this? he basically said ``We didn't ask for one, but of course the
President has said he has the power to do it.'' They obviously want
some special treatment. They are already getting it. But we have no
record of any of this.
So, yes, this is so unusual, extraordinary, and unprecedented. And if
they think this is going to somehow answer the questions that have been
raised by their refusal to turn over these documents, it is the
furthest thing from that, wouldn't you say?
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. I see that the Senator from Maryland has come to the
floor to make his unanimous consent request, so let me yield to him
since we are kind of into his time here.
But what Senator Schiff and I can both tell all of you is that it is
extremely rare for even a U.S. attorney to go and do a witness
statement and unusual in most circumstances even for an assistant U.S.
attorney to go and do a witness statement. The reason for that is you
then become a witness to what took place in that room, and you don't
want to be both the prosecutor and the witness in the same case.
So the fact that he went in either alone or with no FBI agent or with
no stenographer and became a witness to what took place sends off
flares of concern to everybody who has served in that line of work.
With that, I yield.
Mr. SCHIFF. Can I make one last point, with your indulgence?
One other extraordinary fact about this is that none of the
prosecutors who actually worked on prosecuting Maxwell were present.
The reason you would want them there is, they know the facts. Blanche
doesn't know the facts. So when you are interrogating this person, when
you are taking their statement, you want somebody who knows the facts,
who can attest to whether they are being forthcoming, telling the truth
or not.
Also, a defense lawyer representing 20 of the Epstein victims asked
to be present, and they were turned down.
This just stinks to high heaven.
I yield to my colleague from Maryland.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Maryland.