[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 129 (Monday, July 28, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4762-S4763]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of David Wright
Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Madam President, I am here to speak to the nomination
of David Wright to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and to express my
opposition. Not only will I be casting my vote against the nomination
of Mr. Wright, but I truly urge all of my colleagues, Republican and
Democrat alike, to do the same, at least until things settle down at
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
At his hearing, I had intended to vote for Mr. Wright and to support
a speedy confirmation through the Senate. But things started going
haywire at the NRC. Mr. Wright has the qualifications to serve on that
Agency and assured us that he wanted to bring expertise, competence,
and independence to the Agency--or I should say, protect the expertise,
competence, and independence of that Agency.
The background here is that Congress created the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission to be an independent Agency to regulate nuclear facilities
and materials. And when Congress did that, we deliberately separated it
from the Department of Energy, and we have protected, for years, that
as an important firewall.
Well, where are we now? The DOGE boys and the Department of Energy
are infiltrating the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, compromising its
integrity, its competence, and its mission. If you support expanding
America's nuclear energy, this situation should alarm you. Even now,
right now as I speak here, conditions aren't getting better at the NRC.
After we pointed this out, they are still deteriorating.
While Mr. Wright committed to Congress that he would promote NRC's
full authority and retain qualified staff and fulfill the Agency's
commitment to the safe use of nuclear energy, that is not what we are
seeing. What we are seeing is a DOGE-DOE detailee who has entered the
top ranks over at the Agency without any Nuclear Regulatory Commission
supervision. He is just planted over there, reporting to who knows who
but, presumably, the Energy Secretary who is supposed to be on the
other side of that firewall.
This DOGE-DOE detailee has been up to some bad business over there.
He has been pushing out the Agency's top experts. Expertise in nuclear
science and nuclear safety is a pretty precious commodity. People who
worked there for years--for decades--are being shoved out. He has been
pursuing reductions in force when, at this moment, the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission needs more staff and help than ever.
And he has been pulling tricks like sidelining the general counsel
over there to put her out of the equation--she, who must be approved by
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission--and slip in a DOGE- and Department
of Energy-driven, so-called chief counsel who the NRC hasn't approved
and doesn't have to approve.
So the way we set it up was the Commission would pick its counsel,
would have to approve it. And that person is being sidelined--the woman
is being sidelined--so this other character can come in a slightly
different role that doesn't require the approval of the Commission and
just elbow her out. This guy is a fossil fuel lawyer. He doesn't know
anything about nuclear energy except that it competes with fossil fuel.
There is no good reason for that shift and a lot of bad reasons.
So my suspicions are up. All of this interference is threatening the
NRC's independence and credibility at a time when the NRC's
independence and credibility matters so much as we try to meet our
unprecedented new demand for nuclear power.
I say this as a longtime champion of nuclear reform. I have been the
top Democrat--the lead Democrat--on all of the nuclear reform bills
that we have passed. It started with the Innovation Act with Senator
Crapo. We went on to the Innovation and Modernization Act with Senator
Barrasso and, most recently, the ADVANCE Act with Senator Capito.
I have put a fair amount of my credibility on the line because I
believe that there is a new renaissance possible with nuclear power
because of the small modular reactors and the safety components that
can be done when you are building the same thing repeatedly and can
test and test for safety; and the next-gen nuclear power that can be
far safer than the older stuff and, if done right, could even burn
through the nuclear waste stockpile, for which we have no other use, to
provide a value power, clean power out of what is now a liability--
nuclear waste.
We really do have a huge opportunity in this industry. The industry
is responding. People are hiring. People are going back to school. This
is really happening, and I want to it happen. I want it to succeed.
So it is really dumb for the Trump administration to be recklessly
interfering with the NRC right now. It ought to be as offensive to
Senator Capito, Senator Crapo, Senator Barrasso as it is to me.
Supporting America's nuclear industry has been a bipartisan project,
and it is working. The NRC has moved. It has changed. These new
projects are moving forward, the small modulars and the next gen.
Things are happening over there.
It is not like they have fouled it up and now deserve to be taken
over by DOGE characters--who don't know anything about nuclear power--
and by the Department of Energy. We are busting a thing that is working
by doing this, and it doesn't seem to be a sensible plan other than the
Department of Energy would like something else to run, even though they
are supposed to be a firewall, and the DOGE people want stuff to wreck.
But the DOE wanting something to run and DOGE wanting something to
wreck is not a justification.
So to send a signal, I will be voting against Mr. Wright. And if--if,
if, if--we could get a few votes to actually stop this nomination--not
for long; just long enough to send a signal to the Department of
Energy: Hands off the NRC; you are not supposed to cross that firewall,
and the NRC itself: Hey, wake up; stand up and get those DOGE folks out
of your shop, and to the nuclear industry, a burgeoning industry right
now: Hey, defend the regulator upon whose credibility you depend,
[[Page S4763]]
then I think we could make some real progress.
So this is not just an angry shout against an incompetent nominee. I
have done that. This is trying to protect an important Agency because
it is essential to accomplishing a key bipartisan goal to renew
America's nuclear industry safely and productively.
With that, I yield the floor.