[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 127 (Thursday, July 24, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4693-S4695]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                       Unanimous Consent Requests

  Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. President, last week, I stood here and introduced a 
simple resolution calling on the Justice Department to release the 
Epstein files, but a Republican Senator blocked it.
  In the week since, even more damning information has come out, and 
now we know exactly why Trump is bending over backwards to keep these 
files hidden.
  We know that Epstein was at Trump's wedding. We know that Epstein 
once called Trump his ``closest friend for 10 years.'' And we have seen 
that Trump wrote Epstein a birthday card and said:
  ``Happy Birthday--and may every day be another wonderful secret.''
  And the real kicker, we learned yesterday that Trump is in the 
Epstein files, and he knows it. The truth is coming out, and the 
coverup is crumbling. So I am here again, and my request is very 
simple. The Senate should go on record supporting the release of the 
Epstein files. Any effort to block their release is simply continued 
coverup for our Nation's elites.
  While I stand here on the Senate floor demanding answers, House 
Republicans have run for the exit, ended their term early, skipping 
town early to avoid taking up any more discussion about Epstein and the 
files. They didn't just punt accountability; they literally fled 
Washington, DC.
  While everyday Americans are struggling to afford their groceries and 
their healthcare, we have a President in the White House focused on 
protecting the most powerful men and women who preyed on children. This 
is who Donald Trump really is. He campaigned as a man of the people. 
When it comes down to it, he is a servant of the powerful and the 
elite. He built a movement claiming to fight those same elites, and now 
he is protecting them every way possible.
  The American people are seeing right through it. They spent years 
listening to Trump promise--promise--that he was going to release the 
Epstein files, and now he is mocking them every day for even believing 
him and all his lies. But the American people are not stupid. They know 
something is off. They smell it.
  If Donald Trump really wants these files released, they would be out 
already. Instead, he is orchestrating a coverup, and he is not acting 
alone. The entire Republican Party, the FBI Director, the intelligence 
community, and the Justice Department are backing him up to bury the 
truth. They are doing everything they can to keep the truth buried 
because they know who is in those documents, and they want to protect 
them and his friends.
  So, today, I am calling on my colleagues to stand with me and stand 
on the side of the American people--not the pedophile elites that they 
are trying to protect--and call on the Justice Department to release 
these files. It is that simple. If there is nothing to hide, then come 
out and prove it.
  Mr. President, as if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule 
XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be 
discharged from further consideration and the Senate now proceed to the 
consideration of S. Res. 325; further, I ask unanimous consent that the 
resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and that the 
motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with 
no intervening action or debate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  The Senator from Oklahoma.
  Mr. MULLIN. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, as we hear 
my colleague from Arizona use I would say very liberal truths as to 
what he was saying by not giving all the facts, I would also pose this 
question: Where was all this outrage over the last 4 years when 
Director Wray was over the FBI and Attorney General Garland was over 
the DOJ?
  He knows, I know, and all the Democrats know that if there was 
anything to do with President Trump, they would have happily released 
it. My lord, you went after him for everything else you could possibly 
think of. Why wouldn't you possibly go after this?
  Well, it is because this is nothing but political theater. We know 
that. We know that what your resolution is--it doesn't actually have 
transparency because we all want transparency. All of us want 
transparency. We want to know actually what happened. The American 
people want to know what has happened. But what this resolution does is 
it actually is a blurred line between the separation of powers.
  When we start dictating to the Department of Justice what they can 
and can't do--there is a clear separation of power. We are the 
legislative branch. That is what we do. We make laws. We can't dictate 
to the other branches on what they must and how they must do their job.
  Now, with that being said, I would simply ask the question: Why now? 
Is it because of their hatred toward President Trump, because they want 
to do anything they can possibly do to distract from what they might be 
hiding? Why wasn't this done the previous 4 years? What happened? They 
had the same files. This case wasn't new.
  So this resolution does absolutely nothing; therefore, I object.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
  The Senator from Arizona.
  Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. President, in response to the Senator from Oklahoma, 
the reason we are here, the reason why there is a request of this 
nature is because there is one and only one administration and one 
campaign that ran more than 8 years that vilified--

[[Page S4694]]

vilified--DOJ employees that were consistently trying to do their best 
job and started a conspiracy theory that has affected hundreds of 
people across this country, a conspiracy theory that caused people to 
start doing shootings at pizza places, that accused other people and 
other politicians of being pedophiles and then said and campaigned that 
``If you elect me, I will release the files.'' That was only one 
campaign, and that was the Trump campaign.
  So now, as he is in power, as he has gotten power, he has 
specifically said he would release it in campaign. He had an Attorney 
General that said: I have the files on my desk right now, and I will be 
releasing it.
  As soon as we heard--first from Elon Musk--that Trump himself was in 
the files, all of a sudden, we started seeing the coverup starting. 
First he wasn't. Then he was. Then it was created by somebody else. 
Then it is coming after him.
  This is all because the President has to answer to the American 
public.
  Did you lie for those 8 years and put all these employees, all these 
innocent people at risk to cover up for your elite friends? Or is there 
something in the file you are trying to hide to protect your friends?
  This whole issue started because of only one person, and one campaign 
has made this a campaign issue. That is why the American public is 
demanding this. That is why the Republican House of Representatives has 
fled Washington, DC--Washington, DC. I have not seen, have not heard of 
the House of Representatives leaving Washington, DC, since we had to 
get away from the redcoats, but that is what happened because this 
President wants to avoid accountability, and this President wants to 
continue to cover up for his elite friends.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oklahoma.
  Mr. MULLIN. Mr. President, we all want transparency and for credible 
information on the Epstein case to be made public so that the American 
people can decide.
  The Trump administration has already said they are committed to 
releasing all available files. Last week, President Trump directed AG 
Bondi to produce any and all permanent grand jury testimony in the 
Epstein case.
  My colleague from Arizona's resolution tells the FBI and the DOJ how 
to do their job.
  My resolution would echo the seriousness of the directive from the 
President and the DOJ to the courts and calls immediately to unseal all 
materials. When combined with what our House colleagues have done, this 
resolution moves forward providing justice to the victims and 
transparency to the American people.
  Mr. President, as I said before, we want transparency, but the courts 
control the grand jury; the judges that oversee the courts control the 
grand jury. We in this body can have resolutions back and forth and 
suggest that it be done, but truthfully, the judges have to do it. AG 
Bondi and the President have both already called upon the judges to 
release this information.
  What my resolution is simply saying is that we agree with the 
President, we agree with AG Bondi on the judges and calling upon the 
judges to release it.
  As if in legislative session and not withstanding rule XXII, I ask 
unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. 
Res. 335, which is at the desk. Further, I ask unanimous consent that 
the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and that the 
motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no 
intervening action or debate.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
  The Senator from Arizona.
  Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, let me 
explain to the American people what just happened. My colleague from 
Oklahoma refused to join me in calling on the DOJ to release all the 
Epstein files. Instead, he offered his own resolution calling on the 
courts to unseal the records.
  When asked if it did both, which I am asking to do both--I want to 
call for transparency, and, of course, we could ask the Justice 
Department and the courts--he is also going to object.
  Republicans are demanding that the courts be transparent but aren't 
willing to ask the same thing of the Trump DOJ. This is the height of 
hypocrisy. They want to tell the courts to be transparent but aren't 
willing for themselves to be transparent.
  This is the second time in 1 week the Senate had the chance to demand 
transparency and stand up for the truth. Instead, my colleagues chose 
to protect, again, the powerful elites.
  If there is truly nothing to hide in those files, then what are they 
so afraid of? What are they hiding? Why the panic? Why the 
backpedaling? Why all the objections?
  Congress should work for the people, not the powerful elites and 
definitely not for one man or one administration. Today's resolution 
should have made that clear.

  Therefore, I ask that the unanimous consent request be modified such 
that my resolution, S. Res. 325, be discharged from the Committee on 
the Judiciary; further, that the Senate proceed to the en bloc 
consideration of S. Res. 335 and S. Res. 325; and that the resolutions 
be agreed to, the preambles be agreed to, and the motions to reconsider 
be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action 
or debate, all en bloc.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection to the modification?
  The Senator from Oklahoma.
  Mr. MULLIN. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, it is 
interesting that my colleague wants to continue talking about the 
elites, but the elites are the ones who actually covered up the last 4 
years of the Biden administration.
  I mean, think about what happened during the Biden administration. 
They covered up, No. 1, for his cognitive behavior; No. 2, they covered 
up the Hunter Biden laptop; No. 3, they covered up the Russiagate and 
continue to cover up the Russiagate; and No. 4, they covered up the 
fact that an autopen signed every--well, every one of his papers except 
one.
  Where was the coverup? Where did the elites come from? Well, it is 
because of the pressure from the Biden administration that actually did 
put it on all the social media outlets.
  It is interesting, when I started talking to the social media 
founders after President Trump was elected, they said: We feel like we 
can actually do our job again. Why? Because the DOJ wasn't threatening 
to sue them; the Biden administration wasn't threatening to blackmail 
them. Yet my colleague from Arizona is saying that we are covering up 
for the elites?
  Let's be honest. We know these files have been out there forever. I 
don't remember a single time the Biden administration called on these 
things to be released, and I definitely don't remember my colleague 
from Arizona calling for these files to be released.
  As I said before, this is nothing more than political theater. 
Everybody sees it. The American people see it. And what else can 
President Trump and AG Bondi do but call on the judges to release the 
information? We are simply going back and forth here saying the same 
thing.
  The difference between my resolution and my colleague from Arizona's 
resolution is mine isn't blurring the boundaries between separation of 
power; mine is simply calling upon the judges to release the 
information. What my colleague's resolution does is truly trying to 
tell the FBI and the DOJ how they can proceed in doing their job and 
how they can actually present the information--basically saying: We 
want all that information to go through Congress.
  Well, I am sure Congress has never once played politics with any 
information. I am sure that this investigation would be handled much 
like other investigations into this administration that the Democrats 
have done over the last, I don't know, 8 years. I am sure this will be 
handled just like any other thing they have tried to go after, like the 
baseless impeachments or the baseless special counsels or the 
unbelievable amount of charges they have tried to file against the 
President. I am sure this will be handled the exact same way.
  What we are simply wanting to do here is give them cover. So if my 
colleague from Arizona actually wants transparency, then he would drop 
his objection to my resolution and just simply have mine go through, 
and we

[[Page S4695]]

can move forward with the transparency that maybe both of us actually 
want.
  Therefore, I object to combining them. I would ask my colleague once 
again to accept my resolution.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard to the modification.
  Is there objection to the original request?
  The Senator from Arizona.
  Mr. GALLEGO. Mr. President, reserving the right to object, let's just 
understand why we are here. The political theater was started more than 
8 years ago--the political theater started just 5 months ago when the 
President said, after appointing his Attorney General, that they are 
going to release the Epstein files; when the Attorney General said ``I 
have those files right here; I am going to show them to you,'' and 
then, all of a sudden, the shenanigans started. All of a sudden, the 
files are gone; they are not there; they were made up by somebody else. 
That is where this political theater is coming from.
  The American public wants to know why. Why, after 8 years of this 
President promising that ``I will release the files''; why after 8 
years, getting into the office and then appointing his Attorney General 
and then directing the Attorney General to go look for those Epstein 
files and that Attorney General saying they are going to release the 
Epstein files and then poof--all of a sudden, there is an issue. All of 
a sudden, there is backpedaling.
  This is what stinks for the American public. This is what smells like 
an elite coverup. That is what we are trying to get to.
  If my good colleague from Oklahoma agreed with me, then we would do 
both because that is what is being demanded by the American public, 
because the first promise was made by this President that they were 
going to release the files. That is where this political theater 
started.
  With that, Mr. President, I object to the good Senator from 
Oklahoma's motion, and I yield back.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
  The Senator from Oklahoma.
  Mr. MULLIN. Mr. President, in closing, I would just simply say that 
maybe my colleague from Arizona and I can work together, if he wants 
to, and we can drop some of the stuff in his resolution. Maybe we can 
come up with a conclusion with my resolution. I have concerns about 
yours blurring the lines between the separation of powers and at the 
same time want transparency.
  If we can both agree we want transparency--we have worked together on 
several issues in the past. Let's sit down and try working this one 
out.
  Mr. President, with that, I yield back.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Kansas.