[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 120 (Monday, July 14, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Page S4324]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CENTRAL TEXAS FLOODS
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, we continue to pray for the families of
the 132 people now confirmed dead in Central Texas. We continue to pray
for everyone still missing. We thank our heroic first responders who
risked their lives to save those trapped in the storm.
Now, in the aftermath of the tragedy in Texas, some of us asked very
necessary questions about how to prevent something like this from ever
happening again: Did Federal funding cuts hinder rescue efforts? Did
staffing shortages make it harder to respond?
Of course, Donald Trump didn't like these questions. He threw a fit,
a tantrum. He called them lies. He said they were inappropriate. That
is how he talks.
We know now why he threw a fit and acted so defensively--because,
sadly, we may well have been right. Donald Trump and Kristi Noem have
spent months attacking FEMA, calling for its elimination, slashing its
budget, and hollowing out its workforce. And, now, their own chaos is
catching up with them in the worst, worst way.
Now, they are trying to change their tune, saying they don't want to
get rid of FEMA. A few months ago, they were all for getting rid of it.
Now, they say they just want to change it. But there aren't enough
walk-backs or pivots in the world to erase the truth. Their actions
have unnecessarily harmed America's disaster response ecosystem.
Last week, I demanded an investigation into what role, if any, the
administration's staff cuts to local and National Weather Service
stations played in this tragedy. It is now clear that the
administration fired key FEMA personnel during and, sadly, after the
tragedy. So, today, it is very clear: This is a systemic problem that
exists in Texas, extends beyond Texas, beyond the National Weather
Service, and across FEMA.
Here are the facts about FEMA: A day after the Texas flooding, FEMA
laid off workers--hundreds of call center workers. On July 7, the
Agency received 16,000 calls and only answered 2,000 of them, around 16
percent.
Secretary Noem, meanwhile, issued a directive on July 11 saying that
all DHS contracts of over $100,000 had to be personally approved by
her, according to the New York Times--including, according to the New
York Times, deployment of search and rescue teams. Every one of them
had to be signed off.
This is not efficiency. This is adding redtape in the midst of a
crisis, authored by Kristi Noem herself. Experts say this ill-advised
decision very likely hindered recovery efforts.
As it stands today, FEMA is operating with a quarter fewer staffers
compared to 18 months ago--one-quarter fewer--including senior-level
officials, meteorologists, institutional experts, people who coordinate
with public officials and other levels of government to respond to
natural disasters.
In the middle of a natural disaster, Donald Trump and Kristi Noem are
sowing chaos at FEMA, and their incompetence is putting lives in
danger.
They and the DOGE people and so many around them, they have this
fanatical dislike of all government, and so they just cut it. They
don't even know what the effect will be. They don't even care. Just
cut, cut, cut. Cut meteorologists who warn our people, our citizens,
our farmers, our businesses of dangers that might come? Cut them? They
are not waste.
Their recklessness is hurting rescue efforts. It has hurt the
existing ones, and it is going to hurt more in the future, unless they
reverse themselves.
We all support making Agencies like FEMA more efficient. Americans
support cutting waste. Americans support improving the Federal
response. But Americans sure as hell don't support DOGE-like cuts to
vital places that can often be the difference between life and death.
The American people do not support this kind of chaos, this chain-saw
approach to FEMA, to the National Weather Service, and to government at
large. What Donald Trump and Kristi Noem are doing is chaos, and it is
going to lead, unfortunately, to even more people getting hurt when the
next disaster arrives.
____________________