[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 120 (Monday, July 14, 2025)]
[House]
[Page H3226]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AMENDMENT TO KAWEAH PROJECT PROVISION
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 1044) to amend Public Law 99-338 with respect to Kaweah
Project permits.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 1044
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO KAWEAH PROJECT PROVISION.
The first section of Public Law 99-338, as amended by
Public Law 108-447, is amended--
(1) by striking ``3 renewals'' and inserting ``7
renewals''; and
(2) by striking ``of Southern California Edison Company''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Hoyle)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.
General Leave
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to
add extraneous material in the Record on H.R. 1044, the bill now under
consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Arkansas?
There was no objection.
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of Representative Valadao's bill, H.R.
1044.
This bill is a commonsense measure to ensure the continued operation
of existing hydroelectric facilities, which have provided reliable and
affordable power to Californians over a century.
The bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to issue four 10-
year renewals for a special use permit for the Kaweah Hydroelectric
Project, thereby extending the project's life for up to 40 additional
years.
These hydroelectric dams, located on the Kaweah and East Fork Kaweah
Rivers, fall within the boundaries of Sequoia National Park, but they
predate the park's expansion and have long been recognized by Congress
as a valuable energy asset.
With the current statutory authorization for the permits set to
expire in 2026, this bill provides much-needed certainty for the
continued operation of a critical source of reliable energy. Without an
extension, Southern California Edison will be forced to remove this
infrastructure at enormous expense to their ratepayers.
I thank Representative Valadao for his leadership on this issue. By
championing this bill, he is ensuring that more than 15 million people
in California have access to affordable, reliable, and clean energy for
generations to come.
Mr. Speaker, I support this bill, and I reserve the balance of my
time.
Ms. HOYLE of Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1044 introduced by my
colleague Representative Valadao of California.
This bill would allow the Secretary of the Interior to issue
additional permit renewals for the Kaweah Project, a hydroelectric
facility that operates within the boundaries of Sequoia National Park.
The Kaweah Project has been generating clean, renewable energy since
1907. Although it was originally granted a 50-year permit, the
boundaries of the Sequoia National Park were later expanded in 1943,
bringing portions of the project, such as flow lines and diversions,
within park lands. Since the project predated the park, it was allowed
to continue operating.
In 2004, Congress authorized the Secretary of the Interior to issue
up to three permit renewals with reasonable safeguards to ensure the
project's continued operation wouldn't harm the park.
These include prohibiting any expansion of the project within the
park, requiring safety assessment, and appropriate compensation for the
use of public resources.
H.R. 1044 would build on that responsible approach. By allowing the
Secretary to continue renewing permits for the Kaweah Project under the
same protective conditions, this bill allows continued hydropower
generation while upholding our responsibility to protect the park for
future generations.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve
the balance of my time.
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to
the gentleman from California (Mr. Valadao), the lead sponsor of the
bill.
Mr. VALADAO. Mr. Speaker, I rise to urge support for my bill, H.R.
1044, which authorizes seven permit renewals for the Kaweah
Hydroelectric Project in Tulare County, California.
Southern California Edison has operated the Kaweah Hydroelectric
Project since 1899, marking well over a century of reliable, clean
power.
For decades, Congress has allowed for the continued use of the
Federal lands for this purpose, but unless we act now, the
authorization will expire in 2026.
Without authorization, Southern California Edison would be forced to
dismantle critical infrastructure, costing ratepayers in the region
tens of millions of dollars and eliminating a clean, reliable, and
affordable source of energy.
This bill ensures that Kaweah can keep operating without disruption
or unnecessary costs for families across California.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Westerman and his staff at the
Committee on Natural Resources for their work on this issue. I urge my
colleagues to support this bill and protect the Central Valley's clean
energy future.
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Ms. HOYLE of Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, this is a straightforward, commonsense
bill. In the world we live in today, where we have more and more
electrical energy demand, it makes no sense to be closing down any kind
of electrical generation, especially one where the infrastructure is
already built, working, and producing reliable and affordable baseload
power.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support Representative Valadao's
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. McDowell). The question is on the motion
offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House
suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1044.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________