[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 120 (Monday, July 14, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H3209-H3211]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           UNDERSTANDING CYBERSECURITY OF MOBILE NETWORKS ACT

  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill 
(H.R. 1709) to direct the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
Communications and Information to submit to Congress a report examining 
the cybersecurity of mobile service networks, and for other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 1709

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Understanding Cybersecurity 
     of Mobile Networks Act''.

     SEC. 2. REPORT ON CYBERSECURITY OF MOBILE SERVICE NETWORKS.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary, in 
     consultation with the Department of Homeland Security, shall 
     submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House 
     of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
     and Transportation of the Senate a report examining the 
     cybersecurity of mobile service networks and the 
     vulnerability of such networks and mobile devices to 
     cyberattacks and surveillance conducted by adversaries.
       (b) Matters To Be Included.--The report required by 
     subsection (a) shall include the following:
       (1) An assessment of the degree to which providers of 
     mobile service have addressed, are addressing, or have not 
     addressed cybersecurity vulnerabilities (including 
     vulnerabilities the exploitation of which could lead to 
     surveillance conducted by adversaries) identified by academic 
     and independent researchers, multistakeholder standards and 
     technical organizations, industry experts, and Federal 
     agencies, including in relevant reports of--
       (A) the National Telecommunications and Information 
     Administration;
       (B) the National Institute of Standards and Technology; and
       (C) the Department of Homeland Security, including--
       (i) the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency; 
     and
       (ii) the Science and Technology Directorate.
       (2) A discussion of--
       (A) the degree to which customers (including consumers, 
     companies, and government agencies) consider cybersecurity as 
     a factor when considering the purchase of mobile service and 
     mobile devices; and
       (B) the commercial availability of tools, frameworks, best 
     practices, and other resources for enabling such customers to 
     evaluate cybersecurity risk and price tradeoffs.

[[Page H3210]]

       (3) A discussion of the degree to which providers of mobile 
     service have implemented cybersecurity best practices and 
     risk assessment frameworks.
       (4) An estimate and discussion of the prevalence and 
     efficacy of encryption and authentication algorithms and 
     techniques used in each of the following:
       (A) Mobile service.
       (B) Mobile communications equipment or services.
       (C) Commonly used mobile phones and other mobile devices.
       (D) Commonly used mobile operating systems and 
     communications software and applications.
       (5) A discussion of the barriers for providers of mobile 
     service to adopt more efficacious encryption and 
     authentication algorithms and techniques and to prohibit the 
     use of older encryption and authentication algorithms and 
     techniques with established vulnerabilities in mobile 
     service, mobile communications equipment or services, and 
     mobile phones and other mobile devices.
       (6) An estimate and discussion of the prevalence, usage, 
     and availability of technologies that authenticate legitimate 
     mobile service and mobile communications equipment or 
     services to which mobile phones and other mobile devices are 
     connected.
       (7) An estimate and discussion of the prevalence, costs, 
     commercial availability, and usage by adversaries in the 
     United States of cell site simulators (often known as 
     international mobile subscriber identity catchers) and other 
     mobile service surveillance and interception technologies.
       (c) Consultation.--In preparing the report required by 
     subsection (a), the Assistant Secretary shall, to the degree 
     practicable, consult with--
       (1) the Federal Communications Commission;
       (2) the National Institute of Standards and Technology;
       (3) the intelligence community;
       (4) the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of 
     the Department of Homeland Security;
       (5) the Science and Technology Directorate of the 
     Department of Homeland Security;
       (6) academic and independent researchers with expertise in 
     privacy, encryption, cybersecurity, and network threats;
       (7) participants in multistakeholder standards and 
     technical organizations (including the 3rd Generation 
     Partnership Project and the Internet Engineering Task Force);
       (8) international stakeholders, in coordination with the 
     Department of State as appropriate;
       (9) providers of mobile service, including small providers 
     (or the representatives of such providers) and rural 
     providers (or the representatives of such providers);
       (10) manufacturers, operators, and providers of mobile 
     communications equipment or services and mobile phones and 
     other mobile devices;
       (11) developers of mobile operating systems and 
     communications software and applications; and
       (12) other experts that the Assistant Secretary considers 
     appropriate.
       (d) Scope of Report.--The Assistant Secretary shall--
       (1) limit the report required by subsection (a) to mobile 
     service networks;
       (2) exclude consideration of 5G protocols and networks in 
     the report required by subsection (a);
       (3) limit the assessment required by subsection (b)(1) to 
     vulnerabilities that have been shown to be--
       (A) exploited in non-laboratory settings; or
       (B) feasibly and practicably exploitable in real-world 
     conditions; and
       (4) consider in the report required by subsection (a) 
     vulnerabilities that have been effectively mitigated by 
     manufacturers of mobile phones and other mobile devices.
       (e) Form of Report.--
       (1) Classified information.--The report required by 
     subsection (a) shall be produced in unclassified form but may 
     contain a classified annex.
       (2) Potentially exploitable unclassified information.--The 
     Assistant Secretary shall redact potentially exploitable 
     unclassified information from the report required by 
     subsection (a) but shall provide an unredacted form of the 
     report to the committees described in such subsection.
       (f) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Adversary.--The term ``adversary'' includes--
       (A) any unauthorized hacker or other intruder into a mobile 
     service network; and
       (B) any foreign government or foreign nongovernment person 
     engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of 
     conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the 
     United States or security and safety of United States 
     persons.
       (2) Assistant secretary.--The term ``Assistant Secretary'' 
     means the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications 
     and Information.
       (3) Entity.--The term ``entity'' means a partnership, 
     association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, 
     subgroup, or other organization.
       (4) Intelligence community.--The term ``intelligence 
     community'' has the meaning given that term in section 3 of 
     the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
       (5) Mobile communications equipment or service.--The term 
     ``mobile communications equipment or service'' means any 
     equipment or service that is essential to the provision of 
     mobile service.
       (6) Mobile service.--The term ``mobile service'' means, to 
     the extent provided to United States customers, either or 
     both of the following services:
       (A) Commercial mobile service (as defined in section 332(d) 
     of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d))).
       (B) Commercial mobile data service (as defined in section 
     6001 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 
     2012 (47 U.S.C. 1401)).
       (7) Person.--The term ``person'' means an individual or 
     entity.
       (8) United states person.--The term ``United States 
     person'' means--
       (A) an individual who is a United States citizen or an 
     alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United 
     States;
       (B) an entity organized under the laws of the United States 
     or any jurisdiction within the United States, including a 
     foreign branch of such an entity; or
       (C) any person in the United States.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Ohio (Mr. Latta) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) each 
will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Ohio.


                             General Leave

  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may 
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and 
insert extraneous material into the Record on the bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Ohio?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1709, the Understanding 
Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act, led by the gentlewoman from 
Florida's Third District and the gentleman from Ohio's First District.
  In recent years, we have seen a rise in large-scale cybersecurity 
attacks that put Americans at risk. Attacks like the Salt Typhoon have 
directly impacted the communications of public officials, including 
President Trump and Vice President Vance.
  While mobile service providers take numerous steps to address 
vulnerabilities in the networks, threats to our mobile networks 
continue to exist. To sufficiently address threats across networks, 
Congress needs a sophisticated and comprehensive assessment of what 
vulnerabilities persist, what issues have been resolved, and where 
mobile cybersecurity policymaking should be focused.
  The Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act requires the 
National Telecommunications and Information Administration, NTIA, to 
submit to Congress a comprehensive report examining the cybersecurity 
at existing wireless networks and vulnerabilities to cyberattacks and 
surveillance by adversaries. This bipartisan bill will ensure 
communications networks are safe and protect the privacy and security 
of the American people.
  This bipartisan legislation passed by a vote of 393-22 in the last 
Congress.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 1709, and I reserve 
the balance of my time.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1709, the Understanding 
Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act.
  The security of our mobile networks and devices is paramount to 
American security overall. Most Americans carry a cell phone or other 
mobile device with them all the time, and this trend is unlikely to 
change as we are only becoming more and more connected.
  Consumers, therefore, deserve to stay in touch with their friends and 
family, use social media, or connect to the internet without fear of 
their devices being hacked. We must ensure that these devices, the 
networks they run on, and the vast amount of data they hold are secure 
and protected from the malicious actions of our foreign adversaries and 
other bad actors.
  H.R. 1709 is an important step toward addressing these concerns.
  This bill directs the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 
Communications and Information to report to Congress on the 
cybersecurity threats our mobile networks and mobile devices face at 
the hands of foreign adversaries and other bad actors. Among other 
things, the report will include an assessment of whether mobile 
carriers have or have not addressed cybersecurity vulnerabilities in 
their respective

[[Page H3211]]

networks. It will also include an analysis of whether there are 
commercially available tools to help consumers evaluate the 
cybersecurity risks of these networks.
  I thank Representatives Landsman and Cammack for their bipartisan 
work on this bill. It is a good step toward ensuring we can protect our 
mobile networks from evolving threats. I know we will continue to work 
toward securing our country's data, devices, and networks, whether from 
a foreign adversary or a domestic threat.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve 
the balance of my time.
  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers, and I reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Landsman), who is a member of our committee.
  Mr. LANDSMAN. Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from Ohio (Mr. Latta) 
and Mr. Pallone.
  This is, I think, a really important bipartisan piece of legislation. 
It is a very simple and straightforward bill. It is simpler than the 
name itself. H.R. 1709, the Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile 
Networks Act, is a mouthful, but the bill is really quite simple, as 
Mr. Latta and Mr. Pallone described.
  We have foreign adversaries like Russia and China that are attempting 
to get our data. There have been breaches, including our own personal 
data and personal devices, and so the goal of this bill is to require 
an interagency group to build out all the information we need to ensure 
that we understand where all of our vulnerabilities are and that we are 
dealing with those vulnerabilities--where are the gaps, how our foreign 
adversaries are accessing data, how could they be accessing our data, 
and how to further our ability to stop our enemies from attacking our 
individual devices.
  This is an important step toward understanding and improving our 
cybersecurity for the safety and protection of all Americans. It passed 
overwhelmingly in the Energy and Commerce Committee. This is a 
bipartisan bill. I thank the staff on both sides of the Energy and 
Commerce Committee, Republican and Democratic, for helping us put this 
together.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support it today.
  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close, and I reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, this is an important bill, as was described 
by the sponsor, and I urge my colleagues to support it. I yield back 
the balance of my time.
  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, cybersecurity is something we have talked 
about not only in the Energy and Commerce Committee for many years, but 
it is also absolutely essential that our wireless networks are not 
vulnerable to attacks, especially by our adversaries across the globe.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge support and ask for passage of the legislation. 
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Latta) that the House suspend the rules and 
pass the bill, H.R. 1709.
  The question was taken.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds 
being in the affirmative, the ayes have it.
  Mr. LATTA. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
  The yeas and nays were ordered.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further 
proceedings on this motion will be postponed.

                          ____________________