[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 113 (Monday, June 30, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4078-S4079]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                                 H.R. 1

  Mr. BENNET. Mr. President, as the Senate debates H.R. 1, I would like 
to state for the record several motions I have to address a range of 
issues with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) that I believe the 
Senate must address.

       The following are motions to commit in the jurisdiction of 
     the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry:
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate with 
     instructions to report the same back to the Senate in 3 days, 
     not counting any day on which the Senate is not in session, 
     with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would ensure that the Secretary of Agriculture 
     continues to pay States 50 percent of the administrative 
     costs incurred in operating the supplemental nutrition 
     assistance program established under the Food and Nutrition 
     Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) in order to prevent 
     overburdening States with those costs.

  The proposal currently in the bill would force states to shoulder 75 
percent of administrative costs, on top of a proposal that would shift 
the responsibility for a portion of benefit expenditures onto States. 
But in States like Colorado, where the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights 
strictly limits state spending and revenue growth, taking on additional 
costs of a major Federal program like SNAP, whether through benefit 
expenditures or increased administrative costs, would be incredibly 
difficult without cutting other essential services. And Colorado is not 
alone. Every State faces its own budget constraints, and this kind of 
cost shift would destabilize the program and put food access at risk 
when State budgets fall short. SNAP reduces poverty, strengthens rural 
economies, and generates $1.50 in local economic activity for every 
Federal dollar invested. It is one of the most effective investments we 
can make to keep families fed and local economies afloat. That is why 
we should not be making it harder for States to afford to administer 
the program. We should be focused on strengthening SNAP's delivery and 
responsiveness, not destabilizing it.
  Senator Adam Schiff also supports this motion.

       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate with 
     instructions to report the same back to the Senate in 3 days, 
     not counting any day on which the Senate is not in session, 
     with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would rescind voluntary conservation funding provided 
     by the Inflation Reduction Act and reinvest the full amount 
     of those rescinded funds into the Environmental Quality 
     Incentives Program, the Conservation Stewardship Program, the 
     Regional Conservation Partnership Program, and the 
     Agricultural Conservation Easement Program.
       Senators Cory Booker, Adam Schiff, and Peter Welch also 
     support this motion.
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate with 
     instructions to report the same back to the Senate in 3 days, 
     not counting any day on which the Senate is not in session, 
     with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would ensure that all rescinded voluntary conservation 
     funding provided by the Inflation Reduction Act is fully 
     reinvested in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program 
     (EQIP), the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), the 
     Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP), and the 
     Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP).

  These programs play a central role in the Department of Agriculture's 
conservation support. Not only do these programs help farmers and 
ranchers protect our natural resources, but they are also incredibly 
popular and consistently oversubscribed. The programs are not just 
about conservation either. They help producers stay afloat by giving 
practical ways to manage climate risks while keeping their operations 
running and providing financial stability. In Colorado, farmers and 
ranchers are already doing the hard work of conserving water, improving 
soil health, and protecting the land. These programs support their 
leadership with voluntary, locally driven solutions. But too often, 
producers ready to do more are turned away because funding runs out. 
That is why we made historic investments in conservation through the 
Inflation Reduction Act. The motion I am submitting today would ensure 
that every dollar that is rescinded from those investments is returned 
to these trusted and proven programs. Farmers and ranchers are already 
stepping up to protect the land and water we all depend on. The least 
we can do is follow through on the commitments we made to them.

       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate with 
     instructions to report the same back to the Senate in 3 days, 
     not counting any day on which the Senate is not in session, 
     with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would establish an emergency relief grant program for 
     migrant and seasonal farmworkers affected by federally 
     declared natural disasters.
       The following are motions to commit in the jurisdiction of 
     the Committee on Finance:
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Finance of the Senate with instructions to report the same 
     back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting any day on which 
     the Senate is not in session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee;
       (2) would strike any provision that forces more paperwork 
     on Medicaid enrollees every 6 months; and
       (3) would ensure big corporations and the ultra-wealthy pay 
     a fair share in taxes.

  My motion to commit would cut bureaucratic redtape in the 
reconciliation bill under consideration today, and I thank Finance 
Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden for his support of my motion as 
well. Among the many egregious Medicaid policies in this bill is a 
requirement that Medicaid expansion adults must prove their eligibility 
every 6 months--twice as often as they do today. Like the other 
Medicaid cuts, this is being disguised as cutting waste, fraud, and 
abuse. But we know that is not what is going to happen. We know that 
qualified people are going to get inappropriately dropped off Medicaid 
for administrative reasons. Putting aside whether we think people 
deserve health insurance regardless of where they live or how much 
money they make, which incidentally I do, this policy will lead to more 
people being uninsured, more uncompensated care for hospitals and 
health clinics, and worse health outcomes. This seems in contradiction 
to the administration's supposed commitment to Making

[[Page S4079]]

America Healthy Again, which is why I oppose this provision, along with 
all of the Medicaid cuts in this bill. My motion to commit will strike 
this unnecessary and harmful requirement, and I urge my colleagues to 
support it.

       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Finance of the Senate with instructions to report the same 
     back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting any day on which 
     the Senate is not in session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would increase the amount and availability of the Child 
     Tax Credit to match levels of the expanded Child Tax Credit, 
     adjusted for inflation, by ensuring big corporations and the 
     ultra-wealthy pay a fair share.
       Senators Raphael Warnock, Cory Booker, Catherine Cortez 
     Masto, Richard Durbin, and Ron Wyden also support this 
     motion.
       The following are motions to commit in the jurisdiction of 
     the Committee on Judiciary:
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Judiciary of the Senate with instructions to report the 
     same back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting any day on 
     which the Senate is not in session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would ensure the definition of `affected area' in 
     downwind states includes the States of Arizona, Colorado, 
     Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, South Dakota, Utah, 
     Wyoming and the territory of Guam due to the catastrophic 
     amounts of radiation exposure in these areas after U.S. 
     testing above ground nuclear weapons during World War II and 
     the Cold War.
       Senators John Hickenlooper, Ben Ray Lujan, Ruben Gallego, 
     Jacky Rosen, Catherine Cortez Masto, Martin Heinrich, and 
     Mark Kelly also support this motion.
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Judiciary of the Senate with instructions to report the 
     same back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting any day on 
     which the Senate is not in session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would--
       (A) establish child-appropriate procedures in immigration 
     court;
       (B) expand access to legal representation for unaccompanied 
     children;
       (C) create dedicated children's dockets within immigration 
     courts; and
       (D) protect the due process rights and safety of children 
     in federal custody.
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Judiciary of the Senate with instructions to report the 
     same back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting any day on 
     which the Senate is not in session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would--
       (A) streamline the work authorization process for asylum 
     seekers and DACA recipients;
       (B) reduce USCIS application backlogs through staffing and 
     modernization;
       (C) ensure timely adjudication of employment-related 
     benefits; and
       (D) strengthen legal pathways to support economic growth 
     and reduce strain on cities like Denver.
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on the Judiciary of the Senate with instructions to report 
     the same back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting any day 
     on which the Senate is not in session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would--
       A. create a path to legal status for long-time agricultural 
     workers; and
       B. modernize the H-2A visa program to stabilize the farm 
     workforce and protect U.S. food security.
       The following is a motion to commit in the jurisdiction of 
     the Committee on Foreign Relations:
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Foreign Relations of the Senate with instructions to 
     report the same back to the Senate in 3 days, not counting 
     any day on which the Senate is not in session, with changes 
     that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would--
       (A) support international efforts to disrupt firearms 
     trafficking networks;
       (B) enhance firearm tracing capabilities and cooperation 
     with Mexico and Central America;
       (C) prevent U.S. weapons from fueling regional violence and 
     forced migration.
       The following is a motion to commit in the jurisdiction of 
     the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs:
       Mr. Bennet moves to commit the bill H.R. 1 to the Committee 
     on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate 
     with instructions to report the same back to the Senate in 3 
     days, not counting any day on which the Senate is not in 
     session, with changes that--
       (1) are within the jurisdiction of such committee; and
       (2) would increase funding for fentanyl interdiction 
     technology and border screening.

                          ____________________