[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 101 (Thursday, June 12, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H2663-H2664]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DOGE HAS UNFETTERED ACCESS TO PERSONAL DATA
(Mr. Larson of Connecticut was recognized to address the House for 5
minutes.)
Mr. LARSON of Connecticut. Mr. Speaker, I, first and foremost, will
associate myself with the remarks of Mr. Neal from Massachusetts about
our dear friend and colleague, Charlie Rangel.
Also, Mr. Speaker, I will point out, as well, that I believe the
Representative from Indiana was on the floor talking about how we
should go after PBS and NPR. ``Sesame Street'' and Big Bird are really
culprits here, and every American ought to be really concerned about
that.
We still have something we call free press and free opinions. If you
think that they are the kind of organization that they are--I believe
the other night on the floor they were called communistic, as well. How
about we have an open public hearing and debate on that and put
legislation forward not in the dark of night but when the public can
actually view what you are saying.
Mr. Speaker, I am here today primarily, though, to talk about Social
Security and also to enlighten, I hope, my colleagues on the other
side. I am very concerned about the Supreme Court's most recent ruling
that overturned two lower courts with no logic and said, no, there
shouldn't be a pause, that DOGE ought to be able to look at everyone's
personal data and records.
To all Social Security recipients and all Americans out there that
are tuned in to this, understand what this is about. This is about DOGE
having access to the more than 70 million Social Security recipients
and everybody who, in fact, is on Social Security, which will include
basically the whole Nation.
Why they need this data they don't make clear, but then again, they
have never been vetted. They have never had to go through a Senate
process. They are a special group status that has no responsibility or
accountability and have been given unfettered access to everyone's
personal data and information.
I would hope that one Republican--perhaps you, Mr. Speaker--will
stand up and speak out against this outrage, because you know how
important Social Security is to your district and how many recipients
you have and how much money comes into your district on a monthly
basis.
Imagine, that hasn't been altered in over 54 years because this body
hasn't taken action, but now Elon Musk and Trump will get over the
dispute they had because their focus is on privatizing Social Security
and going after the $2.7 trillion of the people's money that is in
trust. Their goal is to privatize Social Security by both dismantling
it from within by laying off people, cutting phone service, closing
regional offices, and suspending more than 7,000 workers under the
guise of ``we are after fraud and abuse.''
They are about to take and use something that could be a very
constructive tool in AI, but, no, they are going to be using that tool
to go after the people's data and information and the $2.7 trillion in
the trust fund.
Will anyone on the other side of the aisle join Representatives Neal
and Jeffries in putting forward a bill that stops DOGE from looking at
and taking people's personal data and information?
[[Page H2664]]
{time} 1100
They have no accountability. The only accountability over Social
Security is the United States Congress. If the Republicans remain
silent and let this happen, shame on them for letting this happen.
There is no way that Americans should be subject to a person who hasn't
been verified, people who are going in and looking at their personal
data and information.
I think it is disgusting what is going on, and there ought to be
hearings and, most importantly, there ought to be a vote. We have a
plan. We have a plan not to privatize Social Security, but to enhance
it for the first time in over 54 years, to lift the 5 million people
that get below-poverty-level checks out of it.
____________________