[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 93 (Monday, June 2, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3182-S3185]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                253RD ANNIVERSARY OF THE ``GASPEE'' RAID

  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. Mr. President, I take the Senate back to June 9 of 
1772, and I read from Rory Raven's ``Burning the Gaspee.''

       A handful of longboats glided across the water on a 
     moonless night. The men--some at the oars, other nervously 
     fingering muskets or clubs or handspikes--were silent as they 
     drew closer and closer to the silhouette of a schooner a 
     short distance away. A white British ensign fluttered from 
     the schooner's topmast in a humid breeze.
       A sentry on deck peered into the darkness, catching sight 
     of the approaching boats.
       ``Who comes there?'' he called.
       The men in the boats bristled at the sentry's English 
     accent.
       ``We mean to come aboard,'' replied a big man in the lead 
     boat. ``You cannot,'' the sentry shouted back. ``You cannot 
     come aboard.''
       A moment later, the schooner's commanding officer came on 
     deck. Roused from his bunk, he stood at the rail in his 
     shirtsleeves. Raising a pistol, he warned the men not to come 
     closer.
       Another man in another boat rose to his feet and declared, 
     ``I am the sheriff of the county of Kent''--
  That would be Kent County, RI--
       ``I am the sheriff of the county of Kent, God damn you. I 
     have a warrant to apprehend you, God damn you. So surrender, 
     God damn you.''
       The officer drew his sword and repeated his warning. Some 
     of the sailors under his command joined him, weapons at the 
     ready.
       In one of the boats, a man turned to the friend seated next 
     to him, saying, ``Reach me your gun--I can kill that 
     fellow.''
       The gun was handed over. Shouldering the musket, the man 
     took aim and the shot echoed over across the waters.
       The officer doubled over and fell.

  The officer involved was Lieutenant Duddingston of the Royal Navy. 
The ship he was on was the HMS Gaspee, a naval vessel deployed as a 
revenue cutter to harass the trade of the Rhode Island Colonials.
  There is a bit more of a story around this because before the 
challenge to the Gaspee that led to that shooting, the Gaspee had been 
harassing other Rhode Island shipowners. One of them was a very 
prominent individual.
  The Gaspee seized a boat called the Fortune, and this reading is from 
the chapter ``The Dark Affair, The Gaspee Incident'' from ``An Empire 
on the Edge'' by Nick Bunker.


[[Page S3183]]


  

       Unwilling to trust a local judge, he sent the Fortune round 
     to Boston, a step of doubtful legality that only made matters 
     worse. Unwittingly, the Gaspee had antagonized a family of 
     Rhode Islanders who embodied all the values for which the 
     colony stood.
       The rum [on board] belonged to the Greenes, Quakers with a 
     farm or two, a saw-mill, and a forge for making anchors. The 
     navy had not the slightest idea who they were or why it might 
     not be wise to upset them. But one of the men who owned the 
     cargo was Nathanael Greene, who would soon shed his Quaker 
     beliefs to become the youngest general in George Washington's 
     army and his closest aid from Bunker Hill to Yorktown. As 
     Greene wrote soon after the arrest of the Fortune, the loss 
     of her cargo created ``such a Spirit of Resentment that I 
     have devoted almost the whole of my time in devising measures 
     for punishing the offender.''

  Well, of course, Nathanael Greene was not only George Washington's 
aide-de-camp and administrative officer, but he was also deployed to 
lead the southern campaign in the South, which caused Lord Cornwallis 
to write home to his wife to say:

       That damn Greene is more dangerous than Washington.

  So the Gaspee launched that spirit of resentment that led to a 
General Greene more dangerous than Washington, a Rhode Islander.
  The story of that day is fairly simple. On July 9, 1772, another 
ship, the Hannah, is making her way north toward Providence when the 
Gaspee comes after her, seeking to stop and board her and seeking to 
seize her cargo.
  Well, the Hannah was having none of it and continued sailing north, 
so the Gaspee gave chase. In the course of the chase, the captain of 
the Hannah steered the vessel over a sandy spit that sticks out where a 
river comes into Narragansett Bay at a place called Namquit Point and 
delivers a column of sand.
  Now, the captain of the Hannah knew those waters well, and he knew 
the depths well, and he slid over the shallows in his lighter boat. The 
big-armed Gaspee coming along behind foundered on the sand in a falling 
tide and was stuck. The despised Gaspee and the despised Lieutenant 
Duddingston became a target.
  The Hannah continued up to Providence that night. It was owned by the 
Brown family, who ended up giving their names to Brown University, were 
prominent merchants in 1772, and they rallied several longboats full of 
men who that night, presumably after some refreshment, rode down from 
Providence--miles down--to where the Gaspee was stranded.
  That is where that incident began. It was those men in those 
longboats on that moonlit night who decided they were going to rid 
their beloved Narragansett Bay of the wretched and detested Gaspee, so 
they ended up shooting the captain of the vessel, Lieutenant 
Duddingston. He survived his wounds. They took the vessel. They 
captured the crew. They took everybody ashore. They saw that medical 
care was given to Lieutenant Duddingston. They came back out, and they 
set fire to the Gaspee.
  This painting, which hangs in my office, is a depiction of the Gaspee 
on fire that night. As the fire burned, it came to the powder magazine, 
and the powder magazine exploded. The Gaspee was blown to smithereens 
across Narragansett Bay, and that was the end of her.
  Now, the episode got rather lost to history. I will put it in a time 
context. This is June 9 of 1772. This is more than a year before the 
Boston Tea Party up in Boston Harbor. On that occasion, Massachusetts 
Colonials painted their faces and boarded a civilian vessel and pushed 
tea bags off it into Boston Harbor. That was Massachusetts.
  Rhode Island's effort a year and a half before was to trick the 
military vessel into grounding herself, come down the bay in longboats 
at night, shoot the captain, capture the crew, and blow the boat up.
  What more did we need to do to be in the history books? Well, we are 
getting there. I give this speech every year.
  Rory Raven wrote ``Burning the Gaspee.'' ``The Burning of His 
Majesty's Schooner Gaspee'' by Steven Park. Makes an entire book.
  And I just read ``An Empire on the Edge,'' from an entire chapter on 
the Gaspee incident.
  What happened afterwards is nearly as interesting as the destruction 
of the Gaspee. King George was furious. Parliament was furious. An 
enormous bounty on the heads of the men in those longboats was offered 
by the King--over $100,000 in today's money.
  And officials were sent from England to go and put on a trial. Find 
these men, try them, and hang them. No one would talk.
  About 60,000 people lived in Rhode Island back then, but it was a 
close community, gathered mostly around the shore, a very prosperous 
community because of its trading. And nobody would talk.
  There was never any satisfaction to King George for his rages.
  So, Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Washington Post 
article be printed in the Record.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

               [From the Washington Post, Dec. 14, 2023]

 Boston Tea Party? Rhode Island Says its Rebellion was First--and Just 
                              as Important

                            (By Dan Diamond)

       You'd be forgiven for thinking you know this story.
       American colonists, itching for independence, stormed a 
     British vessel. A spark in New England helped ignite a 
     national revolution.
       But this was not the Boston Tea Party.
       Eighteen months before colonists dumped tea in Boston 
     Harbor--an event that marks its 250th anniversary this week--
     Rhode Islanders attacked and destroyed a British navy ship 
     off the coast near Providence, furious with what they saw as 
     the crown's overreach.
       The burning of the HMS Gaspee on June 10, 1772, was the 
     first major armed act of rebellion by the American colonists, 
     Rhode Island historians and officials maintain. And the 
     resulting fallout--with King George III demanding that the 
     perpetrators be held accountable in a showdown between the 
     colonial legal system and the British courts--helped unify 
     the colonies for the war to come.
       ``[T]his is a Matter in which the whole American Continent 
     is deeply concerned and a Submission of the Colony of Rhode 
     Island to this enormous Claim of power would be made a 
     Precedent for all the rest,'' founding father Samuel Adams 
     wrote to Rhode Island's deputy governor in January 1773.
       But the Gaspee affair, which shook the colonies and rattled 
     the crown, has been largely forgotten outside of Rhode 
     Island. It's been overlooked in U.S. history classes and 
     remains little studied by historians of the American 
     Revolution. The Washington Post reviewed six high school and 
     college U.S. history textbooks and found no mention of the 
     burning of the Gaspee, even as multiple pages were devoted to 
     later--and, in the minds of many Rhode Islanders, lesser--
     events such as the Boston Tea Party.
       ``Nobody knows that well before anybody pushed a tea bag 
     off a civilian ship in the Boston Harbor, Rhode Islanders 
     blew up a military vessel,'' Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) 
     said in a recent interview in his office--sitting in front of 
     a painting that depicts the burning of the Gaspee.
       The senator from Rhode Island has repeatedly given speeches 
     that celebrate the Gaspee raiders, and he's denounced the 
     attention paid to Massachusetts, saying that leaders of his 
     neighboring state have spent centuries spinning their own 
     history.
       ``They got drunk, painted themselves like Indians and 
     pushed tea bags into the Boston Harbor, which we in Rhode 
     Island think is pretty weak tea compared to blowing up the 
     goddamn boat and shooting its captain,'' Whitehouse told The 
     Post. ``But you know, all those Massachusetts people went on 
     to become president and run Harvard . . . so they told their 
     story, and their story, and their story.''
       Rhode Island-based historians agreed that the Gaspee affair 
     is a case study in how important chapters in history become, 
     well, history. The state's own firsts--Rhode Island, for 
     example, was the first colony to declare independence from 
     Britain on May 4, 1776, two months before the other 12 
     colonies--tend to get relegated to footnotes in national 
     stories about the revolution.
       ``So much focus is put into Massachusetts history, and 
     Rhode Island gets overlooked,'' said Kathy Abbass, the 
     principal investigator of the Rhode Island Marine Archaeology 
     Project, which is working to locate the wreckage of the 
     Gaspee off the shore of Warwick, R.I. ``Partly that's because 
     the early histories were written by professors at Harvard and 
     Yale, which set the tone for all the histories that came 
     later.''


                        The attack on the Gaspee

       There's little dispute over the events leading up to the 
     burning of the Gaspee--only how historically significant they 
     were.
       In Rhode Island, as across the colonies, residents were 
     bristling at the taxes, fees and other burdens imposed by a 
     British parliament an ocean away. That parliament, meanwhile, 
     grew frustrated by what leaders saw as Americans' efforts to 
     evade the responsibilities of being part of the British 
     Empire.
       ``The British were trying to raise money by capturing 
     vessels that were sneaking stuff in and not paying duty,'' 
     Abbass said. ``And yes, of course we were smugglers [in Rhode 
     Island]--there's no doubt about that.''

[[Page S3184]]

       Commanded by Lieutenant William Dudingston, a Scottish 
     naval officer, the Gaspee sailed into Narragansett Bay in 
     early 1772, seeking to enforce trade laws that the American 
     colonists were increasingly flouting. The British ship began 
     to abruptly board colonial vessels off the coast of Rhode 
     Island and seize their cargo, such as barrels of smuggled 
     rum. Accusations soon proliferated that the Gaspee's crew was 
     stealing sheep and hogs from local farmers, and cutting down 
     their fruit trees for firewood.
       Rhode Islanders compared Dudingston to a pirate, sued him 
     in a local court (which found against him) and even sought 
     his arrest. But the British warned that anyone who attempted 
     to interfere in the Gaspee's work would be executed.
       ``Let them be cautious what they do; for as sure as they 
     attempt it, and any of them are taken, I will hang them as 
     pirates,'' British Adm. John Montagu wrote to Rhode Island's 
     governor in April 1772.
       Then came June 9.
       A small ship called the Hannah, reportedly owned by Rhode 
     Island entrepreneur John Brown, was headed toward Providence. 
     It refused the Gaspee's exhortations to stop--probably 
     because the Hannah carried illegal cargo--and the British 
     gave chase. But the Hannah's captain, a local man named 
     Benjamin Lindsey, knew the area better than Dudingston, and 
     he led the Gaspee into waters that had receded because of the 
     daily tides. The British ship ended up stuck on a sandbar, 
     waiting for the tides to change again hours later.
       The Hannah successfully slipped away to Providence, where 
     Lindsey quickly recounted his tale to Brown, one of the 
     city's leading merchants, who was a member of the loose 
     resistance movement known as the Sons of Liberty and part of 
     the family that helped found Brown the Ivy League university 
     that would later bear its name.
       Brown was also a smuggler--one of Rhode Island's most 
     notorious, Abbass said--and had been nursing a grudge against 
     Dudingston and his ship.
       Learning that the Gaspee was temporarily marooned, ``Mr. 
     Brown immediately resolved on her destruction,'' Ephraim 
     Bowen, a local man who was among the several dozen men who 
     joined Brown, would recount decades later.
       As many as 60 men gathered in the Providence harbor that 
     evening, launching boats and muffling their oars to quietly 
     row out to the Gaspee under cover of darkness. As they 
     approached the ship, a confrontation began--with one of the 
     Gaspee raiders asserting that Dudingston was a criminal who 
     had evaded the local law, Bowen recounted--that led to 
     Dudingston being shot in the groin and arm and all of the 
     ship's crew being taken from the vessel.
       The Rhode Islanders burned the Gaspee to the water line 
     early on the morning of June 10. Then the gunpowder on board 
     exploded, sending pieces of the ship flying.
       As news of the attack made its way to London, British 
     leaders seethed. In a royal proclamation, King George III 
     offered a reward of up to 1,000 pounds sterling--more than 
     $150,000 in today's currency--to anyone who could help 
     identify and convict the ``outrageous and heinous Offenders'' 
     behind the ship's burning. He also established a commission 
     to conduct a formal inquiry, and the British vowed to 
     transport any colonists indicted in the attack to England for 
     trial and, almost certainly, execution.
       But no arrests were ever made. Rhode Islanders refused to 
     volunteer information about the Gaspee raiders, and local 
     officials found ways to slow or stymie the British 
     investigation. Colonial leaders further argued that anyone 
     involved in the Gaspee's burning should face a jury of their 
     peers in America. A Rhode Island sheriff even arrested 
     Dudingston as he recovered from his wounds, charging him for 
     the Gaspee's previous seizures of cargo.
       Meanwhile, the nation's founding fathers exchanged fervent 
     messages about the Gaspee's burning and the British response, 
     setting up the committees of correspondence that helped them 
     coordinate strategies in the years to come.
       Adams, particularly, warned that Britain's determination to 
     pursue the Gaspee affair, and the discussion of the 
     deployment of troops, could lead to a cascade of events that 
     might spark ``a most violent political Earthquake through the 
     whole British Empire if not its total Destruction,'' he wrote 
     in January 1773 to Rhode Island's deputy governor, Darius 
     Sessions.
       ``I have long feard that this unhappy Contest between 
     Britain & America will end in Rivers of Blood,'' Adams wrote.


                 An `uncelebrated burning' is forgotten

       Most of the Rhode Islanders involved in the burning of the 
     Gaspee successfully concealed their identities from the 
     British and even other colonials, helping confound the 
     crown's probe. In some ways, their effort to hide was too 
     successful: Even today, about half the men who burned the 
     Gaspee are unknown.
       But as the American Revolution began to slip out of living 
     memory, Rhode Islanders tried to lay a claim to the first 
     shot fired.
       ``The first blood that was shed in the revolutionary 
     contest, by that very act begun, stained her deck, and it was 
     drawn by a Rhode Island hand,'' William Hunter, a former U.S. 
     senator from Rhode Island, said in an address on July 4, 
     1826--50 years after the signing of the Declaration of 
     Independence. ``Yes, the blood of Lieutenant Duddington was 
     the first blood drawn in the American cause.''
       Those efforts to highlight the Gaspee affair had limited 
     success. In the fight over the American legacy, Rhode Island 
     would end up largely nudged to the side--a casualty of a 
     battle between larger states, chiefly Massachusetts and 
     Virginia, that were disproportionately home to some of the 
     era's most influential figures.
       ``There was a very busy group of Boston-based intellectuals 
     who were eager to frame Boston as the driver of the 
     revolution and Bostonians as the inheritors of the legacy of 
     the revolution,'' said Nat Sheidley, a historian who runs 
     Revolutionary Spaces, a Boston-based organization that runs 
     public programs about colonial America--including this week's 
     anniversary of the tea party. He added that America's elite 
     leaders initially downplayed a number of revolutionary 
     events, such as the destruction of tea in Boston's harbor, 
     fearing that it would undermine the sense of order in the 
     young nation.
       ``But by the 1830s, it felt a little bit safer to go 
     there,'' Sheidley said. ``And so that's the moment where . . 
     . the name `Tea Party' is invented, and it becomes 
     popularized as a story of what led us to the revolution.''
       A century later, a 1922 New York Times article detailed 
     ``the uncelebrated burning'' of the Gaspee and asked why the 
     Boston Tea Party had developed a ``much stronger hold'' upon 
     Americans.
       ``[A]s an exhibition of daring the tea party was literally 
     a tea party and nothing more compared with the Gaspee 
     incident,'' Jonathan A. Rawson Jr. wrote in the Times.


                  The Gaspee affair's place in history

       Even today, some historians are largely unfamiliar with the 
     Gaspee or suggest that its burning was a regional matter, The 
     Post found. But in Rhode Island, lore about the Gaspee is 
     thriving. For 57 years, local volunteers have held an annual 
     celebration--known as Gaspee Days--featuring a parade to 
     celebrate the burning of the ship, which is increasingly 
     joined by government officials, reenactors and thousands of 
     residents.
       ``Declare your independence from bank fees!'' reads one ad 
     from a local credit union in last year's 250th anniversary 
     booklet.
       Other efforts abound. Rhode Island's secretary of state 
     offers free Gaspee posters on demand. A Brown University 
     instructor created a virtual reality app that allows users to 
     be immersed in a reenactment of the story. A license plate 
     depicting the burning of the Gaspee became available to state 
     drivers this fall--and it looks ``wicked cool,'' said John 
     Concannon, a retired pediatrician who is Gaspee Days' 
     historian.
       It's all part of a larger state goal: to ensure that the 
     burning of the Gaspee is never forgotten again. Historians 
     who have studied the event said that it merits more mention, 
     particularly in textbooks.
       ``The thing about the Gaspee that is important was that the 
     king took notice,'' said Abbass, who has written about other 
     colonial attacks on British vessels that preceded the burning 
     of the Gaspee but provoked negligible reaction from the 
     crown.
       The king's intervention also led to a British attempt to 
     circumvent the colonial courts, causing alarm and ultimately 
     backfiring on the crown, Concannon said. He argued that 
     several articles in the Declaration of Independence, 
     including the right to a jury of one's peers, stem from the 
     Gaspee affair--a more significant contribution to that 
     document than made by the Boston Tea Party, he said.
       That's one reason this weekend's latest celebration of the 
     events in Massachusetts continues to vex Rhode Islanders. 
     When it comes to the founding of America, Concannon said, the 
     burning of the Gaspee is ``just as important.''
       Philip Bump, Azi Paybarah and Dan Lamothe contributed to 
     this report.
  Mr. WHITEHOUSE. And you can recognize the picture I just showed you, 
it is in the article, and it does quite a good job of putting into 
context this rebellious act by Rhode Island that took place nearly a 
year before the Boston Tea Party and yet is mostly overlooked by 
historians.
  Here is another version of the Gaspee aflame before it explodes, and 
here are the men in the longboats coming away from it having lit that 
fire.
  So it is important enough that I thought I might try a poetical hand 
to it. I have read this before, and I will read it again.

       Listen, my colleagues, and you shall see
       How Rhode Islanders blew up the dread Gaspee.
       Great Britain was fearsome, she ruled the sea,
       But Rhode Islanders burned with the fire to be free.
       So when George sent his frigate to tax our coast,
       And its arrogant captain was heard to boast
       That he'd soon have Rhode Island under his sway,
       Well, a course was set for a fateful day.
       Narragansett Bay sparkled bright and blue June 9 of 1772,
       The trading ship Hannah was making her way
       With cargo for Providence that fine day.
       King George's Gaspee pursued in chase,
       But the Hannah decided to give her a race.
       Away fled the Hannah with wind in her sails,

[[Page S3185]]

       As the Gaspee's cannon fired from its rails.
       Evading the Gaspee's cannon balls,
       The Hannah sailed for the Namquid shoals.
       Fast and light, Hannah crossed the shallow,
       But when the Gaspee attempted to follow,
       She ran aground on the Warwick shore,
       In a falling tide, and could move no more.
       That night dark longboats with muffled oars,
       Came slipping quietly down the shore,
       To rid our Bay of the dread Gaspee,
       And show old King George that Rhode Island be free.
       The battle was fierce off Warwick Neck.
       When the gunsmoke cleared from the Gaspee's deck,
       The Rhode Islanders had her as their prize,
       And her crew bound up in chains and ties.
       When the crew was ashore, Pawtuxet's Rangers
       Assured they'd present us no further danger.
       Back to the Bay, in the dark of the night,
       Went the Gaspee Raiders to set her alight.
       The fire spread through the Raiders' prize,
       'Til a blast filled the Narragansett Bay skies.
       The fire had reached the Gaspee's magazines,
       And her gunpowder blew her to smithereens.
       Away sped the raiders into the dark,
       Leaving in the embers freedom's spark.
       ``I want their names!'' King George demanded,
       And ordered the Raiders be apprehended.
       But his call for hangings came to naught:
       His nooses hung empty; no charge was brought;
       Because never a traitorous tale was told.
       Rhode Island stood steady, silent, and bold.
       The spark that was struck in the Gaspee Raid
       Lit a flame that still burns in our hearts today.
       And the lesson from then is a lesson now,
       That every American still will avow.
       ``However majestic your powers may be,
       You should heed our warning: don't tread on me.''

  So that is the tale of the Gaspee. And one day it will get its 
appropriate notice in history.
  I yield the floor.

                          ____________________