[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 76 (Wednesday, May 7, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H1885-H1886]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OPPOSING ILLEGAL POWER GRABS
(Mr. Espaillat of New York was recognized to address the House for 5
minutes.)
Mr. ESPAILLAT. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to the Trump
administration's illegal power grabs.
Through executive orders, the Trump administration continues to
circumvent Congress and violate the checks and balances of our three
branches of government. He also continues to ignore court orders,
including from the highest Court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court,
inching every day closer and closer to a constitutional crisis.
{time} 1030
Mr. Speaker, in addition, Senate and House Republicans have made it
clear time and time again that they have no interest in holding the
President accountable to the American people and the Constitution of
the United States of America, leaving the judicial branches of
government as our strongest tool, leaving the courts as our only hope.
Within hours of taking office, President Trump issued an executive
order that would have unlawfully denied birthright citizenship, which
is guaranteed to everyone born in America by the 14th Amendment. He did
this although this principle has been affirmed
[[Page H1886]]
by the courts on numerous occasions. Currently, the courts have halted
this executive order, citing how unconstitutional it is. More than 200
Democrats filed an amicus brief against this executive order when it
was challenged in court. This attempt has been successfully halted.
In February, over a dozen religious organizations filed a lawsuit.
These organizations sued the Department of Homeland Security after the
administration rescinded guidance that would prevent immigration
enforcement in sensitive locations, like schools, hospitals, and houses
of worship.
Mr. Speaker, you could be praying at a church or in a synagogue or
temple, and immigration enforcement could bust in to arrest somebody as
they pray to their God. They tried to implement this aggressive
practice, and yet people have gone to the courts for relief.
This echoes my own bill, H.R. 1061, Protecting Sensitive Locations
Act, which would codify the Biden-era guidance. More than 70 of my
Democratic colleagues have joined to support this legislation.
Democrats have been hard at work to support ongoing legal cases by
joining our amicus briefs.
When the Trump administration tried to dismantle the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, the agency that provides relief to
consumers, 200 Democrats filed an amicus brief when it went to court.
The amicus brief was cited by the judge in the decision, pausing the
dismantling of this important bureau.
Mr. Speaker, after one of Trump's latest crackdowns on scientific
research at universities, Harvard filed a lawsuit against the
administration, arguing that its freezing of research funding is
unconstitutional and flatly unlawful.
Though undocumented families and small businesses were explicitly
encouraged for decades by government and legal counsel to come forward
out of the darkness and pay their taxes through their ITIN number, the
Trump administration is now trying to target this data to carry out his
mass deportation plan.
This is not just an immigration issue; this is a privacy issue.
Taxpayer privacy is key to our democracy. That is why, as chair of the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus, I led the CHC in an amicus brief on this
legislation. More than 100 Democrats have signed on.
It is clear through his actions and his words that President Trump
has no interest in upholding the Constitution and granting every
American the due process that they are owed. There has been a
longstanding tradition of underrepresented communities resorting to the
judicial system when all else has failed to hold larger, richer, and
more powerful entities accountable.
We must continue the fight to uphold the right to due process. We
must fight to continue to hold the Trump administration accountable. We
must preserve our system of checks and balances. Not to do so would
damage the balance of power and permanently fracture our democracy.
____________________