[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 73 (Thursday, May 1, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2730-S2732]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Frank Bisignano
Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, I rise to urge my colleagues to reject
Frank Bisignano's nomination to be the Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration.
The first 100 days of Donald Trump's second term have been filled
with chaos and cruelty that have reached into every corner of American
life. Perhaps no development has been as alarming to the elderly and
other concerned Americans as the attacks of the Trump administration on
Social Security.
Social Security has long been considered the third rail of American
politics. It is simply too important to American workers who spent
their lives paying into the program out of every paycheck for
politicians to idly propose major changes that would harm the earned
benefits of Americans. Yet Donald Trump and his billionaire allies have
decided that they are simply immune to the concerns of American
citizens. They are about to find out just how wrong they are.
Over the past several months, the Trump administration has attacked
nearly every aspect of Social Security. First, it was Americans'
sensitive private information protected by Social Security. Then it was
scheduling field offices for closure across the country. Then it was
eliminating phone service for many Social Security claims.
Worst of all, there is a widespread view among Donald Trump's top
lieutenants, from Elon Musk to Howard Lutnick, that Social Security is
just chock-full of fraudsters. The whiplash caused by day after day of
all the disruption and chaos has resulted in bedlam at Social Security,
and, in my view, it has put the earned benefits of millions of
Americans in jeopardy.
Mr. President, I wish I could stand in the Senate today and say the
cavalry is coming; the chaos will soon be over. But I am afraid that is
not the case.
If Frank Bisignano is confirmed, he is going to bring more of the
chaos, lies, and callous disregard for Americans who count on Social
Security that the Trump administration has brought to the Agency
through DOGE. That was front and center when the nominee came before
the Finance Committee in March.
That was front and center when the nominee came before the Finance
Committee in March. Just before the hearing, I received a very valuable
statement from a whistleblower, a former senior official at Social
Security. The whistleblower stated that Mr. Bisignano had been deeply
involved in the DOGE chaos at Social Security. The whistleblower said:
I am concerned that the President's nominee to be
Commissioner of Social Security, Frank Bisignano, will not
temper the crisis but rather bolster it.
The allegations presented by the whistleblower center around Elon
Musk's DOGE and their attempts to access Social Security databases that
[[Page S2731]]
hold reams of personal, sensitive information of every single American.
These databases represent the Fort Knox of Americans' personal lives--
bank account numbers, home addresses, work history, salaries, medical
records. Trump's DOGE cronies wanted unfettered access to the
databases. They are still fighting for that as we speak, after they
have been blocked in court.
According to the whistleblower, Mr. Bisignano personally appointed
his Wall Street friend Michael Russo to be the leader of the DOGE team
at Social Security. According to the Washington Post, which
independently verified the whistleblower's account:
After Russo had trouble persuading the career staff to
expedite the hiring of a DOGE software engineer named Akash
Bobba, ``Mr. Bisignano personally intervened . . . to
instruct Social Security Administration staff to onboard Mr.
Bobba and give him immediate access'' to the agency's private
data systems. Bisignano did not address what role he may have
had in helping Mr. Bobba gain access. Bobba and Russo did not
respond to requests for comment.
That is a direct quote from the Washington Post newspaper.
My view is this is a remarkable statement that ought to alarm all
Americans.
I asked Mr. Bisignano about his affiliations with DOGE before,
during, and after his hearing. Each time, he disavowed the
whistleblower's allegations. I viewed that moment as an opportunity for
Democrats and Republicans to come together, as we have done so often on
a bipartisan basis, and get to the bottom of this before the Finance
Committee reported the nominee to the full Senate. Unfortunately, my
Republican colleagues didn't see it that way.
I started by asking the chairman of the Finance Committee for a
bipartisan meeting with this whistleblower to evaluate their claims and
seek additional evidence to determine if the nominee lied to members of
the committee. The majority refused to hold that meeting or postpone
the committee vote unless we agreed to hand over any information
received from the whistleblower directly to the nominee and the Trump
administration.
I just want to be clear on this point. This is a violation of
Whistleblowing 101. That is because it allows the government to
identify the individual blowing the whistle through a process of
elimination. It jeopardizes the whistleblower's anonymity and safety,
and I am going to have no part of that as the cochair of the
Whistleblower Caucus with my friend Chuck Grassley. There is a long
bipartisan tradition in the Senate of treating whistleblowers with
great respect and deep care.
I am here to warn America now about a dangerous erosion of
congressional oversight that will have a chilling effect on public
servants who are thinking about coming forward and blowing the whistle
when government Agencies are acting against the interests of the
Americans they serve.
Mr. President, I fear that the events I have just described are going
to cause public servants who want to do the right thing to put away
their whistles. That is bad for good government, it is bad for
congressional oversight of laws we delegated to the executive branch
through our constitutional authority, and it is bad for Americans who
expect their government to be responsive and transparent.
The double whammy of disrespect for Social Security and the Americans
who count on its earned benefits, along with the culture of secrecy and
lies that exist throughout the Trump administration, is a bad omen for
what is ahead for Social Security.
Even if the Republican Party decides to pretend none of this is
happening, Americans from Portland, OR, to Portland, ME--all of them--
are speaking out, literally, this weekend.
All Americans should be concerned that a nominee for a position of
public trust like Commissioner of Social Security is accused of lying
about his actions at the Agency, and that efforts to bring this
important information to light are now being thwarted.
If Mr. Bisignano can get away with lying before he is even in place
as Commissioner, who knows what else he will be able to get away with
once he is in office? He could lie by denying any American who paid
their Social Security taxes the benefits they have earned, claiming
some phony pretense. He could lie about how sensitive personal
information is being mishandled or, worse, exploited for commercial
use.
I will close with this. I am going to have a lot more to say about
the nominee and the Trump administration's disastrous record on Social
Security. Today, I urge my colleagues to vote no on the cloture vote
coming up to bring sanity back to Social Security and, in my view,
safeguard the Senate's long and bipartisan tradition as a safe haven
for government whistleblowers who want to speak truth to power.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Moreno). The Senator from Idaho.
Mr. CRAPO. Mr. President, I rise today to urge my colleagues to vote
in favor of the confirmation of Mr. Frank Bisignano, who is nominated
to be the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.
The Social Security Administration has the significant responsibility
of overseeing the Social Security Program, which provides monthly
benefits to millions of seniors, individuals with disabilities, and
their families. The Social Security Administration also oversees the
Supplemental Security Income Program and issues Social Security numbers
and cards, among other critical workloads.
I am confident that Mr. Bisignano has the experience needed to lead
this important Agency. He has more than 30 years of executive
leadership experience in banks and financial institutions. He currently
serves as the chairman of the board and the chief executive officer of
Fiserv, Incorporated, a leader in payments and financial technology.
During his nomination hearing, Mr. Bisignano committed to improving
customer service at the Social Security Administration, including by
bringing down wait times for the Agency's national 800 number and for
claims decisions; ensuring that individuals can interact with the
Social Security Administration in the way they prefer, whether in
person, by phone, or online; and improving the Social Security
Administration's payment accuracy.
During Mr. Bisignano's nomination hearing, concerns were raised
regarding his alleged connections to DOGE's work at the Social Security
Administration. These allegations were raised in an anonymous letter
dated March 24, 2025, the day before the nomination hearing.
The allegations focused on the frequency and details of
communications between the nominee and Social Security Administration
officials. Mr. Bisignano addressed these allegations during the hearing
and responded in writing as part of the questions for the record. He
has stated clearly that he does not currently have a role at the Social
Security Administration and was not part of the decision-making process
led by the Acting Commissioner, Lee Dudek, about Social Security
operations, personnel, or management.
The Social Security Administration needs steady, Senate-confirmed
leadership. Mr. Bisignano would bring his decades-long focus on
customer service and operational excellence to the Social Security
Administration.
I strongly encourage my colleagues to join me in voting to confirm
Mr. Bisignano to serve as the next Commissioner of Social Security.
Mr. WYDEN. To respond to my colleague, who I have worked together
with so often in such a positive way, this is an area where we just
have a very significant difference of opinion.
The whistleblower was a senior official who worked for years at
Social Security. I believe the information given was credible,
documented now by the Washington Post reporter who surveyed some of the
resources and the individuals who could confirm it.
What I want to do, because I have worked with my colleague so often,
is to have a bipartisan process to resolve the matter. What the
majority said was, if we were going to have a bipartisan process, we
would take the information that the whistleblower gave and we would
give it to the administration and anybody else. And it would breach the
essence of Whistleblowing 101--what we have worked on for so long.
So I want it understood that I still wish we were doing this in a
bipartisan way, as I have done for so long as the cochair of the
Whistleblower Caucus.
[[Page S2732]]
That would resolve it, and it would be done with the tradition of
protecting whistleblowers, as we have done so often over the years and
especially in the Finance Committee.
What I think is unfortunate is this is breaking the tradition that
the Finance Committee has always done in terms of protecting
whistleblowers, doing it in a fair way, and working together. I think
we will regret it.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Idaho.
Mr. CRAPO. Mr. President, briefly to respond, we worked very closely
with our colleagues across the aisle to try to vet this anonymous
letter and get the information necessary to evaluate it. We are still
willing to look at it.