[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 73 (Thursday, May 1, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Page S2727]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




  PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL UNDER CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 5, 
    UNITED STATES CODE, OF THE RULE SUBMITTED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL 
 PROTECTION AGENCY RELATING TO ``REVIEW OF FINAL RULE RECLASSIFICATION 
  OF MAJOR SOURCES AS AREA SOURCES UNDER SECTION 112 OF THE CLEAN AIR 
                             ACT''--Resumed
                              S.J. RES. 31

  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sheehy). Under the previous order, the 
Senate will resume consideration of S.J. Res. 31.


 =========================== NOTE =========================== 

  
  On page S2727, May 1, 2025, first column, the following appears: 
S.J. Res. 31 The PRESIDING OFFICER. (Mr. Sheehy). Under the 
previous order, the Senate will resume consideration of S. J. Res. 
31
  
  The online Record has been corrected to read: PROVIDING FOR 
CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL UNDER CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 5, UNITED 
STATES CODE, OF THE RULE SUBMITTED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
AGENCY RELATING TO ``REVIEW OF FINAL RULE RECLASSIFICATION OF 
MAJOR SOURCES AS AREA SOURCES UNDER SECTION 112 OF THE CLEAN AIR 
ACT''--Resumed The PRESIDING OFFICER. (Mr. Sheehy). Under the 
previous order, the Senate will resume consideration of S. J. Res. 
31


 ========================= END NOTE ========================= 


  Under the previous order, all debate time is expired. The clerk will 
read the title of the joint resolution for the third time.
  The joint resolution was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading 
and was read the third time.


                          Vote on S.J. Res. 31

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The joint resolution having been read the 
third time, the question is, Shall the joint resolution pass?
  Mr. DURBIN. I ask for the yeas and nays.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
  There appears to be a sufficient second.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  The bill clerk called the roll.
  Mr. BARRASSO. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the 
Senator from Alabama (Mrs. Britt).
  Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Rhode Island (Mr. 
Whitehouse) is necessarily absent.
  The result was announced--yeas 52, nays 46, as follows:

                      [Rollcall Vote No. 229 Leg.]

                                YEAS--52

     Banks
     Barrasso
     Blackburn
     Boozman
     Budd
     Capito
     Cassidy
     Collins
     Cornyn
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crapo
     Cruz
     Curtis
     Daines
     Ernst
     Fischer
     Graham
     Grassley
     Hagerty
     Hawley
     Hoeven
     Husted
     Hyde-Smith
     Johnson
     Justice
     Kennedy
     Lankford
     Lee
     Lummis
     Marshall
     McConnell
     McCormick
     Moody
     Moran
     Moreno
     Mullin
     Murkowski
     Paul
     Ricketts
     Risch
     Rounds
     Schmitt
     Scott (FL)
     Scott (SC)
     Sheehy
     Sullivan
     Thune
     Tillis
     Tuberville
     Wicker
     Young

                                NAYS--46

     Alsobrooks
     Baldwin
     Bennet
     Blumenthal
     Blunt Rochester
     Booker
     Cantwell
     Coons
     Cortez Masto
     Duckworth
     Durbin
     Fetterman
     Gallego
     Gillibrand
     Hassan
     Heinrich
     Hickenlooper
     Hirono
     Kaine
     Kelly
     Kim
     King
     Klobuchar
     Lujan
     Markey
     Merkley
     Murphy
     Murray
     Ossoff
     Padilla
     Peters
     Reed
     Rosen
     Sanders
     Schatz
     Schiff
     Schumer
     Shaheen
     Slotkin
     Smith
     Van Hollen
     Warner
     Warnock
     Warren
     Welch
     Wyden

                             NOT VOTING--2

     Britt
     Whitehouse
       
  The joint resolution (S.J. Res. 31) was passed, as follows:

                              S.J. Res. 31

       Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
     United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 
     disapproves the rule submitted by the Environmental 
     Protection Agency relating to ``Review of Final Rule 
     Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under 
     Section 112 of the Clean Air Act'' (89 Fed. Reg. 73293 
     (September 10, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or 
     effect.

                          ____________________