[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 73 (Thursday, May 1, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H1804-H1805]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GAS PRICES ARE LOWER FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT CALIFORNIANS
(Under the Speaker's announced policy of January 3, 2025, Mr. Kiley
of California was recognized for 30 minutes.)
Mr. KILEY of California. Mr. Speaker, there is good news for
Americans when it comes to gas prices. They are down about 50 cents
since last year, but unfortunately this good news does not extend to
Californians. As you can see here, we remain a stark outlier with by
far the highest gas prices in the country.
As of just a couple days ago, gas prices in California are 29 cents
higher than second place Hawaii, an island State. Third place is
Washington. Our gas prices are 52 cents higher than Washington. They
are 88 cents higher than fourth place Oregon, 94 cents higher than
fifth place Nevada, a $1.16 higher than sixth place Alaska.
This is truly astounding and is one of the main reasons why it has
become so hard for people to get by in our State. Now, it is no mystery
why this is so: California has by far the highest gas tax in the
country, our cap-and-trade program adds a huge amount to the price of
each gallon, as well as the requirements of our fuel blend in
California.
All of these taxes and regulations combine to give California by far
the highest gas prices in the country already and now we have just
learned that another refinery is closing. So two refineries have
announced they are shutting down in California thanks to our insane
energy policies. This certainly is not going to help matters.
It is time for Governor Newsom and the California Legislature to
restore just a little bit of common sense when it comes to our energy
policies because we cannot afford for these trends to continue. Indeed,
it is one of the main reasons that people have been leaving our State
in record numbers over the last several years.
Update on the High-Speed Rail Project
Mr. KILEY of California. Mr. Speaker, I will provide an update on the
nonexistent high-speed rail project in California. As I have noted on
this floor before, I have introduced a resolution or legislation to cut
off all future Federal funding for California High-Speed Rail. I was
with Secretary Duffy when he announced an investigation into where the
recent Federal funding has actually gone and I have called upon the FBI
Director Kash Patel to launch an investigation into what happened to
the $17 billion that has already been spent.
At this point, the cost of the project is estimated to be about $100
billion more than it was initially sold to the public.
But we did get some news this week and maybe I have been a little too
unkind to high-speed rail.
The new CEO--and, by the way, this is the fifth CEO--so there have
been five more CEOs than there have been riders. Five CEOs, zero
riders. But the new CEO came out with some exciting news. He announced
that he has a goal by the year 2045 of completing the line going from
Palmdale to Gilroy.
So let's parse that statement, a goal of by 2045 going from Gilroy to
Palmdale to Gilroy.
Well, 2045 is, of course, 20 years from now. I will note that when
the project was passed in 2008, it was supposed to be done, the entire
thing, by 2020. So the whole thing was supposed to be done 5 years ago,
but now the CEO is saying I have got an exciting ambitious plan. We are
going to have Palmdale to Gilroy completed in 20 years. And this is
just the goal.
There have been a number of goals in the past, in the tortured 17-
year history of this project, and they have blown right past them,
missing deadline after deadline with more cost overruns than we can
even keep track of.
{time} 1345
Then, finally, when you look at what his goal--which is very unlikely
to actually be reached--is, it is to go from Palmdale to Gilroy. Where
are these places?
Remember, the initial project was supposed to ultimately go from Los
Angeles to San Francisco, the two main population hubs of California.
Well, Palmdale is a ways away from L.A. It is about 37 miles
northeast of Los Angeles, so if traffic is good, it will take you an
hour in your car or 2 hours if you are using existing public
transportation.
Think about this. You are taking our high-speed rail which, by the
way, isn't going to be that fast. It will probably be the slowest high-
speed rail system in the world if it even gets built. Then you get out
at Gilroy, and you have to somehow have a car there and drive another
hour or you hop on public transit for another 2 hours of travel just to
get into L.A.
It is similar on the north part of it. Gilroy is 70 miles from San
Francisco, and you would be going for at least another hour, probably
more, you would certainly be driving more than an hour after hopping
off there if you actually wanted to get into the city.
Of course, I am being facetious when I say that this is an exciting,
ambitious plan. It is just another example of why we need to end this
project once and for all. There is absolutely no reason that State or
Federal taxpayers should continue to fund a project that is going
absolutely nowhere, especially when our roads are in such bad shape,
among the worst in the entire world.
It is time to redirect this spending toward transportation needs that
will actually improve the quality of life for Californians.
Covered California Trackers
Mr. KILEY of California. Mr. Speaker, an investigation by CalMatters
has revealed something extremely disturbing when it comes to the
personal health information of Californians.
It has been revealed that the website of Covered California, which is
the State's ObamaCare exchange, had a tracker that was collecting the
personal health information of Californians, and then transmitting that
information for marketing purposes.
Specifically, the CalMatters investigation discovered that trackers
on the website of Covered California collected and sent personal
information to Linkedin through one of the company's trackers called an
Insight tag. This information included very personal health
information, whether the individual was blind, disabled, pregnant,
whether they used prescription drugs, their gender identity, whether
they are a victim of domestic abuse, how often they sought care at
inpatient or outpatient facilities.
A spokesperson for Covered California even admitted they installed
these trackers as part of a marketing campaign, and the trackers, by
the way, were not removed until this CalMatters report was published.
This illegal action was undertaken despite the fact that Linkedin has
publicly advised on their website that the Insight tags ``should not be
installed on web pages that collect or contain sensitive data and that
pages offering specific health-related or financial services or
products to consumers,'' that should not be there, either.
However, despite these warnings, Covered California proceeded. I
believe this raises a serious issue under HIPAA, a law designed to
protect the privacy of individuals' personal health information.
I have written to Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F.
Kennedy, Jr., to ask for an investigation into what happened in
California, into how this was allowed to happen and to any illegal
violations that may have occurred. Specifically, I am asking Secretary
Kennedy to investigate whether Covered California violated
[[Page H1805]]
HIPAA or any other laws, who authorized the use of the trackers, what
controls exist to protect privacy in California's Affordable Care Act
exchange? How did Covered California evade those controls? How many
people have been impacted? Have they been notified? Has there been any
restitution? Why did Covered California use the trackers contrary to
Linkedin's explicit guidance? I am asking how this sort of violation
can be prevented in the future. This is truly unacceptable, and I am
looking forward to getting some answers from this investigation.
Congratulating Mark and Marcus Haney
Mr. KILEY of California. Mr. Speaker, I wanted to take a moment today
to commemorate John Adams Academy for its inaugural Servant Leadership
Award Gala, which is taking place this weekend.
Now, John Adams is an exceptional school in my district. As a matter
of fact, they have three schools now--in Roseville, El Dorado Hills,
and Lincoln--and there are hundreds of families on the waiting list.
This is a charter school. The school is so popular that there are
hundreds of families who want to go there, as well.
If you walk through one of their campuses, you will see quotes from
the Founding Fathers on the walls, and you will see all signs of the
classical education philosophy that guides the school's instruction.
I have had the chance to work with John Adams over the years in many
ways. I have judged the Constitution Bowl at their school. I have been
to their ceremonies for veterans. I have met with their student council
and participated and helped judge debates that they were a part of. It
is truly a special place. This Servant Leadership Award really embodies
the spirit of the institution.
John Adams was founded by Dr. Dean Forman, and he is spearheading
this Servant Leadership Award, which will be awarded this weekend, and
the inaugural recipients will be Mark and Marcus Haney. Mark Haney runs
the Growth Factory in Rocklin, which helps early-stage entrepreneurs
build startup businesses. They work with them to build the funding case
and leadership capacity to attract the capital and team needed to
support scaling a high-growth company.
Then his son, Marcus Haney, started AllegiantVETS, which is a way to
provide a bridge for veterans leaving military service to be integrated
into jobs in their local communities.
Mark Haney, his father, says:
We have imagined the impact that the most resourceful
regional leaders could have if united to help one promising
entrepreneur. The Growth Factory is the realization of that
vision multiplied by a hundred.
I am a little biased in this respect because I have seen the impact
that the Haney family has had on our community in so many different
ways. In fact, I honored Marcus Haney with the Veteran of the Year
award when I was a member of the State legislature.
I wanted to also give you a description that Dr. Forman has given for
what a servant leader is because I think it is a timely reminder in
these times in many ways of what we should aspire to in public service
or in other forms of community leadership.
The description of a servant leader is as follows: Robert K.
Greenleaf said: ``The great leader is seen as servant first.''
``A servant leader is a servant first, driven by an inner compass of
virtues or core values, with a natural desire to serve and empower
others. This is not about being subservient but about sincerely wanting
to help others by identifying and meeting needs.
``A servant leader has the gift of persuasion through moral
authority: the principled use of natural virtues unique to them for the
benefit of others. Positional authority: titles, credentials, degrees
give only the opportunity to lead but it is the actions in behalf of
others that can command, inspire and motivate change and moral behavior
in others. A servant leader has submitted himself to his higher nature
and asks, `What is wanted of me?'
``A servant leader has vision. They have knowledge of the past,
recognize what is needed to improve their life, family, community and
world and act to bring about a better future for others.
``A servant leader applies true principles such as: public and
private virtue, natural law, liberty, life, personal responsibility, et
cetera.
``A servant leader has the ability to build coalitions and inspire
others to follow as first among equals. They see where things are in
their condition, where they should be, and then insert themselves to
voluntarily move self and others to the ideal. They model what they
teach. Every servant becomes a leader because of their example and
influence.
``A servant leader understands that life is not just a quest for
pleasure or power but of meaning. Meaning and happiness is found when
one is dedicated to a cause greater than oneself. The servant nature is
not bestowed and cannot be taken away; it is who one is deep inside.
Once this is recognized the servant intentionally chooses to lead.
American Classical Servant Leadership is about becoming.''
I just say thank you to Dr. Forman and John Adams Academy for
providing this tremendous recognition. I look forward to seeing the
award promote this idea of servant leadership in the years to come.
Congratulations to Mark and Marcus Haney on being the inaugural
recipients.
Secure Rural Schools
Mr. KILEY of California. Mr. Speaker, today I am calling on the House
of Representatives to act with urgency to reauthorize Secure Rural
Schools. The program, unfortunately, because of the House's lack of
action, has been allowed to expire. Even though the Senate did pass it
last year, the House failed to do so.
Secure Rural Schools provides critical funding for a number of
counties in my district and across the country. It was enacted in the
year 2000, and it compensates counties with large amounts of national
forest land for lost revenue due to declining Federal timber sales. The
funds support local schools, roads, and essential public services.
Congress reauthorized the program through fiscal year 2023, but, as I
mentioned, the authorization expired in September 30, 2023, and final
payments were paid in April of 2024. Congress must reauthorize this to
avoid critical funding shortfalls.
For example, in some of the counties of my district: Plumas County
relies on Secure Rural Schools for $3.7 million, Sierra County for
$942,000, Yuba County for $122,000, Nevada County for $393,000, Placer
County for $839,000, El Dorado County for $2.1 million, and Alpine
County for $493,000.
Many of those counties are small counties. This provides critical
funding that they need because they have a large amount of Federal land
and don't have a large tax base.
I am calling on House leadership and my colleagues on both sides of
the aisle to act with urgency to get this measure passed and make sure
that these communities receive the funding that they need and that they
rely upon.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________