[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 70 (Monday, April 28, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H1665-H1666]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           FOREIGN ADVERSARY COMMUNICATIONS TRANSPARENCY ACT

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 906) to direct the Federal Communications Commission to 
publish a list of entities that hold authorizations, licenses, or other 
grants of authority issued by the Commission and that have certain 
foreign ownership, and for other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                                H.R. 906

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Adversary 
     Communications Transparency Act''.

     SEC. 2. LIST OF ENTITIES HOLDING FCC AUTHORIZATIONS, 
                   LICENSES, OR OTHER GRANTS OF AUTHORITY AND 
                   HAVING CERTAIN FOREIGN OWNERSHIP.

       (a) In General.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall publish on 
     the internet website of the Commission a list of each 
     entity--
       (1) that holds a license issued by the Commission pursuant 
     to--
       (A) section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
     U.S.C. 309(j)); or
       (B) the Act of May 27, 1921 (47 U.S.C. 34 et seq.; commonly 
     known as the ``Cable Landing Licensing Act'') and Executive 
     Order 10530 (3 U.S.C. 301 note; relating to the performance 
     of certain functions vested in or subject to the approval of 
     the President); and
       (2) with respect to which--
       (A) a covered entity holds an equity or voting interest 
     that is required to be reported to the Commission under the 
     ownership rules of the Commission; or
       (B) an appropriate national security agency has determined 
     that a covered entity exerts control, regardless of whether 
     such covered entity holds an equity or voting interest as 
     described in subparagraph (A).
       (b) Rulemaking.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall issue rules 
     to obtain information to identify each entity--
       (A) that holds any authorization, license, or other grant 
     of authority issued by the Commission (other than a license 
     described in subsection (a)(1)); and
       (B) with respect to which a covered entity holds an equity 
     or voting interest that is required to be reported to the 
     Commission under the ownership rules of the Commission.
       (2) Placement on list.--Not later than 1 year after the 
     Commission issues the rules required by paragraph (1), the 
     Commission shall place each entity described in such 
     paragraph on the list published under subsection (a).
       (c) Paperwork Reduction Act Exemption.--A collection of 
     information conducted or sponsored by the Commission to 
     implement this section does not constitute a collection of 
     information for the purposes of subchapter I of chapter 35 of 
     title 44, United States Code (commonly referred to as the 
     ``Paperwork Reduction Act'').
       (d) Annual Updates.--The Commission shall, not less 
     frequently than annually, update the list published under 
     subsection (a), including with respect to any entity required 
     to be placed on such list by subsection (b)(2).
       (e) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Appropriate national security agency.--The term 
     ``appropriate national security agency'' has the meaning 
     given such term in section 9 of the Secure and Trusted 
     Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1608).
       (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
     Communications Commission.
       (3) Covered country.--The term ``covered country'' means a 
     country specified in section 4872(f)(2) of title 10, United 
     States Code.
       (4) Covered entity.--The term ``covered entity'' means--
       (A) the government of a covered country;
       (B) an entity organized under the laws of a covered 
     country; and
       (C) a subsidiary of an entity described in subparagraph 
     (B), regardless of whether the subsidiary is organized under 
     the laws of a covered country.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) and the gentlewoman from Michigan (Mrs. 
Dingell) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.


                             General Leave

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks 
and insert extraneous material in the Record on this particular bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 906, the Foreign Adversary 
Communications Transparency Act, led by the gentleman from Virginia 
(Mr. Wittman), my good friend.
  Entities with ties to our adversaries--China, Russia, Iran, and North 
Korea--are threats to our communications networks, unfortunately, but 
it is a reality.
  This legislation requires the FCC to publish a list of those entities 
holding a license, authorization, or other authority granted by the 
FCC. Understanding which adversaries are in our networks and the 
threats they pose, is necessary to securing our networks.
  I thank Representative Wittman, a great Member, for his leadership on 
this bill, which passed last Congress by voice vote, and I urge my 
colleagues to support this very important and necessary bill. I reserve 
the balance of my time, Mr. Speaker.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 906, the Foreign Adversary 
Communications Transparency Act. At the end of last year, we learned 
that Salt Typhoon, a cyber espionage operation backed by the Chinese 
Communist Party, infiltrated several American telecommunications 
networks to gain access to detailed information on former Vice 
President Harris and other political figures, as well as access 
American surveillance information.
  This is extremely disturbing and a stark reminder of the lengths to 
which foreign adversary countries will go to use our media and 
communications networks to disrupt and divide us, weakening our economy 
for their own benefit. Whether it is through communications equipment, 
the networks themselves, or social media, we have seen these operations 
time and time again, which is why we must stay vigilant to minimize 
these risks or avoid them altogether.
  Fortunately, today, we are taking additional action to address these 
and future threats. H.R. 906 would require the Federal Communications 
Commission to publish a list within 4 months indicating any entities 
with ties to China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran that hold wireless 
and undersea cable licenses that power our country's mobile and fixed 
communications networks.
  The bill would also require the FCC to issue rules in 18 months to 
help it attain foreign ownership information for the remaining 
authorizations, licenses, and grants that the agency issues. The FCC 
would then publish on its list any additional entities with ties to 
China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran no later than 1 year after the new 
rules are adopted. The FCC would also

[[Page H1666]]

need to update this entity list annually.
  This bill is particularly important since we know our communications 
networks carry Americans' most sensitive personal and government data 
on a daily basis, so we must have a clear understanding if any foreign 
adversary countries or the companies operating within those countries 
are investors in our networks.
  With this bill, we continue to secure our communications networks, 
protect Americans and their personal data, and help better protect our 
allies as they, too, rely on our global undersea cable network for 
broadband services.
  I thank Representatives Castor, Khanna, Wittman, and Kean for their 
bipartisan work and leadership on this legislation. Mr. Speaker, I urge 
all of my colleagues to support H.R. 906, and I reserve the balance of 
my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to 
the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wittman), the sponsor of this bill.
  Mr. WITTMAN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Foreign 
Adversary Communications Transparency Act, known as the FACT Act. I 
introduced this bill in January, and I have been pleased to see it 
advance through committee and now onto the House floor.
  First, I thank Chairman Guthrie, Chairman Hudson, and the entire 
Energy and Commerce Committee for advancing this bill, and Leader 
Scalise for bringing it to the floor today. Additionally, 
Representatives Stefanik, Kean, Castor, and Khanna have been strong 
partners in garnering support for this legislation as cosponsors. I 
also thank my staff as well as those fellow cosponsors on the Energy 
and Commerce Committee and in leadership for their diligent work on 
this important bill.
  I also applaud the administration for taking the CCP's threat to our 
national security seriously. Communist China is using every tool at its 
disposal to conduct a coordinated campaign to surveil and collect 
information on Americans. We should all be deeply concerned about that. 
China is not our friend.
  China looks to defeat us both economically and strategically. This is 
one of many means that they are using to accomplish that. They are 
infiltrating our telecommunications networks and technology sectors for 
the sole purpose of doing harm to the United States and its friends. 
Despite this clear threat, far too many companies with ties to the CCP 
and other foreign adversaries still hold authorities to operate in the 
United States, often without the public's knowledge. That is absolutely 
unacceptable.
  While companies like Huawei and ZTE are well known, others controlled 
by the CCP continue to fly under the radar. They are doing this 
purposely. They are creating entities that are third- and fourth-order 
separates from these main organizations to be able to obfuscate those 
connections back to the CCP.

  That is where the bipartisan FACT Act comes in. It would require the 
Federal Communications Commission to publish a list of these companies 
that hold FCC authorizations and have any ownership by foreign 
adversarial governments, including our adversaries like China, Russia, 
North Korea, and Iran.
  This transparency is critical. Americans deserve to know which 
companies inside our tech and telecommunications markets are linked to 
hostile regimes. Shining a light on this malign influence is the first 
step toward a stronger action to defend our communications 
infrastructure and our national security.
  We know what these threats are. We have seen them develop. We have 
seen them accelerate. We have seen what China's intent is. The FACT Act 
will mark real, bipartisan progress in achieving these efforts. It is a 
necessary step to protect Americans from surveillance and infiltration 
by foreign adversaries like the Chinese Communist Party.
  I urge my colleagues to support this critical legislation, and I look 
forward to continuing to work together to defend American sovereignty 
and security.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the distinguished 
gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Castor), a great leader on this issue.
  Ms. CASTOR of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I thank Mrs. Dingell for yielding 
the time, and I thank Chairman Bilirakis for moving the bill forward to 
the floor today.
  I rise in strong support of H.R. 906, the Foreign Adversary 
Communications Transparency Act. This bill would require the Federal 
Communications Commission, the FCC, to publish a public list of 
entities with ties to foreign adversarial governments, such as China, 
Russia, North Korea, and Iran, especially if they have a license or 
authorization that is tied to our communications networks.
  Along with Representative Wittman, I serve on the bipartisan Select 
Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and 
the Chinese Communist Party. Last Congress, the committee released a 
bipartisan report on maintaining America's economic and national 
security interests. The report found that the widespread adoption of 
certain People's Republic of China-developed technologies in the United 
States poses a significant risk to national security and threatens 
long-term U.S. technological competitiveness.
  Our committee report recommended that we enact the FACT Act to shine 
a light on companies connected to foreign adversarial governments like 
the CCP and to ensure greater accountability and transparency in our 
critical communications networks.
  Our bill passed the House unanimously by voice vote in the last 
Congress, but it didn't quite get over the finish line. We really have 
no more time to wait, Mr. Speaker. Our adversaries continue to target 
our communications systems, so Congress must take steps now to protect 
our communications, telecommunications infrastructure and strengthen 
our national security to keep Americans safe. I urge a ``yes'' vote on 
the bill.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I strongly urge that my 
colleagues on both sides of the aisle support H.R. 906, the Foreign 
Adversary Communications Transparency Act for the security of our 
Nation. I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I commend Representative 
Wittman and Representative Castor for their good work on this 
particular bill, and I urge passage. I yield back the balance of my 
time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Fulcher). The question is on the motion 
offered by the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) that the House 
suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 906.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________