[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 70 (Monday, April 28, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H1663-H1665]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




 FUTURE USES OF TECHNOLOGY UPHOLDING RELIABLE AND ENHANCED NETWORKS ACT

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 2449) to direct the Federal Communications Commission to 
establish a task force to be known as the ``6G Task Force'', and for 
other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 2449

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Future Uses of Technology 
     Upholding Reliable and Enhanced Networks Act'' or the 
     ``FUTURE Networks Act''.

     SEC. 2. 6G TASK FORCE.

       (a) Establishment.--Not later than 120 days after the date 
     of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall establish 
     a task force to be known as the ``6G Task Force''.
       (b) Membership.--
       (1) Appointment.--The members of the Task Force shall be 
     appointed by the Chair.
       (2) Composition.--To the extent practicable, the membership 
     of the Task Force shall be composed of the following:
       (A) Representatives of companies in the communications 
     industry, except companies that are determined by the Chair 
     to be not trusted.
       (B) Representatives of public interest organizations or 
     academic institutions, except public interest organizations 
     or academic institutions that are determined by the Chair to 
     be not trusted.
       (C) Representatives of the Federal Government, State 
     governments, local governments, or Tribal Governments, with 
     at least one member representing each such type of 
     government.
       (c) Report.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date on 
     which the Task Force is established under subsection (a), the 
     Task Force shall publish in the Federal Register and on the 
     website of the Commission, and submit to the Committee on 
     Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the 
     Committee on Commerce, Science, and

[[Page H1664]]

     Transportation of the Senate, a report on sixth-generation 
     wireless technology, including--
       (A) the status of industry-led standards-setting bodies in 
     setting standards for such technology;
       (B) possible uses of such technology identified by 
     industry-led standards-setting bodies that are setting 
     standards for such technology;
       (C) any limitations of such technology (including any 
     supply chain or cybersecurity limitations) identified by 
     industry-led standards-setting bodies that are setting 
     standards for such technology; and
       (D) how to best work with entities across the Federal 
     Government, State governments, local governments, and Tribal 
     Governments to leverage such technology, including with 
     regard to siting, deployment, and adoption.
       (2) Draft report; public comment.--The Task Force shall--
       (A) not later than 180 days after the date on which the 
     Task Force is established under subsection (a), publish in 
     the Federal Register and on the website of the Commission a 
     draft of the report required by paragraph (1); and
       (B) accept public comments on such draft and take such 
     comments into consideration in preparing the final version of 
     such report.
       (d) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Chair.--The term ``Chair'' means the Chair of the 
     Commission.
       (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
     Communications Commission.
       (3) Not trusted.--
       (A) In general.--The term ``not trusted'' means, with 
     respect to an entity, that--
       (i) the Chair has made a public determination that such 
     entity is owned by, controlled by, or subject to the 
     influence of a foreign adversary; or
       (ii) the Chair otherwise determines that such entity poses 
     a threat to the national security of the United States.
       (B) Criteria for determination.--In making a determination 
     under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Chair shall use the criteria 
     described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of section 2(c) of 
     the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 
     (47 U.S.C. 1601(c)), as appropriate.
       (4) State.--The term ``State'' has the meaning given such 
     term in section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 
     U.S.C. 153).
       (5) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the 6G Task 
     Force established under subsection (a).

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) and the gentlewoman from Michigan (Mrs. 
Dingell) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.


                             General Leave

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and 
include extraneous material in the Record on this particular bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this bill, H.R. 2449, the FUTURE 
Networks Act led by Representative Matsui and Representative Allen.
  United States leadership in 6G technology is critical for both our 
economic and national security.
  This bill would direct the FCC to establish a 6G Task Force made up 
of both public and private-sector participants to develop a report on 
the standards development process and possible uses of sixth-generation 
technology. This task force will ensure that the United States has a 
unified position to cement our leadership in 6G, which is so critical.
  This legislation has strong bipartisan support.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 2449, the FUTURE Networks Act. 
This bipartisan legislation is an important step to protect Americans 
and our communication networks from threats posed by rapidly evolving 
next-generation technologies. It also ensures that the standards used 
to build technological advancements are designed from the start to be 
safe and secure.
  H.R. 2449 establishes a task force at the Federal Communications 
Commission to study sixth-generation, or 6G, technologies to identify 
potential supply chain and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. The task 
force will include government, public interest advocates, academics, 
and industry.
  The United States leads the world in the innovation of secure and 
resilient next-generation technologies, a position congressional 
Democrats have fought hard to sustain. Among other things, House 
Democrats have worked to increase the safety of our networks and supply 
chains by examining the security of mobile networks and educate 
consumers about cybersecurity vulnerabilities and risks. The FUTURE 
Networks Act is yet another important step to support America's 
leadership in a secure and reliable future.
  By directing the FCC to engage in the exploration of 6G technology in 
the early stages of development, the FUTURE Networks Act will enable 
American values to be embedded within the global framework for this 
technology and to ensure it will be available to all Americans.
  I thank Communications and Technology Subcommittee Ranking Member 
Matsui and Representatives Allen and Walberg for their bipartisan work 
on this legislation.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 2449, and I reserve 
the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to 
the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Allen.)
  Mr. ALLEN. Mr. Speaker, I thank my good friend from Florida, Mr. 
Bilirakis, for yielding.
  As vice chairman of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I 
rise today in support of the bipartisan FUTURE Networks Act, which I 
proudly introduced with my colleagues, Representative Matsui and 
Representative Walberg.
  This commonsense legislation would direct the FCC to bring together 
industry leaders, public interest groups, and government experts to 
establish a 6G Task Force.
  As we all know, 6G is the future of telecommunications, and we must 
ensure that the United States is a global leader in this emerging 
technology. Failure to do so would put our adversaries, like the 
Chinese Communist Party, in the driver's seat. We cannot allow that to 
happen.
  I come from the world of business and just like in business we want 
the best, most qualified individuals to have a seat at the table. By 
establishing a 6G Task Force, we can bring together America's brightest 
industry leaders, stakeholders, and innovators to collaborate on the 
future deployment of 6G and strengthening our wireless networks.
  This is a matter of economic and national security. I was proud to 
help lead the FUTURE Networks Act this Congress. I strongly encourage 
all of my colleagues to support H.R. 2449.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
California (Ms. Matsui), the ranking member of the Communications and 
Technology Subcommittee.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I thank Representative Dingell for yielding 
me time.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the FUTURE Networks Act, and 
I thank Representatives Allen and Walberg for our joint effort in 
making this a very bipartisan bill.
  I introduced this bill to ensure America continues our leadership and 
standard setting in the global technology race.
  Mr. Speaker, 6G is going to be a global evolution in the way we 
communicate. If we lead the race for next-generation wireless, then 
this global technology will be based on our values, democracy, open 
markets, and transparency.
  If we fall behind, our foreign adversaries will have a new way to 
expand their reach. That means less openness, less security, and more 
top-down control.
  This risk is real. Already, China is leading in the 6G patent race, 
filing about 35 percent of patents globally.
  To stay the global leader, America must invest in innovation and 
convene our best and brightest to map the road ahead.
  This is increasingly true as artificial intelligence redefines our 
society and drives rapid change, including in our communications 
infrastructure.

                              {time}  1645

  Mr. Speaker, 6G networks will leverage AI to meet the connectivity 
demand of American consumers and businesses. Mr. Speaker, 6G also can 
support smart cities and supercharge augmented reality applications for 
education, healthcare, and manufacturing.

[[Page H1665]]

  Given such transformative potential, we must be proactive and make 
sure America sets the gold standard for this next-generation 
technology. That is why I am so glad to see this bipartisan bill moving 
forward today.
  The FUTURE Networks Act ensures our brightest minds in industry, 
government, and academia are collaborating on the strategically vital 
development of 6G. The race to 6G is not just about faster phones; it 
is about national security, the economy, and America's standing on the 
world stage.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of suspending the 
rules and passing this important legislation.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I have no additional speakers, and I 
reserve the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues on both sides of the 
aisle to support H.R. 2449, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to 
close.
  I commend Representative Allen, the vice chair of the Communications 
and Technology Subcommittee; Representative Matsui, the ranking member; 
and also my good friend, Mr. Walberg, for this very important bill. I 
encourage Members to vote ``yes'' on this bill, and I yield back the 
balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) that the House suspend the rules 
and pass the bill, H.R. 2449.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________