[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 70 (Monday, April 28, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H1651-H1652]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                              {time}  1545
         CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANUFACTURING FEASIBILITY ACT

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 1721) to direct the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study 
on the feasibility of manufacturing in the United States products for 
critical infrastructure sectors, and for other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 1721

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Infrastructure 
     Manufacturing Feasibility Act''.

     SEC. 2. STUDY ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANUFACTURING IN THE 
                   UNITED STATES.

       (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall 
     conduct a study to--
       (1) identify, within each critical infrastructure sector, 
     any product that is in high demand and is being imported due 
     to a manufacturing, material, or supply chain constraint in 
     the United States;
       (2) analyze the costs and benefits of manufacturing in the 
     United States any product identified under paragraph (1), 
     including any effects on--
       (A) jobs, employment rates, and labor conditions in the 
     United States; and
       (B) the cost of the product;
       (3) identify any product identified under paragraph (1) 
     that feasibly may be manufactured in the United States; and
       (4) analyze the feasibility of, and any impediments to, 
     manufacturing any product identified under paragraph (3) in--
       (A) a rural area;
       (B) an industrial park; or
       (C) an industrial park in a rural area.
       (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
       (1) submit to Congress a report containing the results of 
     the study required by subsection (a), with recommendations 
     relating to manufacturing in the United States products 
     identified under subsection (a)(3); and
       (2) make the report available to the public on the website 
     of the Department of Commerce.
       (c) Limitation on Authority.--This section may not be 
     construed to provide the Secretary of Commerce with authority 
     to compel a person to provide information described in this 
     section.
       (d) Definition of Critical Infrastructure Sector.--In this 
     section, the term ``critical infrastructure sector'' means 
     each of the 16 designated critical infrastructure sectors 
     identified in Presidential Policy Directive 21 of February 
     12, 2013 (Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience).

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) 
each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.


                             General Leave

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks 
and insert extraneous material in the Record on this particular bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 1721, the 
Critical Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act, led by 
Representative Miller-Meeks, my good friend. She is an outstanding 
Representative. We are very fortunate to have her on the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce.
  Mr. Speaker, manufacturing is vital to the United States, not only 
for economic stability and job creation but for maintaining our global 
leadership in emerging technologies.
  To sustain this leadership, it is crucial that we identify and 
address barriers to making critical products here at home. Otherwise, 
we risk becoming reliant on countries like China.
  This legislation will advance domestic manufacturing while 
safeguarding our economy and national security. I urge my colleagues to 
join me in voting for this particular bill, a very important bill, very 
critical, H.R. 1721, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1721, the Critical 
Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act.
  Our Nation's manufacturing base was once the envy of the world. 
Unfortunately, it faced steady headwinds for decades. The United 
States' share of global manufacturing activity declined from 28 percent 
in 2002 to less than 16 percent in 2021.
  Fortunately, the work we did under the Biden administration, passing 
the bipartisan infrastructure law, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the 
CHIPS and Science Act, started to turn the tide. Our Nation added over 
700,000 manufacturing jobs during President Biden's time in office.
  However, we must not allow President Trump to put this great progress 
in jeopardy with his chaotic trade wars and uncertain tariff policies. 
I urge my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to stand with the 
domestic manufacturers they claim to support by speaking out against 
the uncertain market environment that this administration has thrown 
manufacturing into. We should be working together on commonsense 
investments and legislation to strengthen domestic supply chains and 
manufacturing, as we have done before, instead of allowing President 
Trump and his friends to crash our economy, including the manufacturing 
sector, with careless policies.
  H.R. 1721 will commission the Department of Commerce to study the

[[Page H1652]]

costs, benefits, and feasibility of manufacturing products within 
critical infrastructure sectors so we can take well-informed and 
strategic next steps to bolster our Nation's supply chains.
  I thank our Democratic sponsor, Representative Schrier, for her work 
on this bill. I urge my colleagues to support the bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consumer to 
the gentlewoman from Iowa (Mrs. Miller-Meeks).
  Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS. Mr. Speaker, I thank Chair Bilirakis for yielding.
  I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 1721, the Critical 
Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act. This bipartisan 
legislation that I co-lead with Representative Schrier directs the 
Secretary of Commerce to conduct a comprehensive study examining the 
feasibility of manufacturing critical infrastructure products here in 
the United States.
  At a time when we have a President who is going to make good on the 
promise to onshore manufacturing and have a resurgence of manufacturing 
in the United States, there is nothing more important we can do than to 
reauthorize the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and pass H.R. 1721.
  The challenges we face regarding our supply chains and manufacturing 
capabilities have been brought into sharp focus in recent years. We 
cannot continue to allow foreign competitors, particularly China and 
the Chinese Communist Party, to control our supply chains and create 
economic vulnerabilities.
  Consider our infrastructure and emerging technologies. We have seen 
how foreign control of critical minerals needed for solar panels and 
battery production has created bottlenecks in our renewable energy 
transition and also in the manufacturing of vehicles.
  Similarly, the components required for data centers that power our 
artificial intelligence, or augmented intelligence capabilities, are 
largely manufactured overseas, creating significant vulnerabilities in 
these strategically important sectors.
  These examples demonstrate with painful clarity that our Nation's 
critical infrastructure, spanning 16 designated sectors including 
energy, communications, transportation, healthcare, military, and more, 
cannot be dependent on foreign supply chains.
  This bill takes a measured, data-driven approach to addressing these 
vulnerabilities. Within one 1 year of enactment, the Secretary of 
Commerce would be required to identify high-demand critical 
infrastructure with manufacturing constraints, do a cost-benefit 
analysis of domestic production, and determine the feasibility of such 
production.
  By supporting this bill, we are taking an important step toward 
rebuilding American manufacturing capability in strategic sectors. We 
are creating a roadmap for revitalizing rural communities that have 
been sidelined for far too long while critical infrastructure 
components are manufactured overseas.

  This legislation not only shields America from global supply chain 
disruptions but also identifies which rural areas are well positioned 
to become manufacturing hubs.
  The strength of our Nation is enhanced when the materials used in our 
critical infrastructure and the products Americans purchase are 
produced domestically and American made. When manufacturing happens on 
American soil, we retain the innovation, the intellectual property, the 
economic benefits, and the long-term prosperity that comes with it in 
rebuilding the middle class.
  I urge my colleagues to support this commonsense, bipartisan measure 
to strengthen America's critical infrastructure, create opportunities 
for American workers, and enhance our economic security.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I support the legislation, and I yield back 
the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I thank, again, Representative Miller-
Meeks and Representative Schrier for this great piece of legislation. I 
encourage a ``yes'' vote on this particular bill, and I yield back the 
balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) that the House suspend the rules 
and pass the bill, H.R. 1721.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________