[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 60 (Thursday, April 3, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2173-S2174]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

      By Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Moran, Ms. 
        Klobuchar, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Warner, Mr. McConnell, and Mr. 
        Bennet):
  S. 1272. A bill to provide for notification to, and review by, 
Congress with respect to the imposition of duties; to the Committee on 
Finance.
  Ms. CANTWELL. Mr. President, I rise today to speak about the 
important role that Congress plays in ensuring our economy remains 
strong, and very important for the American people, to lower costs.
  That is why today I am inducing legislation by myself and Senator 
Grassley. Congress has a duty to ensure that our country remains 
competitive and leads in the global marketplace. American families rely 
on our economy for goods and to make ends meet and to provide shelter.
  American manufacturers rely on an economy to maintain resilient 
supply chains, keep production lines open--and that means aircraft from 
Everett, WA, or cars and trucks from Detroit, MI.
  American farmers rely on our economy to keep fields planted--
production in eastern Washington and northern and central Iowa depend 
on the cost of fertilizer, seed, and equipment.
  Small business owners across the country depend on consumer 
confidence in our economy so that they can keep sales and stay afloat. 
Sharp increases propose a major threat to that economy.
  Inflation and high costs are a threat to stability and prosperity of 
American

[[Page S2174]]

businesses of all size, to our farmers, and to our consumers. We live 
now in an interconnected world--a global economy--and advances in 
technology and transportation have brought that world closer and closer 
together. We have a global economy.
  That is why it is so important to have rules-based trading systems 
that have been in place since World War II, and it is the bedrock of a 
global economy. That is to have rules. Rules-based trade is essential 
to have predictable and stable trade and promoting economic growth and 
development and global cooperation.
  No doubt, opening up markets has grown the pie, not just for those 
economies, but for the U.S. economy. When you establish clear rules-
based mechanisms, you can also resolve trade disputes and encourage 
more investment and more trade.
  Businesses need this certainty to move forward with deals, to reach 
new markets, and grow. But now we are seeing a barrage of tariffs on at 
least 185 countries.
  We cannot have arbitrary policies create chaos and uncertainty. These 
kinds of chaos and uncertainty kill business investment and make for 
very challenging stock market assessments of investments for the future 
based on predictability.
  The current approach, in my opinion, is outside the predictable, 
rules-based system. It is arguable that the current approach is 
literally a misconstruction of statutory authorities.
  But what we know today for sure is that 95 percent of the world's 
consumers are outside of the United States. That means the global 
middle class includes almost 4 billion people. Those are markets for 
American businesses, for farmers to reach to grow and prosper.
  According to the World Bank, in the recent decade, trade has lifted 1 
billion people out of poverty. My colleagues here, who have worked on 
deals in the past that opened up markets in places like Chile, Peru, 
Singapore, the Central America Free Trade Agreement, the update of the 
USMCA, all know that this hard work created economic opportunity.
  Our trade agreements helped American farmers export $176 billion in 
agricultural products last year. They helped ensure that the United 
States is the world's largest agriculture exporter, with soybeans and 
corn leading the way as the top export.
  I want to return to trade agreements. I want to open up more markets. 
I want us to have a robust export opportunity for the excellent U.S. 
manufactured and grown products.
  Our trade agreements have ensured that the U.S. remained the second 
largest exporter of manufactured goods in the world--$2.06 trillion in 
2024.
  And it is clear today, the United States must be competing hard to 
win in the race for emerging technologies like AI and quantum. Our 
foreign adversaries and our competitors are in this global race too.
  So that is why economic disruption puts America at risk. Straining 
ties with trade alliances also put us at a security risk. Trade wars 
have lasting consequences. Trade wars devastate Americans working 
families and small businesses and manufacturers.
  Article I, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gave Congress--gave 
Congress--the explicit authority to impose duties and regulate 
commerce, given the far-reaching impact to our national economy that I 
just mentioned.
  As ranking member of the Commerce Committee, and my colleague from 
the Senate Finance Committee, we both know how much our Nation needs to 
continue to have interstate commerce and to have foreign commerce.
  Since the 1930s, Congress has enacted or directed the President to 
negotiate trade deals, including authority to negotiate the agreements 
and impose or adjust tariffs.
  But I think these Presidents have used this authority correctly by 
opening up markets, lowering tariffs, and establishing a rules-based 
trading system. The current approach, I believe, is creating 
uncertainty and certainly raising costs unnecessarily.
  Businesses rely on certainty and transparency from a rules-based 
trading system. So how has Congress done on these issues? Well, it is 
time, I believe, for Congress to reassert ourselves in our 
constitutional duties.
  Article I of the Constitution also gave Congress the power to declare 
war. The Founding Fathers wanted to prevent any single individual from 
unilaterally committing our Nation to war. The Founding Fathers wanted 
to ensure that we had a strong check and balance.
  I believe the same check and balance needs to exist now as it relates 
to protecting our commerce activities and any Presidential overreach 
that is not a rules-based approach.
  Congress, in the War Powers Act, decided to reclaim its authority 
because they thought a President had overreached. Senator Grassley and 
I are trying to do the same thing today by introducing the Trade Review 
Act of 2025.
  Trade wars--which frequently trigger sharp price increases, foreign 
retaliation, and huge shock impacts to our economy--could affect the 
livelihood of workers, supply chain manufacturers, and hard-won markets 
that American exporters have wanted to see continue to be open.
  I want to thank Senator Grassley for his leadership over many years 
for American farmers, for the people of Iowa, and for our country. I 
want to thank him for working with me on the introduction of the Trade 
Review Act of 2025 that ensures that Congress plays its constitutional 
role in making sure that, as our Founding Fathers intended, we set the 
duties and regulate foreign commerce.
  This important reassertion of Congress's constitutional role is 
important so we have a strong voice in trade policy. This legislation, 
as I said, modeled after the War Powers Act, says that a President must 
notify Congress within 48 hours of imposing or raising tariffs, provide 
an explanation of why they are warranted, and an assessment of their 
likely impact on American businesses and consumers.
  Our legislation, though, protects that constitutional authority by 
also saying these tariffs should be reviewed by Congress for approval 
or disapproval, and doing so is in the best interest of our country.
  I can't tell you how challenging I think competition in a fast-moving 
information age global economy is. We can't afford a trade war that 
lasts for 2 or 3 years, leaving our product off the shelves.
  We must reassert Congress's role over trade policy and ensure that a 
rules-based trade system is based on transparency, consistency, and the 
benefits of the American public.
                                 ______