[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 57 (Monday, March 31, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H1354-H1356]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ELECTRONIC FILING AND PAYMENT FAIRNESS ACT
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and
pass the bill (H.R. 1152) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to
provide for
[[Page H1355]]
the application of the mailbox rule to documents and payments
electronically submitted to the Internal Revenue Service, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 1152
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Electronic Filing and
Payment Fairness Act''.
SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF MAILBOX RULE TO DOCUMENTS AND PAYMENTS
ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED TO THE INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE.
(a) In General.--Section 7502(c) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 is amended--
(1) in the heading, by inserting ``and Payment'' after
``Filing'',
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in the heading, by striking ``; electronic filing'',
and
(B) by striking ``and electronic filing'', and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) Electronic filing and payment.--
``(A) In general.--If any return, claim, statement, or
other document required to be filed, or any payment required
to be made, within a prescribed period or on or before a
prescribed date under authority of any provision of the
internal revenue laws is sent electronically by any person to
the agency, officer, or office with which such return, claim,
statement, or other document is required to be filed, or to
which such payment is required to be made, the date on which
such return, claim, statement, or other document, or payment,
is sent electronically by such person shall be deemed to be
the date of delivery or the date of payment, as the case may
be, regardless of the date on which the applicable agency,
officer, or office receives or reviews such return, claim,
statement, document, or payment.
``(B) Regulations.--Not later than December 31, 2025, the
Secretary shall issue such regulations or other guidance as
the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the purposes
of this paragraph.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section
shall apply to any document or payment sent after December
31, 2025.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Missouri (Mr. Smith) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Davis) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Missouri.
General Leave
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all
Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their
remarks and include extraneous material on the bill under
consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Missouri?
There was no objection.
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, the April 15 deadline to file one's taxes is rapidly
approaching. Right now, if a taxpayer mails a payment or tax return to
the IRS that is postmarked by midnight on the due date, the payment or
tax return will be considered timely even if it is received a week
later. Under current law, taxpayers who file electronically do not
receive the same treatment. If a taxpayer submits the same payment or
return electronically on the due date, it may be considered late if the
IRS receives it and processes it the next day.
In fiscal year 2023, more than 213 million returns and other forms,
79 percent of all filings, were filed electronically. Not only are
electronic payments faster and easier to process, but they also
eliminate the risk of theft that we have seen recently with checks,
like in Representative Malliotakis' district, for example.
If Congress doesn't correct this, taxpayers could potentially be on
the hook for late penalties through no fault of their own.
H.R. 1152, the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act, is
bipartisan legislation that will harmonize IRS deadline rules to ensure
that electronic payments or documents submitted by taxpayers will be
treated the same as postmarked mail.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Representatives LaHood, Feenstra, Fitzpatrick,
DelBene, Panetta, and Schneider for their leadership on this bill. This
is a simple, commonsense fix to tax administration that will save
taxpayers time and money.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support it, and I reserve the
balance of my time.
Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1152, the Electronic Filing
and Payment Fairness Act.
Taxpayers should have one clear deadline to file documents and make
required payments. Under current law, payments or certain documents
that are mailed to the IRS are considered timely filed as long as they
are postmarked by midnight on the due date. This is called the mailbox
rule. However, if a taxpayer submits certain payments or documents to
the IRS electronically on a given due date but they are not processed
until the next day, they would be considered late.
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow the mailbox rule
to extend to electronic tax payments and documents.
The IRS should not treat taxpayers who choose to file electronically
differently than those who file by mail. This bill would ensure the
same standard for all Americans regardless of how they file.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may
consume to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood), the sponsor of
this legislation.
Mr. LaHOOD. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of my bill, the
Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act.
This commonsense bill, which has been included in the ``National
Taxpayer Advocate 2025 Purple Book'' of legislative recommendations,
would amend the tax code to apply the ``mailbox rule'' to electronic
submissions of payments and documents to the Internal Revenue Service.
As the chairman articulated, under current law, if a taxpayer
physically mails a payment or tax return to the IRS that is postmarked
on the due date, that payment or tax return is considered timely even
if it is received a week later. If a taxpayer submits the same payment
or return to the IRS electronically on the due date, however, it is
considered late if the IRS receives or processes it the following day.
This disparity punishes taxpayers electing to correspond with the IRS
electronically, which should be the preferred method of communication
in this day and age.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Smith for his leadership and for making
tax administration and improved efficiencies a priority within the Ways
and Means Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I also thank my bipartisan co-leads on this bill,
Representatives DelBene, Feenstra, Schneider, Fitzpatrick, and Panetta.
This is a great step in our effort to modernize the IRS and make it
more user-friendly, especially for the roughly 90 percent of taxpayers
already filing electronically.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill.
Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for
time so I am prepared to close.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1152 is a narrowly targeted bill that can provide
meaningful help and assurance to taxpayers.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support it, and I yield back the
balance of my time.
Mr. SMITH of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, the bill before us is simple.
Those taxpayers who will be filing their taxes electronically on April
15, just a couple of weeks from now, should be treated the same as
taxpayers who use postmarked mail.
Unfortunately, under current law, that is not always the case. If a
taxpayer submits a payment or return electronically by midnight on the
due date, it could still be considered late if the IRS does not process
it until the next day.
H.R. 1152, the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act, will
harmonize IRS deadline rules so taxpayers receive equal treatment
whether they file electronically or through the mail.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this commonsense
legislation to help level the playing field for American taxpayers, and
I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Smith) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 1152, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
[[Page H1356]]
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________