[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2025)]
[Senate]
[Pages S406-S408]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Border Security
Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, as the world knows, it goes without saying
that one of President Biden's biggest failures was security at our
southern border. In fact, the situation is so dire that now Democrats,
after the November 5 election, are actually finally seeing the light
that they need to do something to recapture the support of the American
people, and that was reflected in the first piece of legislation we
passed that President Trump will sign into law tomorrow: the Laken
Riley Act.
Twelve of our Democratic colleagues in the Senate and 46 in the House
supported that bill, which I have to think, before the November 5
election, they would have uniformly voted against. But they realized
that they were so out of sync with the American people and our national
security interests, I would love to say they got religion or saw the
light. Maybe they just counted the votes.
I am heartened, though, that they have seemed to buck the liberal
status quo when it comes to the border and actually helped us pass a
law that will strengthen our security and make our communities safer.
But let's make no mistake about where this crisis came from that took
the life of Laken Riley and so many others. This is one that the Biden
administration invited and exacerbated from day one after President
Biden took office.
On the campaign trail in 2020, President Biden made this pledge. He
said:
I would in fact make sure that we immediately surge to the
border all those people who are seeking asylum.
Now, that was a big welcome mat or invitation for anybody and
everybody across the planet to show up at the border and to claim
asylum. And because of the backlog in asylum claims and the fact that
they would be released into the interior of the country, basically that
was a free ticket into the United States outside of what should be our
regular, orderly, lawful immigration system.
But President Biden didn't stop there. When he assumed office, he
ended all of the policies of the previous administration--very
successful policies like President Trump's ``Remain in Mexico'' policy.
He halted the construction of the border wall and, instead, spent
Federal dollars to store unused wall materials. And then, right before
the election or right after the election, we found out they were
actually selling these border wall materials for essentially salvage or
for pennies on the dollar. And knowing that, with President Trump
resuming office again, we would have to repurchase those items, it just
seemed like a kick in the teeth for the American taxpayer and
contemptuous, frankly, of law and order.
So we also know that, sort of to add insult to injury, the Biden
administration created the so-called CBP One app. This is an app for
your phone. CBP stands for ``Customs and Border Protection.'' So,
basically, what happens is people outside of the country who wanted to
come here and claim asylum, knowing they would be released into the
interior of the country and have to wait for years--maybe as long as a
decade--before they would appear before an immigration judge, they
could literally make an appointment to show up at a port of entry using
the CBP One app.
So here you have the Federal Government, the U.S. Government,
facilitating the movement of people into the country that were
transported here by criminal organizations that got rich thanks to the
Biden administration. And it was not uncommon to see people coming from
far-flung parts of the planet.
Now, I live in Texas. We have a 1,200-mile border with Mexico. We are
accustomed, over the years, to people from Mexico or Central or even
South America coming to the border, but not people from Latvia, from
China, from the Middle East. But under the Biden administration, they
knew that they were going to be able to come to the United States, and
they could actually even schedule an appointment thanks to the
misguided policies of the Biden administration.
Even as this crisis continued to grow, President Biden ended the use
of the very effective title 42 authority, which was used during COVID
to limit the
[[Page S407]]
movement of adult males into the country because of the COVID
situation.
While this is a national crisis that President Biden created, it is
one that has been felt most acutely by the people of Texas, the 31
million people I represent. In the midst of the Biden administration's
abject failure to keep the American people safe and to control the
movement of people and drugs, including some of the most dangerous
criminals you can imagine, it was up to the State of Texas and our
leadership, like Governor Abbott, to step up and defend our people and
our borders the best we could.
Now, understand, border security is not normally a State function
because this is an international border, which means it is a Federal
responsibility. But what are we supposed to do when the President of
the United States and the Federal Government fail to do their job?
Well, the State stepped up, which means not only our leadership, our
National Guard, but also Texas taxpayers. In other words, we had to pay
the tab to provide for border security such as we could, instead of the
Federal Government picking up the tab, as it should have.
So Governor Abbott initiated Operation Lone Star, which resulted in
more than half a million illegal immigrants being apprehended by Texas
law enforcement. More than 50,000 criminals were arrested, and more
than 240 miles of border barriers were built by the State--not at
Federal expense, a Federal responsibility, but at State expense, by
State taxpayers.
This law enforcement operation also intercepted a half a billion
doses of fentanyl. Fentanyl, as we now know, is spread throughout the
United States--is hidden in counterfeit pills that look like an
innocuous pharmaceutical, only to find out that it will kill you in
small doses. It took roughly 70,000 lives last year alone, and it is a
leading cause of death for young people between the age of 18 and 45.
That is what comes over the border in addition to the millions of
people.
I applaud the efforts of the Governor and our State legislature to
step up and to secure the border and to protect my fellow Texans, even
when the Federal Government--the President of the United States and
Vice President--turned a blind eye.
As a result of Operation Lone Star, Texas was able to reduce illegal
immigration into the State by 87 percent. But, as I said, these efforts
came at a very real cost. The State of Texas spent nearly $4.8 billion
on walls and barriers, local grants to counties and cities, processing
criminal arrests, and moving migrants out of small Texas towns.
Deploying the National Guard for building border barriers, guarding
and constructing those barriers, and apprehending migrants who were
illegally present in the United States cost another $3.6 billion. Then
Texas had personnel costs for our State troopers, Department of Public
Safety troopers, who were responsible for repelling additional illegal
migrants, arresting those who otherwise broke the law, transnational
gang members, cartel members, human smugglers, and human
traffickers. The Federal Government didn't do it; so Texas did. That
came to an additional $2.25 billion in taxpayer expenditure--money that
should have been provided by the Federal Government for a Federal
responsibility, borne by the taxpayers of my State.
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice spent an additional $311.2
million on anti-gang violence. The number of dangerous gangs emanating
from Central America or Venezuela are well-known and, indeed, these are
some of the most dangerous people that have made their way into the
United States as a result of the policies of the Biden administration.
So Texas had no choice but to deal with anti-gang violence.
And then there is a cost associated with the prosecution of these
border crimes at Operation Lone Star's criminal processing centers.
And then the game wardens--this was an ``all hands on deck.'' Even
the game wardens in Texas played a role. They patrolled the Rio Grande
River to prevent illegal entries.
Criminal processing centers required health and safety services. And
the list goes on and on and on.
This was an all-of-government effort in the State of Texas. Even the
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission put millions of dollars toward
interdicting human trafficking at the border.
All told, as a result of the Biden-Harris administration's abject
dereliction of its responsibility at an international border, to
enforce the law cost the State of Texas about $11.1 billion.
Now, Texas, unlike many of the States in the rest of the country,
doesn't have an income tax. We fund our government through sales tax
and through property tax, and we don't have an income tax. This was a
painful expenditure by the Texas legislature and by our leadership. And
that figure doesn't even take into account what local counties and
cities and other nonprofits were forced to further shoulder when it
came to the financial burden.
Before President Biden came to office, Texas spent $800 million every
2 years on border security, roughly $400 million a year. That means
that taxpayers are on the hook for nearly 14 times what they typically
spent on border security due to the failure of the Biden
administration.
It wasn't just negligence. It was intentional. It was willful.
Keeping our Nation's border secure is the responsibility of the
Federal Government. It is not and it should not be the responsibility
of the individual States. That is part of our constitutional framework.
This is a crisis that the Biden administration literally invited by
rolling out the welcome mat and refusing to enforce laws that were on
the books.
What is worse? In the midst of this disaster, the Federal Government
reimbursed others--nonprofits, nongovernmental associations--to help
facilitate illegal immigration, through FEMA's Emergency Food and
Shelter Program to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.
So Texas has been stuck with the check for the Biden-Harris failed
policies, and that is wrong. Governor Abbott has asked Congress to
reimburse Texas for its costs that should have been incurred by the
Federal Government in the first instance. I support this request. And
along with our State delegation, we are going to fight to get Texas
taxpayers the money they are rightfully owed.
The Texas congressional delegation is 40 individuals strong--38 in
the House and 2 here in the Senate--and we believe it is only right and
just for the Federal Government and the Congress to reimburse the State
for expenditures it should have never had to make if the Biden-Harris
administration had simply done its job, which is to provide for a
secure border.
Surely, if the Federal Government can reimburse nongovernmental
organizations for rolling out the welcome mat for illegal migrants, it
could also cover Texas's expenses for keeping U.S. citizens safe.
And the work that was done along the border did not accrue to the
benefit solely of people in Texas. I mentioned the fentanyl crisis.
Fentanyl now, unfortunately, has spread to 50 States. But the work that
was done at the border, keeping some of the fentanyl out of the country
and arresting criminals at the border, that benefited people in all 50
States--again, another reason why this is a Federal responsibility.
It is only a matter of basic fairness that the Federal Government
should step up and help address a crisis that was a problem of its own
making. Texas taxpayers should not have to foot the bill alone as a
result of President Biden's mishandling of border policy.
So I urge all of our colleagues here in the Senate, as well as our
colleagues in the House, to work with me and the Texas delegation--all
40 of us--on fulfilling this request by Governor Abbott to reimburse
Texas for its expenses that it never should have had to spend and make,
if President Biden and the Federal Government had simply done their
job.
The Federal Government created this crisis, and it is up to the
Federal Government to pay the tab.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. RISCH. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded
[[Page S408]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.