[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 21, 2025)]
[House]
[Pages H244-H246]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           ACCURATELY COUNTING RISK ELIMINATION SOLUTIONS ACT

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass 
the bill (H.R. 204) to require that the Secretary of Agriculture and 
the Secretary of the Interior submit accurate reports regarding 
hazardous fuels reduction activities, and for other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                                H.R. 204

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Accurately Counting Risk 
     Elimination Solutions Act'' or the ``ACRES Act''.

     SEC. 2. ACCURATE HAZARDOUS FUELS REDUCTION REPORTS.

       (a) Inclusion of Hazardous Fuels Reduction Report in 
     Materials Submitted in Support of the President's Budget.--
       (1) In general.--Beginning with the first fiscal year that 
     begins after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each 
     fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary concerned shall include 
     in the materials submitted in support of the President's 
     budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States 
     Code, a report on the number of acres of Federal land on 
     which the Secretary concerned carried out hazardous fuels 
     reduction activities during the preceding fiscal year.
       (2) Requirements.--For purposes of the report required 
     under paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned shall--
       (A) in determining the number of acres of Federal land on 
     which the Secretary concerned carried out hazardous fuels 
     reduction activities during the period covered by the 
     report--
       (i) record acres of Federal land on which hazardous fuels 
     reduction activities were completed during such period; and
       (ii) record each acre described in clause (i) once in the 
     report, regardless of whether multiple hazardous fuels 
     reduction activities were carried out on such acre during 
     such period; and
       (B) with respect to the acres of Federal land recorded in 
     the report, include information on--
       (i) which such acres are located in the wildland-urban 
     interface;
       (ii) the level of wildfire risk (high, moderate, or low) on 
     the first and last day of the period covered by the report;
       (iii) the types of hazardous fuels activities completed for 
     such acres, delineating between whether such activities were 
     conducted--

       (I) in a wildfire managed for resource benefits; or
       (II) through a planned project;

       (iv) the cost per acre of hazardous fuels activities 
     carried out during the period covered by the report;
       (v) the region or system unit in which the acres are 
     located; and
       (vi) the effectiveness of the hazardous fuels reduction 
     activities on reducing the risk of wildfire.
       (3) Transparency.--The Secretary concerned shall make each 
     report submitted under paragraph (1) publicly available on 
     the website of the Department of Agriculture and the 
     Department of the Interior, as applicable.
       (b) Accurate Data Collection.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     the enactment of this Act, the Secretary concerned shall 
     implement standardized procedures for tracking data related 
     to hazardous fuels reduction activities carried out by the 
     Secretary concerned.
       (2) Elements.--The standardized procedures required under 
     paragraph (1) shall include--
       (A) regular, standardized data reviews of the accuracy and 
     timely input of data used to track hazardous fuels reduction 
     activities;
       (B) verification methods that validate whether such data 
     accurately correlates to the hazardous fuels reduction 
     activities carried out by the Secretary concerned;
       (C) an analysis of the short- and long-term effectiveness 
     of the hazardous fuels reduction activities on reducing the 
     risk of wildfire; and
       (D) for hazardous fuels reduction activities that occur 
     partially within the wildland-urban interface, methods to 
     distinguish which acres are located within the wildland-urban 
     interface and which acres are located outside the wildland-
     urban interface.
       (3) Report.--Not later than 2 weeks after implementing the 
     standardized procedures required under paragraph (1), the 
     Secretary concerned shall submit to Congress a report that 
     describes--
       (A) such standardized procedures; and
       (B) program and policy recommendations to Congress to 
     address any limitations in tracking data related to hazardous 
     fuels reduction activities under this subsection.
       (c) GAO Study.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 
     States shall--
       (1) conduct a study on the implementation of this Act, 
     including any limitations with respect to--
       (A) reporting hazardous fuels reduction activities under 
     subsection (a); or
       (B) tracking data related to hazardous fuels reduction 
     activities under subsection (b); and
       (2) submit to Congress a report that describes the results 
     of the study under paragraph (1).
       (d) Definitions.--In this Act:
       (1) Hazardous fuels reduction activity.--The term 
     ``hazardous fuels reduction activity''--
       (A) means any vegetation management activity to reduce the 
     risk of wildfire, including mechanical treatments and 
     prescribed burning; and
       (B) does not include the awarding of contracts to conduct 
     hazardous fuels reduction activities.
       (2) Federal lands.--The term ``Federal lands'' means lands 
     under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior or 
     the Secretary of Agriculture.
       (3) Secretary concerned.--The term ``Secretary concerned'' 
     means--
       (A) the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to National 
     Forest System lands; and
       (B) the Secretary of the Interior, with respect to public 
     lands and units of the National Park System.
       (4) Wildland-urban interface.--The term ``wildland-urban 
     interface'' has the meaning given the term in section 101 of 
     the Healthy

[[Page H245]]

     Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6511).
       (e) No Additional Funds Authorized.--No additional funds 
     are authorized to carry out the requirements of this Act, and 
     the activities authorized by this Act are subject to the 
     availability of appropriations made in advance for such 
     purposes.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Huffman) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.


                             General Leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all 
Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks 
and to add extraneous material on H.R. 204, the bill now under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of Representative Tiffany's 
legislation, H.R. 204, the Accurately Counting Risk Elimination 
Solutions, or ACRES Act. This is a commonsense, good-governance bill 
that will bring sorely needed transparency and accountability to the 
misleading way our Federal land managers are tracking and reporting 
hazardous fuel treatments.
  This month, wildfires in southern California leveled entire 
communities and took the lives of at least 24 people. Local residents 
forced to flee their homes described the scene as a war zone.
  Unfortunately, the tragedies in southern California are just the 
latest consequences in what has been a historic wildfire crisis, 
devouring an average of 7 million acres every year for the last two 
decades. This alarming figure is more than double the annual losses 
seen during the 1990s. This worsening problem is directly linked to 
insufficient forest management, which has created a dangerous build-up 
of hazardous fuels in our forests.
  Despite the clear need to confront this crisis head-on, Federal land 
management agencies like the Forest Service are still failing to 
increase the pace and scale of their treatments. Alarmingly, 
investigative reporting from ``NBC News'' found that the Forest Service 
is overreporting the number of acres they treat annually by over 20 
percent, but that is not all. The same report found that overcounting 
was worse in areas of greater risk, such as California, where the total 
acres treated were overcounted by 35 percent in the wildland-urban 
interface. In one example, the Forest Service reported that they 
treated 744 acres of land when, in fact, only 173 acres of land had 
been treated.
  This means that the Forest Service suggested to Congress and the 
public that they had done four times more work than they had actually 
accomplished. This is unacceptable, particularly in an area where 
wildfire risk and the risk to communities and lives is extremely high.
  This inaccurate and misleading reporting results from the Forest 
Service counting the same piece of land towards its risk reduction 
goals multiple times if different treatments, such as prescribed 
thinning and burning, are completed on that land. In some cases, the 
Forest Service counted the same parcel of land 30 times, meaning the 
agency reported to Congress that they reduced hazardous fuels on 30 
acres when, in fact, only 1 acre received treatment.
  This legislation simply requires the Forest Service to submit data to 
Congress annually that details their hazardous fuels reduction work by 
only counting each acre once, even if multiple treatments were 
performed. This exact idea has been supported in reports from the 
Government Accountability Office and the USDA's Office of Inspector 
General.
  The fact that we even need to pass legislation to tell the Forest 
Service how to count makes it clear just how deep this problem runs 
when it comes to confronting our catastrophic wildfire crisis. Holding 
our Federal land managers accountable for their actual work on the 
ground is a good first step. We need to improve the health of our 
Nation's forests as we fight against these catastrophic wildfires, and 
this bill will help us do that.
  Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the legislation, and I 
reserve the balance of my time.

                                         House of Representatives,


                                     Committee on Agriculture,

                                 Washington, DC, January 10, 2025.
     Hon. Bruce Westerman,
     Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: This letter confirms our mutual 
     understanding regarding H.R. 204, the ``ACRES Act.'' Thank 
     you for collaborating with the Committee on Agriculture on 
     the matters within our jurisdiction.
       The Committee on Agriculture will forego any further 
     consideration of this bill. However, by foregoing 
     consideration at this time, we do not waive any jurisdiction 
     over any subject matter contained in this or similar 
     legislation. The Committee on Agriculture also reserves the 
     right to seek appointment of an appropriate number of 
     conferees should it become necessary and ask that you support 
     such a request.
       We would appreciate a response to this letter confirming 
     this understanding with respect to H.R. 204 and request a 
     copy of our letters on this matter be published in the 
     Congressional Record during Floor consideration.
           Sincerely,
                                            Glenn ``GT'' Thompson,
     Chairman.
                                  ____

                                         House of Representatives,


                               Committee on Natural Resources,

                                 Washington, DC, January 13, 2025.
     Hon. Glenn ``GT'' Thompson,
     Chairman, Committee on Agriculture,
     Washington, DC.
       Dear Mr. Chairman: I write regarding our mutual 
     understanding of H.R. 204, the ``ACRES Act.''
       I recognize that the bill contains provisions that fall 
     within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Agriculture and 
     appreciate your willingness to forgo further consideration of 
     the bill. I acknowledge that the Committee on Agriculture 
     will not formally consider H.R. 204 and agree that the 
     inaction of your Committee with respect to the bill does not 
     waive any jurisdiction over the subject matter contained 
     therein.
       I am pleased to support your request to name members of the 
     Committee on Agriculture to any conference committee to 
     consider such provisions. I will ensure that our exchange of 
     letters is included in the Congressional Record during floor 
     consideration of the bill. I appreciate your cooperation 
     regarding this legislation.
           Sincerely,
                                                  Bruce Westerman,
                                                         Chairman.

  Mr. HUFFMAN. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume. The Forest Service manages millions of acres of forestland, 
including vital watersheds, critical wildlife habitat, and countless 
outdoor recreational areas.
  The Forest Service's 10-year wildlife crisis strategy implementation 
plan stresses the importance of fire-adapted landscapes and hazardous 
fuel treatments to build resilient forests. These critical wildfire 
risk reduction projects are complex, multistep processes requiring 
significant planning and investments often carried out over several 
years.
  In order for these projects to operate effectively, we must receive 
accurate, transparent, and accessible data on how they are planned and 
implemented. This bill proposes requiring the Forest Service and the 
Department of the Interior to include in the President's annual budget 
a report on hazardous fuel activities carried out in a given fiscal 
year to account for each treated acre.
  The ongoing reporting requirement would enhance transparency and 
accountability, providing critical information that could help guide 
investments in the management of our national forests, including how we 
deploy the historic funding for wildfire risk reduction efforts that 
were included in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and in the 
Inflation Reduction Act if we can hang on to that historic funding in 
the coming months. I certainly support this bill for proposing that 
idea of an ongoing reporting requirement. However, I want to clarify 
that the bill does not actually require or even authorize it. The 
Congressional Budget Office found that the reporting requirements 
proposed by this bill would need significant funding, including for 
hiring 30 additional Federal employees.

[[Page H246]]

  Now, I think that would be a worthwhile investment for wildfire risk 
reduction. These days the Freedom Caucus tends to call the shots on 
these matters, and they don't allow us to consider bills that authorize 
that kind of money without spending reductions elsewhere.
  So what we have before us is a revised version of the bill, a 
workaround, that doesn't even authorize the reporting activities that 
it describes. It is right there on the last page of the bill in all 
caps: No additional funds authorized.
  Madam Speaker, you will notice that the CBO score on this bill is now 
zero. That is because the revised bill doesn't actually do anything.
  We need to do better than this. We have a serious, real fire crisis 
in front of us. We can't fight climate change with window dressing or 
thoughts and prayers. I am going to support this bill because it 
doesn't do any harm and it does bring attention to a good idea, but 
this is nowhere near enough.
  I will point out that the Biden-Harris administration achieved record 
acres of annual forest treatments thanks to the investments secured by 
House Democrats in both the IIJA and the IRA. This includes vegetation 
management to reduce hazardous fuels and prescribed burns.
  That is important work worth doing, and I look forward to continuing 
to work with the majority and the new administration if they are 
willing to make those investments. We have to ensure that agencies have 
resources so they can continue reporting back with record-breaking 
numbers that we achieved under the last administration.
  Unfortunately, this bill and the so-called Fix Our Forests Act that 
we will be considering later this week simply fail to provide any 
resources. Team extreme might be unhappy with a bill that includes a 
price tag, but I guarantee that it would be far less than the cost of 
the mass destruction from fires that we are seeing in places like L.A., 
and it is certainly worth the lives that would be saved.
  Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Madam Speaker, I thank my friends across the aisle, 
Mr. Huffman and the minority, for supporting forestry bills both small 
and large. This is, I think, a small step in the right direction, and 
it shouldn't cost any more to report accurate data than to report 
inaccurate data.
  I look forward to passing this bill as well as some larger bills like 
the Fix Our Forests Act that we hope to have before the body this week.
  Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. 
Tiffany), who is the lead sponsor of the bill.
  Mr. TIFFANY. Madam Speaker, in spite of what was just said on the 
other side of the aisle, I want to invite the gentleman from California 
to Wisconsin. He can get some good fishing in in northern Minnesota, 
good musky fishing, but if the gentleman wants the best, then come to 
northern Wisconsin. I have an invitation for my friend.
  This bill will bring transparency, Mr. Speaker, to the misleading and 
inaccurate way hazardous fuels treatments are reported.
  Decades of mismanagement of our Federal lands have left our forests 
overstocked with trees and created tinderbox conditions, and we have 
long known the reported pace and scale of forest management has been 
insufficient to truly address our catastrophic forest health crisis.
  There is a better way to actively manage our public lands, and that 
starts with holding our Federal land management agencies accountable by 
requiring accurate reporting on the effectiveness of their work in fuel 
reduction.
  According to troubling reports, the situation is even worse than we 
have been led to believe, as agencies have been overstating their 
treatments by over 20 percent. Accurate reporting is necessary to 
broadly track the progress made on our larger wildfire mitigation 
targets as well as individual projects.
  The ACRES Act is a simple solution to hold our Federal agencies 
accountable to see the actual work they are doing to reduce the 
enormous risks of wildfire. American taxpayers deserve to know they are 
getting what they paid for. This bill will help ensure that happens.
  Mr. Speaker, this is a small step in what needs to be a number of 
steps to get back to active forest management to protect the life and 
health of our forests and the people who live around them in the United 
States of America. I hope this incoming administration and this 
Congress are active in getting us back to active forest management here 
in America.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes.''

                              {time}  1500

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and 
I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Speaker, I look forward to working with our friends 
across the aisle on the accounting issue that has been discussed here 
today. Obviously, we want to make sure that the Forest Service is not 
taking advance credit for phases of projects that haven't happened yet.
  I think that is for the most part what has happened that the 
gentleman from Arkansas identified. I don't believe there has been any 
actual double or triple counting, but either way, we want it to be 
accurate. We all need good, accurate data on that reporting.
  We will work together on that. In the meantime, I urge my colleagues 
to support this bill. I have no further requests for time, and I yield 
back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, as we continue to pray for communities 
across the Nation that have been impacted by wildfire, we do need to 
put feet to our prayers to ensure that our forests are being properly 
managed.
  The ACRES Act is a step in the right direction and a commonsense 
solution to a problem that really shouldn't even exist in the first 
place.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge adoption of the bill, and I yield back the 
balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Bost). The question is on the motion 
offered by the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House 
suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 204.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________