[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 187 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H7285-H7286]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                  REVERSIONARY INTEREST CONVEYANCE ACT

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 8946) to convey the reversionary interest of the United 
States in certain land in Sacramento, California.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 8946

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Reversionary Interest 
     Conveyance Act''.

     SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF UNITED STATES INTEREST IN CERTAIN LAND.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section:
       (1) Covered land.--The term ``covered land'' means the 
     approximately 8.43 acres of land under the administrative 
     jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in Sacramento, 
     California, as generally depicted as ``Proposed Easements to 
     be Released'' on the map titled ``Lands Proposed for Release 
     from Any and All Reversionary Interests of the United States, 
     including interests under the Act of July 1, 1862 (12 Stat. 
     489)'', dated November 7, 2022.
       (2) Buyer.--(A) The term ``buyer'' means the owner of 
     record of any of the parcels included in the covered land at 
     the time of the requested conveyance.
       (B) Buyer may only request and purchase the covered land's 
     reversionary interest for the parcels of which the owner is 
     the owner of record at the time of request.
       (3) Reversionary interest.--The term ``reversionary 
     interest'' means all reversionary interests of the United 
     States in the covered land.
       (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
     of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land 
     Management.
       (b) Conveyance.--Not later than two years after the 
     Secretary receives a request from the buyer, the Secretary 
     shall offer to the buyer the applicable reversionary interest 
     subject to the requirements in subsection (c), and shall 
     convey the lands to buyer upon payment of the appraised 
     value.
       (c) Requirements.--Any conveyance under this section--
       (1) shall be subject to valid existing rights; and
       (2) shall be for not less than fair market value.
       (d) Payment of Fair Market Value.--The Secretary shall 
     determine the fair market value of the applicable 
     reversionary interest--
       (1) in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and 
     Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and
       (2) based on an appraisal that is conducted in accordance 
     with--
       (A) the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land 
     Acquisitions; and
       (B) the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal 
     Practice.
       (e) Costs.--In addition to the fair market value determined 
     under subsection (d), the buyer shall pay all costs related 
     to the applicable conveyance of the reversionary inter est, 
     including all surveys, appraisals, and other administrative 
     costs.
       (f) Proceeds From the Sale of Land.--The proceeds from the 
     sale of the applicable reversionary interest shall be--
       (1) deposited in the Federal Land Disposal Account 
     established by section 206(a) of the Federal Land Transaction 
     Facilitation Act (43 U.S.C. 2305(a)); and
       (2) used in accordance with that Act.

     SEC. 3. STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

       Nothing in this Act shall--
       (1) diminish the right-of-way associated with the covered 
     land in section 2 to a width of less than 50 feet on each 
     side of the center of the main track or tracks established 
     and maintained by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company 
     on the date of the enactment of this Act; or
       (2) validate or confirm any right or title to, or interest 
     in the land referred to in section 2 arising out of adverse 
     possession, prescription, or abandonment, and not confirmed 
     by conveyance made by the Southern Pacific Transportation 
     Company before the date of the enactment of this Act.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Huffman) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.


                             General Leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to 
include extraneous material on H.R. 8956, the bill now under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of Representative Matsui's bill, 
H.R. 8956, the Revisionary Interest Conveyance Act.
  This bill will resolve a stubborn property law issue that has long 
afflicted a small parcel of land in California.
  The private owners of an 8-acre property in Sacramento recently 
discovered a revisionary interest on their land, which was originally 
conveyed by a railroad company. The interest, which dates back to the 
days of the transcontinental railroad, technically requires the land to 
revert to the United States since it is no longer used for railroad 
purposes. With their land encumbered, the owners of this property are 
limited in their ability to develop or sell the land.
  The Bureau of Land Management, which would receive the property 
through the reversion, does not want to manage the land in question. 
Since the agency can't extinguish the revisionary interest 
unilaterally, the BLM has encouraged Congress to pursue a legislative 
solution.
  H.R. 8946 would resolve this conflict by requiring the Bureau of Land 
Management to convey the reversionary interest to the private 
landowners for fair market value. In so doing, this bill will free up 
the land for economic development and prevent further Federal 
interference.
  That is a good governance bill that supports a local community, 
encourages economic development, and reduces the burden on the Federal 
Government. I applaud Representative Matsui for advancing this solution 
on behalf of her constituents.
  Mr. Speaker, I support this bill, and I reserve the balance of my 
time.
  Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  I rise in support of the Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act, 
introduced by my colleague from the Sacramento area in California, 
Representative Matsui.
  Her bill would allow for the conveyance of certain Federal Government 
claims associated with approximately 8.43 acres of land administered by 
the Bureau of Land Management in Sacramento.
  It is currently encumbered by what is known as a reversionary 
interest, in this case dating back to the 19th century.
  The original conveyance of the land from the Federal Government 
stipulated that it must be used for specific stated purposes or 
ownership would revert back to the United States.
  Lands with reversionary interests like these have what is called a 
clouded title, which limits allowable uses and development.
  In this case, the reversionary interests originate from the initial 
conveyance that provided public land for railroad purposes in the 19th 
century, but the land changed hands over the years, eventually without 
knowledge of this requirement.
  The bill aims to clear up the land ownership issue by resolving the 
Federal Government's ownership claims on these parcels. Under the sale 
authorized by the bill, landowners would be given the opportunity to 
purchase the reversionary interests from the government so that they 
can pursue development or future conveyances of the land.
  Importantly, this bill has standard conveyance language, including a 
requirement to sell the interest at fair market value, and the 
authorized conveyance is supported by the Department of the Interior.
  This is a win-win for the government and the community in Sacramento. 
Mr.

[[Page H7286]]

Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve the 
balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time. I am 
prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the 
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Matsui), the author of this bill.
  Ms. MATSUI. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my bill, H.R. 
8946, the Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act.
  This bill provides a technical correction that will help unlock the 
innovative potential of Sacramento. It provides the BLM with the clear 
authority to convey 8\1/2\ acres of former railroad right-of-way in 
Sacramento.
  This will allow the city of Sacramento, Sacramento State University, 
and their partners to continue moving forward on the Sacramento Center 
for Innovation, a research park that will allow Sacramento to retain 
and grow the level of talent the region needs to attract investment and 
business.
  We support our innovators, our educators, and our businesses because 
we know that these economic drivers don't just support job and 
community growth today, they sustain them for generations. Because of 
this, I really support this bill. It is something that is very, very 
needed.
  I thank the chair and ranking member for their support of this bill. 
I urge my colleagues to support this bill.
  Mr. HUFFMAN. Mr. Speaker, this is a great bill. I urge my colleagues 
to support it, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, this is straightforward legislation that 
will extricate property owners and the Federal Government from a legal 
quagmire. I support this bill and note that it passed out of the 
Committee on Natural Resources by unanimous consent.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge adoption of this bill, and I yield back the 
balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the 
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 8946.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________