[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 187 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H7265-H7266]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           KLAMATH BASIN WATER AGREEMENT SUPPORT ACT OF 2024

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 7938) to amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement 
Act of 2000 to provide the Secretary of the Interior with certain 
authorities with respect to projects affecting the Klamath Basin 
watershed, and for other purposes, as amended.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 7938

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Klamath Basin Water 
     Agreement Support Act of 2024''.

     SEC. 2. KLAMATH PROJECT WATER AND POWER.

       (a) Addressing Water, Power, and Facilities Management for 
     Irrigation.--Section 4 of the Klamath Basin Water Supply 
     Enhancement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-498) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:
       ``(d) Restoration Activities.--The Secretary may--
       ``(1) plan, design, construct, operate, and maintain 
     projects in the Klamath Basin watershed, including--
       ``(A) facilities to reduce fish entrainment;
       ``(B) projects that reduce or avoid impacts on aquatic 
     resources of facilities involved in the storage or diversion 
     of water for irrigation in the Klamath Project service area; 
     and
       ``(C) projects that restore habitats in the Klamath Basin 
     watershed, including Tribal fishery resources held in trust;
       ``(2) undertake studies, including feasibility studies, and 
     improvements that the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
     implement this subsection;
       ``(3) in implementing this subsection, enter into 
     contracts, memoranda of understanding, financial assistance 
     agreements, cost-sharing agreements, or other appropriate 
     agreements with--
       ``(A) State, Tribal, and local governmental agencies; and
       ``(B) private parties; and
       ``(4) accept and expend non-Federal funds in order to 
     facilitate implementation of this subsection.
       ``(e) Goals.--The goals of activities under subsections (b) 
     and (d) shall include, as applicable--
       ``(1) the short-term and long-term reduction and resolution 
     of conflicts relating to water in the Klamath Basin 
     watershed; and
       ``(2) compatibility and utility for protecting natural 
     resources throughout the Klamath Basin watershed, including 
     the protection, preservation, and restoration of Klamath 
     River Tribal fishery resources, particularly through 
     collaboratively developed agreements.
       ``(f) Pumping Plant D.--The Secretary may enter into 1 or 
     more agreements with the Tulelake Irrigation District to 
     reimburse the Tulelake Irrigation District for not more than 
     69 percent of the cost incurred by the Tulelake Irrigation 
     District for the operation and maintenance of Pumping Plant 
     D, subject to the condition that the cost results in benefits 
     to the United States.
       ``(g) Keno and Link River Dams.--The Secretary of the 
     Interior shall comply with the terms of the agreement 
     entitled `2016 Klamath Power and Facilities 
     Agreement'(`Agreement'), including Attachment A to the 
     Agreement.''.
       (b) Administration; Effect.--
       (1) Compliance.--In implementing the amendments made by 
     this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall comply 
     with--
       (A) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
     U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);
       (B) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
     seq.); and
       (C) all other applicable laws.
       (2) Effect.--None of the amendments made by this section--
       (A) modify any authority or obligation of the United States 
     with respect to any Tribal trust or treaty obligation of the 
     United States;
       (B) create or determine any water right; or
       (C) affect any water right or water right claim in 
     existence on the date of the enactment of this Act.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. 
Kamlager-Dove) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.


                             General Leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks 
and include extraneous material on H.R. 7938, the bill now under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 7938, the Klamath Basin Water 
Agreement Support Act of 2024.
  This legislation, sponsored by Congressman Cliff Bentz, would uphold 
the commitments made by the Federal Government in the agreements 
concerning dam removal and species restoration, which are aimed at 
ensuring farmers are shielded from the adverse effects of these 
actions.
  The Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and northern California 
encompasses more than 12,000 square miles with some of the most 
productive irrigated agriculture in the country.
  The basin is partially supported by the Bureau of Reclamation's 
Klamath Project and is home to six national wildlife refuges, which 
rely on basin waters to sustain migratory bird habitats and support 
Native American Tribal fishing grounds. However, this basin has been 
plagued by decades of disagreement and conflicting agency opinions on 
how to best conserve the ESA-listed species.
  While H.R. 7938 provides the Department of the Interior the 
authorization to operate and improve infrastructure, it makes clear 
that Klamath Project irrigators are not responsible for those costs. 
The bill also enables Reclamation to implement conservation measures 
for ESA-listed species through fish screens and other restoration 
projects. This would protect Tribal resources in the basin and avoid 
additional regulatory burdens on other stakeholders.
  Mr. Speaker, I thank Congressman Bentz for his diligent leadership on 
this issue and tireless support of the Klamath Basin. I urge my 
colleagues to support the bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the Klamath Basin Water Agreement 
Support Act, which seeks to resolve stakeholder conflicts regarding 
water use and fish and wildlife management in the Klamath River Basin.
  Since time immemorial, the Klamath River has supported the 
livelihoods of several tribes in the basin. It continues to play a key 
role in each of these tribes' cultures, economies, and food 
sovereignty.
  Unfortunately, the construction of dams along the river and changing 
climate conditions in the basin resulted in devastating consequences 
for tribes, agriculture, fish and wildlife, and fishing communities as 
a result of reduced water flows.
  Since planning for dam removal in the lower Klamath River started, 
there have been years of work and negotiations between the tribes and 
other parties to reach agreement on issues affecting water, fish, and 
wildlife in the basin.
  After the removal of the four lower Klamath Dams, salmon have already 
begun migrating into previously inaccessible historic salmon spawning 
habitat. Good for them.
  The legislation before us today would build on this historic 
restoration project by further supporting the commitments made under 
the Klamath Basin agreements.
  I thank the majority for working with us to ensure that Tribal 
concerns with the introduced language were addressed prior to moving 
the bill out of committee.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to support the bill, and I reserve 
the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from 
Oregon (Mr. Bentz), the lead sponsor of the bill.
  Mr. BENTZ. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 7938, as amended.

[[Page H7266]]

  This long overdue legislation is necessary if the Federal Government 
is to honor critical commitments it has made to farmers and ranchers in 
my district in Oregon and Mr. LaMalfa's district in northern 
California.
  For generations, farmers and ranchers receiving water delivered from 
the Klamath River and Klamath Lake have assumed the risk of weather, 
skyrocketing costs of production, wildly fluctuating markets, while 
playing by the rules, conserving more and more water, and continuing to 
do their best to provide high-quality food for our Nation.
  However, over the past 25 years, they have done so under the 
additional burden of federally mandated drastic reductions in the 
amount of water they have State certified rights to use. These 
reductions dictated federally, coupled with increasing drought, 
threaten farmers' and ranchers' livelihoods, the communities that rely 
upon them, and ultimately our Nation's food supply.
  The reason this legislation is needed now is because earlier this 
year, the four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River in Oregon and 
California were dismantled and removed. This leaves operation of 
instream structures, located upriver from the now removed four 
hydroelectric dams, at legal risk through no fault or action of or by 
the farmers.

                              {time}  1600

  As context, Mr. Speaker, for over 100 years, there were four 
hydroelectric facilities on the Klamath River. These facilities were 
located downstream from the Klamath Reclamation Project diversion 
structures. The four hydroelectric dams generated low-cost, clean, 
renewable energy for over a century. Although they were built by a 
local company, they were eventually acquired by PacifiCorp, a 
nationally operating investor-owned electrical utility.
  In recent years, State and Federal regulators decided they wanted the 
four lower dams on the Klamath River removed. Regulations and 
litigation drove the cost of relicensing these dams through the roof, 
leading their owner, PacifiCorp, to the not-too-surprising conclusion 
that disposing of rather than relicensing the dams was the best path 
forward.
  Based on this, PacifiCorp agreed the dams could be removed, but only 
if someone else assumed all legal responsibility and paid for all the 
work.
  In addition, as a condition of allowing the four hydroelectric dams 
to be removed, PacifiCorp demanded that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 
assume ownership of all remaining water infrastructure previously owned 
by PacifiCorp, including the Link River and Keno Dams, regardless of 
their condition, shifting all and whatever liabilities, known and 
unknown, that might burden them to the Bureau of Reclamation.
  In the 15 years before removal of the hydroelectric dams, farmers and 
ranchers on the Klamath Project were promised that they would not have 
to bear the cost of retrofitting and updating this upstream 
infrastructure. This legislation will finally deliver on those 
promises.
  Mr. Speaker, I include in the Congressional Record a link to this 
copy of the 2016 Klamath Power and Facilities Agreement, which reflects 
some of these promises: https://bentz.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/
bentz.house. gov/files/evo-media-document/OR02Sharp__20241217__150611-
compressed.pdf
  In addition, Mr. Speaker, H.R. 7938 partially addresses another 
consequence of the destruction of these dams. The major reason for 
their removal was to allow salmon, steelhead, and other fish to migrate 
up rivers and streams to new areas. However, accompanying these 
returning fish are regulations and regulators anxious to make sure that 
the fish have appropriate means of passage, but the Klamath Project's 
irrigation infrastructure was not built or designed to deal with the 
needs of these species.
  Over the past 15 years, irrigators in the Klamath Project have been 
repeatedly assured that there would not be any significant new 
regulatory burden or costs imposed upon them associated with removal of 
the four dams and the resultant arrival of fish, yet here we are.
  Fortunately, this legislation would give the Bureau of Reclamation 
some of the authority and tools needed to keep that promise.
  I thank my colleagues, Mr. LaMalfa, Ranking Member Huffman, and the 
Natural Resources Committee for supporting and working with me on this 
important bill. I also thank Chair Westerman.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote on H.R. 7938.
  Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the 
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 7938 would provide important tools 
and certainty for both wildlife and people living in the Klamath River 
Basin. The irrigated lands of the Klamath Project support family farms 
and ranches, Tribal fishing rights, and the recovery of several ESA-
listed fish species. This legislation builds upon vital work being done 
by these groups.
  Mr. Speaker, I again thank my colleague, Mr. Bentz, for his work on 
the bill. I urge Members to support this commonsense legislation, and I 
yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the 
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 7938, as amended.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________