[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 183 (Tuesday, December 10, 2024)]
[House]
[Page H6545]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CAN'T PASS AN AUDIT
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Bean of Florida). The Chair recognizes
the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Hoyle) for 5 minutes.
Ms. HOYLE of Oregon. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to state my opposition
to the National Defense Authorization Act.
First, let me be clear, I support any funding to keep Americans safe,
protect and fairly compensate our troops for their sacrifices, and to
improve our national security. I also support some of what is included
in this act: pay raises for our servicemembers, expanding access to
contraceptives for female servicemembers under TRICARE, and properly
funding the replacement of poor and failing military housing and
barracks.
However, it is simply irresponsible to give more money to an agency
that accounts for half of our discretionary spending but can't pass an
audit. This is an agency that spends over half its budget on defense
contractors who have no incentive against price gouging, some who
overcharge the Department of Defense by 40 to 50 percent with no
accountability and no consequences. Year after year, we dump money into
defense contractors that grow fatter while our servicemembers and their
families struggle to scrape by.
Since the election, we have heard a lot of talk about improving
government efficiency and cutting waste, and I agree. It is incumbent
upon us to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars, but instead of
proposing cuts to Social Security benefits for seniors or cutting
veterans' benefits to our servicemembers, benefits that they have
earned, let's start where there are clear savings to be had.
In this NDAA, the Pentagon would get $10 billion more than last year.
Simply put, the Pentagon just failed its seventh audit, and it is
getting nearly $900 billion already. Why should we keep writing blank
checks and expecting things to change when there is no incentive to do
so?
Without robust accountability, all this is, is a transfer of wealth
from hardworking American taxpayers to private defense contractors in
the military industrial complex. Without meaningful oversight for how
my constituents' taxpayer dollars are spent, I plan on voting no.
____________________