[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 181 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H6435-H6437]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                       CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Lawler). Under the Speaker's announced 
policy of January 9, 2023, the Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Kiley) for 30 minutes.
  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I am very happy to report that the newly 
formed Department of Government Efficiency has homed in on perhaps the 
single-greatest example of government waste in United States history, 
and that is California's high-speed rail boondoggle.
  Here are the facts that the DOGE X handle cited, all of which are 
true.
  The high-speed rail project was originally projected in 2008 to cost 
$33 billion. It is now projected to cost up to $127.9 billion.
  Its estimated completion date was 2020. Of course, we are past 2020 
now. As of 2024, zero passengers have been transported. Indeed, the 
majority of the system has not even been fully designed, yet it has 
received $6.8 billion in Federal funds, and they are requesting an 
additional $8 billion in Federal funds.
  In short, the cost has quadrupled, and nothing has been built. 
Actually, I am being a little bit unfair. There was an announcement 
earlier this year in May where the High-Speed Rail Authority, which 
really has to strain to come up with milestones to advertise to the 
public--there was a lot of hoopla surrounding the unveiling of an $11 
billion bridge to nowhere that took 9 years to build, which is about 
the only thing that the High-Speed Rail Authority has to show for its 
efforts over the last 16 years.
  A few years ago, The New York Times did an expose, reporting that at 
the current pace, the high-speed rail project will not be completed 
this century. I actually asked Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg 
whether he agreed with The New York Times' assessment. He said that, 
yes, it will be completed this century, although I gave him several 
opportunities to give his own estimation of when it will be completed 
and he declined to do so.
  To give you a sense of how bad things are, in the early days of the 
project, the lead operator abandoned the project to go build a rail 
system in North Africa because they said that it was less politically 
dysfunctional there than in California. That operator, by the way, 
brought a high-speed train online in Morocco in 2018.
  High-speed trains are not impossible to build. Californians and 
Americans travel abroad, and they ride them. They ask why we can't have 
them here. It is just impossible in California because of stratospheric 
levels of political incompetence.

  Indeed, the head of the California High-Speed Rail Authority 
testified last year that the project is $100 billion short in funding. 
In spite of all the billions that have been poured in by California 
taxpayers and through Federal support, there is still a funding gap of 
$100 billion.
  This was the former head of the California High-Speed Rail Authority 
because they have since gotten a new one, and they are now up to five 
CEOs throughout the life of the project. The number of CEOs outnumber 
the number of passengers five to zero.
  What are some of the things that some of these past leaders of the 
high-speed rail project have had to say about it? Well, you can ask 
Michael Tennenbaum, who was the first chairman of the California High-
Speed Rail Authority. He said, ``I realized the system didn't work. . . 
. I don't know how they can build it now.''
  There is also Dan Richard, the longest serving chairman of the 
California High-Speed Rail Authority, who said, ``I don't think it is 
an existing project. It is a loser.''
  Rich Tolmach, the head of the California Rail Foundation, said, ``It 
will never be operable.''
  Former Governor of California Jerry Brown, perhaps the biggest 
supporter of the project, has derided opponents of the train as small-
minded people, but this is an incredibly small-minded project. In fact, 
it is a nonexistent project at this point in time.
  Even if built, even if the high-speed train magically materializes by 
the end of the decade, it will still be yesterday's technology.

                              {time}  1230

  China, right now, is working on a train that they are planning to 
complete by the end of the decade that will go up to a 1,000 kilometers 
per hour. At this point, it is past time to stop throwing good money 
after bad. We should end all Federal support for the high-speed rail 
project because that Federal support is keeping the project on life 
support, and is then forcing California taxpayers to continue to pay 
billions and billions of dollars more.
  Meanwhile, our roads are among the very worst in the country despite 
us paying the highest taxes in the country. That is the very 
definition, by the way, of inefficiency, when you pay the most and get 
the least in return.
  The high-speed rail, in short, is a staggering waste of taxpayer 
dollars that fails to meet the transportation needs of either today or 
tomorrow. I look forward to working with the new DOGE commission and my 
colleagues here in the House to see that we bring this boondoggle to an 
end once and for all.


                     Protecting California's Values

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, this last week, California Governor Gavin 
Newsom called a special emergency session of the legislature for the 
purpose of Trump proofing California or protecting California values.
  There is a question of whether this session is even legal given that 
the State constitution allows for a special session to be called under 
extraordinary circumstances, and you might wonder whether the result of 
a dually conducted Presidential election could truly constitute 
extraordinary circumstance.
  More than that, it is clearly a farce despite the Governor's claims 
that this is an emergency situation. It was such an emergency that they 
gaveled in for about an hour and then went home for a month without 
passing any legislation.
  We should just examine the Governor's claim that we need to protect 
California values, protect the status quo in California against any 
forces of reform that may be coming from Washington, D.C.
  What exactly is the Governor aiming to protect? Is it California's 
national lead when it comes to homelessness, the fact we have half the 
unsheltered homeless in the entire country? Is that what Governor 
Newsom is aiming to protect?
  Is it our poverty rate that is the highest in the Nation? Is he 
looking to protect our lead when it comes to poverty? When it comes to 
retail crime, does he want to maintain the number one record for the 
worst retail crime in the country?
  Does he want to maintain the number one spot when it comes to 
antibusiness regulations, or when it comes to frivolous lawsuits, or 
when it comes to unemployment.

[[Page H6436]]

  Actually, we are now only the second worst in the country when it 
comes to unemployment, so perhaps his protective measures are aiming to 
get us back in the lead.
  Is he looking to protect our standing as the worst State in the 
country when it comes to an increase in wages--wages have stagnated in 
California more than any State in the country--or when it comes to 
restrictions on workers and the right to earn a living?
  Is he looking to make sure that California maintains its lead in gas 
prices, well above the price of gas in any of the other 49 States? 
Well, we know he is looking to do that because his own car board just 
passed regulations that are going to raise gas prices about 60 cents a 
gallon more.
  Is he looking to protect our standing as number two in the country in 
housing costs; number two in the country in water bills; number three 
in the country in energy and electricity costs; number three in the 
country in inequality; number one in the country when it comes to 
income taxes? He certainly wants to protect California's lead in that 
respect.
  Does he want to protect our budget deficit which was reported last 
year as number one in the country; or our standing third in the country 
in road disrepair; or maybe it is the fact that California has the 
highest illiteracy rate in the entire country?
  Perhaps that is the value that Governor Newsom is aiming to protect. 
Or relatedly, the fact that we are second out of the 50 States when it 
comes to educational inequity.
  If we were still in the COVID days, he would certainly be looking to 
protect our national lead when it came to school shutdowns, business 
shutdowns, and COVID mandates. We know that he is looking to protect 
our national lead when it comes to illegal border crossings for the 
first time since the nineties. Over the last year, the highest level of 
illegal border crossings have been in the San Diego border sector 
because he stood by California's standing as a sanctuary State.
  When it comes to funding for illegal immigrants, surely he is looking 
to protect our lead there as California is the only State in the 
country that is offering free Medicaid to those who are here 
unlawfully. Most certainly we know the Governor is looking to extend 
California's four-peat in leading the Nation in one-way U-Haul rentals 
and is looking through his protective special session, I am sure, to 
make that a five-peat.
  No, Mr. Speaker, California values, as Governor Newsom envisions 
them, do not need protecting, and I would argue they are not actually 
the values of Californians. What we are seeing happen in our State is 
that Californians themselves are looking to Newsom-proof California.
  That has been happening in my district for quite some time where we 
have developed a different model; where we support law enforcement, 
where we support small businesses, and where we believe in respecting 
the personal decisions of folks in our community.
  As a result, we are one of the few areas of the State that people are 
actually moving to. By all of these metrics that I just mentioned, we 
are doing much better than the State as a whole.
  However, we are seeing Newsom-proofing measures taking hold, not just 
in my district, but across California. For evidence of this, look at 
the overwhelming passage of Prop 36 on the ballot this November. This 
was a measure to make crime illegal again in California. It largely 
rolled back the notorious Proposition 47.

  Gavin Newsom, and I might add the leaders of the supermajority in the 
legislature, fought it every step of the way. He concocted several 
schemes to un-Democratically remove it from the ballot even after it 
qualified through a citizen petition process.
  Then he led the ``no'' on Prop 36 campaign. Yet, at the end of the 
day, it passed in an overwhelming victory, nearly 70 percent of the 
vote, an overwhelming majority: Democrats, Republicans, and 
Independents. It passed in all 58 counties, wasn't close anywhere, even 
passed in Newsom's hometown of San Francisco.
  Mr. Speaker, California is now on a path back to sanity, and I have 
great hope for the future of our State. Frankly, I think that the 
Governor's attempts to get himself in the headlines and whatever 
theatrics may be coming are not going to stand in our way of getting 
our State moving in the right direction.


                        Recognizing Michael Lee

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize retiring Placer County 
Water Agency Board Member Michael R. Lee for his more than 40 years of 
dedicated public service.
  Mr. Lee began his career in government in 1972 at just 27 years of 
age. He served as a Placer County board supervisor for 16 years before 
moving into his role as director of the Placer County Water Agency 
where he served for 27 years.
  Not only did Mr. Lee work as a government official, but he also owned 
and operated his own businesses, including the Villa Market and the 
Loomis Travel Agency.
  He demonstrated his unwavering commitment to the community by serving 
in a variety of local, regional, and national organizations, boards, 
and commissions, including the Loomis Chamber of Commerce, South Placer 
Heritage Foundation, Sierra Planning Council, and the National 
Association of Counties to name a few.
  Throughout his career, he played a pivotal role in improving 
transportation, law enforcement, fire protection, water resources, and 
community welfare programs in the region.
  Mr. Lee achieved a wide diversity of accomplishments to improve the 
quality of life and experiences for the residents, businesses, and 
visitors of Placer County. One particularly noteworthy accomplishment 
was his leadership in the development of the Twelve Bridges project and 
expansion of the corresponding PCWA canal system for this new 
community.
  His efforts with this project significantly contributed to the 
vibrancy and transformation of the city of Lincoln. It is because of 
the devoted efforts of people like Mike Lee that Placer County is such 
a great place to live, work, and to raise a family.
  As a pillar in our communities, he is known by others as one who 
exhibits diligence, honor, integrity, thoughtfulness, and wisdom in his 
work, and an unwavering commitment to the people of Placer County.
  I am confident that Mr. Lee's exceptional contributions to the 
community, local business, and local government, and the legacy he 
built within those spheres will continue to benefit the county for many 
years to come.
  Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I 
am honored to recognize Mr. Michael Lee for his four decades of 
dedicated leadership, and I join the Placer community in wishing him 
the very best in his retirement.


           Roseville Boy Scout Troop 11 100-Year Anniversary

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to mark and celebrate the 100-year 
anniversary of Boy Scout Troop 11, located in Roseville, California.
  Troop 11 was first chartered in 1924 by American Legion Post 169, and 
it is the oldest continuing Boy Scout troop in Roseville.
  It is a scout-run, leader-mentored, and parent-supported troop that 
focuses on personal growth, leadership development, and community 
outreach.
  One core tenet of Troop 11 is the ``good turn'' concept, which helps 
Scouts grow as they participate in community service projects and 
provide acts of good and kindness toward others.
  Troop 11 is involved in a variety of local projects, including giving 
aid during times of emergency, hosting community events such as pancake 
breakfasts and the crab and spaghetti feeds, as well as retiring worn 
U.S. flags to name a few.
  Groups like Boy Scout Troop 11 play an integral role in developing 
self-reliance and community building, preparing the youth who 
participate to become the leaders of tomorrow. Their commitment to 
excellence of character and tenacity to build a better world is 
inspiring to all those around them.
  Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I 
am honored to recognize Roseville Boy Scout Troop 11 for reaching this 
significant milestone, their centennial celebration.

[[Page H6437]]

  



                      Recognizing Elaine Andersen

  Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize retiring Folsom City 
Manager Elaine Andersen for her years of dedication to serving the 
Folsom community.
  Elaine's career to public service to the people of Folsom, the 
Sacramento area, and the State of California spans over three decades, 
while serving as Folsom city manager for the last 6 years.
  Prior to her service to the city of Folsom, Elaine Andersen enjoyed 
an eminent career in numerous roles working for the city of Sacramento 
and the State of California, as well as in public affairs, specializing 
in legislative projects for the private sector.
  She began her nearly 20 years of service in the city of Folsom as a 
special projects manager and would go on to dutifully serve in a wide 
array of roles as acting director for various departments, deputy city 
manager, and assistant city manager, all of which contributed to the 
prosperity of the Folsom community.
  Elaine's commitment to public service was fostered in her studies as 
she received her bachelor of arts degree in political science from the 
University of California, Berkeley.

  Elaine's experience and knowledge combined with her love for the city 
of Folsom enabled her to excel in her tenure as Folsom city manager. 
She demonstrated exceptional leadership managing a staff of over 400 
workers across multiple departments and an annual budget exceeding $250 
million.
  She successfully helped facilitate the development and construction 
of Fire Station 34, improving the public safety of the region, as well 
as the beautiful Prospector Park to promote public recreation and well-
being.
  Elaine's ability to collaborate with multiple facets of the 
community, including local businesses, city council, and the hundreds 
of staff she leads ensured that Folsom remains a great place to live, 
raise a family, and conduct business.
  Elaine has also been successful in securing Folsom City Council's 
adoption of the first strategic plan in many years. This plan 
established guidelines for the city to ensure a continued commitment to 
financial stability and sustainability, public safety and 
infrastructure, economic and community development, and organizational 
effectiveness to best prepare for the future while seizing current 
opportunities.
  Elaine Andersen has truly embodied what it means to be a public 
servant. I am certain her life's work of service to her community will 
leave a longstanding legacy as her impact will benefit the region for 
years to come.
  Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, 
it is an honor and a privilege to acknowledge Folsom City Manager 
Elaine Andersen for her career of exemplary leadership and public 
service. I join the Folsom community in wishing her the very best in 
her retirement.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________