[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 178 (Tuesday, December 3, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H6265-H6267]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                COLORADO RIVER SALINITY CONTROL FIX ACT

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 7872) to amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act 
to modify certain requirements applicable to salinity control units, 
and for other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 7872

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Colorado River Salinity 
     Control Fix Act''.

     SEC. 2. SALINITY CONTROL UNITS.

       Section 205 of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control 
     Act (43 U.S.C. 1595) is amended--
       (1) by striking the section designation and all that 
     follows through ``(a) The Secretary'' and inserting the 
     following:

     ``SEC. 205. SALINITY CONTROL UNITS; AUTHORITY AND FUNCTIONS 
                   OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

       ``(a) Allocation of Costs.--The Secretary'';
       (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
       ``(1) Nonreimbursable costs; reimbursable costs.--
       ``(A) Nonreimbursable costs.--
       ``(i) In general.--In recognition of Federal responsibility 
     for the Colorado River as an interstate stream and for 
     international comity with Mexico, Federal ownership of the 
     land of the Colorado River Basin from which most of the 
     dissolved salts originate, and the policy established in the 
     Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) 
     and except as provided in clause (ii), the following shall be 
     nonreimbursable:

       ``(I) 75 percent of the total costs of construction and 
     replacement of each unit or separable feature of a unit 
     authorized by section 202(a)(1), including 90 percent of--

       ``(aa) the costs of operation and maintenance of each unit 
     or separable feature of a unit authorized by that section; 
     and
       ``(bb) the total costs of construction, operation, and 
     maintenance of the associated measures to replace incidental 
     fish and wildlife values foregone.

       ``(II) 75 percent of the total costs of construction and 
     replacement of each unit or separable feature of a unit 
     authorized by section 202(a)(2), including 100 percent of--

       ``(aa) the costs of operation and maintenance of each unit 
     or separable feature of a unit authorized by that section; 
     and
       ``(bb) the total costs of construction, operation, and 
     maintenance of the associated measures to replace incidental 
     fish and wildlife values foregone.

       ``(III) 75 percent of the total costs of construction, 
     operation, maintenance, and replacement of each unit or 
     separable feature of a unit authorized by section 202(a)(3), 
     including 75 percent of the total costs of construction, 
     operation, and maintenance of the

[[Page H6266]]

     associated measures to replace incidental fish and wildlife 
     values foregone.
       ``(IV) 70 percent of the total costs of construction, 
     operation, maintenance, and replacement of each unit or 
     separable feature of a unit authorized by paragraphs (4) and 
     (6) of section 202(a), including 70 percent of the total 
     costs of construction, operation, and maintenance of the 
     associated measures to replace incidental fish and wildlife 
     values foregone.
       ``(V) 70 percent of the total costs of construction and 
     replacement of each unit or separable feature of a unit 
     authorized by section 202(a)(5), including 100 percent of--

       ``(aa) the costs of operation and maintenance of each unit 
     or separable feature of a unit authorized by that section; 
     and
       ``(bb) the total costs of construction, operation, and 
     maintenance of the associated measures to replace incidental 
     fish and wildlife values foregone.

       ``(VI) 85 percent of the total costs of implementation of 
     the on-farm measures authorized by section 202(c), including 
     85 percent of the total costs of the associated measures to 
     replace incidental fish and wildlife values foregone.

       ``(ii) Special rule for nonreimbursable costs for fiscal 
     years 2024 and 2025.--Notwithstanding clause (i), for each of 
     fiscal years 2024 and 2025, the following shall be 
     nonreimbursable:

       ``(I) 75 percent of all costs described in clause (i)(I).
       ``(II) 75 percent of all costs described in clause (i)(II).
       ``(III) 70 percent of all costs described in clause (i)(V).
       ``(IV) The percentages of all costs described in subclauses 
     (III), (IV), and (VI) of clause (i).

       ``(B) Reimbursable costs.--The total costs remaining after 
     the allocations under clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph 
     (A) shall be reimbursable as provided for in paragraphs (2), 
     (3), (4), and (5).'';
       (3) in subsection (b), by striking the subsection 
     designation and all that follows through ``Costs of 
     construction'' in paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
       ``(b) Costs Payable From Lower Colorado River Basin 
     Development Fund.--
       ``(1) In general.--Costs of construction'';
       (4) in subsection (c), by striking ``(c) Costs of 
     construction'' and inserting the following:
       ``(c) Costs Payable From Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.--
     Costs of construction''; and
       (5) in subsection (e), by striking ``(e) The Secretary is'' 
     and inserting the following:
       ``(e) Upward Adjustment of Rates for Electrical Energy.--
     The Secretary is''.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) and the gentlewoman from Michigan (Mrs. 
Dingell) each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Arkansas.


                             General Leave

  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks 
and include extraneous material on H.R. 7872, the bill now under 
consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Arkansas?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 7872, the Colorado River 
Salinity Control Fix Act. The Colorado River is a critical resource for 
the basin's seven States.
  Since the 1970s, the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program 
has operated salinity control projects to reduce salinity levels in the 
river, which helps to improve crop yields for farmers. This effort is 
crucial since agriculture is the most significant component of the 
basin's economy.
  Historically, this program has been funded through both 
appropriations and power revenues. However, the Colorado River has 
experienced historic ongoing multidecade drought conditions that have 
reduced hydropower generation and created an imbalance between the 
program's obligations and the costs payable through hydropower.
  The Colorado River Salinity Control Fix Act would address this 
challenge by reducing the cost-share percentages from hydropower 
revenues and increasing the Federal nonreimbursable costs for the 
salinity programs across the Colorado River Basin.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge the adoption of this legislation, and I reserve 
the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I stand in support of the Colorado River Salinity 
Control Fix Act introduced by my colleague from Utah (Mr. Curtis).
  The Colorado River is, of course, one of the American West's national 
treasures, but it is also a vital source of fresh water for 40 million 
people and 5.5 million acres of farmland across seven States and 
Mexico.

                              {time}  1545

  These communities rely on this river for water that is essential to 
their livelihoods.
  Agriculture and natural leaching can lead to the rising levels of 
salinity that threaten the water quality of these communities and the 
amount of water available to be used for hydropower generation.
  Congress recognized the crucial need to limit the river's salinity in 
1974 when it passed the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act, 
which authorized a desalting complex, and by passing further amendments 
to establish a basin-wide salinity control project.
  For years, these actions have helped maintain the salinity content 
within the river.
  The problem of salinity now, however, has been significantly 
intensified by continually worsening drought conditions, which have 
limited hydropower generation and, in turn, the funds made available 
for salinity control programs.
  This bill before us today prompts us to once again take action to 
preserve the water quality in the Colorado River. Specifically, this 
legislation would increase the Federal cost share for the program to 
account for the impacts of ongoing drought.
  We must ensure that the Colorado River's clean fresh water does not 
become ruined by our inaction.
  Mr. Speaker, I encourage my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this bill, 
and I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from 
Utah (Mr. Curtis), the lead sponsor of this bill.
  Mr. CURTIS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of my bill, 
the Colorado River Salinity Control Fix Act, a critical piece of 
legislation addressing a longstanding challenge to the people of Utah.
  High salinity levels in the Colorado River have far-reaching 
consequences. They threaten the beauty and the integrity of Utah's 
national parks, impact our ranchers and farmers, and jeopardize 
drinking water for millions of Americans.
  Decades ago, Congress recognized the urgency of this issue. In 1974, 
the Colorado River Salinity Control Program was established to combat 
harmful effects of salt discharged into the river from natural saline 
rock formations.
  However, we now face new challenges, including reduced water flows 
and increasing pressures on the Federal budget. The Colorado River 
Salinity Control Fix Act makes vital adjustments to this program, 
ensuring its continued effectiveness while adapting to modern 
realities.
  I am pleased to see this important bill before us today. It 
represents a significant step toward preserving Utah's iconic 
landscapes, safeguarding our water resources, and ensuring a clean and 
reliable water supply for Utahns and all who depend on the Colorado 
River.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this critical bill and 
join me in protecting one of our Nation's most important resources.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and 
I am prepared to close. I continue to reserve the balance of my time.
  Mrs. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this 
legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. WESTERMAN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.
  Again, H.R. 7872 builds on important efforts undertaken by all seven 
States in the Colorado River Basin to ensure that salinity control 
projects are funded.
  These projects support farmers and ranchers across the region and 
lead to better environmental outcomes. The importance of this work 
cannot be overstated.
  Lastly, I thank Congressman   John Curtis for his work in moving this 
legislation forward. While we will miss him on our committee next year, 
I know we will continue to find ways to work with him in his new role 
at the other end of the Capitol.

[[Page H6267]]

  Mr. Speaker, I encourage adoption of this legislation, and I yield 
back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Westerman) that the House suspend the 
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 7872.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________