[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 166 (Tuesday, November 12, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H5942-H5943]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                      VALUE OVER COST ACT OF 2024

  Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules 
and pass the bill (H.R. 9596) to amend title 41, United States Code, 
and title 10, United States Code, to provide best value through the 
multiple award schedule program, and for other purposes.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 9596

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Value Over Cost Act of 
     2024''.

     SEC. 2. PROVIDING BEST VALUE THROUGH THE MULTIPLE AWARD 
                   SCHEDULE PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--Section 152(3)(B) of title 41, United 
     States Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(B) orders and contracts under those procedures result 
     in--
       ``(i) the lowest overall cost alternative; or
       ``(ii) in the case that the Administrator of General 
     Services determines that obtaining best value (as described 
     under section 15.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation) 
     is necessary to promote the best interests of the Federal 
     Government, obtaining the best value to meet the needs of the 
     Federal Government.''.
       (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3012(3)(B) of title 10, 
     United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
       ``(B) orders and contracts under those procedures result 
     in--
       ``(i) the lowest overall cost alternative; or
       ``(ii) in the case that the Administrator of General 
     Services determines that obtaining best value (as described 
     under section 15.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation) 
     is necessary to promote the best interests of the Federal 
     Government, obtaining the best value to meet the needs of the 
     United States.''.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Louisiana (Mr. Higgins) and the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Raskin) 
each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Louisiana.


                             General Leave

  Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that 
all Members have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their 
remarks and include extraneous material for this measure.


 =========================== NOTE =========================== 

  
  On November 12, 2024, page H5942, in the third column, the 
following appeared: Mr. HIGGINS. Mr. Speaker, I ask
  
  The online version has been corrected to read: Mr. HIGGINS of 
Louisiana. Mr. Speaker, I ask


 ========================= END NOTE ========================= 


  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Louisiana?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I 
may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 9596, the Value Over Cost Act.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. 
Donalds).
  Mr. DONALDS. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the Value 
Over Cost Act. This is a simple, commonsense piece of legislation that 
modernizes the antiquated Federal procurement process. Specifically, 
this bill provides the General Services Administration with additional 
contracting flexibility by allowing for the consideration of best value 
in addition to the lowest overall cost alternative.
  Instead of just looking at the initial price tag, the Federal 
Government should be fiscally responsible and also consider the 
contractual value of products and services over time, if it is in the 
best interest of the Federal Government.
  Ultimately, my bill increases contractual flexibility and contracting 
competition, provides clarity for acquisition stakeholders, maximizes 
the Federal Government's ability to procure modern technology, and 
helps the small business community by reducing regulatory burdens 
associated with Federal procurement.
  In sum, I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this commonsense 
piece of legislation.
  Mr. RASKIN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in favor of H.R. 9596, the Value Over Cost Act. 
The GSA keeps a list of goods and services that

[[Page H5943]]

are available to Federal agencies for multiple GSA-approved vendors at 
different prices. This schedule is known as the Federal supply 
schedule. Agencies can order commercial goods and services listed on 
this schedule in different quantities at the prices stated on the 
schedule.
  It provides a simplified process for agencies to acquire goods and 
services while also earning the volume discounts for the Federal 
Government as a whole.
  Current law is ambiguous about whether the contracts and orders under 
the Federal supply schedule program must be the lowest price or the 
best value price. Best value contracts consider price but also things 
like the quality of the product and the expertise of the service 
provider.
  The bill clarifies that both the lowest price and the best value are 
acceptable outcomes for contracts obtained under the scheduled program.
  I commend Representative Byron Donalds and Representative Gerry 
Connolly from Virginia for their work on the legislation, and I yield 
back the balance of my time.
  Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana. Mr. Speaker, I have no further speakers on 
this bill, and I am prepared to close.
  Mr. Speaker, I encourage my House colleagues to support this bill, 
and I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Higgins) that the House suspend the rules 
and pass the bill, H.R. 9596.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________