[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 150 (Wednesday, September 25, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6423-S6425]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                     ACCESSIBLE FEDERAL TECHNOLOGY

  Mr. CASEY. Madam President, I rise today to recognize the 51st 
anniversary of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the importance of 
the law to equal access for people with disabilities, including equal 
access to Federal technology.
  When it was signed into law on September 26, 1973, the Rehabilitation 
Act prohibited discrimination on the basis of disability by the Federal 
Government, in federally funded programs, and by Federal contractors. 
Passage of the Rehabilitation Act committed the Federal Government to 
ensuring that every person, including people with disabilities, have 
access to government programs and services. As with any legislation, 
enforcement is key. In the years following passage, people with 
disabilities needed to advocate that the Federal Government issue 
regulations and implement the law in order to ensure Federal services 
and products are accessible. Four years after passage, no regulations 
had been issued. At the beginning of April 1977, disability advocates 
started a month-long national protest, pressuring President Carter and 
his Cabinet. The protests lasted 26 days and resulted in implementation 
of the first Rehabilitation Act regulations. The Rehabilitation Act and 
the resulting regulations laid the groundwork for the passage of the 
Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990.
  The Rehabilitation Act helped make the Federal Government more 
accessible for people with disabilities, but with time, new 
accessibility barriers emerged. Those accessibility barriers were 
related to America's information revolution, which has changed society 
at a rapid pace. In response to the emerging digital revolution, 
Senator Orrin Hatch led efforts in 1986 to establish guidelines on 
electronic accessibility, resulting in a new section of the 
Rehabilitation Act: section 508. In 1998, Senator Chris Dodd and 
Representative Anna Eshoo led efforts to further strengthen section 
508's accessibility requirements for digital information, services, and 
tools offered by Federal Agencies. The Rehabilitation Act amendments in 
1998 were the last significant congressional changes to Section 508.
  Section 508 requires technology at Federal Departments and Agencies 
to be accessible for, and usable by, people with disabilities, 
including Federal employees who have disabilities. Section 508 requires 
the United States Access Board to develop the specific standards that 
Department and Agency technology must meet to be accessible for people 
with disabilities. Technology covered by section 508 includes websites, 
apps, and electronic documents, as well as physical technology such as 
kiosks, computers, and telecommunications equipment. Examples of 
accessible technology include websites, apps, or PDFs that can work 
with a screen reader or other assistive technology. They include video 
communications systems that are capable of incorporating sign language. 
They include kiosks that are properly positioned for a wheelchair user 
and provide an option for speech output.
  Accessible Federal technology is important to ensure all Americans 
can benefit from government resources, and demographic changes mean 
more Americans will be disadvantaged if Federal technology is not 
accessible. Our Nation is rapidly aging, and older adults are more 
likely to have a disability. That means a larger population will be 
relying on accessible Federal technology for access to Federal 
employment, information, and services in the coming decades. Accessible 
Federal technology also benefits people without disabilities. For 
example, an accessible Federal website also benefits someone browsing 
on a small screen, someone browsing with a broken arm, or someone in a 
noisy environment who cannot hear an online video.
  Despite the importance of accessible technology, the Federal 
Government has a poor record of meeting its obligations under section 
508. In 2018, I was approached by blinded veterans who informed me that 
they could not access Department of Veterans Affairs' websites using 
their screen readers. In

[[Page S6424]]

response, I introduced bipartisan legislation, the Department of 
Veterans Affairs Website Accessibility Act. When it was signed into law 
in 2020, the VA Website Accessibility Act required the VA to report on 
the accessibility of the VA's websites and intake kiosks. The resulting 
report, released in 2021, had stark findings--fewer than 10 percent of 
the VA's websites were fully accessible for people with disabilities. 
The report also included a wholly inadequate plan for bringing the VA's 
websites into section 508 compliance.
  The VA's web accessibility report was a wakeup call; the Federal 
Government must do better. To start, I used my position as chairman of 
the Senate Special Committee on Aging to push the VA to improve. I am 
pleased that my efforts had bipartisan support from the ranking member 
of the Aging Committee and from the bipartisan leadership of the House 
and Senate Committees on Veterans Affairs. In response to a letter 
signed by the bipartisan leadership of three committees and two 
subcommittees, the VA released a revised website accessibility report, 
with an updated plan for making VA websites accessible. I also 
requested that the VA conduct regular section 508 compliance updates 
for bipartisan House and Senate staff, which the VA has done since 
March 2022. The VA's recurring progress reports for congressional staff 
help ensure that the VA's efforts to improve stay on track.
  Unfortunately, the shortfalls at the VA are not unique. In recent 
years, a long list of agencies has settled lawsuits alleging that their 
websites and technology are not accessible. Further, since 1998, the 
Federal Government's reporting and oversight for section 508 has ranged 
from lackluster to nonexistent. The Department of Justice is required 
by law to report every 2 years on the Federal Government's section 508 
compliance but, prior to my oversight, had not done so since 2012. The 
General Services Administration routinely collected data on Federal 
website accessibility but did not make that information available to 
the public or Congress. The Office of Management and Budget maintained 
a strategic plan for Federal section 508 compliance, but that strategic 
plan had not been updated since 2013, despite Federal accessibility 
shortfalls and rapid technological change.
  Since 2022, I have authored multiple letters to Federal departments 
and Agencies urging them to improve section 508 compliance, oversight, 
and transparency. Many letters were bipartisan, demonstrating the 
continued, broad interest in accessible Federal technology. I also led 
two Aging Committee hearings on accessible government technology that 
included people with disabilities as witnesses. Their testimony helped 
the committee understand the real-world impact when Federal technology 
does not allow for equal access. In December 2022, I released Unlocking 
the Virtual Front Door, an Aging Committee majority staff report that 
lays out many of the Federal accessibility failures that I have 
outlined today. Unlocking the Virtual Front Door includes a set of 
recommendations for the Federal Government and for Congress for making 
Federal technology accessible.
  I am pleased that improvements have been made in response to my 
oversight of section 508 compliance. The VA reorganized its technology 
access office, expanded its outreach to people with disabilities, and 
bolstered its efforts to make its technology accessible. The VA also 
reevaluated over 300 exceptions that it had granted to allow the use of 
inaccessible technology and revoked all but 18. The Department of 
Justice, meanwhile, released its first report on the Federal 
Government's section 508 compliance since 2012, and the General 
Services Administration committed to new section 508 oversight and 
transparency efforts. The Office of Management and Budget has released 
updated guidance for Departments and Agencies on meeting section 508 
standards, replacing its outdated 2013 strategic plan. Department and 
Agency inspectors general have also taken an interest in accessible 
technology, which resulted in a January 2024 inspector general report 
on technology at the VA.
  While there has been progress toward making the Federal Government's 
technology accessible for people with disabilities, significant 
shortfalls remain. The Justice Department's latest section 508 report, 
released in January 2023, found that 1 in 10 public-facing websites at 
major Departments and Agencies are not fully accessible for people with 
disabilities. A December 2023 General Services Administration 
assessment likewise noted that the Federal Government's section 508 
compliance is ``well below expectations.'' There are also continued, 
troubling reports of specific electronic accessibility failures within 
the Federal Government. For example, there are allegations that the new 
electronic health record system at the VA is not accessible for people 
with disabilities. The VA has come a long way since I began my 
oversight of section 508. The VA must continue to show that it is 
serious about section 508 by prioritizing accessibility for all new 
information and communications technology, including its EHR system.
  The reports and data that have been released in response to my 
oversight of section 508 highlight a need to do more. One 
recommendation in Unlocking the Virtual Front Door was for Congress to 
significantly update section 508 for the first time since 1998. That is 
why I have introduced S. 4766, the Section 508 Refresh Act of 2024. My 
legislation would make changes to ensure that newly purchased or 
developed Federal technology is accessible before it is deployed. It 
would also reform the Federal Government's section 508 complaint 
process by giving the experts with the Access Board a prominent role. 
The Section 508 Refresh Act would require regular testing to ensure 
that Federal technology already in use remains fully accessible over 
time, and it would require Departments and Agencies to appoint 
qualified, dedicated section 508 officers. Critically, my legislation 
would also require the involvement of people with disabilities in the 
acquisition and accessibility testing of Federal technology. People 
with disabilities who work for the Federal Government or use Federal 
resources are the ones who are harmed when Federal technology is not 
accessible. It is essential for them to have a seat at the table when 
Federal technology is being acquired, designed, implemented, and 
tested.
  The need to reform section 508 is real. My own constituents have 
testified to the Aging Committee about the impact when Federal 
technology does not allow equal access for all Americans. Ms. Jule Ann 
Lieberman of Devon, PA, is an expert on assistive technology. Yet, 
during the COVID-19 pandemic, she could not access local prevalence 
data on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website because 
it was inaccessible for her screen reader. Although Ms. Lieberman was 
able to ask a family member for help, she explained to the committee 
that ``repeated requests for help become burdensome for those who 
support me, potentially leaving me with either no access or not timely 
information.'' Sadly, Ms. Lieberman ran into yet another accessibility 
barrier later in the pandemic, when she could not use her screen reader 
to access COVID-19 vaccination resources on the CDC website.
  Mr. Ron Biglin is a blind Air Force veteran from Clarks Summit, PA. 
Mr. Biglin can fish, kayak, and do online banking. However, Mr. Biglin 
could not use the internet to access his VA health benefits. When Mr. 
Biglin tried to do so, the VA's online portal, My HealtheVet, would not 
work with his screen reader. Mr. Biglin told the Aging Committee that, 
``when you are visually impaired you want to be as independent as 
possible and having problems getting on VA websites takes away this 
independency.'' In response to my oversight, the VA worked to resolve 
the issues that Mr. Biglin was having with My HealtheVet. However, to 
safeguard equal access, we must ensure that all Federal Departments and 
Agencies build accessibility into their technology from the start.
  I remain committed to ensuring that Federal technology is accessible 
for people with disabilities and that all Americans have equal access 
to Federal jobs, information, and benefits. I look forward to working 
with my colleagues in Congress on continued section 508 oversight and 
to advance the Section 508 Refresh Act.

[[Page S6425]]

  

                          ____________________