[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 150 (Wednesday, September 25, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H5776-H5777]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STUCK ON HOLD ACT
Mr. BOST. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill
(H.R. 6656) to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the
Commissioner of Social Security to implement automated systems with
callback functionality for each customer service telephone line of the
Department of Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration,
respectively, and for other purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read the title of the bill.
The text of the bill is as follows:
H.R. 6656
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Stuck On Hold Act''.
SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS REGARDING WAIT TIMES FOR CALLERS TO
CERTAIN SERVICE TELEPHONE LINES OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.
(a) Automated System.--Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs shall implement, for each covered line, an automated
system that--
(1) informs any caller to a covered line about the
anticipated wait time, if any; and
(2) automatically offers a callback to any such caller with
an anticipated wait time of more than 10 minutes.
(b) Guidance Regarding Caller Wait Times.--The Secretary
shall issue such guidance the Secretary determines necessary
to reduce the average wait time of a caller to a covered line
to not more than 10 minutes.
(c) Covered Line Defined.--In this section, the term
``covered line'' means a customer service telephone line of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Such term does not
include--
(1) the toll-free hotline for veterans provided by the
Secretary under section 1720F(h) of title 38, United States
Code; or
(2) a phone line for the emergency department of a health
care facility of the Department.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Illinois (Mr. Bost) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) each
will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Illinois.
General Leave
Mr. BOST. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may
have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks on H.R.
6656, as amended.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from Illinois?
There was no objection.
Mr. BOST. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 6656, offered by the
gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert), my good friend and colleague.
The Stuck on Hold Act would require the VA to implement an automated
callback system. This bill would inform veterans of the expected wait
time for their call to be answered. This change would make life easier
for veterans while ensuring the VA responds to them in a timely manner.
During my time in Congress, I have long heard horror stories from
veterans about waiting on hold for over an hour to talk to someone at
the VA. That is unacceptable in today's digital age, and the VA needs
to do better.
Representative Calvert's bill is in lockstep with the House
Republicans'
[[Page H5777]]
effort to modernize VA care and services. I thank the VFW and DAV for
their support of this bipartisan legislation, and I urge my colleagues
to support H.R. 6656, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
{time} 1345
Mr. TAKANO. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to express my support for H.R. 6656, the Stuck On
Hold Act, as amended.
This bill mandates that the Department of Veterans Affairs implement
automated callback systems for their customer phone lines and aim to
limit wait time for veterans on hold to no more than 10 minutes.
Since we skipped regular order on this bill, we were not able to mark
it up in committee and make the needed improvements to the bill. I was
not informed why we are rushing this bill to the floor without a
markup, but I appreciate that the chairman's staff worked with mine to
amend the bill to include important changes to improve the bill to
ensure that veterans who should be prioritized for assistance are not
negatively impacted by excessive wait times.
Considering the Senate is unlikely to take this bill up as written
due to concerns with implementation, I also hope we can continue to
work with our Senate colleagues to determine the correct amount of time
we should target for veterans on hold.
Obviously, no one likes being on hold, but ideally every veteran
should have the option to receive a callback instead of needlessly
remaining on hold and waiting for assistance.
During our limited committee consideration, our committee heard from
VA about concerns for implementation, and I believe limiting hold time
is not simply picking a number but also requires us to understand what
resources are necessary to limit hold times.
The rush to get this bill to the floor did not allow for a more
detailed conversation about resources and impacts, so I hope a
truncated committee process will not prevent us from engaging with the
Senate to ensure we enact the best possible bill.
Mr. Speaker, I will support the bill for now with the expectation
that there is more work to do, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. BOST. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the
gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert).
Mr. CALVERT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me time.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 6656, the Stuck
On Hold Act, legislation I introduced to support American veterans.
This legislation is simple yet powerful in its potential to make
government services more accessible to those who served our country.
In a time when technology has advanced significantly in the private
sector, it is long overdue that we bring the same level of efficiency
and user-friendly approach to our Federal agencies, like the VA.
Right now, when a veteran picks up the phone to call the VA, they
often face long, uncertain wait times. They sit on hold, sometimes for
hours, with no clear idea of when their call will be answered or how
long they will have to wait.
The frustration this causes is immeasurable, and frankly, it is
unacceptable.
That is why the Stuck On Hold Act is so crucial. The bill requires
the VA to implement a system to inform callers of their estimated wait
times and, when those times exceed 10 minutes, give them the option of
receiving an automated callback when it is their turn.
Many of us are familiar with this kind of system from our
interactions with private companies. It is not a new idea, and it is
not revolutionary technology, but for millions of Americans who rely on
the VA for benefits or medical treatment, it is a game changer. It
shows respect for their time and acknowledges the importance of their
needs.
Mr. Speaker, it is time for Congress to set acceptable customer
service standards for our Federal departments and agencies. The
American people, especially those who have served our country, deserve
a responsible and efficient government.
That is why the Stuck On Hold Act is supported by the veterans
service organizations, including the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the
Disabled American Veterans, and others.
Mr. Speaker, I thank Chairman Bost and Ranking Member Takano of the
Veterans' Affairs Committee, as well as Chairman Van Orden and Ranking
Member Levin of the Economic Opportunity Subcommittee and their
respective staff for helping us bring this important legislation to the
House floor.
Mr. TAKANO. Mr. Speaker, I support H.R. 6656, as amended, and I yield
back the balance of my time.
Mr. BOST. Mr. Speaker, once again, I encourage all Members to support
the legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Bost) that the House suspend the rules and
pass the bill, H.R. 6656, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the
rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________