[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 149 (Tuesday, September 24, 2024)]
[House]
[Pages H5656-H5657]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                             HOUSING ISSUES

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from 
Nebraska (Mr. Flood) for 5 minutes.
  Mr. FLOOD. Mr. Speaker, I rise to discuss Vice President Kamala 
Harris' housing plan.
  First, let's talk about the broader problem. Housing is less 
affordable and less available today, and it is bringing costs onto the 
American people.
  Overall, housing underproduction costs the U.S. economy $1.6 trillion 
in lost wages and productivity every single year.
  The U.S. needs to build 4.3 million more apartments by 2035 to meet 
the demand for rental housing. This includes 600,000 units to fill the 
shortage from after the 2008 financial crisis.
  Underproduction of housing has translated to higher housing costs, 
resulting in a decline of 4.7 million affordable apartments from 2015 
to 2020.
  Housing underproduction also increases the cost of living for 
families, inhibits geographic mobility, burdens both renters and 
buyers, and stifles economic productivity.
  According to one estimate, from 1964 to 2009, our national housing 
shortage lowered aggregate economic growth by 36 percent.
  All of that is to say there is no question we have a housing supply 
problem in this country. Unfortunately, Vice President Kamala Harris' 
plans would make the problem much, much worse.
  The Harris plan's goals are to ``lower housing costs for working 
families and end America's housing shortage.'' The problem is that the 
Biden-Harris policies and the Harris plan will actually raise housing 
costs and worsen the housing crisis.
  I will break it down piece by piece to demonstrate why. First, let's 
start with Kamala Harris' proposal to add tens of thousands of dollars 
in new downpayment assistance for home buyers.
  Large amounts of downpayment assistance might sound nice, it might 
sound like it is free, but it is exactly the wrong answer in this 
environment with housing shortages across the country.
  More government subsidies won't bring housing costs down. They will 
continue to increase demand and drive prices even higher.
  The great irony is that this policy would hurt the very people it is 
intended to help. Think about a young person who is currently renting 
but planning to buy a home. He and his wife may be looking at prices on 
Zillow and diligently saving up for a downpayment on a nearby house. 
They financially planned for this goal, and they have been working 
toward it for years.
  If the Harris plan's subsidy were to go into effect, the prices of 
those homes would increase. They could find themselves further from 
their goal, even if they were able to receive the promised subsidy 
themselves.
  It is a classic example of why progressive economic policies fail. 
Instead of working through a market-focused solution, the Harris plan 
simply throws money on the problem, and it hopes for the best. That is 
not leadership, and that is not going to solve the problem.
  Next, let's talk about rent caps. Earlier this year, the Biden-Harris 
administration announced their intention to impose rent caps on 
``corporate landlords.''
  Rent caps are a failed policy with a long track record of 
exacerbating housing shortages by dissuading developers from building 
new rental units in high-demand areas.
  If investors know that future rent increases will be capped, they 
shift their capital elsewhere. That means less building, less housing 
supply, fewer options, and it drives demand for existing units even 
higher, which pushes rents up in buildings that aren't even subject to 
the caps.
  We have seen how these policies work in New York and San Francisco 
where rent control has been in place for decades.
  According to AEIR, rent control policies in New York City resulted in 
more rental units being abandoned than built in the 1970s and 1980s.
  We can expect more of the same under the Harris plan, which will 
replicate these failures on a national scale.
  To recap, the Harris plan would implement an expensive downpayment 
assistance subsidy. It would hamper new

[[Page H5657]]

development by putting in place rent caps that disincentivize 
investment.
  In other words, Harris would both increase demand and limit supply, 
the exact wrong combination of policies if you want housing costs to go 
down.
  The result is a housing market where both renters and potential 
homeowners are squeezed, leaving everyone with fewer choices and higher 
prices.
  Vice President Harris has said previously that ``Bidenomics is 
working.'' For those that are concerned about rising housing costs, her 
words should be taken literally and taken as a warning.
  Vice President Harris plans to continue the inflationary policies of 
the Biden-Harris administration, exacerbating our housing affordability 
problems and leaving renters with less options and future home buyers 
with even higher costs.
  If America wants to boost housing supply and end the inflationary 
policies of the Biden-Harris era, we need to cut red tape, streamline 
Federal housing programs, and remove barriers to building new units.
  Until we move toward a solution that encourages private investment in 
development, we can expect that our country's housing shortage will 
persist, leaving the American Dream out of reach for everyday working 
families.

                          ____________________