[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 120 (Wednesday, July 24, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Page S5327]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Trump Rally Shooting
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, some events in our lives make such an
impression that we can recall exactly where we were and what we were
doing when we reflect on learning about them. On November 22, 1963, I
was a sophomore at Georgetown University here in Washington, DC, when
the news broke that President John F. Kennedy had been shot in Dallas,
TX. I was in the library, and the news spread through that quiet room
like wildfire. We all stopped what we were doing and went outside and
stood in the street and listened to the car radio's report of the news
that was just tragic news, of course, that President Kennedy had given
his life.
It has been more than 60 years since the assassination of President
Kennedy and 43 years since President Reagan was shot. A week and a half
ago, Americans were shocked to witness on live television an
assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump as well as
the murder of Corey Comperatore at a Pennsylvania political rally.
We should all take a moment to reflect on Mr. Comperatore's family
loss. His wife reported that when shots were ringing out, he shielded
his wife and children with his body. It is an amazing scene to think
that at that moment--that emergency moment--he thought of others to
protect them. They have been in my thoughts since the tragic events of
that Saturday afternoon.
We have a responsibility in Congress to learn how the Secret Service
failed to protect former President Trump on July 13. We need to do this
on a bipartisan basis; keep politics out of it.
The Judiciary Committee, which I chair, has jurisdiction over the
Secret Service. Tomorrow morning, the Judiciary Committee, along with
the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committees, will receive a
classified briefing on the shooting. I hope that we learn more since
the hearings that occurred in the House of Representatives.
Next Tuesday morning, the Judiciary Committee and the Homeland
Security Committee will hold a joint, bipartisan hearing on the
assassination attempt, where we hope to learn more from the FBI and the
Secret Service.
We need to ask probing and important questions and do it in a
responsible way that avoids the kind of incendiary language that has
become all too common in our country. It is irresponsible for a Member
of Congress to accuse the opposing political party of being ``flat out
evil and . . . [trying] to murder President Trump,'' but a Member of
Congress actually said that. Another Member said, ``Joe Biden sent the
orders.'' Can you imagine? Those kinds of statements are so
irresponsible, mean-spirited. They don't belong as part of the national
debate.
As a country, we have become desensitized to toxic and violent
rhetoric that some politicians have embraced as standard fare. We
should all be disturbed by the April poll from Marist which found that
``one in 5 U.S. adults believe Americans have to resort to violence to
get their country back on track.''
I have said this repeatedly, and it bears repeating: Political
violence is never acceptable. It is never the answer. Political parties
should not elevate leaders who say these things that are so
irresponsible.
Candidates should encourage Americans to exercise their
constitutional right to speak and vote, not open a rally with an
official declaring: If we lose this election, it is going to take a
civil war to save this country.
As the most powerful democracy in the world, the eyes of our allies
and rivals are always on us. Our political discourse should reflect our
solemn responsibility to encourage free and fair elections not just
abroad but at home because, in the land of the free, everyone should
feel safe expressing their political views and participating in this
country's most sacred and fought-for legacy, a free and fair democracy.