[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 119 (Tuesday, July 23, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5174-S5175]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ELIMINATE USELESS REPORTS ACT OF 2024
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask the Chair to lay before the Senate a message from
the House of Representatives on S. 2073.
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before the Senate the following message
from the House of Representatives:
Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 2073) entitled
``An Act to amend title 31, United States Code, to require
agencies to include a list of outdated or duplicative
reporting requirements in annual budget justifications, and
for other purposes'' do pass with an amendment.
Motion to Concur with Amendment No. 3021
(Purpose: In the nature of a substitute.)
Mr. SCHUMER. I move that the Senate concur in the House amendment to
S. 2073 with amendment No. 3021, which is at the desk.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the motion.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
The Senator from New York [Mr. Schumer] moves to concur in
the House amendment to S. 2073 with an amendment numbered
3021.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask that further reading be dispensed with.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
(The amendment is printed in today's Record under ``Text of
Amendments.'')
Cloture Motion
Mr. SCHUMER. I have a cloture motion at the desk.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under
rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
Cloture Motion
We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the
provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate,
do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to
concur in the House amendment to S. 2073, a bill to amend
title 31, United States Code, to require agencies to include
a list of outdated or duplicative reporting requirements in
annual budget justifications, and for other purposes, with
amendment No. 3021.
=========================== NOTE ===========================
On page S5174, July 23, 2024, first column, the following
appears: Cloture Motion We, the undersigned Senators, in
accordance with the provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules
of the Senate, do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the
motion to concur in the House amendment to S. 2073, a bill to
amend title 31, United States Code, to require agencies to include
a list of outdated or duplicative reporting requirements in annual
budget justifications, and for other purposes, do pass with an
amendment.
The online Record has been corrected to read: Cloture Motion We,
the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the provisions of
rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, do hereby move to
bring to a close debate on the motion to concur in the House
amendment to S. 2073, a bill to amend title 31, United States
Code, to require agencies to include a list of outdated or
duplicative reporting requirements in annual budget
justifications, and for other purposes, with amendment No. 3021.
========================= END NOTE =========================
Charles E. Schumer, Maria Cantwell, Sheldon Whitehouse,
Jack Reed, Tammy Duckworth, Jeanne Shaheen, Tim Kaine,
Mark R. Warner, Edward J. Markey, Gary C. Peters, John
W. Hickenlooper, Angus S. King, Jr., Tammy Baldwin,
Raphael G. Warnock, Cory A. Booker, Catherine Cortez
Masto, Richard Blumenthal.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask for the yeas and nays on the motion to concur with
the amendment.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The yeas and nays are ordered.
Amendment No. 3022 to Amendment No. 3021
Mr. SCHUMER. I have an amendment to amendment No. 3021, which is at
the desk.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
The Senator from New York [Mr. Schumer] proposes an
amendment numbered 3022 to amendment No. 3021.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask that further reading be dispensed with.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The amendment is as follows:
(Purpose: To add an effective date)
At the end add the following:
SEC. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect on the date that is 1 day after
the date of enactment of this Act.
Motion to Refer with Amendment No. 3023
Mr. SCHUMER. I move to refer the House message to the Committee on
Homeland Security with instructions to report back forthwith an
amendment No. 3023.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
The Senator from New York [Mr. Schumer] moves to the refer
House message to accompany S. 2073 with instructions to
report back forthwith an amendment numbered 3023.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask that further reading be waived.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The amendment is as follows:
(Purpose: To add an effective date)
At the end add the following:
SEC. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect on the date that is 2 days after
the date of enactment of this Act.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask for the yeas and nays on my motion.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The yeas and nays are ordered.
Amendment No. 3024
Mr. SCHUMER. I have an amendment to the instructions at the desk.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
The Senator from New York [Mr. Schumer] proposes an
amendment numbered 3024 to the instructions of the motion to
refer.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask that further reading be waived.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The amendment is as follows:
(Purpose: To add an effective date)
On page 1, line 3, strike ``2 days'' and insert ``3 days''.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask for the yeas and nays on my amendment.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
There appears to be a sufficient second.
The yeas and nays are ordered.
Amendment No. 3025 to Amendment No. 3024
Mr. SCHUMER. I have an amendment to amendment No. 3024, which is at
the desk.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
The Senator from New York [Mr. Schumer] proposes an
amendment numbered 3025 to amendment No. 3024.
Mr. SCHUMER. I ask that further reading of the amendment be waived.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
The amendment is as follows:
(Purpose: To add an effective date)
On page 1, line 1, strike ``3 days'' and insert ``4 days''.
Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, I have some good news for the Senate.
Before we adjourn this evening, I would like to celebrate two
significant bills that just passed the Senate two moments ago.
First, just now, the Senate unanimously passed a bill to combat the
spread of sexually explicit AI-generated deepfakes, the DEFIANCE Act. I
commend Senator Durbin for his excellent work on this bill. I was proud
to support it every step of the way, and it is a very, very important
thing we get this bill done.
As we know, AI plays a bigger role in our lives than ever before.
While it has many benefits, it is also easier than ever to create
sexually explicit deepfakes without a person's consent. It is a
horrible attack on someone's privacy and dignity to have these fake
images of them circuiting online without recourse.
This isn't just some fringe issue that happens to only a few people.
It is a widespread problem. These types of malicious and hurtful
pictures can destroy lives. Nobody is immune, not even celebrities like
Taylor Swift or Megan Thee Stallion. It is a grotesque practice.
Victims of these deepfakes are deserved justice. This is one of the
examples of the AI guardrails I often talk about.
AI is a remarkable technology that can spur incredible innovation,
but we must pass guardrails to prevent its worst abuses from causing
people grave harm.
By passing this bill, we are telling victims of explicit
nonconsensual deepfakes that we hear them and we are taking action. I
urge the House now to take up this piece of legislation so victims of
nonconsensual deepfakes can have the justice they deserve. It is just
awful what people do to people
[[Page S5175]]
with deepfakes. This bill will end that. It is a very good thing.
We passed another very good bill a few moments ago as well. The
Senate passed the Preventing Financing of Illegal Synthetic Drugs Act.
This bill will get to the root of financing behind these deadly and
destructive drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine. I have led the way
here in the Senate for months cracking down on supply chains of drugs
like fentanyl.
Last fall, I met with Chinese President Xi and urged him and the
Chinese Government to do more work to crack down on companies that
allow precursor chemicals to make their way to countries like Mexico
and made often by gangs into fentanyl and sent into the U.S.
Just a few months ago, I led the Senate passing the national security
supplemental, which included the FEND Off Fentanyl Act. This bill is
another step in that direction--the right direction--to better
understand and anticipate how malicious synthetic drug traffickers
finance their operations.
Two Senators worked very hard on this legislation and deserve the
credit. Our two Senators from Nevada, Senator Catherine Cortez Masto
and Senator Jacky Rosen. I want to commend them for their excellent
work.
So these two bills--they are passing quietly later this evening, but
they are very important. I hope that people will take notice of them
and show that the Senate is fighting the scourge of drugs and fighting
the scourge of deepfakes.
____________________