[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 96 (Wednesday, June 5, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3963-S3964]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RIGHT TO CONTRACEPTION ACT
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, let me begin with a disturbing statistic.
According to a recent poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, one in five
U.S. adults worries that the right to contraception is under threat--
one in five U.S. adults. That is more people than live in Florida or
Texas or California. In the same poll, less than half of the adults
said they felt the right to use birth control was secure.
Americans' uncertainty about using birth control is one of the many
shameful consequences of overturning Roe v. Wade. This is the mess
Donald Trump, the MAGA Supreme Court, and the Republican-led Senate has
created.
Today, we live in a country where not only tens of millions of women
have been robbed of their reproductive freedoms, we also live in a
country where tens of millions more worry about something as basic as
birth control. That is utterly medieval. It is sickening. It should
never happen here in the United States. But because of Donald Trump and
the hard right, it is reality.
Today, the Senate has the chance to protect reproductive rights by
advancing the Right to Contraception Act. I thank my good friends
Senators Hirono and Markey for championing this bill. I thank every
Senator and every advocate and every concerned citizen who has raised
their voice supporting this bill.
In a perfect world, a bill saying you can access birth control
without government interference should not be necessary, but given the
erosion of reproductive rights in America, today, it is absolutely
vital. So I will be proud to vote yes today. I urge all my colleagues
on both sides of the aisle to do the same.
Sometimes the right answer is the obvious one. If Republicans truly
support protecting access to birth control, then they should vote yes
on moving this bill forward.
Now, we have heard a number of very anxious arguments from the other
side against moving forward on the Right to Contraception Act. We have
heard that it radically expands access to
[[Page S3964]]
abortion. We have been told it stomps all over religious liberties. We
have heard that this issue is much ado about nothing. At best, these
retorts are feeble and predictable, and at worst, they are dangerous.
So let's set the record straight.
To those who claim the Right to Contraception Act undermines
religious liberties, if anything, the opposite is true. This bill
absolutely protects religious liberties. There is nothing in the text
forcing anyone to provide contraception if it contradicts their own
beliefs. Should this bill pass, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
would remain the law of the land.
To those who say outlandishly that this bill expands abortion access,
that is false, full stop. I invite Americans to read this bill for
themselves. There is nothing--nothing--in this bill about abortion. To
suggest this bill expands abortion is vulgar fearmongering, plain and
simple.
The reason we hear these claims is because Republican colleagues
don't want to say the quiet part out loud: The GOP, the Republican
Party here in the Senate, has been totally captured by the radical MAGA
right, which is totally opposed to protecting reproductive rights, even
birth control, which, of course, 90 percent of Americans support.
Make no mistake, if Republicans get into power, the MAGA right will
push for a national abortion ban and the total elimination of
reproductive care.
Finally, of course, there is the more devious claim that the Right to
Contraception Act is much ado about nothing, that it is unnecessary,
that birth control could never possibly fall under risk. Well,
remember, people said the same thing about Roe--that it could never be
overturned--and then tragically, unfortunately, it was because Donald
Trump and the Republican Senate filled the Supreme Court with MAGA
radicals who followed through with the hard right's goal of eliminating
freedom of choice.
And who knows how far the hard right will go. A few years ago, it was
Roe. A few years from now, it could be something else. Justice Thomas
himself opened the door to undoing protections for birth control in his
dissenting opinion in Dobbs. We are kidding ourselves if we think the
hard right is done with their attacks on reproductive rights.
Let's be perfectly clear: Attacks against birth control aren't
theoretical bugaboos; it is already happening at the State level.
To those who argue Federal protections for birth controls are
unnecessary, go ask the people of Virginia what they think after their
Republican Governor vetoed--vetoed--a bill that would have protected
contraceptives at the State level. Go ask the people of Nevada what
they think after their Republican Governor also vetoed a bill to
protect access to birth control.
To those who say birth control will never fall at risk, go ask the
people of Arizona or Florida or Idaho or Iowa or Missouri. In each of
these States, Republican Governors or Republican State legislators are
on record blocking protections for birth control access in one form or
another.
So let there be no mistake: In the aftermath after Roe's demise, the
threat to birth control is very, very real, and that is why it is so
important for the Senate to act.
This is a simple bill and a simple vote. If you believe all women
deserve to have contraception, then you should vote for this bill. That
is all there is to it.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so
ordered.