[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 90 (Thursday, May 23, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Page S3878]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]


                             CLOTURE MOTION

  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Pursuant to rule XXII, the Chair lays before 
the Senate the pending cloture motion, which the clerk will state.
  The legislative clerk read as follows:

                             Cloture Motion

       We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the 
     provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, 
     do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to 
     proceed to Calendar No. 397, S. 4361, a bill making emergency 
     supplemental appropriations for border security and 
     combatting fentanyl for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
     2024, and for other purposes.
         Charles E. Schumer, Christopher Murphy, Richard J. 
           Durbin, Tammy Duckworth, Tammy Baldwin, Catherine 
           Cortez Masto, Brian Schatz, Mark R. Warner, Kirsten E. 
           Gillibrand, Debbie Stabenow, Gary C. Peters, Margaret 
           Wood Hassan, Jeanne Shaheen, Angus S. King, Jr., 
           Benjamin L. Cardin, Christopher A. Coons, John W. 
           Hickenlooper, Jack Reed.

  The question is, is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the 
motion to proceed to S. 4361, a bill making emergency supplemental 
appropriations for border security and combatting fentanyl for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes, shall be 
brought to a close?


 =========================== NOTE =========================== 

  
  On page S3878, May 23, 2024, in the left column, the following 
appeared: The question is, is it the sense of the Senate that 
debate on the motion to proceed to S. 4261, a bill making 
emergency supplemental appropriations for border security and 
combatting fentanyl for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, 
and for other purposes, shall be brought to a close?
  
  The online Record has been corrected to read: The question is, 
is it the sense of the Senate that debate on the motion to proceed 
to S. 4361, a bill making emergency supplemental appropriations 
for border security and combatting fentanyl for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes, shall be 
brought to a close?


 ========================= END NOTE ========================= 


  The yeas and nays are mandatory under the rule.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk called the roll.
  Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from West Virginia (Mr. 
Manchin), the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Menendez), and the Senator 
from Massachusetts (Ms. Warren) are necessarily absent.
  Mr. THUNE. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator 
from Tennessee (Mr. Hagerty), the Senator from Oklahoma (Mr. Mullin), 
the Senator from Nebraska (Mr. Ricketts), and the Senator from South 
Carolina (Mr. Scott).
  The yeas and nays resulted--yeas 43, nays 50, as follows:

                      [Rollcall Vote No. 182 Ex.]

                                YEAS--43

     Baldwin
     Bennet
     Blumenthal
     Brown
     Cantwell
     Cardin
     Carper
     Casey
     Coons
     Cortez Masto
     Duckworth
     Durbin
     Fetterman
     Gillibrand
     Hassan
     Heinrich
     Hickenlooper
     Hirono
     Kaine
     Kelly
     King
     Klobuchar
     Lujan
     Merkley
     Murkowski
     Murphy
     Murray
     Ossoff
     Peters
     Reed
     Rosen
     Schatz
     Schumer
     Shaheen
     Smith
     Stabenow
     Tester
     Van Hollen
     Warner
     Warnock
     Welch
     Whitehouse
     Wyden

                                NAYS--50

     Barrasso
     Blackburn
     Booker
     Boozman
     Braun
     Britt
     Budd
     Butler
     Capito
     Cassidy
     Collins
     Cornyn
     Cotton
     Cramer
     Crapo
     Cruz
     Daines
     Ernst
     Fischer
     Graham
     Grassley
     Hawley
     Hoeven
     Hyde-Smith
     Johnson
     Kennedy
     Lankford
     Lee
     Lummis
     Markey
     Marshall
     McConnell
     Moran
     Padilla
     Paul
     Risch
     Romney
     Rounds
     Rubio
     Sanders
     Schmitt
     Scott (FL)
     Sinema
     Sullivan
     Thune
     Tillis
     Tuberville
     Vance
     Wicker
     Young

                             NOT VOTING--7

     Hagerty
     Manchin
     Menendez
     Mullin
     Ricketts
     Scott (SC)
     Warren
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. On this vote, the yeas are 43, the nays are 
50.
  Three-fifths of Senators duly chosen and sworn having not voted in 
the affirmative, the motion is not agreed to.
  The motion was rejected.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority leader.

                          ____________________