[Congressional Record Volume 170, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 22, 2024)]
[Senate]
[Page S3820]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                           BORDER ACT OF 2024

  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, on the border, well, tomorrow, Senators 
face an important decision: Will both sides come together to advance a 
bipartisan border security bill or will partisanship get in the way yet 
again?

  Three months ago, Donald Trump told his Republican allies to block 
the strongest bipartisan border security bill Congress has seen in a 
generation. Luckily, we are trying again tomorrow, and I hope this time 
Republicans join us to achieve a different outcome.
  The only way--the only way--we are going to fix the border is through 
bipartisan legislation, just like the one both sides spent months 
negotiating a few months ago and which we are taking up again tomorrow. 
We don't expect every Democrat or every Republican to support this 
bill. It wasn't designed that way. It wasn't designed to get all the 
votes of one party, which then almost inevitably means you get none of 
the votes from the other side. It was intended to be a compromise that 
could pass and become law.
  We know there are disagreements, as there always are, about the best 
way to proceed on the border. But that is precisely why I have 
emphasized from day one, we need to have strong border support if we 
hope to get border done.
  Unlike H.R. 2, a very partisan bill, the bipartisan border bill was 
written with the goal of getting 60 votes in the Senate, with support 
from both Republicans and Democrats. It had input from both Republicans 
and Democrats. H.R. 2 can't claim that. If anything is political, it is 
H.R. 2. It didn't receive a single Democratic vote in the Senate 
because Democrats weren't consulted. It didn't even get the full 
support of Senate Republicans. H.R. 2 was the definition of political 
theater, one side sitting in a room by itself writing what it wanted 
not even thinking of how you pass a bill.
  Our bill, however, is what a serious attempt at border reform looks 
like. Now, most people might not remember, but a few months ago, there 
was a lot of bipartisan interest in getting our border bill passed 
before Donald Trump killed it in its tracks. Our Republican 
colleagues--including the Republican leader--was adamant. We needed to 
get border security done as part of the national security supplemental. 
This is what the Republican leader said right before our bill was 
released:

       I think this is the ideal time to do it.

  He then added, Leader McConnell added:

       This is a unique opportunity where divided government has 
     given us an opportunity to get an outcome.

  These aren't the words of someone who thinks our efforts were 
political theater. These are the words of someone who thinks we were 
close to reaching a breakthrough, and he wasn't alone. My friend from 
South Carolina also said that.

       To those who think that if President Trump wins . . . that 
     we can get a better deal, you won't.

  He added:

       This moment will pass. Do not let it pass.

  Republican Senator from South Carolina.
  So let's be perfectly clear: Our bipartisan border bill represented a 
real chance--in fact, the best chance in decades--to act on border 
security, to make a law, not just to make a political point.
  Importantly, the bill would have made huge strides toward cracking 
down on the scourge of fentanyl. It would have given billions for DEA, 
for DHS to hire officers to focus exclusively on drugs and billions for 
state-of-the-art equipment to detect the flow of drugs at border 
crossings and ports.
  And some of my Democratic colleagues will be talking about that, at 
12:30, at an event, how this bill really does more than anything we 
have done thus far, and we have worked hard on it to deal with the 
scourge of fentanyl. So, today, my Democratic colleagues will shine a 
spotlight on the immense good this bill will do to protect our country 
from the free flow of this dangerous drug, fentanyl.
  If you told me a year ago that this was the kind of bill we had 
before us, I would have been certain Republicans would have helped 
enact this bill into law. By any objective measure, it is strong, 
necessary.
  And one final note, the last time we came close here was 2013 when we 
passed comprehensive immigration reform. We did it bipartisan. It was 
the only way to do it. I and my late friend, good friend, John McCain 
had a Gang of 8--four Democrats, four Republicans. We got, I believe it 
was, 69 votes on the floor of the Senate. Unfortunately, the House 
didn't pass it.
  But it is just a lesson to all of us. Bipartisanship is the only way 
to go. H.R. 2 is not the least bit bipartisan. Our bill was completely 
bipartisan.
  So, tomorrow, we are going to lay out a clear choice. Tomorrow, we 
will see who is serious about actually wanting to fix the border and 
who prefers to merely talk about fixing the border.

                          ____________________